TRUMP memecoin slips near $5.4 as whales exit at 50% loss – What now?

ambcryptoPubblicato 2026-01-11Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-01-11

Introduzione

Trump (TRUMP) memecoin declined to around $5.4, continuing a downtrend after failing to reclaim $5.6. The token has been range-bound within a descending channel since peaking near $9.5 two months ago. Whale activity has shifted significantly, with large holders selling consistently for 11 consecutive days after months of accumulation inactivity. One whale sold 437K TRUMP tokens at a 50% loss of $2.35 million, signaling eroding long-term conviction rather than tactical repositioning. Momentum indicators show strengthening bearish control, with price below key EMAs. If selling continues, TRUMP could test support near $5.0–$4.6. A reclaim of the 50 EMA near $5.5 is needed for a potential trend reversal.

Official Trump [TRUMP] memecoin remained inside a descending channel after topping near $9.5 two months ago. Price attempts to reclaim $5.6, fails, leaving the memecoin range-bound.

At press time, TRUMP traded near $5.4 after a modest daily pullback.

That stagnation appeared to pressure long-term holders. Several whales exited positions after months of inactivity.

TRUMP whales exit after deep drawdowns

TRUMP memecoin has recorded a significant shift in sentiment, especially from large holders who jumped to accumulate early last year.

In fact, whales have not made any significant purchases since October 2025, when whales recorded an accumulation for seven consecutive days. In recent days, TRUMP has recorded no whale buy activity for six consecutive days, as per the Whale Buy Activity Indicator on Trading View.

Instead, whales have been consistently selling. Looking at the Whale Trend Analysis metric on Tradingview, whales have sold throughout the past 11 days.

Arkham data captured one such whale activity. According to Arkham, a whale sold his entire Trump holdings after holding for 8 months.

The whale deposited 437k TRUMP tokens worth $2.35 million into Binance. These tokens were purchased for $4.7 million, and with the recent sale, the whale realized $2.35 million in loss.

When whales realize losses exceeding 50%, it often reflects eroding conviction rather than tactical rotation. That behavior suggested capital stepped aside instead of repositioning.

Momentum weakens as sellers dominate

Selling pressure showed up across momentum indicators.

The Directional Movement Index showed a negative index near 30, above the positive index near 21. That configuration reflected strengthening downside control.

On top of that, TRUMP remained below the 50, 100, and 200 EMA levels. Price structure continued to favor sellers.

If distribution persists without matching demand, TRUMP could revisit the 20 EMA near $5.2. A breakdown there could expose the $5.0 zone, with downside risk toward $4.6.

For trend reversal signals, bulls would need a decisive reclaim of the 50 EMA near $5.5. Without that shift, rallies may continue to face supply.


Final Thoughts

  • TRUMP’s price action reflected more than short-term volatility; it mirrored fading conviction among large holders.
  • Without renewed accumulation or a reclaim of key EMAs, downside risk may continue to define near-term sentiment.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the current trading price of TRUMP memecoin and what key level did it fail to reclaim?

AAt press time, TRUMP traded near $5.4 after failing to reclaim the $5.6 level.

QAccording to the Whale Trend Analysis metric, for how many consecutive days have whales been selling TRUMP?

AWhales have been selling TRUMP throughout the past 11 consecutive days.

QWhat significant loss did a specific whale realize when selling his TRUMP holdings, as reported by Arkham?

AA whale sold his entire TRUMP holdings, realizing a loss of $2.35 million after purchasing the tokens for $4.7 million.

QWhat does the configuration of the Directional Movement Index (negative index above positive index) indicate about the market's momentum?

AThe configuration, with the negative index near 30 above the positive index near 21, reflects strengthening downside control and that sellers are dominating the momentum.

QWhat do bulls need to see for a potential trend reversal in TRUMP's price?

AFor a trend reversal, bulls would need a decisive reclaim of the 50 EMA, which is near the $5.5 level.

Letture associate

La Liga Team Bets $1 Million Against Themselves Before Match: Does Using Prediction Markets for Insurance Comply with Sports Regulations?

A Spanish La Liga club, reportedly Osasuna, purchased insurance against relegation and was linked to a transaction of over $1 million on the prediction market platform Kalshi, betting against its own victory in a crucial season-ending match. While Osasuna confirmed buying €1.2 million insurance for a potential €6 million payout in case of relegation through broker Howden, it did not confirm involvement with Kalshi. The reported trade involved intermediaries like Game Point Capital and Greenlight Commodities, with quant firm Susquehanna as the counterparty. This incident highlights the blurring line between financial hedging and gambling in prediction markets. Such markets allow trading on future event outcomes, like sports results. In the US, Kalshi operates as a regulated event contract market under the CFTC. However, Spanish authorities recently initiated penalties against Kalshi and Polymarket, considering their activities unlicensed gambling. The case raises core questions about prediction markets: who can trade, how insider information is handled, and whether participants can influence outcomes, especially in sports where results are human-driven. While leagues like La Liga and Serie A have partnered with Polymarket in North America, the regulatory clash and potential for conflicts of interest, as seen in this club's alleged transaction, present significant challenges as prediction markets evolve toward institutional risk management.

Foresight News8 min fa

La Liga Team Bets $1 Million Against Themselves Before Match: Does Using Prediction Markets for Insurance Comply with Sports Regulations?

Foresight News8 min fa

From Shouting 150 Dollars to Liquidating HYPE in Just Three Days, How Much Credibility Does Arthur Hayes Have Left?

How much of Arthur Hayes's market credibility remains? Recently, the "godfather of crypto perpetual swaps" and BitMEX co-founder has faced public criticism, including accusations from on-chain investigator ZachXBT about creating exit liquidity for his followers. Starting last week, Hayes executed multiple sudden sell-offs. He had repeatedly publicly predicted the HYPE token would reach $150. After a $100,000 bet defending Hyperliquid on June 1st, he announced just three days later that he had completely sold his HYPE and NEAR holdings, successfully exiting near the peak. He also sold ZEC and WLD. His sale of WLD appeared to be a classic "pump and dump" maneuver. On June 3rd, he publicly set a $10 target for WLD, causing its price to surge over 35%. By June 6th, he announced he had sold his WLD, citing "anomalous" SpaceX pre-IPO price action, which triggered a sharp price drop. On June 9th, Hayes published a lengthy article explaining his actions, citing factors like rising energy costs and a potential AI bubble burst. Consequently, his family office, Maelstrom, now holds positions in US energy producers and only core crypto assets BTC and ETH, having sold AI-related stocks and non-core cryptocurrencies. This pattern is not new. In 2025, he similarly touted HYPE before selling it at what turned out to be a cycle peak, only to repurchase it at the next cycle's low. Similar scenarios played out with tokens like ETHFI and ENA. Long-term observers have developed a strategy: ignore Hayes's public statements but closely monitor his on-chain actions—be cautious following his buys, but decisively follow his sells. If he continues these tactics, especially as seen with the WLD case, his market credibility risks being permanently damaged. As Hayes himself admitted in his latest article, "I remain an unapologetic gambler."

marsbit26 min fa

From Shouting 150 Dollars to Liquidating HYPE in Just Three Days, How Much Credibility Does Arthur Hayes Have Left?

marsbit26 min fa

Fundraising is Like a Strange Dance: The 'Absurd Drama' of Silicon Valley Founders' Capital Raises

The article details a series of absurd and revealing anecdotes shared by Silicon Valley founders about their venture capital fundraising experiences, sparked by Greg Isenberg's story of pitching to a sleeping a16z partner. Founders describe surreal pitch meetings: one faced a barefoot, peanut-eating investor who offered triple the requested amount after 30 seconds; another performed a pitch in a VC's parked car; a founder discovered his audience understood no English beyond "yes." These stories highlight the often irrational and performative nature of fundraising. Beyond the absurdity, darker power imbalances are exposed. Stories include investors suggesting founders fire co-founders for their equity, blatant market misjudgments, disrespectful behavior from LPs, and discriminatory remarks. A debate also emerges around "Sequoia's" practice of splitting a round into two valuations. However, the thread isn't solely critical. Positive counter-narratives celebrate supportive VCs who offered crucial advice during crises, respected founders' timelines, and showed simple gestures of respect—like a partner personally fetching coffee before a major pitch. Ultimately, the collective sharing acts as a pressure release, illustrating that fundraising is a complex dance of power, trust, and sometimes sheer theater. It underscores that beyond capital, mutual respect and integrity remain the most enduring foundations of the founder-investor relationship.

marsbit39 min fa

Fundraising is Like a Strange Dance: The 'Absurd Drama' of Silicon Valley Founders' Capital Raises

marsbit39 min fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片