Upbit and Bithumb Report Revenue Decline for the First Six Months of 2026

cryptonews.ruPubblicato 2026-08-18Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-08-18

Introduzione

Major South Korean crypto exchanges Upbit and Bithumb reported their financial results for the first half of 2026. Both saw revenue decline by approximately 50% year-over-year, to $288.9 million for Upbit's parent company Dunamu and $119.5 million for Bithumb, attributed to lower market activity and trading volumes impacting commission income. Despite the revenue drop, both exchanges remained operationally profitable. Dunamu posted an operating profit of $78.9 million (27% margin), while Bithumb's was $10.5 million (8.8% margin). Bithumb significantly cut costs, including sales incentives and advertising. A key divergence emerged in net profit. Dunamu achieved a net profit of $76.7 million. In contrast, Bithumb reported a net loss of $76.9 million, driven by $109.8 million in non-operating expenses, including losses from digital asset disposals, revaluation, and provisions for regulatory proceedings. Both exchanges show high dependence on trading commissions, which constituted about 97% of Dunamu's and nearly 100% of Bithumb's revenue. Client assets on both platforms fell by around 35%. This trend reflects the broader South Korean market, where Q2 2026 trading volume across five major licensed exchanges fell 49.5% year-over-year. Both companies also faced operational challenges, including an investigation into Bithumb's CEO and a hacking incident at Upbit in November 2025.

Major cryptocurrency exchanges in South Korea, Upbit and Bithumb, have reported their financial results for the first six months of 2026. Both companies recorded a revenue drop of about 50%, but their outcomes differed.

Both Dunamu, Upbit's parent company, and Bithumb published their reports on August 14, 2026. They cover the period from January 1 to June 30, 2026, inclusive.

The reports indicate that the first six months of this year were a period of business cooling for both companies. Dunamu's revenue decreased by 49.1% year-on-year to 408.1 billion won ($288.9 million), while Bithumb's revenue fell by 48.7% to 168.8 billion won ($119.5 million).

This is primarily linked to the overall market situation. A decline in investor activity and trading volumes directly impacted the commission income of both platforms.

However, Dunamu maintained an operating profit of 111.5 billion won ($78.9 million) and a net profit of 108.4 billion won ($76.7 million). The operating margin was about 27%, though it had exceeded 68% a year earlier.

Bithumb also remained profitable at the level of its core operations, earning 14.9 billion won ($10.5 million) in operating profit. However, its operating margin declined to approximately 8.8%. Furthermore, the company actively reduced costs.

Sales incentive expenses decreased by about 70%, advertising was also cut, and total operating expenses fell by 35.6%. In Q2, Bithumb's operating margin reached approximately 14%, slightly exceeding Dunamu's figure of 13.5%.

The main difference between the companies manifested below the operating profit level. Bithumb incurred a net loss of 108.7 billion won ($76.9 million). For comparison, in the first half of 2025, the company recorded a net profit of 55 billion won ($38.9 million).

Non-operating expenses amounting to 155.1 billion won ($109.8 million) played a significant role, including 73.4 billion won ($52 million) in losses from the disposal of digital assets and additional losses from their revaluation.

Separately, the company reflected expected expenses related to a regulatory investigation. As a result, the relatively small operating profit was insufficient to compensate for these items.

The financial statements also reveal a common structural problem for both exchanges—an extremely high dependence on trading commissions. For Dunamu, revenues from the trading platform amounted to about 395.5 billion won ($280 million), or approximately 97% of all revenue.

For Bithumb, commission revenue was about 168.7 billion won ($119.4 million), meaning it constituted practically the entire revenue stream. Client funds on both platforms decreased by about 35%.

It is also worth noting that this trend is observed across the South Korean cryptocurrency sector as a whole. According to Bitwatch, the total trading volume on the five fully licensed domestic exchanges—Upbit, Bithumb, Coinone, Korbit, and Gopax—decreased by 49.5% in Q2 compared to the same period last year, amounting to $146.43 billion.

Besides the decline in financial indicators in the first half of the year, both companies faced other challenges. An investigation is underway in South Korea against Bithumb CEO Lee Jae-won, and Upbit faced another hack in November 2025.

Domande pertinenti

QAccording to the report, what was the primary reason for the revenue decline of both Upbit (Dunamu) and Bithumb in the first half of 2026?

AThe primary reason for the revenue decline was the general market situation. Reduced investor activity and trading volumes directly impacted the commission income of both platforms.

QWhat key financial difference emerged between Dunamu (Upbit) and Bithumb below the operating profit level?

AThe key difference was in net profit/loss. While Dunamu reported a net profit of 108.4 billion won, Bithumb incurred a net loss of 108.7 billion won, largely due to substantial non-operating expenses.

QWhat structural problem is highlighted in the reports of both Dunamu and Bithumb?

ABoth reports highlight an extremely high dependency on trading commissions. For Dunamu, platform trading revenue constituted about 97% of total revenue, while for Bithumb, commission revenue was virtually the entire volume of receipts.

QWhat specific challenges, unrelated to the financial results, did Bithumb and Upbit face according to the article?

ABithumb's CEO Lee Jae-won is under investigation in South Korea, and Upbit faced another hacking incident in November 2025.

QBased on the Bitwatch data mentioned, what was the trend in trading volume across South Korea's five fully licensed crypto exchanges in Q2 2026?

AThe total trading volume on South Korea's five fully licensed exchanges (Upbit, Bithumb, Coinone, Korbit, Gopax) in Q2 2026 fell by 49.5% year-on-year to $146.43 billion.

Letture associate

Hefei 30 Billion for 1 Trillion: The First Year of Equity Finance, Who Can Copy This Assignment

In July 2026, Hefei’s state-owned assets system reaped over 1 trillion RMB in floating gains from the IPO of ChangXin Memory—a return stemming from a cumulative investment of less than 30 billion RMB over the preceding decade. This marks a prominent case of China’s emerging “equity-based fiscal model,” where local governments act as long-term industrial investors rather than relying solely on land sales. The story traces back to 2016, when Zhu Yiming, founder of Gigadevice and later ChangXin, sought funding for a domestic DRAM chip project amid high risks and intense international competition. Hefei, despite its limited fiscal resources, committed to the venture. Over the next ten years, ChangXin accumulated over 36 billion RMB in losses, yet Hefei’s state capital persisted, providing continuous funding and “nanny-style” support while building a surrounding industrial cluster. This approach—now termed the “Hefei Model”—originated earlier with the city’s 2008 decision to pause subway construction to invest in BOE’s struggling LCD panel production line. That bet later spurred a display industry ecosystem in Anhui. Similarly, ChangXin’s eventual profitability in 2026, driven by AI-driven demand for memory chips, validated Hefei’s patience. The model reflects a strategic shift in Chinese local public finance: from land-revenue dependence to nurturing strategic industries through equity participation, leveraging state capital to attract private investment, and ultimately securing long-term fiscal and industrial benefits. However, replicating Hefei’s success is challenging. It requires exceptional political continuity across administrations, professionalized state-capital management teams, precise timing in catching industry cycles, and the resilience to endure prolonged losses without withdrawing—factors not easily copied through policy documents or study tours. Beyond the headline financial gains, Hefei’s deeper achievement lies in cultivating a robust semiconductor cluster, with over 450 upstream and downstream firms and a sevenfold increase in integrated circuit industry output from 2016 to 2025. While the equity-fiscal concept is spreading, the patience, expertise, and historical contingencies behind Hefei’s execution remain its distinctive, hard-to-replicate core.

marsbit22 min fa

Hefei 30 Billion for 1 Trillion: The First Year of Equity Finance, Who Can Copy This Assignment

marsbit22 min fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片