Upcoming Crypto Market Structure Bill Draft Teased, Coinbase Readies Counterproposal

bitcoinistPubblicato 2026-03-28Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-03-28

Introduzione

Congressional sources indicate the Senate Banking Committee may release a draft of the crypto market structure bill (CLARITY Act) next week. The bill's new provisions would broadly prohibit platforms from offering yield on stablecoins or deposit-like assets, permitting only certain activity-based rewards. This has drawn sharp criticism from the industry, with Coinbase formally opposing the recent changes and preparing a counterproposal. The controversy has already impacted markets, contributing to a drop in the crypto sector's total market cap and a significant decline in the stock of stablecoin issuer Circle. Lawmakers are balancing regulatory tightening with incentives, while firms warn broad restrictions could stifle innovation.

Congressional sources told Eleanor Terrett of Crypto In America on Friday that the Senate Banking Committee is poised to release its long‐awaited draft of the crypto market structure bill (CLARITY Act) as soon as next week.

The disclosure comes amid growing industry pushback from the industry, including fresh opposition from crypto exchange Coinbase over recent changes to the bill’s key provisions.

Crypto Bill’s Stablecoin Yield Prohibition

Earlier this week Terrett reported that the newest draft would broadly prohibit platforms from offering yield “directly or indirectly” on stablecoins or on assets that function like bank deposits.

Lawmakers would still permit activity‐based incentives such as loyalty or promotional rewards, but regulators would be charged with defining what incentives are allowed and with crafting anti‐evasion rules within a year.

That policy shift has already generated sharp criticism from crypto firms and advocates, who say the language favors incumbent banks and risks undermining popular rewards programs that drive consumer engagement.

The market reaction extended to crypto stocks, with shares of Circle (CRCL), the issuer of the USDC stablecoin, dropped about 20% toward the $100 mark during Tuesday’s trading session following reports of the draft’s potential restrictions.

The situation intensified midweek when Coinbase informed Senate offices that it could not support the recently inserted language.

Coinbase Signals Major Disagreement

Sources told Terrett that Coinbase’s Global Head of Investment Research, David Duong, said industry participants are working on a coordinated counterproposal designed to demonstrate why targeted alterations are necessary to protect customers and preserve sustainable rewards programs.

The prospect of next week’s release raises several open questions: whether the Banking Committee will set a date for a formal markup of the CLARITY Act portion; how much of the draft may yet change before the committee takes a vote; and how Coinbase and other industry stakeholders will formalize and present their counterproposal.

For now, lawmakers appear to be balancing competing priorities — tightening rules around yield while leaving room for certain customer incentives — even as firms warn that overly broad restrictions could stifle innovation and consumer choice.

The daily chart shows the total crypto market cap drop to $2.26 trillion. Source: TOTAL on TradingView.com

Featured image from OpenArt, chart from TradingView.com

Crypto di tendenza

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the name of the crypto market structure bill and when is its draft expected to be released?

AThe bill is called the CLARITY Act, and its draft is expected to be released by the Senate Banking Committee as soon as next week.

QWhat key provision in the new draft has generated significant industry pushback?

AThe new draft broadly prohibits platforms from offering yield 'directly or indirectly' on stablecoins or on assets that function like bank deposits, which has generated significant industry pushback.

QWhich major crypto company has publicly stated it cannot support the bill's recent changes and is preparing a counterproposal?

ACoinbase has stated it cannot support the recently inserted language and is working on a coordinated counterproposal.

QWhat was the market reaction to the reports of the bill's potential yield restrictions?

AShares of Circle (CRCL), the issuer of the USDC stablecoin, dropped about 20% toward the $100 mark during Tuesday's trading session following the reports.

QWhat are the two competing priorities that lawmakers are trying to balance according to the article?

ALawmakers are trying to balance tightening rules around yield while leaving room for certain customer incentives, such as loyalty or promotional rewards.

Letture associate

Why Are Leveraged ETFs like 7709 Inherently Negative EV Products?

This article argues that the SK H力士 2x Leveraged ETF (7709) is fundamentally a negative expected value (EV) product, rather than simply a "double SK H力士" investment. Its core issue stems from its daily rebalancing mechanism to maintain a 2x leverage target. After a price move, the fund must buy more after a rise or sell after a fall to readjust its leverage, creating a systematic pattern of buying high and selling low. This introduces a "delay loss": it always reacts to past price changes, missing potential gains from adjusting earlier during an uptrend and suffering greater losses from adjusting later during a downtrend. While more frequent intraday rebalancing would improve returns in strong, smooth trending markets by reinvesting profits or cutting losses sooner, it also dramatically increases volatility drag (frictional losses) during choppy, oscillating markets due to more frequent high-buy/low-sell trades. The author draws a parallel to an option seller who delta hedges (short gamma), which involves similar "buy high, sell low" dynamic hedging. However, unlike an option seller who receives upfront premium (IV and theta) as compensation for this risk, the leveraged ETF investor receives no such compensation. Instead, they bear all the path-dependent volatility decay, plus additional costs like swap/derivatives financing, management fees, and trading slippage. Thus, the product's return profile can be framed as: 2x directional return minus realized variance drag minus financing costs minus derivatives costs minus management fees minus transaction costs. For the investor to profit, SK H力士's price must not only rise significantly but do so in a strong, sustained, and smooth trend to overcome these inherent structural costs. High volatility and frequent price reversals are particularly damaging. The article also notes that while the ETF has no explicit liquidation line like perpetual futures, avoiding a sudden "blow-up," its net asset value can still decay towards zero over time through this combination of volatility drag and fees. For experienced traders, directly managing leverage via perpetual contracts may offer more control and potentially lower costs than this packaged, mechanistic product.

marsbit6 min fa

Why Are Leveraged ETFs like 7709 Inherently Negative EV Products?

marsbit6 min fa

'Backstabbing' or 'Win-Win'? How Likely Is TradeXYZ to Break Away from Hyperliquid and Go Solo?

The article discusses the growing debate over whether TradeXYZ, which dominates Hyperliquid's HIP-3 market with over 90% of its volume, might break away to build its own independent trading platform. This possibility is fueled by TradeXYZ's immense market influence and the common industry trend of successful projects seeking more control and profit capture. Key arguments for a potential split include TradeXYZ's overwhelming contribution to Hyperliquid's metrics and the financial incentive to retain all transaction fees, as it currently splits them 50/50 with Hyperliquid. The piece draws parallels to other cases, like Anthropic's "Claude Code" competing with its former partner Cursor, suggesting "betrayal" can occur when business leverage shifts. However, strong counterarguments suggest a split is unlikely or would be detrimental. TradeXYZ relies on Hyperliquid's high-performance infrastructure and its platform as a primary user acquisition channel. Building a comparable system would be challenging. Furthermore, the founders of both projects share a history of trust and mutual admiration. The analysis concludes that a separation would likely be a lose-lose scenario: Hyperliquid would lose a major growth narrative and trading volume, while TradeXYZ would face technical hurdles, user migration issues, and reputational damage, potentially allowing competitors to seize market share. The most rational path is seen as continued collaboration, with TradeXYZ potentially negotiating better terms while leveraging Hyperliquid's established strengths.

marsbit16 min fa

'Backstabbing' or 'Win-Win'? How Likely Is TradeXYZ to Break Away from Hyperliquid and Go Solo?

marsbit16 min fa

The Artificial Intelligence Economy Could Accelerate the Establishment of Dominance for Dollar-Pegged Stablecoins

Economists from the ASEAN+3 Macroeconomic Research Office (AMRO) suggest that the winner in the artificial intelligence (AI) race may not be the country developing the most powerful AI model, but the one whose currency underpins these models and their infrastructure. Their thesis outlines a potential cycle where AI-related costs—such as energy for data centers, infrastructure, and usage fees—are denominated in U.S. dollars. As AI grows into a massive industry, this could significantly increase global demand for U.S. dollar liquidity (first channel of dollar dominance). A second channel involves the currency used for payments between AI agents, expected to become widespread in logistics, inventory, and treasury management. Dollar-pegged stablecoins could provide the programmable settlements required for such agent commerce. These two channels may converge, creating a self-reinforcing "dollar loop" where AI computational payments are settled in stablecoins. Stablecoins could gain an early advantage over alternatives like CBDCs due to existing network effects, further entrenching dollar dominance. This would also boost demand for U.S. Treasury bonds used as collateral for stablecoin reserves. The report warns ASEAN+3 nations of over-reliance on this dollar loop and suggests developing regional data centers and tokenized money based on local currencies to participate in the AI economy without reinforcing dollar dependency.

cryptonews.ru18 min fa

The Artificial Intelligence Economy Could Accelerate the Establishment of Dominance for Dollar-Pegged Stablecoins

cryptonews.ru18 min fa

Base Claims Its Distribution Advantage Can Outlast Robinhood Chain's Initial Surge

Base, a layer-2 blockchain, argues that its established distribution network will outlast Robinhood Chain's initial popularity surge. While Robinhood Chain quickly attracted 230,000 daily active users and over $9 billion in DEX volume (primarily from meme coins) shortly after launch, its core feature of tokenized stocks saw minimal use. Base acknowledged shortcomings in focusing on social blockchain products and lagging in areas like perpetual contracts, predictions markets, and on-chain tokenized stocks—a move Robinhood got right. In response, Base highlights its nearly three-year head start in building infrastructure. It emphasizes its x402 payment protocol, which has processed 187.8 million agent payments, its $3.9 billion in stablecoin deposits (mostly USDC), and its integration with partners like Visa, Shopify, and JPMorgan for institutional and merchant settlements. Base contends these capabilities for corporate payments and stablecoin liquidity represent a more durable and defensible ecosystem than Robinhood's retail trading metrics. Coinbase plans to launch its own on-chain, share-backed tokenized stocks on Base, which would directly challenge Robinhood's key differentiating feature. Base's strategy bets that its deep-rooted distribution and institutional partnerships will prove harder to overcome than Robinhood's early, meme-driven volume, which may fade after the initial launch hype.

cryptonews.ru21 min fa

Base Claims Its Distribution Advantage Can Outlast Robinhood Chain's Initial Surge

cryptonews.ru21 min fa

Trading

Spot

Articoli Popolari

Come comprare T

Benvenuto in HTX.com! Abbiamo reso l'acquisto di Threshold Network Token (T) semplice e conveniente. Segui la nostra guida passo passo per intraprendere il tuo viaggio nel mondo delle criptovalute.Step 1: Crea il tuo Account HTXUsa la tua email o numero di telefono per registrarti il tuo account gratuito su HTX. Vivi un'esperienza facile e sblocca tutte le funzionalità,Crea il mio accountStep 2: Vai in Acquista crypto e seleziona il tuo metodo di pagamentoCarta di credito/debito: utilizza la tua Visa o Mastercard per acquistare immediatamente Threshold Network TokenT.Bilancio: Usa i fondi dal bilancio del tuo account HTX per fare trading senza problemi.Terze parti: abbiamo aggiunto metodi di pagamento molto utilizzati come Google Pay e Apple Pay per maggiore comodità.P2P: Fai trading direttamente con altri utenti HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): Offriamo servizi su misura e tassi di cambio competitivi per i trader.Step 3: Conserva Threshold Network Token (T)Dopo aver acquistato Threshold Network Token (T), conserva nel tuo account HTX. In alternativa, puoi inviare tramite trasferimento blockchain o scambiare per altre criptovalute.Step 4: Scambia Threshold Network Token (T)Scambia facilmente Threshold Network Token (T) nel mercato spot di HTX. Accedi al tuo account, seleziona la tua coppia di trading, esegui le tue operazioni e monitora in tempo reale. Offriamo un'esperienza user-friendly sia per chi ha appena iniziato che per i trader più esperti.

457 Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2024.12.10Aggiornato il 2026.06.02

Come comprare T

Discussioni

Benvenuto nella Community HTX. Qui puoi rimanere informato sugli ultimi sviluppi della piattaforma e accedere ad approfondimenti esperti sul mercato. Le opinioni degli utenti sul prezzo di T T sono presentate come di seguito.

活动图片