What should you expect from 10 February’s White House stablecoin meeting?

ambcryptoPubblicato 2026-02-10Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-02-10

Introduzione

White House officials, Wall Street leaders, and crypto executives are meeting on 10 February to address the deadlock over the CLARITY Act, with interest-paying stablecoins being the most contentious issue. Crypto firms argue that offering yield supports innovation and user benefits, citing companies like Coinbase which earned $355 million from stablecoins in Q3 2025. Traditional banks, however, warn of a potential $6.6 trillion outflow from deposits. Another key point is the Federal Reserve’s proposed “skinny” master account system, which neither side finds satisfactory. Past policy delays and meeting cancellations have triggered sharp market declines, while agreements like the GENIUS Act spurred rallies. Currently, market sentiment is nervous, with total crypto valuation dropping 1.65% to $2.36 trillion in a day, and major cryptocurrencies like BTC and ETH facing downward pressure. Analysts see this as reducing risk rather than a full market crash. Ultimately, the conflict reflects a broader struggle over the future financial system, with markets reacting strongly to regulatory uncertainty.

Inside the White House, a high-pressure struggle is reaching a turning point as government officials, Wall Street leaders, and crypto founders meet on 10 February to resolve the long-running deadlock over the CLARITY Act.

At the center of the conflict is the issue of interest-paying stablecoins, which has become the most divisive topic in the debate.

Crypto companies argue that offering yield is a natural step towards building a modern and efficient financial system that benefits everyday users and supports innovation. For instance, companies like Coinbase, which have earned $355 million from stablecoins in Q3 2025 alone, see yield as critical to their business.

Traditional banks, however, see this as a serious threat and warn that $6.6 trillion from deposits could be drained from savings accounts.

Various other points of concern

Another major issue is the Federal Reserve’s proposed “skinny” master account system, which would give some crypto firms limited access to central bank services under strict conditions.

Crypto companies say the access is too limited to support real growth and stability. Banks, meanwhile, warn that even restricted access could open the door too quickly.

As a result, the proposal fails to satisfy either side, making compromise difficult.

Past meetings and their impact on the crypto market

History shows that policy delays have often triggered sharp market reactions. Last week itself, after the 02 February meeting, the total crypto market’s value dropped from $2.64 trillion to $2.54 trillion in a very short time.

Another major shock followed on 15 January when the Senate Banking Committee suddenly canceled its vote on the CLARITY Act.

Needless to say, the market reacted almost instantly, with crypto prices falling by about 7.5% within minutes and wiping out billions of dollars in value.

On the other hand, when lawmakers reach an agreement, the market also recovers quickly. A strong example is the GENIUS Act, signed on 18 July 2025. It sparked a bullish rally and pushed many altcoins up by nearly 12% in just one week.

Is the market on edge right now?

At present, the market is once again waiting to see what happens next. Even before the meeting concludes, stress is already visible across the crypto market.

The sentiment was well reflected by an X user who said,

Fears of a possible ban on stablecoin interest have weakened investor confidence too. As a result, the total crypto market value fell to $2.36 trillion in a single day – A decline of 1.65%.

Bitcoin [BTC] has also struggled on the charts, trading near $69,132 at press time. Ethereum [ETH] seems to be following the same trend too, dropping to around $2,040 on the back of high traders’ anxiety.

And yet, despite the recent bouts of depreciation, analysts are not calling this a major crash. Instead, they see investors actively reducing risk and shifting into a more defensive position


Final Thoughts

  • The fight over stablecoin yield is really a fight over who gets to shape the next financial system.
  • Markets are reacting not to decisions, but to uncertainty caused by repeated delays and unfinished negotiations.

Crypto di tendenza

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the main topic of the White House meeting on February 10th?

AThe main topic is to resolve the long-running deadlock over the CLARITY Act, with a central focus on the issue of interest-paying stablecoins.

QWhy do traditional banks view interest-paying stablecoins as a threat?

ATraditional banks warn that interest-paying stablecoins could drain $6.6 trillion from savings accounts, posing a serious threat to their deposit base.

QWhat was the market reaction to the Senate Banking Committee canceling its vote on the CLARITY Act on January 15th?

AThe market reacted almost instantly, with crypto prices falling by about 7.5% within minutes, wiping out billions of dollars in value.

QWhat is the Federal Reserve's proposed 'skinny' master account system?

AIt is a proposed system that would give some crypto firms limited access to central bank services, but under strict conditions that both crypto companies and traditional banks find unsatisfactory.

QHow did the market perform in the lead-up to the February 10th meeting?

AThe market was under stress, with the total crypto market value falling 1.65% to $2.36 trillion in a single day due to weakened investor confidence and fears of a possible ban on stablecoin interest.

Letture associate

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

This article explains the three primary methods for Codex to interact with a computer, each with distinct use cases, permission boundaries, and trust levels. **1. Computer Use:** This offers the broadest access, allowing Codex to visually control and interact with the graphical user interface of authorized macOS/Windows apps, system settings, and even iOS simulators. It's ideal for tasks lacking APIs or structured tools, such as operating legacy software or multi-app workflows. However, it's the slowest method and has the widest permission scope, requiring careful supervision for sensitive actions. **2. Chrome Extension:** This grants Codex access to the user's logged-in Chrome browser state, including cookies, profiles, and open tabs. It's best for tasks requiring user identity across websites like Gmail, LinkedIn, Salesforce, or internal dashboards. Its key advantage is multi-tab control for complex workflows. While more powerful for browser-based tasks than Computer Use, it carries higher sensitivity as actions are performed under the user's identity. **3. In-App Browser:** This is a browser isolated within the Codex thread, separate from the user's personal browsing data. It excels in web development and debugging scenarios—previewing local servers, testing responsive layouts, or annotating designs directly on the page. Its isolation is a strength for development but a limitation for tasks requiring login sessions. The core principle is to choose the narrowest, safest, and most structured interface for the task. Use plugins or MCPs first, resort to visual control (Computer Use) only for GUI-dependent tasks, employ the Chrome extension for identity-reliant browser work, and prefer the In-App Browser for isolated development. **Appshots** are clarified as a fourth, complementary tool for *inputting* context—capturing a screenshot of a window to point Codex to something—rather than a method for Codex to *act*. Together, this layered approach highlights a key to AI agent productization: not granting unlimited permissions, but constraining them within clear boundaries for specific tasks while preserving user oversight.

marsbit10 min fa

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

marsbit10 min fa

The "Iron Rule" of Chip Equipment Is Being Broken

For years, the semiconductor equipment industry followed an unwritten "iron rule": suppliers offered steep discounts for new tool introductions (Design-in) and faced consistent price pressure during repeat orders, especially during market downturns. This long-standing buyer's market dynamic is now being upended. Recently, SK Hynix's primary equipment suppliers have reportedly requested a 3-4% price *increase*, a nearly unprecedented move. This shift is driven by a severe supply-demand imbalance fueled by the AI compute boom. Securing equipment has become an urgent arms race as chipmakers' expansion speed dictates their ability to fulfill massive AI chip orders. Key areas feeling the strain include: **TCB (Thermal Compression Bonding) Equipment:** Demand is exploding, driven by the simultaneous needs of HBM4 memory stacking, AI chip Chip-on-Substrate (C2S), and logic Chiplet Chip-on-Wafer (C2W) packaging. Players like Hanmi Semiconductor, Hanwha Semitech, and ASMPT are receiving major orders. While hybrid bonding is seen as the future, TCB remains the pragmatic choice for HBM4 mass production, with its lifecycle extended by relaxed specifications and ongoing technological upgrades. **Test Equipment Bottlenecks:** Ironically, AI-driven shortages are now crippling test equipment manufacturing. Critical components like FPGAs, Driver ICs, and CPUs face severe shortages and extended lead times (up to 52 weeks for FPGAs), as AI data center and server vendors prioritize supply. This creates a paradoxical cycle: AI chip shortages drive fab expansion, which requires more test equipment, whose production is delayed because its key parts are diverted to make AI chips. The industry is entering a broad, AI-powered upcycle. SEMI forecasts global semiconductor equipment sales to hit a record $156 billion by 2027, fueled by investment in advanced logic/foundry, HBM-driven DRAM, and advanced packaging (like CoWoS). Major players like TSMC, SK Hynix, and Micron are aggressively ramping capital expenditure. In conclusion, leading equipment vendors are no longer just selling tools; they are selling the critical capability to deliver AI-era capacity. Pricing power is shifting decisively to those with indispensable technology in key process nodes like advanced logic, HBM, and advanced packaging, rewriting the industry's traditional power structure.

marsbit23 min fa

The "Iron Rule" of Chip Equipment Is Being Broken

marsbit23 min fa

Trading

Spot
Futures

Articoli Popolari

Come comprare HOUSE

Benvenuto in HTX.com! Abbiamo reso l'acquisto di Housecoin (HOUSE) semplice e conveniente. Segui la nostra guida passo passo per intraprendere il tuo viaggio nel mondo delle criptovalute.Step 1: Crea il tuo Account HTXUsa la tua email o numero di telefono per registrarti il tuo account gratuito su HTX. Vivi un'esperienza facile e sblocca tutte le funzionalità,Crea il mio accountStep 2: Vai in Acquista crypto e seleziona il tuo metodo di pagamentoCarta di credito/debito: utilizza la tua Visa o Mastercard per acquistare immediatamente HousecoinHOUSE.Bilancio: Usa i fondi dal bilancio del tuo account HTX per fare trading senza problemi.Terze parti: abbiamo aggiunto metodi di pagamento molto utilizzati come Google Pay e Apple Pay per maggiore comodità.P2P: Fai trading direttamente con altri utenti HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): Offriamo servizi su misura e tassi di cambio competitivi per i trader.Step 3: Conserva Housecoin (HOUSE)Dopo aver acquistato Housecoin (HOUSE), conserva nel tuo account HTX. In alternativa, puoi inviare tramite trasferimento blockchain o scambiare per altre criptovalute.Step 4: Scambia Housecoin (HOUSE)Scambia facilmente Housecoin (HOUSE) nel mercato spot di HTX. Accedi al tuo account, seleziona la tua coppia di trading, esegui le tue operazioni e monitora in tempo reale. Offriamo un'esperienza user-friendly sia per chi ha appena iniziato che per i trader più esperti.

287 Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2025.04.27Aggiornato il 2026.06.02

Come comprare HOUSE

Discussioni

Benvenuto nella Community HTX. Qui puoi rimanere informato sugli ultimi sviluppi della piattaforma e accedere ad approfondimenti esperti sul mercato. Le opinioni degli utenti sul prezzo di HOUSE HOUSE sono presentate come di seguito.

活动图片