Trump Pushes Digital Assets Into U.S. Banking System

TheNewsCryptoPubblicato 2026-05-20Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-05-20

Introduzione

President Trump has issued an executive order directing federal agencies to revise financial regulations to integrate digital assets and fintech into the traditional banking and payments system. The policy aims to streamline rules, lower barriers to entry, and encourage collaboration between fintech firms, banks, and regulators. A key directive is for financial regulators to identify and amend any rules that unfairly prevent fintech companies from partnering with federally regulated banks. Specifically, the order requires the Federal Reserve Board to evaluate its system for providing payment accounts and services to non-bank financial institutions. This review includes examining whether Federal Reserve banks can issue such accounts independently, which could benefit entities like Wyoming's Special Purpose Depository Institutions (SPDIs). The move follows recent limited master account access granted to the crypto exchange Kraken and ongoing Fed efforts to establish a more formal framework for such access.

On Tuesday, US President Donald Trump issued an executive order directing the federal government to revise its regulatory frameworks in order to incorporate “digital assets and innovative technology into traditional financial services and payment systems.”

The order said:

“It is therefore the policy of the United States to streamline regulatory processes, reduce unnecessary barriers to entry, and encourage collaboration between fintech firms, federally regulated financial institutions, and Federal financial regulators.”

Expanding Crypto-linked Access to Fed Payment Services

The document recommends that the United States integrate financial technology services into its preexisting payment and banking infrastructure.

Over the next three months, the chiefs of financial regulators are required by the order to evaluate their current laws and identify any regulations or documents that unfairly prevent fintech companies from forming relationships with banks authorized by the federal government.

As a consequence of the evaluation, Trump ordered regulators to take action within six months to promote innovation. Among these measures is a request that the Federal Reserve Board of Governors examine the current system for providing payment accounts and services to non-bank financial enterprises and uninsured depository institutions.

Additionally, this evaluation inquires as to whether or not the twelve Federal Reserve banks have the authority to issue payment accounts apart from the board. Special purpose depository institutions in Wyoming and other jurisdictions with comparable structures may be particularly well-served by this provision. An SPDI based in Wyoming, Kraken, was earlier this year allowed access to a restricted version of the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas’s so-called master account. Similar access has been requested by other firms.

After unveiling a plan in December to provide access to some businesses, the Federal Reserve is now hard at work creating a more official “skinny” master account.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Bitcoin Faces Pressure as Retail BTC Activity Hits Record Low

TagsAltcoinBitcoin

Domande pertinenti

QWhat did the executive order issued by President Trump aim to do regarding digital assets?

AThe executive order aimed to direct the federal government to revise its regulatory frameworks to incorporate digital assets and innovative technology into traditional financial services and payment systems.

QWhat are the three main policy goals stated in Trump's order for encouraging fintech?

AThe policy goals are to streamline regulatory processes, reduce unnecessary barriers to entry, and encourage collaboration between fintech firms, federally regulated financial institutions, and Federal financial regulators.

QWhat specific action did the order require the Federal Reserve Board of Governors to examine?

AThe order required the Federal Reserve Board of Governors to examine the current system for providing payment accounts and services to non-bank financial enterprises and uninsured depository institutions.

QWhich recent development for a specific type of institution is mentioned as being well-served by the order's provisions?

AThe order's provisions may particularly well-serve Special Purpose Depository Institutions (SPDIs) in Wyoming and other jurisdictions with comparable structures, referencing Kraken's earlier access to a restricted Fed master account.

QWhat is the Federal Reserve currently working on regarding master accounts, according to the article?

AFollowing a plan unveiled in December, the Federal Reserve is now hard at work creating a more official 'skinny' master account to provide access to certain businesses.

Letture associate

Ten-Thousand-Word Analysis: From $10 to $290, MRVL Wins the Entire AI Era by 'Not Making GPUs'

Marvell Technology's stock price surged from under $10 in 2016 to a record $290 in June 2026, fueled not by making GPUs, but by dominating AI infrastructure connectivity. This analysis argues the market misvalues MRVL as merely a smaller Broadcom in custom AI chips, overlooking its true, unique position. Marvell's core strength lies in enabling high-speed data flow for AI clusters through three interconnected businesses. First, it holds a commanding ~70% market share in high-speed optical DSPs (essential for data center light modules), a deep-moat business with accelerating growth. Second, its custom AI chip design business serves hyperscalers like AWS, Microsoft, and Google, with a significant revenue pipeline despite lower margins. Third, stable cash flows come from Ethernet switch chips and enterprise storage controllers. Together, they form a full-stack "AI data movement" platform. CEO Matt Murphy's transformative leadership since 2016, involving strategic divestments, key acquisitions (like Inphi for optical DSPs), and securing long-term agreements with major cloud providers, repositioned the company. A pivotal $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA in 2026 underscored Marvell's critical role in the AI ecosystem, particularly through collaborations like NVLink Fusion. While Marvell faces risks—including client concentration (losing the Amazon Trainium3 design), lower-margin business mix, competitive threats, insider selling, and complex supply chains—its fundamentals remain strong. The optical interconnect moat is widening with the acquisition of Celestial AI (photonics fabric), and financial metrics show accelerating revenue growth and operating leverage. With a PEG ratio suggesting undervaluation relative to its growth, the thesis is that the market undervalues Marvell's monopolistic position in AI "plumbing" while overemphasizing its competitive custom chip segment. The story transcends investing, symbolizing how in any complex system—from the internet to AI—the value of "connection" ultimately surpasses that of individual "nodes."

marsbit15 min fa

Ten-Thousand-Word Analysis: From $10 to $290, MRVL Wins the Entire AI Era by 'Not Making GPUs'

marsbit15 min fa

AI Relay Stations Spark Heated Debate on Zhihu: Behind Cheap Tokens, What Are Users Really Worried About?

A discussion on Zhihu about "AI relay stations" shifted the niche developer topic of "cheap tokens" into broader user awareness. Users moved beyond simply questioning the legitimacy of these services to focus on practical concerns: Where do cheap tokens truly come from? Is the model being accessed the real one? Can relay stations see prompts, code, and API keys? For occasional users, are the risks worth it? The core debate centered less on price and more on trust. A primary worry is model authenticity—the risk of "model swapping," where users paying for a premium model might be routed to a cheaper one, creating an information asymmetry. Others argued that cost comparisons matter; while cheaper than official pay-as-you-go APIs, relay stations may not be the lowest-cost option versus subscriptions, domestic models, or free tiers, making user needs assessment crucial. Speculation about token sources ranged from legitimate bulk discounts to gray-area methods like account sharing or exploiting regional pricing. This opacity makes risk assessment difficult for users. Data security emerged as a critical concern, especially for enterprise use. When processing sensitive information like code, contracts, or client data, the inability to verify a relay station's data handling, retention, or access policies poses significant compliance and confidentiality risks. The evolving consensus suggests relay stations can be used cautiously for low-sensitivity, disposable tasks (e.g., summarizing public info, simple translation). However, they should not be the default for sensitive, professional, or production workflows involving proprietary data, Agents, or automated systems. Recommendations include avoiding large prepayments, not relying on a single service, using test prompts to monitor quality, anonymizing data where possible, and keeping official channels as backups. Ultimately, the discussion framed tokens not just as a billing unit but as a measure of real cost encompassing price, model integrity, data security, and service stability. The popularity of relay stations highlights user demand for affordable access, but the debate underscores a key trade-off: the savings from cheap tokens may come at the price of trust, transparency, and control over one's data and AI experience.

marsbit45 min fa

AI Relay Stations Spark Heated Debate on Zhihu: Behind Cheap Tokens, What Are Users Really Worried About?

marsbit45 min fa

In-Depth Research Report on TradFi: The Convergence Wave of Crypto and Traditional Finance

In 2026, the crypto industry is undergoing a profound infrastructure-level transformation—TradFi assets are migrating on-chain at an unprecedented pace. According to CoinGecko's Q1 2026 report, the total value locked (TVL) of tokenized real-world assets (RWA) has surpassed $31 billion, a nearly 4x increase from $7.8 billion at the beginning of 2025, with the sector’s aggregate market capitalization reaching $19.3 billion. Among these, the market cap of tokenized stocks surged from $2 million to $486 million, with Q1 spot trading volume reaching $15.1 billion—a single quarter already surpassing the entire second half of 2025. RWA perpetual contract Q1 trading volume reached a staggering $524.8 billion, far exceeding the $313 billion for all of 2025. Meanwhile, BlackRock's BUIDL fund has reached $2.3 billion in scale and has filed for two new tokenized funds, signaling that the world's largest asset manager's tokenization strategy is evolving from pilot to product suite expansion. HTX, as a core participant in the crypto exchange sector, officially launched TradFi perpetual futures products including NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, META, and SPY in 2026, enabling crypto users to gain 24/7 trading access to core U.S. equities. Boston Consulting Group predicts that global tokenized asset scale could reach $16 trillion by 2030, while McKinsey offers a conservative estimate of approximately $2 trillion. The on-chain migration of TradFi assets is no longer a "future narrative" but a structural transformation unfolding in real time, as crypto exchanges evolve from single crypto asset trading platforms toward "multi-asset-class trading infrastructure."

HTX Learn47 min fa

In-Depth Research Report on TradFi: The Convergence Wave of Crypto and Traditional Finance

HTX Learn47 min fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片