Zero inflows, weak demand: Did VanEck’s AVAX ETF debut fall flat?

ambcryptoPubblicato 2026-01-28Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-01-28

Introduzione

VanEck's spot Avalanche (AVAX) ETF launched in early 2026 to a deeply negative market reception, recording zero inflows and only $330K in trading volume. This performance starkly contrasts with other recent altcoin ETFs, such as Bitwise's Solana ETF which saw $69M in inflows and Ripple's XRP ETF which attracted $245M. The AVAX ETF debut coincided with extreme bearish sentiment, reflected in a low Fear and Greed Index and stagnant open interest below $200M. AVAX's price remained weak, struggling near its late 2025 range of $11-$15. The lackluster response raises doubts about near-term bullish momentum and increases the risk of a deeper correction below $10 if negative sentiment persists.

Crypto market sentiment is deeply negative in early 2026 and even worse for some select altcoins.

This was illustrated by the recent launch of VanEck’s U.S. spot Avalanche [AVAX] ETF, which saw zero inflows and paltry $330K in trading volume.

For comparison, the Bitwise Solana [SOL] ETF went live on the 29th of October, just after the market-wide crash. Yet it recorded $69 million in inflows and $58 million in trading volume.

In mid-November, Ripple’s first spot XRP ETF, launched by Canary Capital, saw $245 million in inflows on its launch day. Chainlink’s Grayscale LINK ETF also attracted $41 million, making the first-ever AVAX ETF’s zero-inflow debut a subdued reception compared to other altcoin ETFs.

Whether this was just a slow start or a reality check for other altcoin ETFs remained to be seen. Bloomberg analyst James Seyffart said the top 20 crypto assets will likely see at least one single ETF, but was more “bullish on index products.”

AVAX’s debut met with ‘extreme fear’

Even so, the debut was met with ‘extreme fear,’ which remained slightly unchanged as of press time. Notably, the altcoin’s Fear and Greed Index dropped to 20 during the launch and slightly improved to a ‘fear’ level of 29.

In other words, speculators were extremely bearish on the altcoin, and the ETF debut made no huge difference.

A look at AVAX’s Open Interest (OI) or overall speculative appetite across the Futures market painted the same picture. Since the crash on the 10th of October, AVAX’s OI has fallen off a cliff from nearly $1 billion and has remained stagnant below $200 million.

In other words, demand for the altcoin was flat across spot and Futures markets. On the price charts, AVAX only bounced 2% but still struggled near its late 2025 price range of $11-$15.

The extended selling pressure in mid-December eased at the range lows of $11. Bulls attempted to defend the level once again this week.

However, the muted price reaction to the ETF update raised doubts about whether the support will hold and boost bulls to push toward $13 or $15.

A break below the range would reinforce a deeper correction, increasing the odds of a dip below $10 if the bearish sentiment persists.


Final Thoughts

  • Unlike the recent altcoin ETF debuts, the first-ever AVAX ETF attracted zero inflows and $330k in trading volume
  • Speculative interest has been flat for the past few months, while sentiment has soured deeply.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat were the inflow and trading volume figures for VanEck's U.S. spot Avalanche (AVAX) ETF at its debut?

AVanEck's U.S. spot Avalanche (AVAX) ETF saw zero inflows and a paltry $330K in trading volume at its debut.

QHow did the performance of the AVAX ETF compare to the Bitwise Solana ETF and Canary Capital's XRP ETF?

AThe Bitwise Solana ETF recorded $69 million in inflows and $58 million in trading volume, while Canary Capital's XRP ETF saw $245 million in inflows on its launch day. In stark contrast, the AVAX ETF had zero inflows and minimal trading volume.

QWhat was the state of market sentiment for AVAX at the time of the ETF launch, as indicated by the Fear and Greed Index?

AThe altcoin's Fear and Greed Index dropped to a level of 20, indicating 'extreme fear,' during the launch. It only slightly improved to a 'fear' level of 29 by press time.

QWhat does the data for Avalanche's Open Interest (OI) reveal about speculative demand?

ASince the market crash on October 10th, AVAX's Open Interest (OI) has plummeted from nearly $1 billion and has remained stagnant below $200 million, indicating a severe lack of speculative appetite in the Futures market.

QWhat was the price action of AVAX following the ETF launch, and what are the key support and resistance levels mentioned?

AAVAX's price only bounced 2% following the ETF news and continued to struggle near its late 2025 price range of $11-$15. The $11 level was a key support, and a break below it could lead to a deeper correction toward prices below $10.

Letture associate

The Battle for the AI Payment Race: Traditional Card Networks Face Off Against Coinbase

With the rise of AI agents conducting transactions, a battle for the underlying payment infrastructure is underway. Two distinct and incompatible approaches have emerged for enabling autonomous AI payments. The first approach is championed by traditional card networks Visa and Mastercard. They leverage their existing tokenized card credential systems, extending them to allow verified AI agents to make purchases within user-defined limits. Services like Mastercard's Agent Pay and Visa's Intelligent Commerce integrate with major AI platforms (e.g., OpenAI, Anthropic) and keep transactions within the established, decades-old card payment model. This system offers advantages for consumer retail, including robust fraud protection, chargeback mechanisms, and extensive merchant networks. The second approach, led by Coinbase, utilizes stablecoins on open internet protocols. Its x402 protocol reactivates the HTTP 402 status code for machine-to-machine micropayments, using USDC for settlement directly on-chain. This method eliminates the need for accounts or card fees, making it highly efficient for high-frequency, low-value, cross-border transactions between AI agents—such as paying for API calls, data streams, or computational resources—where traditional card fees and settlement times are impractical. While card networks excel in consumer-facing scenarios requiring dispute resolution, stablecoin protocols are tailored for machine economies. A key challenge for both is agent identity verification and transaction authorization. Notably, Visa and Mastercard are hedging their bets by also investing in stablecoins. Visa has rapidly grown its stablecoin settlement volume and is collaborating with Coinbase to bridge its network with the x402 protocol. Mastercard plans to acquire stablecoin platform BVNK. Their strategy is to become the fee-collecting gateway for all payment flows, regardless of the channel. Current applications reflect this division: consumer AI shopping tools (e.g., ChatGPT's checkout, Amazon's "Shop for Me") predominantly use card networks, while machine-focused services (e.g., Amazon Bedrock's core payments) adopt stablecoins via the x402 protocol. In the short term, a coexistence model is expected, with cards dominating retail and stablecoins powering machine transactions. The long-term outcome depends on whether AI-driven commerce evolves to resemble traditional retail or becomes a vast network of machine micropayments. By investing in both tracks, the incumbent card networks are positioning themselves to capture transaction fees regardless of which future prevails.

marsbit12 min fa

The Battle for the AI Payment Race: Traditional Card Networks Face Off Against Coinbase

marsbit12 min fa

Farewell to Traditional Bulls and Bears: The Market Has Entered an Era of Rotating Bubbles

Farewell to traditional bull and bear markets; we have entered an era of rolling bubbles. This article uses a meteorological analogy to explain the modern market's shift from slow-moving, long-term trends to a chain of rapid, successive speculative frenzies. The old market resembled "stratiform" weather—slow, broad cycles lasting years. Today's market is like a "mesoscale convective system," where isolated storms (bubbles in sectors like AI, GLP-1 drugs, or crypto) form in sequence. Each is triggered by the outflow of capital and sentiment from the previous one, creating a self-perpetuating chain of booms and busts. This structural change is driven by eight permanent shifts: the democratization of speculation (zero-commission trading, retail options activity), perpetual buying from defined-contribution retirement plans, the dominance of passive investing (creating price-insensitive flows), the rise of multi-strategy funds and high-frequency trading (weakening price discovery), suppressed volatility that erupts violently, an index composition now dominated by long-duration, narrative-driven tech stocks, the elimination of information delays, and a permissive fiscal/monetary backdrop. These conditions ensure that rolling bubbles are the new normal. To navigate this environment, investors should either become deep-sector experts who understand the underlying technologies and business models or become adept observers of trends and capital flows. While chaotic from within each "storm," a higher-altitude view reveals a predictable pattern of serial booms. The key is to avoid being emotionally swept up in any single narrative and to recognize the market's new, permanent structure.

marsbit47 min fa

Farewell to Traditional Bulls and Bears: The Market Has Entered an Era of Rotating Bubbles

marsbit47 min fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片