Uniswap: Why UNI stalls below $6 even as whales keep buying

ambcryptoPubblicato 2026-01-17Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-01-17

Introduzione

Uniswap (UNI) has struggled on the price charts over the past three weeks, failing to rally despite the broader altcoin market showing strength. Although the 'UNIfication' proposal passed with overwhelming support in late December, subsequent developments like the 100 million UNI burn and fee adjustments were insufficient to drive bullish momentum. On-chain data from Santiment indicates that the top 100 largest wallets have been buying, accumulating 12.41 million UNI over eight weeks—a pattern that has historically preceded price increases. However, the token's price action remains bearish, with UNI trading below key moving averages. Short-term holders are taking profits during brief rallies, and weak demand has kept prices below $6. A drop below $4.73 would reinforce the bearish trend, suggesting cautious investors should wait for stronger signs of strength before entering.

Uniswap [UNI] faced a tough time on the price charts over the past three weeks. Many altcoins followed Bitcoin [BTC] higher in the first week of January, making strong gains. Some tokens continued to show strength.

UNI was the opposite. It showed bullish impetus a month ago, as the ‘UNIfication’ proposal crept closer to being passed. The vote concluded on the 25th of December and was passed with far more votes than the quorum required, highlighting its popularity.

The 100 million UNI burn, Uniswap Labs turning off frontend fees, and fee switches flipped on supported protocols were not enough to drive a rally. This relative weakness against Bitcoin and the wider market was concerning for bulls.

Analyzing the Uniswap on-chain and price action clues

In a post on X, crypto data intelligence platform Santiment pointed out that the top 100 largest wallets were accumulating. In the past 8 weeks, these wallets have added 12.41 million UNI tokens.

Their accumulation trends tie in well with the token’s price action, the post read. Going by past trends, the increased accumulation from the top wallets recently was awaiting a bullish reaction.

Will Uniswap prices rally from here?

The 180-day mean coin age plunged rapidly in the past three weeks. The dormant circulation metric also saw a large spike on the 26th of December. This signaled numerous previously idle tokens moving.

The mean coin age has not begun to trend higher, showing network-wide accumulation trends were lacking in the past two weeks. The 180-day MVRV ratio was still deeply negative, but it was the shorter-term MVRV that signaled a profit-taking threat.

Recently, the metric briefly moved into positive territory to show that short-term holders were at a profit. The demand was weak after the ‘UNIfication’ news, which saw prices slump below $6 once again, reflecting a lack of market conviction.

The price trend on the 1-day timeframe was firmly bearish. The failure to follow through after the breakout past $6 in December, combined with the A/D indicator, reflected sporadic buying pressure.

UNI was below its 20 and 50 DMAs. A drop below $4.73 would reinforce the bearish bias. Investors looking to buy UNI based on the top 100 wallets can use this level as their invalidation.

The more cautious investors can wait for the token to show strength before looking to buy it.

Final Thoughts

Santiment data showed that the top 100 wallets were accumulating UNI, a pattern that generally sees prices rally.
As things stand, this reaction hasn’t begun yet. On-chain metrics showed that short-term holders were happy to exit the market after a brief rally.

Domande pertinenti

QAccording to the article, what on-chain data did Santiment report about the top 100 UNI wallets?

ASantiment reported that the top 100 largest wallets have been accumulating UNI, adding 12.41 million tokens over the past 8 weeks.

QWhat was the outcome of the 'UNIfication' proposal vote that concluded on December 25th?

AThe 'UNIfication' proposal was passed with far more votes than the required quorum, highlighting its popularity.

QWhat does the article identify as a key bearish price level for UNI that would reinforce the negative bias?

AA drop below the $4.73 price level would reinforce the bearish bias for UNI.

QWhat did the 180-day mean coin age and dormant circulation metrics signal about UNI's network activity?

AThe 180-day mean coin age plunged rapidly, and the dormant circulation saw a large spike, signaling that numerous previously idle tokens were moving and that network-wide accumulation trends were lacking.

QWhy did the article state that the short-term MVRV ratio signaled a threat of profit-taking?

AThe short-term MVRV ratio briefly moved into positive territory, indicating that short-term holders were at a profit and were therefore a threat to sell and take those profits.

Letture associate

Stablecoin Hype Overblown? Moody’s Says Banks Aren’t In Danger

The article discusses the legislative stalemate in the US over the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025 (CLARITY Act), which aims to regulate crypto assets. A key point of contention is whether stablecoins should be allowed to pay interest, with crypto companies opposing a ban and banks supporting it. Moody's analyst Abhi Srivastava states that, for now, stablecoins do not pose a significant threat to traditional banks due to existing efficient payment systems and the current prohibition on yield-bearing stablecoins. This limits their appeal for pulling deposits from banks at scale. However, with the stablecoin market cap exceeding $300 billion and growth in tokenized assets, banks could face future pressure from deposit outflows. The crypto industry warns that failure to pass the bill could lead to stricter regulatory crackdowns. Negotiations continue with little progress, despite both sides desiring a resolution.

bitcoinist53 min fa

Stablecoin Hype Overblown? Moody’s Says Banks Aren’t In Danger

bitcoinist53 min fa

Not a Price Hike, but a Supply Cut? Oil Prices Have Crossed the Tipping Point

The global oil market has passed a critical point, shifting the focus from price increases to potential physical supply shortages. The core issue is a time mismatch: even if the Strait of Hormuz reopens, shipping disruptions have already caused significant delays, which will continue to deplete onshore crude inventories for weeks. Refinery behavior acts as an amplifier. Reduced runs in Asia and Europe don’t reflect weaker demand but instead shrink product inventories, raising fuel prices and refining margins, which in turn encourages higher runs—creating a self-reinforcing cycle. If the Strait remains closed beyond April, traditional pricing models may fail. The market could face an unprecedented physical shortfall of 11-13 million barrels per day—roughly four times historical disruption levels. In such a scenario, price becomes an inadequate balancing tool. The only way to rebalance the market would be policy-driven demand destruction, similar to COVID-era lockdowns. Current prices around $95/barrel are insufficient to balance the market. Key signals to watch include inventory levels, policy announcements, and the pace of involuntary demand contraction. Geopolitically, the situation appears likely to worsen before improving, with little room for compromise between the US and Iran.

marsbit2 h fa

Not a Price Hike, but a Supply Cut? Oil Prices Have Crossed the Tipping Point

marsbit2 h fa

Amazon Invests Additional $25 Billion in Anthropic, AI Infrastructure 'Arms Race' Escalates

Amazon announces an additional investment of up to $25 billion in Anthropic, with $5 billion delivered immediately and the remaining contingent on performance milestones. This follows a recent $50 billion investment in OpenAI, highlighting Amazon's strategy of backing leading AI labs. The deal includes a commitment from Anthropic to spend over $100 billion on AWS infrastructure over the next decade, securing up to 5 gigawatts of computing power to address growing demand and capacity constraints. Anthropic’s annualized revenue has surpassed $30 billion, but the company faces infrastructure strain due to rapid user growth. The investment will support scaling Claude’s capabilities using Amazon’s custom Trainium and Graviton chips. The move deepens integration between Anthropic and AWS, allowing Claude to be accessed natively within AWS services. Over 100,000 organizations already use Claude via Amazon Bedrock. This investment is part of a broader AI infrastructure race, with Amazon planning around $200 billion in capital expenditures this year, largely focused on expanding AI compute capacity.

marsbit2 h fa

Amazon Invests Additional $25 Billion in Anthropic, AI Infrastructure 'Arms Race' Escalates

marsbit2 h fa

A New CEO Who Has Worked Exclusively with Hardware for 25 Years Takes Over Apple, Valued at 4 Trillion

Apple, the world's most valuable tech firm, has appointed John Ternus as its new CEO, effective September 1, replacing Tim Cook who transitions to executive chairman. Ternus, a 51-year-old mechanical engineer with 25-year tenure at Apple, previously served as senior vice president of hardware engineering. Known for his low public profile and lack of social media presence, he played key roles in developing products like the iPad, AirPods, and led Apple’s transition from Intel to in-house silicon chips. Ternus takes over a company valued at $4 trillion, with Cook having multiplied Apple’s revenue and built a $100 billion services business. However, he inherits significant challenges: Apple’s AI efforts, including the delayed Siri revamp powered by Google’s Gemini, remain unproven, and the company is preparing to launch its first foldable iPhone amid supply constraints. While Ternus’s hardware expertise positions him well for product-driven innovation, his lack of software/AI experience raises questions about Apple’s competitiveness in the AI era. The company’s structure has been adjusted to support him, with Cook remaining in an advisory role. Ternus’s engineer-led approach—emphasizing humility and collaboration—may prove vital in navigating Apple’s next chapter.

marsbit2 h fa

A New CEO Who Has Worked Exclusively with Hardware for 25 Years Takes Over Apple, Valued at 4 Trillion

marsbit2 h fa

Atkins' First Year at the Helm of the SEC: A Comprehensive Shift in Crypto Regulation

Paul Atkins marked his one-year anniversary as Chair of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on April 21, 2025, overseeing a significant shift in the agency’s approach to cryptocurrency regulation. Under his leadership, the SEC dropped multiple enforcement actions against crypto firms, approved several crypto-linked ETFs, and issued guidance clarifying that most cryptocurrencies are not considered securities under federal law. The SEC also signed a memorandum with the CFTC to improve regulatory coordination. These actions reversed the aggressive enforcement stance of his predecessor, Gary Gensler, and aligned with Trump administration promises to support the crypto industry. However, Atkins has faced criticism from Democratic lawmakers, including Senator Elizabeth Warren, who raised concerns over potential conflicts of interest, particularly regarding dropped cases linked to Trump-affiliated companies. While regulatory clarity has improved, the SEC still awaits congressional action to formally define its jurisdiction over digital assets.

marsbit2 h fa

Atkins' First Year at the Helm of the SEC: A Comprehensive Shift in Crypto Regulation

marsbit2 h fa

Trading

Spot

Futures