从可扩展性到可用性,2023年会涌动哪些crypto新机会?

链茶馆Pubblicato 2023-02-02Pubblicato ultima volta 2023-02-02

Introduzione

crypto行业在2022年的一波又一波的暴雷带来的连锁反应,直到2023年也仍未平息。从行业叙事来看,现在仍处于底层逻辑的重构阶段,应用层的新面孔基本都是遵循上一轮的旧叙事,没有啥新的内容。但我们还是试图去捕获2023年的新机会,不妨参考一下其他机构的判断。

crypto行业在2022年的一波又一波的暴雷带来的连锁反应,直到2023年也仍未平息。

“”

从行业叙事来看,现在仍处于底层逻辑的重构阶段,应用层的新面孔基本都是遵循上一轮的旧叙事,没有啥新的内容。

“”

但我们还是试图去捕获2023年的新机会,不妨参考一下其他机构的判断。

“”

管理约38亿美元资产、历了3轮加密寒冬的加密货币风投Pantera Capital对2023年预测可总结为「DeFi即是未来」。

“”

Pantera的CEO Dan Morehead在投资者信函表示,世界金融发展的下一步是基于区块链的智能合约,可问题在于我们如何到达以及在此之前会发生什么。

“”

而2023年是关键的一年,那么会涌动哪些机会?

“”

可扩展性

“”

虽然已经有很多增强区块链可扩展性的方案被提出并不断优化,但是工程实现上其实都有待加速,而2023年也许会从概念验证到真正的工程实现。

“”

这将进一步降低交易费用,有助于增强DEX的竞争力,去与中心化交易所竞争。

“”

关于以太坊的可扩展性,在2023年要持续关注的是Optimistic Rollups和ZK-Rollups。而在zkEVM成熟之前,市场格局应该依然是以OP主、ZK为辅。因为Starknet、zkSync、Scroll等layer2虽然会在今年陆续落地,但距大规模采用还需一段时间。

“”

值得注意的是,Arbitrum、Polygon等layer2已经建立了真正意义上的生态——出现了许多独家项目,尤其是比较受欢迎的链游。他们也在推动去中心化社交等Web3项目。

“”

另外Meta系公链也值得关注。Aptos,Sui和Linera去年成为行业黑马,创始人团队均是Meta下Diem和Novi项目的成员。

“”

长远来看,它们使用Move语言可以对金融基础设施的各种资产和相应的业务逻辑进行编码,但代价是牺牲了去中心化。

“”

可用性

“”

crypto产品普及的最后一里路是可用性,让小白用户可以轻松使用产品,还有许多需要打磨的地方。

“”

钱包

“”

仅以用户面临的第一步链上钱包而言,也涉及很多领域。如无需助记词的密钥管理方案、具有社交恢复功能的自托管方案、能保证普通用户更方便、更安全进行签名或链上资讯验证的基础工具套件……

“”

可用性是推动crypto真实用户增长的关键,也是帮助所谓Web2用户习惯并有信心自我掌控资产、走向个人主权的基础条件。

“”

DAO

“”

crypto市场的用户和品牌高度分散在社交网络上,因此DAO组织天然适配这个市场。

“”

利用优秀的DAO一定是有效组织专业的人在细分领域持续输出并做贡献,并吸引普通人参与进来,产生长尾效应。

“”

如果说2022年是DAO流行起来的一年,那么2023年则是真正融入crypto行业肌理内部的一年——链上、链下的权限管理将融入DAO的设计之中,参与者通过DAO来完成管理。

“”

NFT/元宇宙

“”

2023年的NFT将不再只是收藏品,而是更多的商业应用。

“”

2022年底星巴克展开的Odyssey Rewards计划起了个好头,展现了一波实用NFT商业的应用,今年会看到更多企业尝试类似的NFT的方案。甚至有人预计2024年与Web3相关的虚拟经济会带来3000亿美金的产值。

“”

当然,它跟crypto核心领域其实没有太大关系……更多只是作为传统商业机构的营销方式。

“”

GameFi

“”

经过元宇宙概念的轰炸,许多传统游戏玩家逐渐熟悉一些游戏外的线上交易,这让他们更容易接受区块链游戏。Animoca Brands的联合创始人Yat Siu甚至认为2023年会有数亿用户因此进入链游。

“”

现阶段链游领域的优秀团队基本处在专心在获取自己的早期用户和打造产品上。

“”

但无论如何,区块链游戏应该会是继金融之后,下一个推动创新的领域。

“”

总结

“”

2023年又一个充满挑战的一年。基于当前的宏观经济状况,今年不太可能有大量参与者涌入。但一定会不断爆发零星的新项目,在为更长远的叙事和机遇做准备。

Letture associate

UBS: The Crowdedness of A-Share Tech Stocks Is Far From Reaching Historical Peaks

UBS: A-share tech stocks still far from peak crowding levels A-shares' technology sector has seen a strong rebound, with trading activity hitting record highs, raising concerns about market crowding. However, UBS Securities argues that a key indicator of institutional positioning suggests the current crowding level remains well below historical peaks. While the large-cap tech sector's share of total A-share trading volume and market capitalization have reached historical highs, the overweight ratio of domestic mutual funds in this sector stood at 9.9% in Q1 2026. This is down from 11.6% in Q3 2025 and significantly lower than the historical peak of 14.1% in Q4 2015. It also pales in comparison to the historical peak overweight of 18.7% for the consumer sector. UBS notes that typical cycles from a low to a peak in fund overweighting last about three years, and the current outperformance of the tech/growth style has lasted less than two years since the policy pivot in September 2024. UBS expects A-share earnings recovery to accelerate, providing fundamental support. It forecasts 2026 A-share profit growth to rise to 11% from 3.9% in 2025. Non-financial A-share profits grew 11.8% YoY in Q1 2026, with gross and net profit margins at their highest since 2023. Persistent fund inflows, the expansion of thematic ETFs, and a recovery in private fund issuance are supporting market liquidity. In tactical allocation, UBS favors growth and cyclical styles under its "slow bull" base case, with overweight ratings on six sectors: Electronics (benefiting from semiconductor inventory recovery and AI innovation), Communications (driven by AI computing demand), Machinery (aided by domestic capex recovery), Non-ferrous Metals (due to rising copper/aluminum prices), Chemicals (supported by anti-involution policies), and Electrical Equipment (driven by policy support and AI data center power demand).

marsbit9 min fa

UBS: The Crowdedness of A-Share Tech Stocks Is Far From Reaching Historical Peaks

marsbit9 min fa

Should You Buy SpaceX Stock at $1.7 Trillion? Here's What the Market Is Worried About

SpaceX is preparing for a massive IPO aiming to raise around $75 billion at a valuation of approximately $1.75 trillion. While its achievements in reusable rockets and the profitable Starlink satellite internet service are clear, the market is concerned about the aggressive valuation. Key issues include: the current $1.75 trillion valuation, which is about 94 times 2025 revenue, seems to price in not just existing businesses but also unproven future ventures like AI infrastructure and orbital data centers. Financially, while Starlink is profitable, the AI division, bolstered by the acquisition of xAI, is incurring massive losses and consuming the majority of capital expenditures. This acquisition also introduced complex related-party financing arrangements and debt onto SpaceX's balance sheet. Furthermore, corporate governance poses a challenge. SpaceX's dual-class share structure ensures founder Elon Musk retains absolute control, limiting ordinary shareholders' influence over high-risk, long-term strategic decisions. The future success of ambitious projects like the Starship rocket—critical for lowering costs and enabling new services—remains a significant variable for the valuation. In summary, the market's apprehension (FUD) centers not on doubting SpaceX's past technological triumphs but on questioning how much premium public investors should pay for a future that combines proven profits with highly speculative and capital-intensive new ventures, all under a governance structure that offers limited shareholder oversight.

marsbit1 h fa

Should You Buy SpaceX Stock at $1.7 Trillion? Here's What the Market Is Worried About

marsbit1 h fa

Breaking the DeFi Cascading Liquidation Curse: Vitalik Proposes a New Solution

Vitalik Buterin has proposed a new DeFi design to eliminate the automatic liquidation mechanism that causes market instability during sharp downturns. The current system, used by protocols like Aave, triggers forced sales when collateral value falls below a threshold, often exacerbating price drops and creating systemic selling pressure. Buterin's alternative model is based on splitting an asset like ETH into two synthetic option-like tokens, P and N, pegged to a price index. Their combined value always equals one ETH. Instead of sudden liquidation, a position's value gradually drifts from its target peg if the market moves. Users must proactively rebalance their holdings to maintain their desired exposure, transferring the management burden from the protocol to the user or automated tools. A key advantage is the reduced reliance on real-time oracles. Pricing decisions are deferred until contract expiry, allowing for more robust, fault-tolerant oracle designs. This removes a clear liquidation threshold that speculators can target for manipulation or MEV extraction. However, significant challenges remain. Frequent rebalancing could incur high slippage and transaction costs, necessitating new liquidity provider models. The design is better suited for hedging instruments than for stablecoins requiring a rigid 1:1 peg. While not an immediate replacement for existing systems, the proposal challenges the foundational assumption that instantaneous forced liquidation is an unavoidable necessity in DeFi, opening the door for fundamentally different risk management architectures.

marsbit1 h fa

Breaking the DeFi Cascading Liquidation Curse: Vitalik Proposes a New Solution

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片