Arbitrum 2022年重大事件回顾与2023年发展路线展望

链茶馆Published on 2023-01-30Last updated on 2023-01-30

Abstract

不出意外的话,Arbitrum在未来市场将持续领跑 L2,现在唯一尚未解决的即是,代币究竟何时会出?以及会有怎样的市场反响?

Arbitrum是目前所有L2里完成度最高、用户体验最优的项目,去年平均每月有近40%的高速增长,交易量甚至超过了以太坊,在生态运营上有不少值得可圈可点的地方,本文仅作简单梳理。

“”

Arbitrum发展时间线

“”

两年之前的2021年1月,OffchainLabs在Arbitrum测试网启动了一批DeFi生态的Demo产品。

“”

2021年5月,Offchain Labs部署了Arbitrum One测试网,当时有超过250个团队申请接入。

“”

2021年9月,Arbitrum正式启动主网Arbitrum One,同时宣布完成了一轮1.2亿美元的B轮融资。

“”

2022年6月,推出了Odyssey项目,可让用户通过参与Odyssey NFT推广活动或者使用Arbitrum的生态系就能获得空投奖励,Optimism也有类似的机制。

“”

由于新用户的大量涌入导致交易成本上升甚至宕机,不得不暂停Odyssey,但也因此让团队大刀阔斧地发布了基于WASM架构的Nitro主网。

“”

2022年8月,推出升级版的Nitro,效率大幅提升。

“”

Arbitrum完成Nitro升级后,在交易量和日活用户上远远与OP拉开了距离,市场份额高达52.5%,

“”

目前Arbitrum还没有自己的治理代币,而Optimism的代币自2023年初以来已实现两位数的收益,可以看出两者之间的营运顺序完全相反。Arbitrum是先让技术升级,之后才要开始发币、搞空投、生态基金。

“”

Arbitrum的DApp生态

“”

Arbitrum上的常规DEX和借贷类应用并没有太多亮点,绝大多数人还是在Uniswap、Sushiswap的Arb版本上交易,但Arbitrum的DeFi生态大部分项目都是围绕着GMX所开展。

“”

GMX是去中心化衍生品交易平台,无需KYC认证,只要有链上钱包即可参与交易,而且也有Swap功能、允许最高开到30倍杠杆、支持Avalanche区块链、预言机报价0价差等竞品没有的功能。

”“

去年GMX排在所有协议/区块链中第8名,且有着超过120%的费用增长,在熊市成为逆风前进的项目。

”“

截止去年底,Arbitrum上用户地址数超过1000的有58个项目,超过10000的有39个项目。

”“

目前在Arbitrum上交易数最多的协议分别是Uniswap、Sushiswap、GMX、Hop、TreasureDAO、Galxe、Stargate、dopex 等。

”“

TVL排名前3的DApp分别为GMX、Uniswap V3、SushiSwap。此外游戏项目 magic网络(TreasureDAO)试图构建web3上的任天堂,要为不同游戏提供各种底层服务,初步展示出生态雏形。

”“

Arbitrum今年展望

”“

去年10月offchain labs在SmartCon 2022的演讲中说到,Arbitrum未来的计划会围绕在:

”“

1.继续降低费用,提升tps

”“

2.去中心化

”“

3.将管理和授权软件升级去中心化

”“

4.验证者去中心化

”“

5.sequencer去中心化

”“

以下则是市场预计Arbitrum今年的会有的动作:

”“

1.重启Odyssey项目

”“

2.发币、成立生态基金、战投基金等等

”“

3.强化目前Arbitrum的强势板块(DeFi和游戏)

”“

4.孵化Nova上的生态(社交+游戏)

”“

目前开发者生态趋势

”“

Electric Capital发现,虽然以太坊拥有最多的开发人员,但大多数每月活跃的开发人员其实都在其他生态系统上工作。

”“

2022年的开发者活跃度比2018年的熊市高很多,去年虽对币圈来说是动荡不安的一年,该行业仍吸引了超过61000名的新开发者,创历史新高。

”“

以太坊新开发者的占比约为16%,但Solana、NEAR和Polygon的开发人员同比增长40%,Sui、Aptos、Starknet、Mina、Osmosis、Hedera、Optimism和Arbitrum也正在吸引开发人员。

”“

可以看出,开发者参与度是「创造链上价值的先驱指标」,开发人员会构建杀手级dapp,为最终用户带来价值,不断吸引更多用户,再进而吸引更多开发人员,达到不断循环的最终目标。

”“

总结

”“

当然,目前OP虽然领先还是有许多不足之处,但Arbitrum把最核心的欺诈证明功能早以完整形态运作一段期间。在zkEVM成熟之前,持续以Op为主、zk为辅。

”“

不出意外的话,Arbitrum在未来市场将持续领跑 L2,现在唯一尚未解决的即是,代币究竟何时会出?以及会有怎样的市场反响?

Related Reads

Bitcoin's 'Rally Ends,' Officially Entering the Later Stage of a Bear Market?

Bitcoin prices declined 13% this week, reversing the recent rebound and signaling a likely transition into the later stages of a bear market. Key on-chain metrics deteriorated, with the short-term holder cost basis falling below the Realized Price—a pattern last seen in early 2022, characteristic of bear market maturity. The rally to ~$82k proved to be a bear market bounce, as evidenced by the 90-day realized profit/loss ratio failing to sustain above the bullish threshold of 2. Daily realized losses surged to $1.35B, including significant selling from long-term holders who accumulated near cycle tops, indicating ongoing supply redistribution. Price was rejected almost precisely at the aggregate US spot ETF cost basis of ~$83k, turning that level into resistance and leaving the average ETF investor underwater again. Spot market selling pressure intensified, with the 7-day volume delta turning significantly negative to its weakest level since February. While a major long liquidation event cleared over $400M in leverage, spot demand has not yet stepped in to absorb the resulting supply. Options markets continue pricing in higher future volatility (elevated volatility risk premium) and maintain a skew toward put options, reflecting persistent demand for downside protection, though not yet panic. Overall, market structure remains fragile. Sustained recovery likely requires a reclaim of the ETF cost basis, a shift back to positive spot demand, and a slowdown in realized loss-taking. Until then, the market risks further downside or extended consolidation within the broader bear trend.

Foresight News19m ago

Bitcoin's 'Rally Ends,' Officially Entering the Later Stage of a Bear Market?

Foresight News19m ago

How Risky is the "Death Spiral" of MSTR and STRC?

Summary: This article explores the perceived "death spiral" risk between MicroStrategy (MSTR), its Bitcoin holdings, and its perpetual preferred stock (STRC), drawing comparisons to the LUNA-UST collapse. While both systems feature price anchors, high yields for holders, and potential feedback loops, their core mechanisms differ fundamentally. The MSTR-STRC structure relies on continuous financing to sustain its high dividend payouts, primarily through stock ATM offerings. A negative feedback cycle could occur: falling MSTR stock price makes raising equity capital harder, increasing pressure to sell Bitcoin, which undermines STRC confidence and further depresses MSTR. However, unlike LUNA-UST's automated, direct linkage, the MSTR-STRC loop is weaker and has brakes: STRC dividends can be deferred or rates lowered, and STRC holders have a $100/share liquidation preference in bankruptcy, providing a price floor. The company's sustainability hinges on its ability to continue financing. Its current ~$900 million USD reserves cover only about 6.3 months of its ~$1.71 billion annual interest/dividend burden. The next six months are critical, aligning with both the potential bottom in Bitcoin's four-year cycle and the depletion timeline of its reserves. While a LUNA-style catastrophic collapse is deemed highly unlikely due to structural differences, the key question is whether MicroStrategy can navigate this period through healthy deleveraging to restart its capital engine.

Foresight News37m ago

How Risky is the "Death Spiral" of MSTR and STRC?

Foresight News37m ago

How Much Debt Does Strategy Really Have? Is There a Risk of Implosion?

MicroStrategy's Debt Risk: A Turning Point in the "Never Sell" Strategy As of June 3, 2026, MicroStrategy holds 843,706 bitcoins (valued at ~$53.1B) but faces significant financial obligations. Its capital structure includes $6.75B in convertible notes and $15.48B in perpetual preferred stock (led by the $8.5B STRC series), creating an annual payout burden of ~$1.71B. With software revenue at only ~$500M, interest and dividend obligations far exceed operating income. A critical shift occurred in late May 2026 when the company sold 32 bitcoins for ~$2.5M to cover dividends, breaking CEO Michael Saylor's long-standing "never sell" pledge. This symbolic move triggered a sharp decline in both Bitcoin's price and MSTR stock, reflecting market fears about cash flow sustainability. The core of the strain is the STRC perpetual preferred stock, designed as a "permanent loan" with no maturity date but requiring high monthly dividends (currently 11.5%). Its business model relies on a three-part cycle: issuing new STRC shares, using proceeds to buy more Bitcoin and fund a USD reserve, and using that reserve to pay dividends. This cycle depends on continuous investor demand for STRC and Bitcoin's price appreciation. Analysis shows Bitcoin needs to appreciate at least 2.3% annually to cover the $1.71B in yearly obligations at current holdings. With Bitcoin price down ~22% from March 2026 highs, this pressure has intensified. The company's $900M USD reserve can only cover about 7 months of payments if STRC issuance stalls. Key risks are not immediate bankruptcy or forced Bitcoin liquidation (as BTC is not collateral), but rather: 1) The erosion of MSTR's premium to its Bitcoin holdings (mNAV), which would cripple its ability to raise cheap capital; 2) A vicious cycle where stagnant Bitcoin prices reduce STRC demand, draining the USD reserve and forcing BTC sales, further depressing prices. The period from February 2027 to September 2028 is a crucial test, with over $5.9B in convertible notes facing put options or maturity. In essence, MicroStrategy has evolved from a simple Bitcoin holder into a complex financial entity acting like a "private Bitcoin bank," leveraging its BTC holdings to create layered financial products. Its survival depends on maintaining Bitcoin's price trend, its stock premium, and market appetite for its preferred shares. The recent token sale marks not a betrayal of its Bitcoin thesis, but an admission that the leveraged strategy must eventually be paid for.

marsbit47m ago

How Much Debt Does Strategy Really Have? Is There a Risk of Implosion?

marsbit47m ago

Anthropic Cries Wolf: Is the AGI Threat Real, or Just an IPO Story?

Anthropic has published an article titled "When AI builds itself," discussing the emerging concept of "recursive self-improvement," where AI begins to actively participate in designing, training, testing, and optimizing its own subsequent versions. The company presents internal data showing that by May 2026, over 80% of code merged into its codebase was written by Claude, its AI model. Claude's capabilities have expanded to handling complex, open-ended engineering tasks, achieving a 76% success rate in such areas, and even contributing to research processes, such as optimizing code performance and conducting AI safety experiments. Anthropic outlines an evolution from human-driven development to AI-assisted workflows, culminating in the current stage where AI agents can autonomously write, run, and delegate code. The company cautions that the path toward a "closed loop," where AI continuously improves itself, is becoming visible. It calls for coordinated global mechanisms to potentially slow or pause frontier AI development to allow safety research and societal structures to catch up. However, the timing of this warning coincides with Anthropic's preparations for an IPO, framing the narrative not just as a safety concern but also as a demonstration of Claude's advanced capabilities and its integral role in accelerating Anthropic's own R&D—creating a potential "flywheel" effect for competitive advantage. This contrasts with OpenAI's recent, more policy-oriented discussion of the same risks, highlighting the competitive dynamics in the AI industry as companies position themselves in both the technological and regulatory landscape.

marsbit1h ago

Anthropic Cries Wolf: Is the AGI Threat Real, or Just an IPO Story?

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片