X Allows Paid Crypto Promotions but Restricts Ads in EU and UK

TheNewsCryptoPubblicato 2026-03-02Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-03-02

Introduzione

X has updated its advertising policy to allow paid crypto promotions through its official partnership programs, requiring clear labeling for transparency. However, the platform maintains restrictions on non-partnership crypto ads to prevent spam and misleading content. This move aligns X with other social networks that permit regulated crypto advertising, emphasizing compliance with legal and platform standards. Industry analysts believe this could boost visibility for legitimate crypto projects and influence marketing strategies, though regulatory compliance remains crucial. The policy does not permit unsolicited promotions, balancing openness with controls.

The announcement came from the social media site itself, saying they updated the advertising rules to include branded content for crypto. This only applies if the accounts are in official paid partnership programs. Creators get to share promo posts about crypto products, but they have to label them clearly as paid. It seems like they are trying to make things more transparent that way.

Still, X is keeping restrictions on the regular kind of crypto advertising that is not tied to partnerships or does not have proper disclosures. They want to stop spam and misleading stuff from reaching users. The change happened after hearing from advertisers and people in the industry who wanted better guidelines for marketing digital assets.

Crypto companies often turn to platforms like this to get their name out there and build awareness with more people. By allowing these paid promotions, X is catching up with other social networks that already allow regulated crypto ads. They stressed that everything has to follow the laws and the platform’s own standards, plus there are safety steps to avoid fraud or deception.

Analysts are saying this could help legitimate crypto projects get more visibility through sponsorships. Some investors feel it supports wider adoption, like opening up new ways to market. But it is not a total free-for-all, since unsolicited promotions are still limited.

Marketing Impact and Industry Response

On the marketing side, people in the industry think this might change how companies spend their budgets on digital stuff. Brands could start seeing X as a spot for campaigns aimed at tech people or crypto fans. It might lead to more organized team-ups between crypto firms and influencers.

The regulatory stuff will probably stay a big deal, especially with different rules in places. Companies will need to keep checks in place to ensure content complies with legal and platform rules. As these partnerships grow, there could be more watching of how things engage and how brands are seen. This policy could spark new ideas in advertising for crypto and regular social sites. Some parts get a bit messy when thinking about how it all connects.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Senate Democrats Urge Federal Review of Binance Compliance Controls

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the main change X announced regarding crypto advertising?

AX updated its advertising rules to allow branded content for crypto, but only for accounts in official paid partnership programs, and these promotions must be clearly labeled as paid.

QWhy is X keeping restrictions on some types of crypto advertising?

AX is maintaining restrictions on crypto ads not tied to partnerships or lacking proper disclosures to prevent spam and misleading content from reaching users.

QHow did this policy change come about according to the article?

AThe change was implemented after X received feedback from advertisers and industry participants who wanted better guidelines for marketing digital assets.

QWhat potential benefit for legitimate crypto projects does this new policy offer?

AAnalysts say the policy could help legitimate crypto projects gain more visibility through sponsorships and open up new marketing avenues, supporting wider adoption.

QWhat is a key concern that companies will need to manage under this new advertising policy?

ACompanies will need to ensure their content complies with varying legal regulations and the platform's own standards, implementing checks to avoid fraud and deception.

Letture associate

Crypto Miners' Big AI Gamble: Valuations Enter Differentiation Stage, Comeback Fight Proves Tough

Crypto Mining Firms' AI Bet: Valuation Divergence and a Challenging Transformation Facing declining profitability in crypto mining, mining companies are pivoting to AI infrastructure, capitalizing on their existing power resources, land, and data center expertise to offer GPU compute power. This transition narrative has boosted their stock prices significantly, with firms like Hut 8 and Bitfarms seeing gains over 100% year-to-date, far outpacing Bitcoin. This has led to a market valuation split, with pioneers like CoreWeave reaching a $62.8B market cap, while others remain below $5B. The market currently prioritizes growth potential over short-term profits, which remain under pressure due to heavy capital expenditures for AI build-outs and crypto asset volatility. However, the transformation is a high-stakes gamble. Bitcoin mining profitability is shrinking, with the average production cost around $63,707 and miner margins contracting. While AI offers a more lucrative long-term path, it requires massive investment—estimated at a $500B near-term funding gap. Success now hinges on execution: delivering on contracted power capacity, securing quality tenants like major cloud providers, and managing the immense financial burden. The valuation focus is shifting from mere power capacity to project delivery, future cash flows, and tenant quality, making this a difficult but critical turnaround attempt.

链捕手4 min fa

Crypto Miners' Big AI Gamble: Valuations Enter Differentiation Stage, Comeback Fight Proves Tough

链捕手4 min fa

Analysis of the Latest Portfolio Adjustment by the "Top Player" in the U.S. Stock Market: $9 Billion Short on NVIDIA, Shifting Focus to Power and Memory Sectors

AI investor Leopold Aschenbrenner has made a significant portfolio shift, taking a $9 billion nominal short position against top AI infrastructure stocks like NVIDIA, ASML, and Oracle. Simultaneously, he is redirecting capital towards what he sees as the next critical bottlenecks in the AI boom: power, memory, and data center networking, alongside private investments in AI model companies like Anthropic. This move is interpreted not as a call that the AI bubble has burst, but as a rotation within the infrastructure stack. The analysis highlights NVIDIA's recent $25 billion bond issuance as a potential signal, questioning why a cash-rich company would seek external debt despite high profits and increased dividends/buybacks. The core investment thesis is that the initial, crowded "picks and shovels" trade in semiconductors is maturing. The next wave of capital is expected to flow into the physical and logistical constraints of AI expansion: electricity supply, memory chip capacity, data center construction, and enabling technologies like optical networking (fiber) for high-bandwidth communication, where copper remains crucial for short distances. Aschenbrenner's substantial (approx. 20% of fund) private stake in Anthropic is noted as a key part of his strategy—investing directly in the "mine" (AI models) rather than just the "shovels." The discussion concludes that while certain segments may be overvalued, the overarching AI infrastructure demand driven by real product usage remains robust. The most promising long-term investments are seen in essential, non-sexy infrastructure—particularly energy and power companies—whose demand is viewed as a global constant irrespective of AI's cyclicality.

marsbit25 min fa

Analysis of the Latest Portfolio Adjustment by the "Top Player" in the U.S. Stock Market: $9 Billion Short on NVIDIA, Shifting Focus to Power and Memory Sectors

marsbit25 min fa

BIT Research: Liquidity is Disappearing, Will Bitcoin Replay the Bottoming Pattern of 2022?

The crypto market is currently in an adjustment phase driven by policy expectations and liquidity shifts. Despite a brief rebound fueled by geopolitical easing and SpaceX's strong IPO performance, unexpectedly hawkish signals from new Fed Chair Kevin Warsh have removed anticipated easing support. Concurrently, stablecoin liquidity is shrinking, with insufficient new capital inflows, pushing the market into a typically quiet summer period. Pricing lacks catalysts for a sustained rally. Daily trading volume has significantly contracted, stablecoin growth has slowed markedly, and the supportive effect of Strategy's (formerly MicroStrategy) STRC preferred stock-financed Bitcoin purchases is fading. Amid policy uncertainty, seasonal weakness, and liquidity contraction, Bitcoin faces near-term downward pressure. Warsh's hawkish pivot and refusal to provide a clear policy outlook have increased risk premiums, historically unfavorable for Bitcoin. Technically, the trend remains bearish below $73,700, with $62,446 as critical support. A break below could accelerate declines, though a prolonged consolidation phase, similar to 2022's bottoming process, is possible. Liquidity is a core constraint. Current daily volume is around $500 billion, roughly 25% of the peak during the July-Oct 2025 rally. The 12-month growth rates for USDT and USDC have fallen to ~20%, with 6-month growth near zero, indicating weak new inflows. Bitcoin ETF and Strategy-driven inflows have also weakened, with a 30-day rolling net outflow. With inflation at 4.2% above the Fed's target, combined hawkish policy, seasonal factors, and liquidity shortages challenge Bitcoin's ability to hold above $60,000. However, this adjustment phase may be forming a cyclical low this summer, potentially setting the stage for the next bull cycle.

marsbit53 min fa

BIT Research: Liquidity is Disappearing, Will Bitcoin Replay the Bottoming Pattern of 2022?

marsbit53 min fa

Who Makes the Best Use of Claude Code? The Answer Might Not Be Programmers

Claude Code Usage Report Summary (Based on ~400k sessions) Core Finding: In agentic programming with Claude Code, a clear division of labor has emerged: humans primarily decide *what* to build (planning decisions), while Claude decides *how* to build it (execution decisions). Key Insights: 1. **Effectiveness is not limited to programmers.** In code-generation tasks, success rates for users in non-technical fields (law, finance, management, research) are nearing those of software engineers. What matters most is the user's domain expertise and understanding of the problem to be solved. 2. **Domain expertise drives success and efficiency.** Sessions where users exhibited "expert" proficiency in the task's domain saw verified success rates double compared to "novice" sessions. Experts also delegated more work per instruction, with Claude executing more actions and producing more output. 3. **AI is amplifying, not replacing, domain knowledge.** Claude Code lowers the *implementation* barrier, not the *judgment* barrier. The value of knowing the "what" and "why" is increasing relative to just knowing the "how" to code. 4. **Usage is evolving.** Over a 7-month period (Oct '25 - Apr '26), the share of sessions for debugging halved, while use for software operations, data analysis, and non-code writing roughly doubled. The estimated economic value of typical tasks increased by ~25%. Conclusion: The data suggests coding agents are making programming background less critical for completing technical tasks. However, they reward and amplify deep domain understanding. The ability to successfully direct an AI agent stems more from mastery of a specific field than from coding skill itself. The primary gains come from being competent in a domain; deep specialization adds only marginal additional advantage. This may signal a shift where software creation becomes integrated into various professions.

marsbit1 h fa

Who Makes the Best Use of Claude Code? The Answer Might Not Be Programmers

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片