Vietnam Opens Crypto Exchange Licensing as Pilot Goes Live

TheNewsCryptoPubblicato 2026-01-22Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-01-22

Introduzione

Vietnam has officially opened the licensing process for cryptocurrency exchanges, accepting applications from January 20, 2026, as part of a state-led pilot program to regulate the crypto market. This move, enabled by recent legal frameworks including the Law on the Digital Technology Industry, recognizes crypto as property but not legal tender, maintaining a ban on its use for payments. Despite the launch, no exchanges have been approved yet. About ten securities firms and banks—including SSI Securities, VIX Securities, and major banks like Military Bank—have announced plans to apply but are still preparing infrastructure pending regulatory clearance. Vietnam’s framework is among Asia’s strictest, requiring licensed entities to be Vietnamese-owned with at least $380 million in capital, 65% institutional ownership, and a 49% foreign cap. The regime aims to shift the crypto market toward institutional control but limits entry to well-capitalized players.

Vietnam has officially begun the procedure of accepting applications for licenses to allow the trade of virtual assets, a procedure that has been viewed as a milestone step towards the launch of a long-awaited cryptocurrency market. The State Securities Commission of Vietnam (SSC) confirmed the move on Tuesday, stating that it will accept applications starting Jan. 20, 2026, as part of its wider plan to bring crypto under formal oversight.

The licensing window follows the release of updated administrative procedures under Decision No. 96 from Vietnam’s Ministry of Finance. The decision operationalizes an earlier resolution that laid the groundwork for piloting a regulated crypto asset market over a multi-year timeframe.

Vietnam activates its crypto pilot after years of planning

Vietnam’s new licensing phase also builds on the Law on the Digital Technology Industry, which took effect on Jan. 1, 2026. This law defines digital assets and crypto assets in statute for the first time, giving regulators a clearer legal foundation to supervise exchanges and trading platforms.

However, Vietnam still draws a hard line between recognition and payment use. While the country recognizes crypto assets as property, it does not classify them as legal tender. Regulators also maintain restrictions that prevent crypto from being used as an official payment method, reinforcing the government’s cautious approach.

Banks and brokerages prepare to enter the market

Even though the pilot now has a live licensing process, Vietnam has not yet confirmed any approved exchanges. In October 2025, the Ministry of Finance said no company had applied for participation in the five-year crypto pilot at the time due to strict requirements and high capital thresholds.

Now, with Wednesday’s report in Vietnam News that about 10 securities companies and banks have publicly announced plans to participate once regulators give the word on licensing.

These include SSI Securities, which launched SSI Digital in 2022, and VIX Securities, which invested in its exchange-focused unit VIXEX. Major banks such as Military Bank, Techcombank, and VPBank have also signaled interest.

Importantly, these institutions are not yet operating licensed trading platforms. Instead, they are preparing applications and internal infrastructure, planning to launch only after regulatory clearance.

No exchange approvals yet despite licensing launch

Despite the milestone, Vietnam has not announced that it has received or approved any applications since opening the window. That gap matters because it highlights that Vietnam is still in the early operational phase of the pilot, where paperwork begins, but enforcement and approvals may take time.

This also means market participants cannot yet assume that the licensing process will produce fast results, especially given the government’s cautious stance.

Vietnam enforces one of the region’s strictest frameworks

Vietnam’s crypto licensing framework ranks among the most restrictive in Asia. When the country launched its five-year crypto market pilot in September 2025, it introduced rules that sharply limit what exchanges and platforms can do.

Under the framework, applicants must be Vietnamese entities with a minimum paid-in capital of 10 trillion dong (about $380 million). Institutional shareholders must hold at least 65% of the capital, and foreign ownership cannot exceed 49%.

Vietnam also bans the issuance of digital assets backed by fiat currencies or securities, signaling that regulators want trading activity under strict control and without stablecoin-like structures inside the pilot.

If this regime is implemented by Vietnam successfully, then it has the ability to shift the market from informal participation to institution-led trading; however, the strict bar to licensing ensures that only major players with deep balance sheets can enter.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Strive Targets $150M Raise to Cut Debt and Buy More Bitcoin

TagsCryptoCrypto LawCrypto Marketdigital asset exchangeVietnam

Domande pertinenti

QWhen does Vietnam officially begin accepting applications for cryptocurrency exchange licenses?

AVietnam officially begins accepting applications for cryptocurrency exchange licenses starting January 20, 2026.

QWhat is the minimum paid-in capital requirement for entities applying for a crypto exchange license in Vietnam?

AApplicants must have a minimum paid-in capital of 10 trillion dong (approximately $380 million).

QHow does Vietnam's legal framework classify cryptocurrency assets?

AVietnam recognizes crypto assets as property but does not classify them as legal tender, and their use as an official payment method is restricted.

QWhat are the ownership restrictions for crypto exchanges under Vietnam's new framework?

AInstitutional shareholders must hold at least 65% of the capital, and foreign ownership cannot exceed 49%.

QWhich Vietnamese financial institutions have announced plans to participate in the crypto market pilot?

ASSI Securities (with SSI Digital), VIX Securities (with VIXEX), and major banks such as Military Bank, Techcombank, and VPBank have signaled interest.

Letture associate

U.S. Government Bans Foreign Nationals from Using Fable 5, Anthropic Issues Rebuttal

U.S. Government Bans Foreign Access to Fable 5, Anthropic Issues Rebuttal On June 12th, the U.S. government ordered AI company Anthropic to immediately suspend all foreign access—including foreign nationals within the U.S. and Anthropic's own foreign employees—to its newly released Fable 5 and Mythos 5 AI models, citing national security concerns. This forced Anthropic to temporarily disable access to both models for all users globally, as it cannot technically differentiate user nationality at scale. The models, released just three days prior, represent Anthropic's highest public capability tier. Fable 5 is the first publicly available model from the advanced "Mythos" family, while Mythos 5 is a less-restricted version for approved cybersecurity and critical infrastructure partners. The government's directive was reportedly triggered by claims from another company that it could "jailbreak" Mythos 5, raising alarm within the Trump administration. Anthropic, in a detailed public statement, strongly challenged this rationale. The company argues the demonstrated "jailbreak" is a narrow, non-generalized technique that merely involves identifying minor, known software vulnerabilities—a capability common to other publicly available models like OpenAI's GPT-5.5 and routinely used by cybersecurity defenders. Anthropic stated it has complied with the order but disagrees with the government's standard, warning that applying it industry-wide would halt all new frontier model deployments. The company criticized the lack of a transparent, fact-based legal process and expressed confidence the situation stems from a misunderstanding. It is working to restore access and will release more technical details within 24 hours. Other Anthropic models remain unaffected.

链捕手14 min fa

U.S. Government Bans Foreign Nationals from Using Fable 5, Anthropic Issues Rebuttal

链捕手14 min fa

The Revelation from the Raydium Theft Incident: New DeFi Vulnerabilities Lurking in Forgotten Old Contracts

**Raydium Exploit Reveals DeFi's Hidden Risk: Forgotten "Zombie" Contracts** A recent attack on Raydium's deprecated V3 AMM pools resulted in a loss of approximately $1.34 million. The hacker exploited pools that were no longer supported by Raydium's current UI or SDK but remained fully functional and accessible on-chain. This incident highlights a critical, often overlooked category of risk in DeFi: inactive or legacy smart contracts that projects fail to properly decommission. Since March 2025, there have been at least 8 publicly reported attacks targeting such abandoned contracts, with total losses around $10.8 million. Including older pools and deprecated features, the count rises to 10 incidents with roughly $22.5 million in losses. These "zombie contracts" represent a lifecycle management failure rather than a code vulnerability, yet they are typically misclassified under general "code bug" categories in security reports, masking the true scale of the problem. The root cause is that projects often merely document a contract as "deprecated" without taking essential technical steps to secure it: withdrawing remaining assets, disabling external call functions, and implementing ongoing monitoring. These forgotten, under-monitored components become prime targets for attackers. To address this, the industry needs to recognize "zombie contracts" as a distinct risk category and establish standardized decommissioning protocols. Essential steps should include: 1) a formal retirement announcement, 2) removal of all front-end integrations, 3) withdrawal of locked assets, 4) disabling key contract functions, 5) ongoing security monitoring, 6) clear user communication, and 7) a post-mortem analysis. The value of a DeFi project lies not only in its current TVL but also in the security of its historical codebase, which has now become a new attack surface.

Foresight News2 h fa

The Revelation from the Raydium Theft Incident: New DeFi Vulnerabilities Lurking in Forgotten Old Contracts

Foresight News2 h fa

Robots Begin to 'Consume Data': The Hidden Production Chain from Indian Data Factories to Billion-Dollar Humanoid Robots

Robots have started to 'consume data,' driving the formation of a new industrial supply chain focused on producing training data for embodied AI. Unlike large language models, which are trained on vast internet text corpora, embodied AI models face a 'data desert' in the physical world. This has created a massive demand for first-person perspective video data (Ego Data), captured by workers wearing cameras in places like Indian garment factories. Companies like Neocambrian AI are establishing 'data factories' where workers perform standardized tasks (e.g., sorting clothes, kitchen organization) to generate thousands of hours of video. Research, such as NVIDIA's EgoScale, demonstrates that scaling this human demonstration data predictably improves robot performance, particularly for dexterous manipulation. This has validated a training path combining large-scale human data for pre-training with smaller amounts of robot-specific data for fine-tuning. The value of different data types varies significantly, forming a 'data pyramid.' The base consists of low-cost, large-scale internet and Ego Data. Higher layers include more expensive motion-capture data (e.g., from data gloves), simulation/synthetic data, and the most costly and scarce layer: real robot teleoperation data. This demand has spawned a layered ecosystem of data suppliers: low-cost data factories, motion capture and alignment specialists, robot-native teleoperation service providers, simulation data companies, and platforms aiming for data standardization. Robot companies themselves are adopting a 'layered procurement' strategy: outsourcing generic Ego Data while building in-house capabilities for robot-specific adaptation data and the critical deployment/failure data generated in real-world applications. The industry is shifting focus from hardware and basic mobility to the data pipelines required for general-purpose capability. While parallels exist to data labeling companies like Scale AI in the LLM boom, the physical complexity of robot data—involving action success ambiguity and sim-to-real gaps—requires more integrated solutions for data collection, annotation, and a continuous feedback loop. The race is on to build the data engines that will teach robots to operate reliably in the unstructured real world.

marsbit4 h fa

Robots Begin to 'Consume Data': The Hidden Production Chain from Indian Data Factories to Billion-Dollar Humanoid Robots

marsbit4 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片