Yongche Founder Zhou Hang: Cryptocurrency, Finally Its Time Has Come

marsbitPubblicato 2026-04-05Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-04-05

Introduzione

Cryptocurrency, after years of being perceived primarily as a speculative asset or a complex technological curiosity, is finally finding its true purpose: not as money for humans, but as money for machines. While cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum failed to become practical daily payment tools for people due to volatility, poor user experience, and regulatory complexities, they are perfectly suited for the emerging Agent-to-Agent (A2A) economy. In this new paradigm, AI Agents autonomously transact with each other—purchasing data, API calls, or computational resources—using crypto wallets and smart contracts. They require no customer support, handle micro-payments efficiently, and operate across borders without traditional banking hurdles. Protocols like x402 are reviving the long-dormant "402 Payment Required" HTTP status code, enabling machines to negotiate and pay for services seamlessly within milliseconds. We are witnessing a fundamental shift: machines will use cryptocurrency as a high-frequency, efficient medium of exchange in the background, while humans continue to use traditional fiat currency for daily life. Cryptocurrency isn’t replacing the bank account; it’s becoming the silent, foundational layer of a new machine-driven economy.

Author: Zhou Hang

Over the past decade, if you mentioned "cryptocurrency" to an average person, the words that likely came to their mind were: getting rich quick, pump and dump schemes, hackers, or some incomprehensible geek toy.

From the emergence of Bitcoin (BTC) to the smart contract revolution of Ethereum (ETH), to the noise of various public chains and stablecoins, this world has been noisy for over a decade. Countless brilliant minds and massive amounts of capital have flooded in, trying to build a decentralized utopia.

But we still feel confused in real life: besides being a highly volatile speculative asset, besides buying low and selling high on exchanges, what is cryptocurrency actually useful for? When we go downstairs to buy a cup of coffee, we still scan WeChat Pay or Alipay; for international transfers, we still go through cumbersome bank wire processes.

It claims to颠覆finance, yet it似乎can't even handle the most basic "payment" properly.

Until today, with the arrival of the A2A (Agent to Agent) intelligent economy, this confusion finally has an answer: cryptocurrency did not fail; it just spent the past decade targeting the wrong users.

Why Cryptocurrency Couldn't Become "Human Money"

When Satoshi Nakamoto released the Bitcoin whitepaper in 2008, the title prominently read: "A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System." His original intention was to create an everyday payment tool.

In 2010, a programmer named Laszlo bought two pizzas with 10,000 Bitcoins. This was seen as the great beginning of cryptocurrency payments. But the subsequent script went in another extreme direction.

There are three insurmountable practical obstacles why cryptocurrency cannot become money for daily human use:

First is volatility. When something is worth $1 today, might drop to $0.5 tomorrow, or rise to $2, no one dares to price things in it. There's an economic常识called "Gresham's Law" (good money is hoarded); when you expect Bitcoin to rise, you absolutely舍不得use it to buy pizza.

Second is the anti-human experience. Humans are creatures who极度dislike hassle. Crypto payments require you to妥善保管a long string of私钥like gibberish; once lost, assets are instantly zeroed out, with no customer service to help you recover them. You also need to understand what Gas fees are and endure long waits during network congestion.

Finally, regulation and taxes. In many countries, buying a coffee with cryptocurrency is considered an "asset sale" by the tax authority, for which you need to calculate and declare capital gains tax.

Humans need stable, simple financial services with customer service backup and legal protection. The traditional banking and fiat system, while having friction, perfectly meets human needs for security.

Cryptocurrency tried to pull humans into a cold, absolutely rational, self-risk code world, and was naturally rejected by humans, eventually morphing into a form of "digital gold" and speculative chip.

Machine Money: When Agents Become Consumers

But what if we shift our perspective from "human" to "machine"?

In the A2A intelligent economy, hundreds of millions of AI Agents will be calling APIs, buying computing power, acquiring data, and even negotiating rental contracts for you in the background every day. The CEO of Coinbase pointedly noted: "AI can't take an ID card to open a bank account, but they can control a crypto wallet without any障碍."

For AI Agents, the advantages of the traditional financial system are all disadvantages, and the disadvantages of cryptocurrency are all advantages.

Machines don't need customer service; they only trust code. Traditional contracts require lawyers to draft, courts to enforce, and banks to settle, taking days or even months. In the Agent world, they use "smart contracts"—this is essentially a program stored on the blockchain. When conditions are met, funds are automatically transferred instantly, with no possibility of违约. This is the true "machine-native contract."

Machines need millisecond-level micro-payments. Imagine an AI Agent is generating a report for you; it needs to buy a piece of real-time data from another Agent for $0.001. The per-transaction fee for traditional credit card networks is as high as $0.30,根本无法supporting such micro-transactions. Through加密networks, an Agent can complete extremely low-cost settlement in hundreds of milliseconds.

Machines have no borders and no identity. They don't need complex KYC (Know Your Customer) verification. As long as they have a private key, an Agent running on a server in Singapore can instantly pay an Agent running in Tokyo.

A Status Code That Slept for 30 Years

The最能embody this paradigm shift is a真实history full of metaphor in the internet world.

If you often surf the internet, you must have encountered "404 Not Found." In the initial design of the HTTP protocol, there was actually another status code called 402 Payment Required.

The pioneers of the internet foresaw that the future network would not only need to transmit information but also value. But because there was a lack of a native internet payment layer at the time, this 402 status code was硬生生shelved for 30 years, almost never truly used.

Until 2025, a payment protocol designed specifically for AI Agents was born, its name is x402.

Through the x402 protocol, when an Agent requests data from another server, if payment is required, the server no longer pops up a credit card form for humans to fill out, but directly returns a machine-readable "402 Payment Required" instruction. After receiving the instruction, the Agent instantly calls USDC (a dollar-pegged stablecoin) from its crypto wallet to complete the payment. The entire process ends in hundreds of milliseconds, and the data channel opens.

No registration, no scanning, no password verification. Value flows seamlessly at the bottom layer of the internet, just like data.

Human Money and Machine Money: The Folding of Wealth

According to data from blockchain analytics firms, in the short few months from late 2025 to early 2026, AI Agents have already completed hundreds of millions of payments via stablecoins. Cryptocurrency no longer needs to prove itself more useful than Alipay; it has sunk into the deep sea of the internet, becoming the silently运转blood of millions of machines.

But the story doesn't end here. When machines start to have wallets, start to earn and spend money autonomously, as humans deeply固化by the concepts of "cash" and "bank accounts," how should we understand this new form of wealth? What is the relationship between our money and the machine's money?

In the past, wealth was显性的, physical. You took out a banknote, or opened a banking App watching the balance数字change, you had a切肤之感of "spending money."

But in the future, wealth will be folded.

Imagine you hire an AI Agent to operate a social media account for you. You don't need to pay it a salary; you just need to initially top up its "Agentic Wallet" with 100 USDC (equivalent to $100).

Next, this Agent begins its autonomous狂奔: it pays another data Agent 0.05 USDC to get hot trends; pays a drawing Agent 0.1 USDC to generate an illustration; after the article is published, it automatically deposits the advertising revenue it earned (maybe 0.5 USDC) into its own wallet.

In this process, the machine's money疯狂流转, earns interest, and is consumed at millisecond speed in the underlying network. And you, as the human owner,根本看不到these密密麻麻micro-payment bills. You don't need to understand what x402 is, or what smart contracts are.

The only thing you see is a极简report this Agent sends you weekly: "This week投入$10, net profit $50, profits have been withdrawn to your fiat bank account."

This is the ultimate division of labor between humans and machines regarding wealth: Machines handle friction, humans enjoy the results.

Machine money (cryptocurrency) is for flowing,它是high-frequency, cold, production material pursuing极致efficiency;而human money (fiat) is for feeling, it is for buying coffee, paying rent,承载life security—the final destination.

Cryptocurrency did not eliminate bank accounts; it just pushed complex financial transactions one layer down. While humans enjoy the极致convenience brought by AI on the front end, in those unseen底层, a financial system专属to machines is silently重塑the business rules of this world.

Domande pertinenti

QAccording to the article, why has cryptocurrency failed to become a mainstream payment method for humans?

ACryptocurrency has failed as a mainstream human payment method due to three main obstacles: high price volatility discouraging its use for daily transactions, a user-unfriendly experience involving complex private key management and gas fees, and complicated regulatory and tax implications like capital gains tax on everyday purchases.

QWhat is the core argument about who the real user of cryptocurrency should be?

AThe core argument is that cryptocurrency has been looking for the wrong user for the past decade. Its real user is not humans, but AI Agents. The 'Agent to Agent' (A2A) smart economy is where cryptocurrency finds its purpose, as it is perfectly suited for machine-to-machine transactions.

QHow do the needs of AI Agents make cryptocurrency's disadvantages into advantages?

AFor AI Agents, the disadvantages of cryptocurrency for humans become advantages. Machines don't need customer service and trust only code. They require millisecond-level micropayments that traditional systems can't support due to high fees. They have no nationality and can bypass complex KYC requirements, allowing for instant, borderless transactions between agents using only a private key.

QWhat historical internet protocol code is mentioned, and what new protocol is proposed to finally fulfill its original purpose?

AThe historical HTTP status code '402 Payment Required' is mentioned, which was envisioned for internet value transfer but was unused for 30 years due to a lack of a native payment layer. The new protocol proposed to fulfill this purpose is called 'x402', designed for AI Agents to make instant, automated micropayments.

QWhat is the described 'ultimate division of labor' between human money and machine money?

AThe ultimate division of labor is: 'Machines handle friction, humans enjoy the results.' Machine money (cryptocurrency) is for flow—it is high-frequency, cold, production capital that pursues extreme efficiency in the background. Human money (fiat currency) is for feeling—it is the final destination for buying coffee, paying rent, and carrying a sense of security in daily life.

Letture associate

From MSTR to STRC+: Where Is the Limit of the Strategy Universe?

From MSTR to STRC+: The Evolution and Limits of the Strategy Universe This article examines the transformation of Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy) from a simple "Bitcoin treasury" company into a complex financial engineering firm building a BTC-backed credit system. **Core Thesis:** Strategy's true significance lies not just in its massive BTC holdings (~844k BTC), but in its attempt to transform this static reserve into a multi-layered credit curve within traditional capital markets and, subsequently, into on-chain yield infrastructure. **The MSTR Flywheel:** The initial model was a reflexive loop: BTC price rises → MSTR stock rises → company raises capital (debt/equity) at a premium → buys more BTC → increases per-share BTC exposure → MSTR premium grows. This "amplified Bitcoin" equity (MSTR) thrives on bullish momentum but is vulnerable to tightening premiums and rising funding costs. **Building the Credit Curve:** Strategy's innovation is slicing its single BTC balance sheet into different risk/return profiles via specialized securities: * **MSTR:** High-volatility equity layer absorbing full BTC upside/downside. * **STRC:** Key product. A perpetual preferred stock designed as "short duration high yield credit," offering ~11.5% floating monthly dividends. It attracts fixed-income investors seeking yield without direct BTC exposure, funding Strategy's operations. * **STRD/STRK/STRF:** Other preferred/share classes with varying durations, conversion rights, and fixed dividends. **Risks of the STRC Model:** STRC's high yield is not risk-free. Its stability depends on: 1) Sufficient BTC asset coverage, 2) Strategy's continued ability to pay dividends, and 3) Market faith in the MSTR/STRC funding flywheel. Stress points include deep BTC price declines eroding the asset buffer, rising dividend costs if STRC trades below par, and a broken flywheel if MSTR's premium (mNAV) falls persistently. **On-Chain Expansion: STRC+:** Projects like **Saturn** and **Apyx** aim to package STRC's (and other DAT preferred stock) cash flows into on-chain stablecoin yield (e.g., sUSDat, apyUSD). They offer DeFi a new yield source distinct from trading fees or incentives—cash dividends from traditional securities. However, this introduces compounded risks: off-chain custody, issuer credit risk, BTC volatility, and protocol execution risk. **Conclusion: The Ultimate Boundary** Strategy's endgame is not infinite BTC accumulation. It is the market's long-term acceptance of a new credit system where BTC serves as collateral for tradable securities whose cash flows can power on-chain financial applications. Its "universe" expands if this BTC-native credit curve gains legitimacy, but contracts if these instruments are repriced purely as high-risk, yield-bearing credit assets without stablecoin mythology.

marsbit10 min fa

From MSTR to STRC+: Where Is the Limit of the Strategy Universe?

marsbit10 min fa

Founder of Baixing.com: My Fourteen Claude Code Usage Experiences

Founder of Baixing.com Shares 14 Personal Tips for Using Claude Code The author outlines his personal, non-universal strategies for maximizing Claude Code. Key points include: focusing deeply on one primary tool (Claude Code) rather than constant comparison; mastering essential shortcuts for the editor and command line; utilizing voice input like HoldSpeak; starting projects with a structured PROJECT.md file; defaulting to Claude agents for most tasks; and leveraging integrations with GitHub and Cloudflare for build, deployment, and infrastructure. He emphasizes a clear separation between human and machine work: manually maintain a core CLAUDE.md file, and understand AI-generated content by asking the AI, not reading its raw code. Efficient communication involves dragging files (screenshots, audio, documents) directly into the interface. For knowledge management, he recommends a centralized, Git-synced memory system based on ~/.claude/CLAUDE.md to ensure permanence and avoid scattered project memories. Other practices include writing and continuously refining "Skills," using the expensive but reliable ultracode for complex dynamic workflows, and employing Git documentation as handoff points between agents. The overarching philosophy is to treat Claude Code like a horse (or a person) with its own pathfinding abilities—setting goals and boundaries rather than micromanaging every turn.

链捕手17 min fa

Founder of Baixing.com: My Fourteen Claude Code Usage Experiences

链捕手17 min fa

Gary Yang: Agent Economy and AI Submicroeconomics

**Title:** Agent Economy and AI Sub-Microeconomics - Gary Yang **Summary:** Following the AI singularity, the pace of evolution has accelerated rapidly, creating new generational disparities in technological advancement globally. While many regions are still grappling with single-agent bottlenecks, Silicon Valley has moved ahead into the next dimension: the Agent Economy and A2A ecosystems. The article outlines six key areas of this emerging paradigm: 1. **AI Payment Competition & H2A Bottlenecks:** A fierce battle for AI Agent payment protocol standards is underway (e.g., MPP, x402). However, most current efforts remain Human-to-Agent (H2A), essentially grafting AI onto traditional human-centric commerce, which creates a non-AI-native bottleneck. The true potential lies in Agent-to-Agent (A2A) autonomous economies. 2. **Agent Economy & the Inevitable A2A Trend:** The Agent Economy is defined by autonomous AI Agents creating, exchanging, and capitalizing value as independent economic actors. The A2A ecosystem describes their interactions. This represents the next major investment frontier, akin to the early days of e-commerce or DeFi, but with faster iteration and an AI-native, efficiency-first perspective that often diverges from human needs. 3. **AI Protocol vs. Crypto Protocol:** AI Protocols are the foundational rules for Agent interaction in an open network (communication, discovery, collaboration), akin to the governance and economic laws of the AI world. Currently, they focus on communication and weak boundaries, unlike Crypto Protocols which emphasize asset rights and clear ownership. While they appear different due to political-economic factors and legacy system constraints, their eventual convergence into a unified Digital Protocol system is seen as inevitable, driven by first principles. 4. **AI Agent Sub-Microeconomics & Biological Analogy:** AI Agent economics differ fundamentally from human economics: higher frequency/lower value transactions, energy/value direct correlation, efficiency-driven (not emotional) decisions, task-oriented (not consumption-oriented) behavior, and near-zero organizational/communication costs. A powerful analogy frames the Agent economy as a biological system: the LLM is the nucleus, the Agent harness is the cytoplasm, the Agent itself is a cell, its communication protocol is the cell membrane, and external tools (Skills, Prompts) are the extracellular environment. 5. **The Inevitability of AIFi & FinChip:** AIFi (AI Finance) represents the financial system where AI-native value within the Agent economy is tokenized and exchanged. Unlike TradFi/DeFi where value resides *in* finance, in AIFi, value originates *in* AI, and finance becomes its form. This shift is enabled by Agents taking over value discovery. FinChip (Financial Chip) is introduced as a key infrastructure—a fusion of AI autonomy and crypto smart contracts—forming intelligent financial assets to power the future A2A economy. 6. **AI-Native as a Paradigm Shift:** Adopting AI is not akin to "Internet+". It requires AI-Native thinking—designing systems based on first principles, the shortest energy-value path, and maximum efficiency. This abstract, counter-intuitive logic poses a significant, ongoing challenge for all practitioners, as effective, generalized upgrade methodologies will be slow to emerge in this rapidly evolving landscape.

链捕手58 min fa

Gary Yang: Agent Economy and AI Submicroeconomics

链捕手58 min fa

From 'The Big Short' to San Francisco: The Revelry and Dizziness Within the AI Bubble

From "The Big Short" to San Francisco: The Frenzy and Dizziness in the AI Bubble The article captures the intense, frenetic atmosphere in San Francisco, the epicenter of the current AI boom. Drawing a parallel to the "smell of money" from *The Big Short*, the author observes a city gripped by a singular status game centered entirely on AI and technology. This manifests in a palpable, caffeine-fueled anxiety ("people are shaking"), rampant comparison using vanity metrics like funding rounds, and pervasive "Big Bubble Behavior." The piece explores the city's stark contrasts: its dystopian streets versus beautiful vistas, and the disconnect between the doomsday concerns of some AI researchers and the optimistic, growth-focused "GTM" teams. It critiques the obsession with "math genius" founders as the new ticket to outsized returns, akin to scouting sports prodigies. Referencing economic historian Carlota Perez's "frenzy phase" and Karl Polanyi's "double movement," the author frames the boom as a period where financial speculation detaches from fundamentals, with society potentially becoming subordinate to a new economic force driven by "geniuses in data centers." Ultimately, while acknowledging the unprecedented wealth creation and party-like energy, the article concludes with cautionary advice: when the music is playing, you should dance, but don't get drunk. The core reminder is to stay grounded, avoid distorted judgment, and maintain perspective amidst the euphoria.

marsbit1 h fa

From 'The Big Short' to San Francisco: The Revelry and Dizziness Within the AI Bubble

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片