VIRTUAL falls 12% – But THIS group of buyers could change everything

ambcryptoPubblicato 2026-03-01Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-03-01

Introduzione

VIRTUAL token fell 12% in 24 hours, extending its weekly losses to 11% amid a broader crypto market downturn. The derivatives market saw a significant capital exit of $9.4 million, with a deeply negative funding rate indicating intense short positioning. However, a key group of spot buyers accumulated approximately $245,000 worth of VIRTUAL during the decline, suggesting confidence in its medium-term prospects and potentially cushioning further downside. Despite this accumulation, on-chain metrics weakened, with user activity and protocol revenue declining sharply. The asset's next major move will likely be determined by this tug-of-war between bearish derivatives traders and accumulating spot investors.

VIRTUAL entered the weekend under pressure as the broader crypto market slipped. The token fell 12% in 24 hours, extending weekly losses to 11%.

The setup suggested limited room for an immediate rebound. Short-term positioning intensified as sentiment weakened across the market. That shift kept downside risks elevated.

Capital pullback intensifies

The latest price decline coincided with a decline in capital inflows and an increase in short dominance, as conditions in the perpetual futures market shifted sharply.

At the time of writing, Virtuals Protocol [VIRTUAL] perpetual market recorded a substantial capital exit totaling $9.4 million, reducing total open interest to approximately $76 million.

Importantly, forced liquidations remained limited. Liquidations totaled roughly $431,000, meaning most traders closed positions voluntarily.

This distinction is critical.

Data from the OI-Weighted Funding Rate dropped to -0.0411% on the 28th of February. That marked its lowest reading of the year.

Such deeply negative Funding Rates indicated aggressive short positioning. The last comparable short concentration appeared in October 2025, just before a sharp downturn.

That history kept sentiment fragile.

No panic yet among spot investors

Despite Derivatives traders leaning bearish, spot investors appear relatively composed. Instead of exiting, they are treating the decline as a potential accumulation opportunity.

At the time of this report, Spot buyers had accumulated approximately $245,000 worth of VIRTUAL while prices were falling, suggesting confidence in the asset’s medium-term prospects.

This marks the first notable accumulation phase since the 24th of February, making the shift in spot behavior particularly noteworthy.

If this buying pattern continues into the new week, it could cushion further downside pressure and support a rebound from the recent drawdown.

On-chain activity weakens

On-chain metrics, however, paint a more cautious picture. VIRTUAL has recorded a simultaneous decline in both user activity and protocol revenue.

According to data from Artemis, user count has dropped to roughly 24,000, while revenue has fallen to around $32,000. This represents a sharp decline from the $133,000 recorded on the 14th of February.

This weakening activity underscores structural concerns.

Reduced user engagement and falling revenue suggest softer on-chain demand, which could weigh on VIRTUAL’s long-term price performance if the trend persists.

In the near term, the tug-of-war between aggressive short positioning and renewed spot accumulation will likely determine the asset’s next major move.


Final Summary

  • VIRTUAL fell 12% in 24 hours, extending weekly losses to 11%.
  • Open Interest dropped by $9.4 million, signaling capital exit from derivatives markets.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat was the percentage decline of VIRTUAL token in 24 hours and what were its weekly losses?

AVIRTUAL fell 12% in 24 hours, extending weekly losses to 11%.

QHow much capital exited the VIRTUAL perpetual market and what was the resulting total open interest?

AThe VIRTUAL perpetual market recorded a capital exit totaling $9.4 million, reducing total open interest to approximately $76 million.

QWhat did the OI-Weighted Funding Rate dropping to -0.0411% indicate about market positioning?

AThe deeply negative Funding Rate of -0.0411% indicated aggressive short positioning by derivatives traders.

QDespite the bearish derivatives market, what action did spot investors take according to the report?

ASpot investors treated the decline as an accumulation opportunity, buying approximately $245,000 worth of VIRTUAL while prices were falling.

QWhat on-chain metrics showed a decline, suggesting structural concerns for VIRTUAL?

AOn-chain user count dropped to roughly 24,000 and protocol revenue fell to around $32,000, a sharp decline from the $133,000 recorded on February 14th.

Letture associate

Arbitrum Pretends to Be the Hacker, 'Steals' Back the Money Lost by KelpDAO

Title: Arbitrum Poses as Hacker to Recover Stolen Funds from KelpDAO Last week, KelpDAO suffered a hack resulting in nearly $300 million in losses, marking the largest DeFi security incident this year. Approximately 30,765 ETH (worth over $70 million) remained on an Arbitrum address controlled by the attacker. In an unprecedented move, Arbitrum’s Security Council utilized its emergency authority to upgrade the Inbox bridge contract, adding a function that allowed them to impersonate the hacker’s address and initiate a transfer without access to its private key. The council’s action, approved by 9 of its 12 members, moved the stolen ETH to a frozen address in a single transaction before reverting the contract to its original state. The operation was coordinated with law enforcement, which attributed the attack to North Korea’s Lazarus Group. Community reactions are divided: some praise the recovery of funds, while others question the centralization of power, as the council can upgrade core contracts without governance votes. However, such emergency mechanisms are common among major L2s. Despite the partial recovery, over $292 million was stolen in total, with more than $100 million in bad debt on Aave and remaining funds scattered across other chains. The incident highlights escalating security challenges in DeFi, with state-sponsored hackers employing advanced tactics and L2s responding with elevated countermeasures.

marsbit4 min fa

Arbitrum Pretends to Be the Hacker, 'Steals' Back the Money Lost by KelpDAO

marsbit4 min fa

iQiyi Is Too Impatient

The article "iQiyi Is Too Impatient" discusses the controversy surrounding the Chinese streaming platform IQiyi's recent announcement of an "AI Actor Library" during its 2026 World Conference. IQiyi claimed over 100 actors, including well-known names like Zhang Ruoyun and Yu Hewei, had joined the initiative. CEO Gong Yu suggested AI could enable actors to "star in 14 dramas a year instead of 4" and that "live-action filming might become a world cultural heritage." The announcement quickly sparked backlash. Multiple actors named in the list issued urgent statements denying they had signed any AI-related authorization agreements. This forced IQiyi to clarify that inclusion in the library only indicated a willingness to *consider* AI projects, with separate negotiations required for any specific role. The incident, which trended on social media with hashtags like "IQiyi is crazy," is presented as a sign of the company's growing desperation. Facing intense competition from short-video platforms like Douyin and Kuaishou, as well as Bilibili and Xiaohongshu, IQiyi's financial performance has weakened, with revenues declining for two consecutive years. The author argues that IQiyi is "too impatient" to tell a compelling AI story to reassure the market, especially as it pursues a listing on the Hong Kong stock exchange. The piece concludes by outlining three key "AI questions" IQiyi must answer: defining its role as a tool provider versus a content creator, balancing the "coldness" of AI with the human element audiences desire, and properly managing the interests of platforms, actors, and viewers. The core dilemma is that while AI can reduce costs and increase efficiency, it risks creating homogenized, formulaic content and devaluing human performers.

marsbit58 min fa

iQiyi Is Too Impatient

marsbit58 min fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片