U.S. SEC Clarifies Rule 15c2‑11 Applies Only to Equity Securities

TheNewsCryptoPubblicato 2026-03-17Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-03-17

Introduzione

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has clarified that Rule 15c2-11 applies only to equity securities, not to other asset classes such as crypto-linked products. The rule aims to prevent manipulative and fraudulent trading in over-the-counter (OTC) equity markets and requires broker-dealers to gather and verify key information before quoting or maintaining a market for OTC securities. Commissioner Hester Peirce expressed support for the amendment, acknowledging that earlier amendments had created confusion regarding the rule’s scope. She encouraged public comments on the proposed revisions, particularly regarding the definition of equity securities, the rule’s applicability to crypto assets, and the establishment of expert markets. This clarification resolves previous uncertainty that led some brokers to halt crypto trading due to legal concerns. The move follows a recent SEC framework focused on developing a token taxonomy to categorize cryptocurrencies and determine their regulatory status.

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission proposes modifications to revise Exchange Act Rule 15c2-11, stating that the rule only applies to equity securities, as this move provides guidance for over-the-counter (OTC) trading, potentially ending the question of whether the rules apply to other asset classes like crypto-linked products.

According to the official statement on March 16, the main focus of Rule 15c2-11 is on preventing certain manipulative and fraudulent trading schemes in the OTC equity markets. From now on, it would refer to only equity securities and sets out certain compliance requirements, where broker-dealers must gather and check key details before quoting or maintaining a market for securities in the OTC market.

Hester Peirce Supports Rule Clarification

Further, Commissioner Hester M. Peirce said she supports the SEC’s proposal to amend Rule. With that, Peirce noted that the 2020 amendments have raised questions regarding the applicability of the rule and argued that the Commission provided temporary guidance and relief for fixed-income securities.

She acknowledged that her own role in not clarifying the rule’s scope earlier, “ I continue to blame myself for failing to ensure that we made the scope of the rule’s application crystal clear during the adoption of amendments to Rule 15c2-11.”

Also, she encourages public comments on proposed revisions to Rule 15c2-11, as the comment period will remain open for 60 days, aiming to clarify its scope for distinct markets. She is particularly interested in how equity security should be defined, how the rule should apply to crypto assets, and what actions should be taken to establish expert markets.

Crypto Clarity and Regulatory Guidance

From these changes, it is clear that the rule applies only to equities, not to other asset classes, because previously, the rule was not clear whether to apply to crypto. With that, some brokers are confused and have stopped trading crypto, considering it a risk from a legal perspective.

Then, two weeks before, the U.S. SEC submitted a new framework that focused on developing a token taxonomy, a system to categorize cryptocurrencies and to determine which come under securities under U.S.SEC laws and which may be treated differently, aiming to provide clearer guidance for crypto-related businesses.

TagsCryptoEquity

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the main focus of the SEC's proposed modifications to Rule 15c2-11?

AThe main focus is to clarify that Rule 15c2-11 applies only to equity securities, providing guidance for over-the-counter (OTC) trading and preventing manipulative and fraudulent trading schemes in the OTC equity markets.

QWhich SEC commissioner expressed support for the rule clarification and self-criticism for not making the rule's scope clear earlier?

ACommissioner Hester M. Peirce expressed support for the amendment and acknowledged her role in not ensuring the rule's scope was made crystal clear during the 2020 amendments.

QHow long will the public comment period remain open for the proposed revisions to Rule 15c2-11?

AThe public comment period will remain open for 60 days.

QWhat specific areas is Commissioner Peirce particularly interested in regarding the rule's application?

AShe is particularly interested in how equity security should be defined, how the rule should apply to crypto assets, and what actions should be taken to establish expert markets.

QWhat was the consequence of the previous lack of clarity regarding whether Rule 15c2-11 applied to crypto assets?

ASome brokers were confused and stopped trading crypto assets, considering it a legal risk, because it was previously unclear if the rule applied to them.

Letture associate

Arbitrum Pretends to Be the Hacker, 'Steals' Back the Money Lost by KelpDAO

Title: Arbitrum Poses as Hacker to Recover Stolen Funds from KelpDAO Last week, KelpDAO suffered a hack resulting in nearly $300 million in losses, marking the largest DeFi security incident this year. Approximately 30,765 ETH (worth over $70 million) remained on an Arbitrum address controlled by the attacker. In an unprecedented move, Arbitrum’s Security Council utilized its emergency authority to upgrade the Inbox bridge contract, adding a function that allowed them to impersonate the hacker’s address and initiate a transfer without access to its private key. The council’s action, approved by 9 of its 12 members, moved the stolen ETH to a frozen address in a single transaction before reverting the contract to its original state. The operation was coordinated with law enforcement, which attributed the attack to North Korea’s Lazarus Group. Community reactions are divided: some praise the recovery of funds, while others question the centralization of power, as the council can upgrade core contracts without governance votes. However, such emergency mechanisms are common among major L2s. Despite the partial recovery, over $292 million was stolen in total, with more than $100 million in bad debt on Aave and remaining funds scattered across other chains. The incident highlights escalating security challenges in DeFi, with state-sponsored hackers employing advanced tactics and L2s responding with elevated countermeasures.

marsbit8 min fa

Arbitrum Pretends to Be the Hacker, 'Steals' Back the Money Lost by KelpDAO

marsbit8 min fa

iQiyi Is Too Impatient

The article "iQiyi Is Too Impatient" discusses the controversy surrounding the Chinese streaming platform IQiyi's recent announcement of an "AI Actor Library" during its 2026 World Conference. IQiyi claimed over 100 actors, including well-known names like Zhang Ruoyun and Yu Hewei, had joined the initiative. CEO Gong Yu suggested AI could enable actors to "star in 14 dramas a year instead of 4" and that "live-action filming might become a world cultural heritage." The announcement quickly sparked backlash. Multiple actors named in the list issued urgent statements denying they had signed any AI-related authorization agreements. This forced IQiyi to clarify that inclusion in the library only indicated a willingness to *consider* AI projects, with separate negotiations required for any specific role. The incident, which trended on social media with hashtags like "IQiyi is crazy," is presented as a sign of the company's growing desperation. Facing intense competition from short-video platforms like Douyin and Kuaishou, as well as Bilibili and Xiaohongshu, IQiyi's financial performance has weakened, with revenues declining for two consecutive years. The author argues that IQiyi is "too impatient" to tell a compelling AI story to reassure the market, especially as it pursues a listing on the Hong Kong stock exchange. The piece concludes by outlining three key "AI questions" IQiyi must answer: defining its role as a tool provider versus a content creator, balancing the "coldness" of AI with the human element audiences desire, and properly managing the interests of platforms, actors, and viewers. The core dilemma is that while AI can reduce costs and increase efficiency, it risks creating homogenized, formulaic content and devaluing human performers.

marsbit1 h fa

iQiyi Is Too Impatient

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片