iQiyi Is Too Impatient

marsbitPubblicato 2026-04-21Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-04-21

Introduzione

The article "iQiyi Is Too Impatient" discusses the controversy surrounding the Chinese streaming platform IQiyi's recent announcement of an "AI Actor Library" during its 2026 World Conference. IQiyi claimed over 100 actors, including well-known names like Zhang Ruoyun and Yu Hewei, had joined the initiative. CEO Gong Yu suggested AI could enable actors to "star in 14 dramas a year instead of 4" and that "live-action filming might become a world cultural heritage." The announcement quickly sparked backlash. Multiple actors named in the list issued urgent statements denying they had signed any AI-related authorization agreements. This forced IQiyi to clarify that inclusion in the library only indicated a willingness to *consider* AI projects, with separate negotiations required for any specific role. The incident, which trended on social media with hashtags like "IQiyi is crazy," is presented as a sign of the company's growing desperation. Facing intense competition from short-video platforms like Douyin and Kuaishou, as well as Bilibili and Xiaohongshu, IQiyi's financial performance has weakened, with revenues declining for two consecutive years. The author argues that IQiyi is "too impatient" to tell a compelling AI story to reassure the market, especially as it pursues a listing on the Hong Kong stock exchange. The piece concludes by outlining three key "AI questions" IQiyi must answer: defining its role as a tool provider versus a content creator, balancing the "coldness...

By New Product Insight Finance, Author|Wu Wenwu

After iQiyi launched its AI artist library, multiple artists quickly denied signing any AI-related authorizations, sparking heated discussions. Behind this, iQiyi, which is frantically pushing its new AI narrative, is clearly too impatient.

01 “iQiyi Is Crazy” Trends on Hot Search

At the 2026 iQiyi World Conference held on April 20, iQiyi officially announced the launch of its "AI Artist Library," with over a hundred artists already onboard. Names like Zhang Ruoyun, Yu Hewei, Wang Churan, and Li Yitong appeared on the big screen list.

iQiyi founder and CEO Gong Yu, in his speech, made remarks such as "AI can help actors go from acting in 4 dramas a year to 14, giving everyone more time to rest" and "in the future, live-action filming might become a world cultural heritage," which further fueled the discussion.

Several topics related to iQiyi quickly trended on hot searches, with the topic "iQiyi Is Crazy" even reaching the number one spot on Weibo's hot search list that day, drawing widespread attention and discussion.

However, iQiyi was quickly contradicted. After the list was released, multiple artists including Zhang Ruoyun, Yu Hewei, and Wang Churan urgently issued statements clearly denying having signed any AI-related authorizations. For example, Zhang Ruoyun's studio was the first to state that they had not signed any AI-related authorization and that their legal team was handling the matter urgently.

iQiyi officials had to quickly respond, stating that joining the iQiyi Nado Pro Artist Library indicates the artist's willingness to engage in AI film and television projects, but participation in any specific project or role requires separate negotiation and authorization.

iQiyi wants to build an AI artist library to provide a standardized platform for AIGC creators, making it easier for them to select artists and efficiently communicate collaboration details through iQiyi with the artists' representatives.

From the artists' perspective, being aware of such a matter but not having signed an authorization agreement is something that artists, who highly value their portrait rights, IP value, and commercial value, clearly cannot accept. It even touches their bottom line.

From the netizens' point of view, iQiyi's move is somewhat excessive. Some netizens commented that this seems like releasing the list first to pressure the artists into compliance. Others said the platform is treating actors as "consumables" without even a heads-up.

The incident also sparked discussions about the legal issues surrounding AI artists. Some lawyers reminded that an actor authorizing their image does not mean AI entities can freely use their likeness; portrait license agreements should clearly define the scope, duration, and manner of use.

From the perspectives of iQiyi, artists, users, and netizens, the considerations, usage points, value points, and impacts of AI are entirely different.

02 iQiyi Is Too Impatient

In recent years, talking about the long-form video platform iQiyi always evokes different images and opinions from the outside world.

For instance, whenever a hit TV series or web drama airs on iQiyi, it sparks discussions about iQiyi's ability to create hit shows and the commercial returns it brings.

However, more of the discussion we hear about iQiyi concerns how short video platforms like Douyin and Kuaishou have stolen users away, diverting user attention, especially with the popularity of micro-dramas, leading more people to abandon long-form video platforms.

According to the "China Network Audiovisual Development Research Report (2026)" released at the Network Audiovisual Conference in April 2026, the average daily time spent on micro-dramas was 129 minutes (December 2025).

iQiyi also faces competition from platforms like Bilibili and Xiaohongshu. "New Product Insight Finance" noted that many mid-to-long form videos on Bilibili now are not inferior to iQiyi in terms of category, quantity, and quality. Xiaohongshu is not just a content discovery platform; its short video content has also risen.

iQiyi's anxiety and pressure have long been directly reflected in its financial reports. According to iQiyi's financial report, for the full year 2025 ended December 31, 2025, the company's total revenue was 27.29 billion yuan, a year-on-year decrease of 6.62%, marking the second consecutive year of negative growth after a 7.97% drop in 2024.

Notably, regarding profit calculations, the non-GAAP operating profit was 640 million yuan, a significant drop of about 73% compared to 2.36 billion yuan in 2024; calculated according to US Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), iQiyi turned from profit to loss, with a net loss of 206 million yuan. In 2023, the company's net profit had peaked at 1.93 billion yuan.

In the fourth quarter, iQiyi's total revenue was 6.79 billion yuan, achieving both year-on-year and quarter-on-quarter growth. The non-GAAP operating profit was 140 million yuan.

Facing intense competitive pressure and realistic operational pressure, iQiyi urgently needs to tell a new story. As all internet companies are successively telling their AI stories, iQiyi, not wanting to be left behind, has begun to constantly push its new AI narrative.

In the second half of 2025, iQiyi targeted areas like AI micro-dramas, AI comic dramas, and AI children's animation. During the earnings conference call in February 2026, it introduced a C-end story: AI character interaction, the Tao Dou World where users and virtual stars/IP characters chat in real-time and co-create storylines, and personalized AI editing that automatically clips highlights, secondary creations, and mashup videos for users.

Then came iQiyi's latest release: the official launch of Nado Pro + 100 artists' AI digital avatars, which unexpectedly caused such a controversy.

iQiyi founder and CEO Gong Yu also stated that the goal is to have a commercial AI blockbuster by this summer, or at the latest, this autumn.

In the view of "New Product Insight Finance," AI has become iQiyi's current lowest-cost and fastest-acting storyline, hoping to tell a new story and find a new growth point to boost market confidence.

At the end of March this year, iQiyi announced it had submitted an application to the Hong Kong Stock Exchange in a confidential manner to advance its listing in Hong Kong. iQiyi now needs to tell a new story to the capital market even more.

Clearly, for various reasons, iQiyi is frantically pushing its new AI narrative, but it is obviously being too impatient.

Senior media personality Hu Xijin commented on the iQiyi AI artist library incident, saying, "iQiyi高调宣布117位演员签约AI影视艺人库,并表示未来真人实拍可能将成非遗,我个人感觉很吃惊。" (iQiyi高调 announced that 117 actors signed with the AI film and television artist library and stated that live-action filming might become intangible cultural heritage in the future. Personally, I was very surprised.). Hu also clearly stated, "爱奇艺过于急功近利了。" (iQiyi is too impatient for quick success and instant benefit.).

03 iQiyi's AI Considerations

This release of the AI artist library by iQiyi was originally intended to be a major move, but it unexpectedly led to denial statements from multiple artists and sparked extensive discussions about iQiyi and the broader context of AI in film and television.

Every technological update and iteration profoundly impacts the video industry and long-form video platforms like iQiyi. For example, the last shift was from the PC era to the internet, followed by the popularity of short videos impacting long-form videos, forcing iQiyi to respond.

The latest wave of AI technology has an even greater impact on film, television, video, and video platforms. iQiyi can only embrace AI and continuously tell its new AI stories.

The application of AI in film and television is an inevitable trend, but its use in the industry has distinctly contrasting A and B sides; it is a double-edged sword.

On one hand, AI technology can significantly reduce costs, optimize creative processes, and improve production efficiency. In film shooting and post-production editing, AI is a magical tool.

On the other hand, although AI technology has advanced noticeably and reached a stage where the "fake" can seem real, AI creation has become data-driven, modular, and formulaic.

For example, the AI short dramas flooding short video platforms are full of plots like domineering CEOs and reincarnation reversals. The stories and tropes are highly similar, even with the same script generating different AI versions, making them very homogeneous and assembly-line like.

Therefore, iQiyi's first consideration is whether it should launch more AI tools, become an AI platform, or become the protagonist of AI? Yangtze Evening News commented on this, saying, "iQiyi, you were meant to embrace AI, not become AI."

At least for now, AI remains an辅助技术手段和工具 (auxiliary technological means and tool). AI stories will become more diverse in the future and will continue to progress.

The second consideration for iQiyi is: cold AI versus the sense of real people, who do audiences prefer?

For a long-form video platform like iQiyi, its core competitiveness still lies in high-quality IP, strong production capabilities, and the ability to produce hit web dramas and TV series. The key to these works is the script, the actors' performances, and the viewing experience they provide to the audience.

If there is too much AI in the works, even the main characters become AI, then the cold sense of AI will only intensify.

Viewers, especially iQiyi members, will always care more about the sense of real people in an excellent work, as the emotional expression and changes of a character can never be replaced by AI.

iQiyi should adopt different strategies. For instance, it can heavily promote AI in works like AI micro-dramas, AI comic dramas, and AI movies, but producing a high-quality work with AI is not necessarily low cost.

iQiyi's third consideration is to balance the interests of multiple parties: the platform, artists, and audiences.

As mentioned earlier, from the perspective of different participants in iQiyi's release of the AI artist library, there are indeed different starting points and considerations. Particularly, how to gain artist acceptance is a key point. Of course, the most important point is still the audience's acceptance of AI works.

In 2025, after the AI-generated "actor" Tilly Norwood emerged, the US Screen Actors Guild, followed by European and Canadian actors' unions,相继表态“坚决反对用合成角色替代真人演员” (successively stated they "resolutely oppose using synthetic characters to replace real actors"). Some international consensus suggests that AI can be a tool, but not the protagonist, especially not at the cost of sacrificing the livelihoods of real people and artistic dignity.

If we zoom out to the entire long-form video industry, the considerations brought by AI mentioned above are not just iQiyi's alone; they are shared considerations for everyone.

References:

[1] "iQiyi Is Crazy"? CEO Gong Yu Responds, Zhang Ruoyun and Yu Hewei Issue Emergency Statements, Jiemian News

[2] "iQiyi Is Crazy", You Were Meant to Embrace AI, Not Become AI, Yangtze Evening News

[3] iQiyi Financial Report, iQiyi

(This article does not constitute any investment advice)

Crypto di tendenza

Domande pertinenti

QWhat was the main controversy surrounding iQiyi's announcement of its 'AI Actor Library'?

AThe main controversy was that multiple actors, including Zhang Ruoyun, Yu Hewei, and Wang Churan, quickly issued statements denying they had signed any AI-related authorization agreements, despite being listed as participants. This led to accusations that iQiyi was trying to pressure actors into compliance and sparked a debate about the legal and ethical use of AI in the entertainment industry.

QAccording to the article, what are the two-sided (AB) impacts of AI on the film and television industry?

AThe two-sided impacts are: 1) Positive: AI technology can significantly reduce costs, optimize the creative process, and improve production efficiency in filming and post-production editing. 2) Negative: AI creation can become data-driven, modular, and formulaic, leading to highly similar, homogeneous, and assembly-line-like content, as seen in the proliferation of similar AI short dramas on platforms.

QWhat financial pressure does iQiyi face, as mentioned in the article, that is driving its push for AI stories?

AiQiyi faced financial pressure with its total revenue for 2025 falling 6.62% year-over-year to 27.29 billion yuan, marking the second consecutive year of negative growth. Its non-GAAP operating profit plummeted by about 73% to 640 million yuan, and it reported a net loss of 206 million yuan under GAAP standards, a significant drop from a net profit of 1.93 billion yuan in 2023.

QWhat three 'thinking questions' or challenges does the article pose for iQiyi regarding its AI strategy?

AThe three thinking questions are: 1) Should iQiyi focus on developing more AI tools and being an AI platform, or should it try to become the main protagonist of AI itself? 2) How does iQiyi balance the appeal of cold AI against the 'living human feeling' that audiences prefer? 3) How can iQiyi balance the interests of the platform, actors, and viewers regarding the use of AI?

QHow did iQiyi's CEO, Gong Yu, contribute to the controversy with his statements at the iQiyi World Conference?

AGong Yu sparked further discussion by stating that 'AI can help actors go from acting in 4 dramas a year to 14 dramas, giving them more time to rest' and that 'live-action filming may become a world cultural heritage in the future.' These comments, alongside the AI Actor Library announcement, contributed to topics like 'iQiyi is crazy' trending number one on Weibo and intensified the public debate.

Letture associate

10,000 Scientists Get 1 Year of Free Access: OpenAI Brings the Scientific Research Pipeline into ChatGPT

OpenAI has launched the "ChatGPT for Academic Researchers" program, offering free one-year access to its flagship models for 100,000 university researchers globally, with 10,000 spots available this summer. Selected institutions include prestigious centers like ENS Paris and the IAS at Princeton. The initiative provides an integrated research workspace within ChatGPT, bundling tools like ChatGPT, ChatGPT Work, and Codex, along with expanded Deep Research capabilities, higher usage limits, and specialized tools for life sciences. The suite connects to platforms like Zotero and GitHub, aiming to streamline the entire research workflow from literature review and coding to data analysis and manuscript drafting. OpenAI notes that about 1.3 million people already use ChatGPT weekly for advanced science and math. The program targets building long-term user dependency by embedding these tools into daily research habits. However, access comes with limitations: it does not include API credits or model weights, and eligibility is restricted to verified academic researchers from supported countries. This approach contrasts with Anthropic's "AI for Science" program, which offers API credits but not an integrated workspace. Both companies emphasize preventing misuse by withholding model weights, a point of contention for AI researchers seeking transparency. The core strategy remains clear: provide a powerful, integrated environment to foster user reliance ahead of the post-free period.

marsbit4 min fa

10,000 Scientists Get 1 Year of Free Access: OpenAI Brings the Scientific Research Pipeline into ChatGPT

marsbit4 min fa

What's Going On with Gigadevice? Major Shareholder Cashes Out 44 Billion, Then Announces 20 Billion Buyback

Gigadevice Innovation, a leading Chinese memory chip company, has executed a controversial financial maneuver. The company's controlling shareholder and chairman, Zhu Yiming, sold approximately 44 billion RMB worth of his shares between early May and mid-June 2026, capitalizing on a soaring stock price that peaked at 846.66 RMB on June 29th. Following a subsequent stock crash—plummeting to around 350 RMB in 22 trading days and erasing over 330 billion RMB in market value—Zhu announced a combined "market rescue" plan on July 29th. This plan includes his personal commitment to buy back at least 1 billion RMB in shares and a company proposal to repurchase 1 to 2 billion RMB worth of stock. This sequence of high-selling followed by a low-buying plan has confused and unsettled many of the company's 240,000 retail investors. The stock's dramatic decline was attributed to several factors: the successful IPO of its sister company, Changxin Technologies, which ended Gigadevice's status as a primary investment proxy for the domestic memory sector; a Morgan Stanley report warning of a potential peak in the memory chip cycle; and a severe loss of market confidence triggered by the chairman's massive sell-off. While the sell-off was procedurally compliant, its timing has been criticized. The company's fundamentals appear strong, with preliminary H1 2026 results showing revenue up 177% year-on-year to 11.5 billion RMB and net profit skyrocketing 1099% to 6.9 billion RMB, driven by a boom in memory chips and MCU demand. However, a significant portion (2.05 billion RMB) of this profit came from non-recurring gains like securities investment, and the memory industry is notoriously cyclical. Analysts highlight the company's role in the domestic substitution of niche DRAM and NOR Flash memory, with some maintaining bullish price targets. Yet, the recent events underscore key risks: its fabless model creates dependency on foundries like Changxin, and the chairman's actions have raised serious questions about management's alignment with minority shareholders. The promised buybacks cannot commence until December 13th due to a mandatory six-month cooling-off period following an insider sale, leaving the stock vulnerable in the interim.

marsbit4 min fa

What's Going On with Gigadevice? Major Shareholder Cashes Out 44 Billion, Then Announces 20 Billion Buyback

marsbit4 min fa

Pi Network Price Forecast for August 2026: Will the August 11th Deadline Become a Catalyst for PI's Recovery?

Pi Network Price Forecast for August 2026: Will the August 11 Deadline Catalyze a Recovery? Pi Network (PI) traded at $0.0830 on July 30, up 1.13%, attempting to stabilize above its all-time low. The price is rebounding from the lower Bollinger Band around $0.07172. All key EMAs (20, 50, 100, 200-day) remain in a downtrend above the current price, with the 20-day EMA at $0.08810 acting as the first significant resistance level to confirm a recovery. August presents two key narratives. First, the Pi Core Team launched Protocol 26 with a hard deadline of August 11 for all node operators to upgrade; failure to do so results in disconnection. This is the final precursor to Protocol 27, a major technical upgrade planned for 2026. Second, a community debate challenges the widespread "GCV" (Global Consensus Value) concept, with a member stating there is no official GCV mechanism and that Mainnet apps price services independently. This could pressure price if holders selling on disillusionment. The 10-day price forecast table suggests a range of $0.072-$0.095 for early August amid Protocol 26 deadline pressure, $0.080-$0.110 in mid-August post-deadline clarity, and $0.085-$0.125 in late August, pending broader crypto market direction. The bullish case requires smooth Protocol 26 migration, clear Protocol 27 announcement, resolution of the GCV debate without major holder exits, and a close above the 20-day EMA. The bearish scenario involves node upgrade difficulties, GCV-related selling pressure, continued supply pressure from 775.8 million PI scheduled to unlock by December, and a fall back to or below the $0.07172 support zone.

cryptonews.ru28 min fa

Pi Network Price Forecast for August 2026: Will the August 11th Deadline Become a Catalyst for PI's Recovery?

cryptonews.ru28 min fa

Trading

Spot

Articoli Popolari

Come comprare AR

Benvenuto in HTX.com! Abbiamo reso l'acquisto di Arweave (AR) semplice e conveniente. Segui la nostra guida passo passo per intraprendere il tuo viaggio nel mondo delle criptovalute.Step 1: Crea il tuo Account HTXUsa la tua email o numero di telefono per registrarti il tuo account gratuito su HTX. Vivi un'esperienza facile e sblocca tutte le funzionalità,Crea il mio accountStep 2: Vai in Acquista crypto e seleziona il tuo metodo di pagamentoCarta di credito/debito: utilizza la tua Visa o Mastercard per acquistare immediatamente ArweaveAR.Bilancio: Usa i fondi dal bilancio del tuo account HTX per fare trading senza problemi.Terze parti: abbiamo aggiunto metodi di pagamento molto utilizzati come Google Pay e Apple Pay per maggiore comodità.P2P: Fai trading direttamente con altri utenti HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): Offriamo servizi su misura e tassi di cambio competitivi per i trader.Step 3: Conserva Arweave (AR)Dopo aver acquistato Arweave (AR), conserva nel tuo account HTX. In alternativa, puoi inviare tramite trasferimento blockchain o scambiare per altre criptovalute.Step 4: Scambia Arweave (AR)Scambia facilmente Arweave (AR) nel mercato spot di HTX. Accedi al tuo account, seleziona la tua coppia di trading, esegui le tue operazioni e monitora in tempo reale. Offriamo un'esperienza user-friendly sia per chi ha appena iniziato che per i trader più esperti.

675 Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2024.12.11Aggiornato il 2026.06.02

Come comprare AR

Discussioni

Benvenuto nella Community HTX. Qui puoi rimanere informato sugli ultimi sviluppi della piattaforma e accedere ad approfondimenti esperti sul mercato. Le opinioni degli utenti sul prezzo di AR AR sono presentate come di seguito.

活动图片