To Those Still Holding On in Crypto: What's More Frightening Than a Bear Market is Collective Silence

marsbitPubblicato 2026-06-05Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-06-05

Introduzione

To those still persevering in Crypto: what's more terrifying than a bear market is collective silence. Author: haotian. Key lessons for anyone wishing to remain in Crypto: 1) Looking back at past cycles, the crypto industry almost "dies" once each cycle before rebounding. Plunges of 90%, 80%, 70% followed by V-shaped recoveries are the norm. While extreme volatility is foundational, so is the industry's remarkable resilience—it simply won't die. 2) Centralized exchanges (CEX) are not the saviors of crypto; in many ways, they don't even belong to the industry. Running a platform to collect fees is their perpetual goal, regardless of whether the assets traded are major cryptocurrencies, memecoins, stock futures, oil, or precious metals. 3) While this cycle's on-chain narrative innovation is rife with VC-funded "scams," it will ultimately be grand, sweeping narratives that pull the industry out of stagnation. Examples include DeFi in 2020, NFTs in 2022, inscriptions in 2023, and AI Agents in 2024. The scale and persistence of these narratives determine a bull market's strength and the difficulty of post-bubble recovery. An absence of "innovative narratives" would spell real trouble for crypto. 4) The noisy, often polarized, and conflicting voices on Crypto Twitter (CT)—ranging from FOMO to sharp criticism—are largely a manifestation of poor market conditions. It's fine to observe for entertainment, but remember: if the crypto industry were to collapse catastrophically, no o...

Author: haotian

If you want to keep making a living in Crypto, you must understand these principles:

1) Looking back at past cycles, the crypto industry has nearly died and reborn almost every cycle. It's normal to see crashes of 90%, 80%, or 70% followed by a V-shaped recovery and takeoff. High volatility is indeed a fundamental characteristic of the industry, but don't forget, so is its incredible resilience. It just won't die.

2) CEX exchanges have never been the saviors of the crypto industry; to some extent, they don't even belong to it. For trading platforms, collecting 'fees' is eternal. Whether what's traded on their platform are major cryptocurrencies, meme coins, U.S. stock futures, crude oil, or precious metals doesn't really matter.

3) While this cycle's on-chain narrative innovation indeed contains many VC project 'scams,' what will ultimately pull the crypto industry out of its slump will still be grand narratives. Just like DeFi in 2020, NFTs in 2022, Inscriptions in 2023, and AI Agents in 2024, the sustainability and scale of these narratives determine the depth of a bull market and the difficulty of rebuilding after the bubble bursts. But a crypto industry without 'innovative narratives' is truly unsustainable.

4) Crypto Twitter is flooded with voices—some driven by FOMO, some sharp and critical, some antagonistic—all of which are ultimately manifestations of a poor secondary market. Look at them, use them for entertainment, but that's it. If the crypto industry ever faces a catastrophic collapse, no one will be spared. So, as they say, all you great 'stock traders,' please do respect the path you came from.

5) Some vested interests or early OG beneficiaries have withdrawn into seclusion, some have retreated to the background to cause mischief, and some are still persevering and preaching. This isn't the scariest part. What's more frightening is when the majority chooses 'silence.' The cost of this silence will undoubtedly be the continuous intensification of 'bad money driving out good,' and the damage this inflicts on the industry's 'consensus' is the most fatal blow.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the author's view on the cyclical nature of the crypto industry based on historical cycles?

AThe author believes that the crypto industry nearly dies in every cycle only to be reborn, with sharp drops of 70-90% followed by V-shaped recoveries being the norm. He highlights that while high volatility is fundamental to the industry, its remarkable resilience and ability to survive are equally inherent traits.

QAccording to the article, why are centralized exchanges (CEX) not considered the saviors of the crypto industry?

AThe article argues that CEXes are not saviors and may not even truly belong to the crypto industry. Their primary business model is collecting fees, and it doesn't matter to them whether they are trading mainstream cryptocurrencies, meme coins, or traditional assets like stock futures and commodities.

QWhat role does narrative innovation play in reviving the crypto industry from downturns, according to the text?

AThe text states that while there are many VC-backed project 'scams,' it is ultimately powerful new narratives that pull the crypto industry out of slumps. Past examples include DeFi in 2020, NFTs in 2022, inscriptions in 2023, and AI Agents in 2024. The sustainability and scale of these narratives determine the strength of a bull market and the difficulty of recovery post-bubble, emphasizing that the industry cannot thrive without 'innovative narratives.'

QWhat does the author suggest about the noisy opinions found on Crypto Twitter (CT) during market downturns?

AThe author suggests that the flood of fomo-driven, sharp, or conflicting voices on Crypto Twitter is largely a manifestation of poor secondary market performance. He advises treating them as entertainment. His core warning is that if the crypto industry were to collapse catastrophically, no one would be spared, and he urges those involved to remember and respect their origins in the space.

QWhat is described as more dangerous than a bear market for the crypto industry in the article?

AThe article posits that collective silence is more dangerous than a bear market. While some early beneficiaries have retreated, turned malicious, or continue to preach, the widespread choice to remain silent leads to the persistent problem of 'bad money driving out good.' This erosion of consensus is described as the most fatal blow to the industry.

Letture associate

In Conversation with Ray Dalio: We Are Currently in an AI Bubble, with 1% of My Portfolio in Bitcoin

Ray Dalio, founder of Bridgewater Associates, warns in an interview that the current AI boom shows classic bubble characteristics, which could lead to significant economic downturns as seen in past cycles like 1929 or 2000. He explains that speculative enthusiasm, fueled by debt and overvaluation, often precedes a crash when rising rates or taxation force asset sales, causing widespread losses and recession. Dalio also outlines his "Big Cycle" theory, describing an approximate 80-year pattern where widening wealth gaps, massive government deficits, and shifting geopolitical power (like China's rise) create internal conflict and global instability. He emphasizes that we are in a late-cycle, transitional phase where traditional powers like the US and UK face decline. For personal wealth protection, Dalio advises diversification beyond cash into assets like stocks, bonds, real estate, and particularly gold, which he prefers over Bitcoin. While he holds about 1% of his portfolio in Bitcoin as a non-printable hard asset, he views gold as more secure from technological or governmental threats. Regarding AI's impact, Dalio believes it will disproportionately benefit capital owners, worsening inequality by replacing both physical and cognitive labor. He suggests that human intuition and emotional intelligence, combined with AI, will be key for future workers. On taxation, Dalio argues that wealth taxes are impractical and risk triggering asset sell-offs, reducing productive investment. He points to the UK as a cautionary example of debt, low productivity, and political strife. Geopolitically, Dalio foresees a more regionalized world, with the US showing weakness in prolonged conflicts like with Iran, akin to past imperial declines. The ideal outcome, he suggests, is coexisting powerful blocs (e.g., Americas, China-Asia Pacific) without major war.

marsbit3 h fa

In Conversation with Ray Dalio: We Are Currently in an AI Bubble, with 1% of My Portfolio in Bitcoin

marsbit3 h fa

Daily 7.2 Trillion KRW: Foreign Capital's Record Net Buying on Friday! Wall Street Says Headwinds for Korean Stock Fund Flows Have Subsided

South Korean stock market sees a dramatic shift in fund flows. On July 31, foreign investors made a record net purchase of approximately KRW 7.2 trillion in KOSPI stocks, marking a fundamental reversal from the persistent large-scale net outflows seen in previous months. This contributed to a significant narrowing of foreign net selling in July to KRW 9.8 trillion, down sharply from KRW 48.4 trillion in June and KRW 44.5 trillion in May. Simultaneously, domestic institutional pressure eased. South Korean pension funds and asset managers turned to a net buying position in July, purchasing KRW 1.0 trillion worth of KOSPI shares, contrasting with net sales in May and June. Market volatility is expected to be dampened by new financial regulations. Effective July 31, the Financial Services Commission tightened access for retail investors to single-stock leveraged ETFs by raising the minimum cash deposit requirement. Trading volumes for these products subsequently dropped to about 50% of their monthly average. Citigroup Research maintains its year-end KOSPI target of 10,000 points. The firm cites several supportive factors: the substantial easing of headwinds from capital outflows, a robust fundamental outlook for the semiconductor sector, historically low market valuations, strong economic fundamentals, and the potential for policy support from financial authorities if needed.

marsbit3 h fa

Daily 7.2 Trillion KRW: Foreign Capital's Record Net Buying on Friday! Wall Street Says Headwinds for Korean Stock Fund Flows Have Subsided

marsbit3 h fa

Thanks to Dice Rolls, Bitcoin Keys Are Stored Offline, But Not Everyone Will Do It

The article discusses using dice rolls to generate secure Bitcoin wallet seeds, providing entropy independent of potentially flawed hardware random number generators. It explains that each fair dice roll offers about 2.585 bits of entropy, with around 50 rolls needed for a standard 12-word seed phrase and 99+ recommended for higher security. This method gained attention after a vulnerability was revealed in some Coldcard hardware wallets, where a faulty firmware RNG (dating back to 2021) compromised generated keys. The analysis notes that while a dice-generated main seed was safe from this specific flaw, other Coldcard functions (like creating paper wallets, backup keys, or passwords) could still be vulnerable if they used the defective RNG. The piece argues that while dice-based entropy is technically robust, the manual process is error-prone, tedious, and unrealistic for most new users, who might make mistakes in recording or inputting rolls. It concludes that while manual entropy generation should remain an option for advanced users, the long-term goal is to develop reliable, user-friendly hardware and software that securely generates randomness without requiring specialized knowledge. Coldcard users are advised to check their firmware version and replace any secondary secrets (like paper wallet keys) created with vulnerable devices, while also considering multi-signature setups with devices from different manufacturers for added security.

cryptonews.ru8 h fa

Thanks to Dice Rolls, Bitcoin Keys Are Stored Offline, But Not Everyone Will Do It

cryptonews.ru8 h fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片