Why ONDO price stays weak even as TVL hits $1.93B record

ambcryptoPubblicato 2025-12-22Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-12-22

Introduzione

Despite reaching a new all-time high in Total Value Locked (TVL) of $1.93 billion following its announcement to launch tokenized U.S. stocks and ETFs on Solana in 2026, ONDO's price remained weak, trading between $0.36–$0.39. Technical indicators showed bearish momentum, with RSI near 34 and MACD below zero, suggesting continued downside pressure. Solana also experienced mixed reactions, briefly dipping below $122 but seeing significant ETF inflows of $35.20 million. The divergence between rising TVL and price weakness indicates potential long-term accumulation by investors, though short-term momentum remains uncertain.

Ondo Finance recorded a new all-time high in Total Value Locked after its announcement on the 15th of December. The firm said it would launch tokenized U.S. stocks and ETFs on Solana in early 2026.

The move extended Ondo’s Global Markets platform beyond Ethereum and BNB Chain. It positioned Solana as the next settlement layer for Ondo’s tokenized finance push.

However, market reaction across Ondo [ONDO] and Solana remained mixed in subsequent sessions. Both assets pulled back shortly after the announcement, diverging from improving protocol metrics.

TVL surged as the price stalled

ONDO’s TVL continued rising to an ATH of $1.93 billion even as the price slipped back into the $0.36–$0.39 trading range. The steady increase suggested capital remained deployed at the protocol level during consolidation.

Liquidity did not immediately exit following the high-profile announcement.

However, technical indicators failed to confirm bullish price momentum. ONDO’s RSI hovered near 34 on the daily chart. The reading reflected persistent bearish momentum following the pullback.

Did rising TVL signal accumulation, or was the market still pricing broader bearish risk?

Momentum stayed under pressure

ONDO dropped below the $0.40 level, briefly reaching $0.36 during the post-announcement decline.

RSI showed tentative stabilization but lacked confirmation of a sustained reversal.

ONDO’s MACD remained below the zero line, signaling continued downside pressure. Local resistance stood near $0.50, while downside risk extended toward $0.25 in a worst-case scenario.

That left price action disconnected from improving fundamentals.

Solana held key support

On the 15th of December, the same day as Ondo’s announcement, Solana [SOL] briefly broke below $122, dipping to around $117 before buyers stepped in, keeping the price within the $122–$145 range.

On the four-hour chart, RSI was near 52, and weak MACD reflected neutral momentum and consolidation, consistent with accumulation rather than a breakout.

During the same session, Solana recorded $35.20 million in ETF inflows. That figure marked the highest inflow of the week and the second-highest daily total in December.

Capital entered despite price weakness, suggesting accumulation during heightened volatility.

Is ONDO consolidating or repricing lower?

ONDO’s rising TVL contrasted sharply with bearish RSI and MACD readings. The setup suggested accumulation without immediate price confirmation. Market participants appeared cautious.

Whether the price stabilized or was repriced lower remained uncertain. Gaining the local resistance level could signal improving momentum, while failure could extend the ongoing consolidation.


Final Thoughts

  • Ondo’s TVL growth showed capital conviction even as price momentum lagged behind.
  • That disconnect suggested investors favored long-term positioning over immediate upside.

Crypto di tendenza

Domande pertinenti

QWhat was the key announcement made by Ondo Finance on December 15th that led to a new TVL record?

AOndo Finance announced it would launch tokenized U.S. stocks and ETFs on Solana in early 2026.

QDespite the record TVL, what was the price range ONDO fell back into and what was the RSI level indicating?

AONDO's price fell back into the $0.36–$0.39 trading range, and its RSI hovered near 34, reflecting persistent bearish momentum.

QWhat did the MACD indicator signal about ONDO's price momentum after the announcement?

AONDO’s MACD remained below the zero line, signaling continued downside pressure.

QHow did Solana's market activity, specifically regarding ETF inflows, contrast with its price action on December 15th?

ASolana recorded $35.20 million in ETF inflows, the highest of the week, despite its price briefly breaking below $122, suggesting accumulation during price weakness.

QWhat does the article suggest is the main reason for the disconnect between ONDO's rising TVL and its weak price?

AThe disconnect suggested that investors were favoring long-term positioning and accumulation over seeking immediate price upside, indicating caution.

Letture associate

Goldman Sachs Bans It, Google Bans It Too: The Gray Zone of Prediction Markets Is Shrinking Fast

Goldman Sachs has updated its personal trading policy, prohibiting employees from trading event contracts on prediction markets involving specific companies (including whether Goldman itself might restructure or initiate acquisitions in a quarter), election outcomes, financial market performance (including Bitcoin prices), macroeconomic data, geopolitical events, and regulatory results for pending M&A deals. Sports and entertainment bets remain allowed. Violations can lead to dismissal or account closure, and the firm may reclaim profits over $200 or donate them to charity. This follows a CFTC case against a Google engineer who allegedly used non-public data to profit $1.2 million on Polymarket. Simultaneously, Google's Chrome Web Store updated its policy, banning extensions that facilitate real-money trading on prediction market outcomes, effective August 1, 2026. While not affecting platforms' websites or mobile apps directly, this restricts a key user access channel. These actions occur amid growing regulatory pressure on prediction markets. The CFTC is investigating Polymarket for alleged misconduct, and a consumer group has filed a lawsuit. Over 30 countries, including Argentina, have blocked access. Despite this, trading volume has hit record highs, and major investments continue, such as ICE's $2 billion stake in Polymarket. The core debate remains whether prediction markets are financial instruments or gambling. CFTC argues for federal oversight as derivatives, while some states seek to regulate them under gambling laws. Multiple fronts—federal probes, political pressure, internal corporate bans, and platform restrictions—are narrowing the operational space for these markets.

Foresight News2 min fa

Goldman Sachs Bans It, Google Bans It Too: The Gray Zone of Prediction Markets Is Shrinking Fast

Foresight News2 min fa

Tsinghua AI Mathematician Emerges: From Intuition to Theorem, Contributing to an 84-Page Quantum Algorithm Paper

Tsinghua University’s Intelligent Industry Research Institute (AIR) has developed an AI mathematician agent named AIM, designed not just to solve math problems but to actively participate in early-stage research. In a recent study, researchers collaborated with AIM to develop "Sign Embedding Quantum Algorithms," resulting in an 84-page paper on quantum algorithms for matrix equations and functions. The research began with a human researcher's intuition: can rational approximation serve as a design principle for quantum algorithms? AIM helped expand this idea into multiple candidate research directions. Human researchers then filtered and focused on the most promising path. AIM assisted in organizing theorems, generating proof drafts, and performing complexity analysis, while humans maintained oversight, auditing assumptions and refining derivations. This case illustrates a human-AI collaborative workflow: AI rapidly explores and expands research avenues, generates draft materials, and aids in checking derivations; human researchers provide critical judgment on direction, value, and validity. The process emphasizes "high-throughput candidate generation + human value gating + AI-assisted audit and repair + human final integration." The resulting quantum algorithm framework offers a unified approach to several matrix problems, advancing quantum linear algebra under more general conditions. This work suggests AI's role in theoretical research is evolving from task-specific assistance to supporting the entire research lifecycle—enhancing exploration and efficiency while keeping human expertise central to guiding inquiry and ensuring rigor. *Paper & System Links:* - AIM application report: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.24899 - Quantum algorithm paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.25333 - AIM repository: https://github.com/TheoryFoundry/AIMv2

marsbit52 min fa

Tsinghua AI Mathematician Emerges: From Intuition to Theorem, Contributing to an 84-Page Quantum Algorithm Paper

marsbit52 min fa

Short-Lived Meme Mania: Can It Be the Icebreaker for Robinhood's RWA Narrative?

Robinhood recently launched its own Layer 2 network, Robinhood Chain, built on Arbitrum and focusing on tokenized stocks, RWA, DeFi, and AI finance. Shortly after launch, a meme coin called CASHCAT, named after an early unused Robinhood brand, surged in popularity, achieving a market cap near $150 million and high daily trading volume. It gained traction through third-party DEXs and launchpads like Uniswap and Noxa.fun, bypassing Robinhood's official listing process. This highlights a key feature of the permissionless chain: even assets not officially approved can achieve significant liquidity and trading activity. While CASHCAT currently dominates the chain's meme coin sector, its high turnover indicates speculative trading. The rapid proliferation of new meme coins risks dispersing liquidity. Meanwhile, the chain's core RWA sector remains relatively small at $12.5 million. CEO Vlad Tenev has expressed that the chain is well-suited for both RWA and meme coins. In the optimistic scenario, meme-driven activity could bootstrap the chain's user base and liquidity for its long-term RWA vision. However, if the meme frenzy fades quickly, the RWA narrative may struggle to gain traction independently. The incident demonstrates that on a permissionless platform, the market itself can create major assets, offering Robinhood a potential new growth avenue beyond its core crypto business as it navigates the long-term development of the tokenized asset market.

Foresight News56 min fa

Short-Lived Meme Mania: Can It Be the Icebreaker for Robinhood's RWA Narrative?

Foresight News56 min fa

The Fall of Zapper: An Act of God or a Human Error?

The Fall of Zapper: A Post-Mortem of a DeFi Pioneer In July 2026, Zapper, a once-dominant DeFi portfolio tracker, announced its shutdown. Born in 2020 from a merger, Zapper capitalized on the DeFi Summer boom, reaching 2 million monthly users and processing over $13B in transactions, backed by $16.5M in funding from investors like Framework Ventures and Coinbase Ventures. Its core "Zap" feature simplified complex multi-step DeFi operations. Despite its early success, Zapper failed to build a sustainable business model. Revenue from DEX aggregation was minimal due to fierce competition, while maintaining its multi-chain data infrastructure was costly. Furthermore, the DeFi landscape shifted: capital consolidated around top protocols, reducing the need for complex portfolio tracking across numerous platforms. Zapper's user base and core demand eroded. The company attempted multiple pivots, including an NFT-based points system, a social app (Chainchat), and plans for a ZAP token protocol. However, these initiatives—often focused on creating new, speculative C端需求 rather than solving existing pain points—ultimately failed. Critics argue Zapper remained trapped in a "blockchain purist" mindset, prioritizing costly, non-revenue-generating features over its competitive DEX aggregator. Unlike competitor DeBank, which successfully pivoted to its Rabby Wallet, Zapper lacked a diversified revenue stream. Its closure highlights the peril for tooling projects that fail to adapt to market shifts and monetize effectively, serving as a cautionary tale for the industry.

Foresight News1 h fa

The Fall of Zapper: An Act of God or a Human Error?

Foresight News1 h fa

Trading

Spot

Articoli Popolari

Come comprare ONDO

Benvenuto in HTX.com! Abbiamo reso l'acquisto di OndoFinance (ONDO) semplice e conveniente. Segui la nostra guida passo passo per intraprendere il tuo viaggio nel mondo delle criptovalute.Step 1: Crea il tuo Account HTXUsa la tua email o numero di telefono per registrarti il tuo account gratuito su HTX. Vivi un'esperienza facile e sblocca tutte le funzionalità,Crea il mio accountStep 2: Vai in Acquista crypto e seleziona il tuo metodo di pagamentoCarta di credito/debito: utilizza la tua Visa o Mastercard per acquistare immediatamente OndoFinanceONDO.Bilancio: Usa i fondi dal bilancio del tuo account HTX per fare trading senza problemi.Terze parti: abbiamo aggiunto metodi di pagamento molto utilizzati come Google Pay e Apple Pay per maggiore comodità.P2P: Fai trading direttamente con altri utenti HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): Offriamo servizi su misura e tassi di cambio competitivi per i trader.Step 3: Conserva OndoFinance (ONDO)Dopo aver acquistato OndoFinance (ONDO), conserva nel tuo account HTX. In alternativa, puoi inviare tramite trasferimento blockchain o scambiare per altre criptovalute.Step 4: Scambia OndoFinance (ONDO)Scambia facilmente OndoFinance (ONDO) nel mercato spot di HTX. Accedi al tuo account, seleziona la tua coppia di trading, esegui le tue operazioni e monitora in tempo reale. Offriamo un'esperienza user-friendly sia per chi ha appena iniziato che per i trader più esperti.

298 Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2024.12.12Aggiornato il 2026.06.02

Come comprare ONDO

Discussioni

Benvenuto nella Community HTX. Qui puoi rimanere informato sugli ultimi sviluppi della piattaforma e accedere ad approfondimenti esperti sul mercato. Le opinioni degli utenti sul prezzo di ONDO ONDO sono presentate come di seguito.

活动图片