Tron Stablecoin Volume Exceeds XRP Activity By More Than 10 Times: Data

bitcoinistPubblicato 2025-12-23Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-12-23

Introduzione

Tron's USDT and USDC stablecoin transfer volume has surged, now exceeding the entire XRP network's activity by more than ten times, according to Glassnode data. The 90-day average for Tron's stablecoin volume stands at $24.2 billion daily, compared to XRP's $2.2 billion. This highlights Tron's significant role as a core settlement layer for stablecoins. Furthermore, stablecoins dominate overall crypto transaction volume. Combined, USDC and USDT process $192 billion daily, nearly double the volume of the top five non-stablecoin assets. USDC leads all assets at $124 billion, followed by Bitcoin ($81B) and USDT ($68B). XRP ranks sixth with its $2.2 billion volume, behind Solana and Ethereum. Meanwhile, XRP's price is trading around $1.93.

Data shows the transaction volume of USDT and USDC on Tron is now more than 10 times the transfer volume of the entire XRP network.

Tron Stablecoin Volume Is Significantly Higher Than XRP Activity

In a new post on X, Glassnode lead research analyst CryptoVizArt.₿ has discussed how stablecoin settlement on the Tron network compares against the transaction activity of XRP. Stablecoins are digital assets that have their value pegged to a fiat currency. The vast majority of this space is currently dominated by two tokens tied to the US dollar: USDT and USDC.

These cryptocurrencies are available on several blockchains, with a major one being Tron. Below is the chart shared by CryptoVizArt.₿ that shows the trend in the 90-day simple moving average (SMA) of the combined transfer volume of USDT and USDC on the network over the last few years.

Looks like the metric has been following an upward trajectory | Source: @CryptoVizArt on X

As displayed in the graph, USDT and USDC have seen their Tron volume follow a rapid uptrend during the last year, suggesting that users have increasingly been using the network for stablecoin settlements.

The 90-day SMA value of the metric is currently sitting at $24.2 billion. In the same chart, the analyst has also attached the data for the transfer volume of the XRP blockchain and from its graph, it’s apparent that the network’s transaction activity pales in comparison to the stablecoin settlement that occurs on Tron.

More specifically, XRP observes just $2.2 billion in transfers every day, a tenth of the Tron stablecoin transactions. “This reinforces Tron’s role as a core settlement layer for stablecoin liquidity,” noted CryptoVizArt.₿.

Glassnode’s official X handle has also made a post about how stablecoins compare against the major cryptocurrencies in terms of the metric.

The trend in the transfer volume of the various top cryptocurrencies | Source: Glassnode on X

As is apparent in the above chart, USDC is currently the most dominant asset in transaction activity out of the major assets with a volume of $124 billion. Bitcoin is second at $81 billion, while USDT is third at $68 billion.

Among the rest, Solana and Ethereum both beat XRP to the fourth and fifth spots with transaction volumes of $9.6 billion and $7.9 billion, respectively. BNB is just behind XRP at $1.6 billion.

The top two stablecoins combined are pulling $192 billion in transaction activity every day, which is almost twice the transfer volume that the top five non-stablecoin cryptocurrencies are witnessing. “Stablecoins have become the primary liquidity rails, while native asset transfers remain comparatively subdued,” said Glassnode.

XRP Price

At the time of writing, XRP is trading around $1.93, down nearly 2% over the last week.

The price of the coin seems to have been moving sideways over the last few days | Source: XRPUSDT on TradingView

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the current 90-day SMA of the combined transfer volume of USDT and USDC on the Tron network?

AThe 90-day simple moving average (SMA) of the combined transfer volume of USDT and USDC on the Tron network is currently $24.2 billion.

QHow does the daily transfer volume of XRP compare to the Tron stablecoin volume?

AThe daily transfer volume of XRP is $2.2 billion, which is about one-tenth (or 10 times less) than the Tron stablecoin volume.

QAccording to the data, which two assets have the highest daily transfer volume among major cryptocurrencies?

AUSDC has the highest daily transfer volume at $124 billion, and Bitcoin is second with $81 billion.

QWhat role does the data suggest Tron plays in the stablecoin ecosystem?

AThe data reinforces Tron's role as a core settlement layer for stablecoin liquidity.

QWhat was the price of XRP and its weekly performance at the time of writing?

AAt the time of writing, XRP was trading around $1.93, down nearly 2% over the previous week.

Letture associate

Jensen Huang 'Saves' South Korean Stock Market: Locks In SK Hynix Memory, Chip Shortage to Continue

On June 5th, South Korea's stock market experienced a sharp decline, with major chipmakers like Samsung and SK Hynix dropping nearly 10%. Amidst the turmoil, NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang's visit to Seoul played a dramatic role in boosting market sentiment. Following a dinner meeting with SK Group Chairman Chey Tae-won and SK Hynix CEO Kwak Noh-Jung, Huang confirmed that NVIDIA's new Vera CPU will utilize SK Hynix DRAM. The companies announced a multi-year technical partnership to co-develop next-generation memory for NVIDIA's AI infrastructure, covering products from data centers to personal AI and robotics. This collaboration extends beyond memory supply. SK Hynix is integrating NVIDIA's AI and Omniverse platform into its own semiconductor design and manufacturing processes, including computational lithography and creating digital twins of its fabrication plants for autonomous operation. While strengthening ties with SK Hynix, NVIDIA is diversifying its supply chain for the upcoming HBM4 memory, with Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron all certified as suppliers for its Vera Rubin platform. Despite this, Huang warned that the global chip shortage, driven by relentless demand from AI factory construction, is expected to persist for several years across the entire supply chain. His visit underscores NVIDIA's systematic effort to deepen integration with South Korea's broader tech industry.

marsbit44 min fa

Jensen Huang 'Saves' South Korean Stock Market: Locks In SK Hynix Memory, Chip Shortage to Continue

marsbit44 min fa

Nasdaq Plunges 4.2% in a Single Day: Does "Black Friday" Burst the U.S. Stock Market Bubble?

The Nasdaq plunged 4.18% on June 5, 2026, its worst single-day drop in over a year, as a much stronger-than-expected US jobs report triggered fears of economic overheating and delayed Federal Reserve interest rate cuts. The selloff, centered on high-valuation tech and AI stocks like Nvidia and Broadcom, spread across major indices. The article examines whether this signals a market top. The strong May non-farm payrolls data, nearly double expectations, pushed bond yields higher, directly hurting rate-sensitive tech stocks. This exposed vulnerabilities in the crowded AI trade, where valuations had soared on narratives of infinite growth, despite emerging signs of slowing order momentum and corporate AI monetization challenges. Prior to the drop, market indicators flashed warning signs: historically high valuations (e.g., Shiller CAPE ratio near 39.5), extreme bullish sentiment, and high levels of leverage. Technical charts showed key support levels being breached. Wall Street is divided on the outlook. Bears, citing risks of "stagflation" and AI bubble comparisons to the dot-com era, warn of a potential significant correction. Bulls view the drop as a healthy correction within a bull market, underpinned by a strong economy and expected corporate earnings growth of around 7% in 2026. The immediate future hinges on upcoming key events: the May CPI inflation data and the mid-June FOMC meeting. Their outcomes will critically shape market expectations for the Fed's rate path. The article concludes that conditions for a major market top are aligning, marking a fragile transition from narrative-driven gains to a phase demanding validation from macroeconomic data and corporate fundamentals. Caution is advised.

marsbit48 min fa

Nasdaq Plunges 4.2% in a Single Day: Does "Black Friday" Burst the U.S. Stock Market Bubble?

marsbit48 min fa

Nasdaq Plunges 4.2% in a Single Day, Did 'Black Friday' Pop the U.S. Stock Bubble?

The Nasdaq Composite plummeted 4.18% on June 5, its biggest single-day drop since April 2025, triggering widespread debate over whether the U.S. stock market has peaked. The sell-off was sparked by a stronger-than-expected U.S. non-farm payrolls report, which fueled fears of economic overheating and pushed back market expectations for Federal Reserve rate cuts, leading to a sharp rise in Treasury yields. The AI sector, the primary driver of the recent bull market, suffered severe losses, with the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index crashing over 10%. Stocks like Nvidia, Broadcom, and Micron led the decline. Concerns are mounting about the sustainability of AI capital expenditures and high valuations, with signs of order cuts for next-generation chips emerging. Analyses point to several warning signs: historically high market valuations (e.g., elevated Shiller CAPE ratio, Buffett Indicator), extreme bullish sentiment indicators, and significant insider selling. The sell-off also caused a key technical breakdown, with the S&P 500 breaking below its short-term moving average and testing its 200-day moving average. Wall Street is divided on the outlook. Bears warn this could be the start of a bubble deflation or a "stagflation" scenario, while bulls view it as a healthy, overdue correction within a bull market driven by solid corporate earnings growth. A more moderate view suggests the easy liquidity-driven rally is over, and markets are entering a phase of fundamental stock-picking with potential for consolidation. The immediate future hinges on key upcoming events: the May CPI report and the mid-June FOMC meeting. Their outcomes will be critical in determining whether this is a temporary pullback or the beginning of a more significant trend reversal. The consensus is that the era of one-directional market gains may be ending, requiring increased investor caution.

Odaily星球日报53 min fa

Nasdaq Plunges 4.2% in a Single Day, Did 'Black Friday' Pop the U.S. Stock Bubble?

Odaily星球日报53 min fa

The First Case on AI Agents: What Was Adjudicated?

"The First 'Agent' Ruling: What Was Decided?" On April 30, the Guangzhou Internet Court issued a ruling—China's first behavior preservation order in the intelligent agent (AI agent) field. The defendant, an open-source AI agent software, was ordered to stop downloads, cease actions that bypassed a platform's technical protection measures, and delete related tutorials and data. The core issue: the software used the operating system's "accessibility service" permissions to automate user interactions within other apps without those platforms' authorization. This mirrors a recent US case where Amazon sued Perplexity for similar reasons—bypassing Amazon's API to directly scrape and interact with its pages—and won a preliminary injunction. Both rulings establish a crucial legal boundary for the AI agent era: agents cannot operate unchecked. The article argues the fundamental legal principle emerging is one of **dual authorization**. An AI agent requires both **user consent** AND **platform consent** to operate legitimately within that platform's ecosystem. Bypassing platform rules through system-level permissions, even with user permission, undermines platform responsibilities for content moderation, data security, and user privacy, creating liability issues. The piece uses the evolution of "Doubao Phone" (an AI-integrated smartphone) as a case study. Its initial, aggressive version that bypassed platform controls faced roadblocks. Its upcoming 2.0 version is reportedly pivoting to negotiate API access and authorization deals with major platforms (like Alibaba's ecosystem), seen as a strategic adaptation to the new regulatory reality. A global trend is identified: the era of unregulated, "wild west" growth for AI agents is ending, replaced by a **compliance race**. This raises barriers to entry, as securing platform authorizations becomes a new cost. Open-source status is also not a legal shield if the code facilitates bypassing technical protections. In conclusion, these first rulings target not the largest, but the most **aggressive and representative** cases. By setting precedent with them, regulators are efficiently steering the entire industry towards a new, more regulated operating paradigm defined by dual authorization and platform cooperation.

marsbit58 min fa

The First Case on AI Agents: What Was Adjudicated?

marsbit58 min fa

Fired by Google Over a 14-Page Paper, Over 4,000 Rallied for Her. 6 Years Later: She Almost Predicted the Entire AI Era Back Then.

In late 2020, Google AI researcher Timnit Gebru was effectively dismissed following a conflict over a 14-page, unpublished research paper she co-authored titled "On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots." The paper, which has since been cited over 14,000 times, raised critical early warnings about the risks of large language models (LLMs). It argued that these models, trained on vast, biased internet data, are essentially "stochastic parrots" that mimic language without true understanding, potentially amplifying societal biases, generating plausible but false information (later termed "AI hallucination"), consuming massive energy, and obscuring their training data contents. Gebru's stance led to a clash with Google management, who requested the paper's withdrawal. Her subsequent internal criticism of the company's diversity efforts and handling of the matter culminated in her termination, which sparked protests from over 4,000 Google employees and researchers. Six years later, the paper's predictions have proven remarkably prescient. Issues like AI hallucination, embedded bias (evident in resume screening and healthcare algorithms), soaring energy consumption from AI data centers, unvetted training data containing harmful content, and the risk of "model collapse" from AI-generated internet content have become central industry challenges. The incident also highlighted concerns about AI development being driven primarily by commercial competition within a handful of powerful tech companies, often at the expense of ethical considerations. After leaving Google, Gebru founded the Distributed AI Research Institute (DAIR) to explore these issues independently. The controversy underscores how her early, critical insights into the fundamental limitations and societal impacts of LLMs anticipated many of the most pressing dilemmas in today's AI era.

marsbit59 min fa

Fired by Google Over a 14-Page Paper, Over 4,000 Rallied for Her. 6 Years Later: She Almost Predicted the Entire AI Era Back Then.

marsbit59 min fa

Trading

Spot

Futures

Articoli Popolari

Come comprare TRX

Benvenuto in HTX.com! Abbiamo reso l'acquisto di TRON (TRX) semplice e conveniente. Segui la nostra guida passo passo per intraprendere il tuo viaggio nel mondo delle criptovalute.Step 1: Crea il tuo Account HTXUsa la tua email o numero di telefono per registrarti il tuo account gratuito su HTX. Vivi un'esperienza facile e sblocca tutte le funzionalità,Crea il mio accountStep 2: Vai in Acquista crypto e seleziona il tuo metodo di pagamentoCarta di credito/debito: utilizza la tua Visa o Mastercard per acquistare immediatamente TRONTRX.Bilancio: Usa i fondi dal bilancio del tuo account HTX per fare trading senza problemi.Terze parti: abbiamo aggiunto metodi di pagamento molto utilizzati come Google Pay e Apple Pay per maggiore comodità.P2P: Fai trading direttamente con altri utenti HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): Offriamo servizi su misura e tassi di cambio competitivi per i trader.Step 3: Conserva TRON (TRX)Dopo aver acquistato TRON (TRX), conserva nel tuo account HTX. In alternativa, puoi inviare tramite trasferimento blockchain o scambiare per altre criptovalute.Step 4: Scambia TRON (TRX)Scambia facilmente TRON (TRX) nel mercato spot di HTX. Accedi al tuo account, seleziona la tua coppia di trading, esegui le tue operazioni e monitora in tempo reale. Offriamo un'esperienza user-friendly sia per chi ha appena iniziato che per i trader più esperti.

1.5k Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2024.12.10Aggiornato il 2026.06.02

Discussioni

Benvenuto nella Community HTX. Qui puoi rimanere informato sugli ultimi sviluppi della piattaforma e accedere ad approfondimenti esperti sul mercato. Le opinioni degli utenti sul prezzo di TRX TRX sono presentate come di seguito.