Weakened Dollar and Crypto Market to be Tested Following a Lost Grip

TheNewsCryptoPubblicato 2026-02-11Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-02-11

Introduzione

The US Dollar is weakening against major currencies like the Japanese Yen and Australian Dollar ahead of key employment data release on Wednesday. USD/JPY fell 0.75% to 153.4810 while USD/AUD dropped 0.54% to 1.4058. The crypto market declined 2.76% overall, with a total market cap of $2.28 trillion. Major losses were seen across all segments, with BNB dropping 5.49%, meme coins TRUMP and BONK falling 4.75% and 3.64% respectively, and AI token TAO plunging 6.34%. Both markets face testing factors including upcoming US employment and inflation data scheduled for Wednesday and Friday, which will be crucial indicators for market direction.

The US Dollar (USD) is feeling the pressure against some of the major currencies, like Japanese Yen (JPY) and Australian Dollar (AUD). This comes ahead of employment data, which is scheduled to be rolled out on Wednesday.

Meanwhile, the crypto market is seeing major dips across every segment – AI, meme, etc. It remains to be seen if the US Dollar and the crypto market stand the test.

US Dollar Weakens

The US Dollar has lost 0.75% against JPY and 0.54% against AUD. USD/JPY stands at 153.4810 while USD/AUD is at 1.4058. Notably, JPY was speculated to go the other way ahead; however, elections over the weekend defied most of it to strengthen Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s hold over her policies.

It was earlier reported that the Chinese Yuan gained strength against the US Dollar. The US currency is also down against the Swiss franc by 0.25% at 0.7659. The New Zealand Dollar gained 0.2% against $0.6054. The US Dollar Index currently stands at 96.626, down from 97.846 as reported last week.

Crypto Market Down

The crypto market, in its entirety, is down by 2.76% in terms of market cap. The value is $2.28 trillion on paper with a single-digit FGI of 9 points. All top-10 tokens, excluding stablecoins, have lost at least 2% of their respective values. BNB has lost the most. It has shed 5.49% over the last 24 hours, and is now trading at $592.29.

The situation is the same across the meme coin segment, with TRUMP and BONK recording the highest losses among the top meme coins. TRUMP is down by 4.75% while BONK has lost 3.64% of its value.

TAO, an AI token, is possibly leading the charge as it has plunged by 6.34% during the same time line. It is now exchanging hands at $147.09.

Testing Factors

Factors that would possibly test the US Dollar and the crypto market are upcoming US Jan 2026 employment and inflation data, scheduled to be rolled out on Wednesday and Friday, respectively.

According to a report by Reuters, markets are pricing an easing of 60 bps by the end of this year, that is 2026. What’s still on the toe is retail sales along with labor costs, as the former slowed in December 2025 and the latter in the fourth quarter.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Into The Cryptoverse Founder Takes a Dig at Meme Coins as Segment Shows Decline

TagsCrypto MarketDollar

Domande pertinenti

QWhat are the two major currencies against which the US Dollar is feeling pressure?

AThe US Dollar is feeling pressure against the Japanese Yen (JPY) and the Australian Dollar (AUD).

QWhat is the current value of the US Dollar Index mentioned in the article?

AThe US Dollar Index currently stands at 96.626.

QWhich top-10 cryptocurrency (excluding stablecoins) lost the most value in the last 24 hours and by what percentage?

ABNB lost the most value, shedding 5.49% over the last 24 hours.

QWhat are the two key economic data releases scheduled for the week that will test the markets?

AThe upcoming US employment data (scheduled for Wednesday) and inflation data (scheduled for Friday) for January 2026 are the key releases.

QAccording to the Reuters report cited, how much easing are markets pricing in by the end of the year (2026)?

AMarkets are pricing an easing of 60 bps (basis points) by the end of 2026.

Letture associate

Borrowing Money from a Hundred Years Later, Building Incomprehensible AI

Tech giants like Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, and Microsoft are undergoing a radical financial transformation due to AI. Their traditional "light-asset, high-free-cash-flow" model is being dismantled by staggering capital expenditures on AI infrastructure—data centers, GPUs, and power. Combined 2026 guidance exceeds $700 billion, a 4.5x increase from 2022, causing free cash flow to plummet (e.g., Amazon's fell 95%). To fund this, they are borrowing unprecedented sums through long-dated, multi-currency bonds (e.g., Alphabet's 100-year bond). The world's most conservative capital—pensions, insurers—is now funding Silicon Valley's most speculative bet. This shift makes these companies resemble heavy-asset industrials (railroads, utilities) rather than software firms, threatening their premium valuations. Historically, such infrastructure booms (railroads, fiber optics) followed a pattern: genuine technology, overbuilding fueled by competitive frenzy, aggressive debt financing, and a crash triggered by financial conditions—not technology failure. The infrastructure remained, but many original builders and financiers did not survive. The core gamble is a "time arbitrage": using cheap debt today to build scale and lock in customers before AI capabilities commoditize. They are betting that AI revenue will materialize before debt comes due. Their positions vary: Amazon is under immediate cash pressure; Meta's path to monetization is unclear; Alphabet has a robust core business buffer; Microsoft has the shortest path from infrastructure to revenue. The contract is set: the most risk-averse global capital has lent its time to Silicon Valley, awaiting a future that is promised but uncertain.

marsbit27 min fa

Borrowing Money from a Hundred Years Later, Building Incomprehensible AI

marsbit27 min fa

The 'VVV' Concept Soars 9x in Half a Year, The New AI Narrative on Base Chain

"The article explores the 'VVV' concept as the new AI-focused narrative within the Base ecosystem, centered around the token $VVV of the privacy-focused, uncensored generative AI platform Venice, led by crypto veteran Erik Voorhees. Venice has seen significant growth in 2026, with its API users surging, partly attributed to exposure from OpenClaw. The platform now boasts over 2 million total users and 55,000 paid subscribers. Correspondingly, the $VVV token price has risen over 9x this year. Key to its performance are tokenomics designed for value accrual: reduced annual emissions, subscription revenue used for buyback-and-burn, and a unique staking mechanism. Staking $VVV yields $sVVV, which can be used to mint $DIEM tokens. Each staked $DIEM provides a daily $1 credit for using Venice's API services, creating tangible utility. The article also highlights other tokens associated with the 'VVV' narrative. $POD, the token of distributed AI network Dolphin (which co-developed Venice's default AI model), saw a massive price surge. $cyb3rwr3n, a project for a Venice credit auction market, gained attention due to perceived connections to Venice's team despite official denials. Finally, $SR of robotics platform STRIKEROBOT.AI rose after announcing a partnership with Venice for robot vision-language model development. Overall, the 'VVV' ecosystem combines AI platform growth, deflationary tokenomics, and innovative utility mechanisms, driving significant investor interest and price action in related tokens."

marsbit36 min fa

The 'VVV' Concept Soars 9x in Half a Year, The New AI Narrative on Base Chain

marsbit36 min fa

Anthropic and OpenAI Have Single-Handedly Severed the Logic of Pre-IPO Stock Tokenization

The pre-IPO stock token market is experiencing significant turmoil following strong statements from AI giants Anthropic and OpenAI. Both companies have updated their official policies, declaring that any transfer of their company shares—including sales, transfers, or assignments of share interests—without prior board approval is "invalid" and will not be recognized in their corporate records. This means buyers in such unauthorized transactions would not be recognized as shareholders and would have no shareholder rights. A major point of contention is the use of Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs), which are legal entities commonly used by pre-IPO token platforms to pool investor funds and indirectly acquire shares from employees or early investors. The companies explicitly state they do not permit SPVs to acquire their shares, and any such transfer violates their restrictions. They warn that third parties selling shares through SPVs, direct sales, forward contracts, or stock tokens are likely engaged in fraud or are offering worthless investments due to these transfer limits. This stance directly threatens the core model of many pre-IPO token platforms, which rely on SPV structures. The announcement revealed additional risks within this model, such as complex "SPV-within-SPV" layering that obscures legal transparency, increases management fees, and creates a chain reaction risk of invalidation. Following the news, tokens like ANTHROPIC and OPENAI on platforms like PreStocks fell sharply (over 20%). The market reaction highlights a divergence: while asset-backed pre-IPO tokens plummeted, purely speculative pre-IPO futures contracts, which are bilateral bets on future IPO prices with no claim to actual shares, remained relatively stable as they are unaffected by the transfer restrictions. The industry is split on the implications. Some believe the fundamental logic of pre-IPO token trading is broken if leading companies reject SPV-held shares, potentially causing a domino effect. Others, like Rivet founder Nick Abouzeid, argue that buyers of such unofficial tokens always knowingly accepted the risk of non-recognition by the company. The statements serve as a stark risk warning and a corrective measure for a market where valuations for some AI-related pre-IPO tokens had soared to irrational levels, far exceeding recent funding round valuations.

marsbit1 h fa

Anthropic and OpenAI Have Single-Handedly Severed the Logic of Pre-IPO Stock Tokenization

marsbit1 h fa

Anthropic and OpenAI Personally Sever the Logic of Pre-IPO Crypto-Stocks

The pre-IPO token market has been rocked by strong statements from Anthropic and OpenAI. Both AI giants have updated official warnings, declaring that any sale or transfer of their company shares without explicit board approval is "invalid" and will not be recognized on their corporate records. This directly targets Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs), the common legal structure used by pre-IPO token platforms. These platforms typically use an SPV to acquire shares from employees or early investors, then issue blockchain-based tokens representing a claim on the SPV's economic benefits. Anthropic and OpenAI's position means that if an SPV's share purchase lacked authorization, the underlying asset could be deemed worthless, nullifying the token's value. Anthropic explicitly warned that any third party selling its shares—via direct sales, forwards, or tokens—is likely fraudulent or offering a valueless investment. The crackdown highlights risks in the popular SPV model, including complex multi-layered "Russian doll" SPV structures that obscure legal ownership, add fees, and concentrate risk. If one layer is invalidated, the entire chain could collapse. Following the announcements, tokens like ANTHROPIC and OPENAI on platforms like PreStocks fell sharply (over 20%). In contrast, purely speculative pre-IPO prediction contracts remained stable, as they involve no actual share ownership. The move is seen as a corrective measure amid a market frenzy where some pre-IPO token valuations (e.g., Anthropic's token hitting a $1.4 trillion implied valuation) far exceeded recent official funding rounds. Opinions are split: some believe this undermines the core logic of pre-IPO token trading if top companies reject SPVs, while others argue buyers always assumed this legal risk when accessing unofficial channels. The statements serve as a stark warning and a potential catalyst for market de-leveraging and clearer boundaries.

Odaily星球日报1 h fa

Anthropic and OpenAI Personally Sever the Logic of Pre-IPO Crypto-Stocks

Odaily星球日报1 h fa

The Waged Worker Driven to Poverty by AI Subscriptions

"AI Membership: The Hidden Cost Pushing Workers Toward 'Poverty'" The widespread corporate push for AI adoption is creating a hidden financial burden for employees. Companies, from giants like Alibaba to small firms, are mandating AI use, often tying token consumption to KPIs, but frequently refuse to cover the costs. Workers are forced to pay for subscriptions out of pocket to stay competitive and avoid being replaced. Front-end developer Long Shen spends up to 2000 RMB monthly on tools like Cursor and ChatGPT Plus, seeing it as a necessary 3% salary investment to handle 90% of his coding tasks. While it boosted his performance and led to promotions, he now faces idle time at work, pretending to be busy. Designer Peng Peng navigates strict company firewalls by using personal devices and accounts for AI image generation tools like Midjourney, spending hundreds monthly without reimbursement, while her boss demands faster, more numerous revisions. The pressure creates workplace anxiety and suspicion. Programmer Li Huahua, after a friend's experience of raised KPIs following AI success, fears being branded a "traitor" for using it yet worries about falling behind if she doesn't. The dynamic allows management to demand results without understanding the tools or covering expenses, treating employees like AI "agents." While some, like entrepreneur Jin Tu, find high value in paid AI, building entire systems and winning competitions, for most, it's a trap. Free tools like Kimi and Doubao are introducing fees, closing off alternatives. The initial efficiency gains individual advantage, but as AI becomes ubiquitous, the personal edge disappears, workloads increase, and a cycle of dependency begins. Workers like Long Shen realize they cannot maintain AI-generated code without AI, making stopping harder than continuing to pay. The tool promising liberation is instead becoming a compulsory, costly chain in the modern workplace.

marsbit2 h fa

The Waged Worker Driven to Poverty by AI Subscriptions

marsbit2 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片