Three Weeks into the US-Iran War: Who is Profiting and Who is Paying?

marsbitPubblicato 2026-03-24Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-03-24

Introduzione

Three weeks after the U.S. and Israel launched military strikes against Iran, the conflict has severely disrupted global energy markets. The blockade of the Strait of Hormuz cut off 20 million barrels of daily oil transit, with IEA reporting a net loss of 11 million barrels per day—exceeding the combined impact of the 1973 oil embargo and 1979 Iranian revolution. Over 40 energy facilities across the Middle East were damaged, and global gas supply fell by 140 billion cubic meters. Russia emerged as a key beneficiary: its Urals crude price surged nearly 80% from under $60 to around $90 per barrel, narrowing the discount to Brent. Sanctions-era price caps effectively collapsed as India increased fossil fuel purchases from Russia by 48% in early March. Russia earned an additional €672 million in oil revenue in just two weeks. U.S. consumers faced a 33% spike in gasoline prices, with jet fuel costs rising over 60%. United Airlines cut flights, warning of potential $110 billion in added annual costs if oil hits $175/barrel. Global airlines from Delta to Qantas raised fares or reduced capacity. Even gig economy platforms like DoorDash began offering fuel subsidies to drivers. With a U.S. sanctions exemption on Russian oil set to expire April 11, further market volatility is expected.

On February 28, the United States and Israel launched a military strike against Iran. Iran immediately blockaded the Strait of Hormuz, cutting off the global daily transit of 20 million barrels of oil. Three weeks later, on March 23, IEA Director Fatih Birol provided a figure at the National Press Club of Australia: the global daily oil supply loss caused by this war is 11 million barrels.

This figure exceeds the combined losses of the 1973 oil embargo and the 1979 Iranian Revolution crises.

Energy infrastructure at over 40 sites across 9 Middle Eastern countries suffered varying degrees of damage. Concurrent IEA data shows that the global natural gas supply loss reached 140 billion cubic meters, nearly double the European gas loss during the Russia-Ukraine conflict (75 billion cubic meters). In just three weeks, the quantitative shock this conflict inflicted on the energy market has surpassed that of the entire 1970s.

But the supply loss is only half the story. The other half is that there are clear beneficiaries of this crisis.

Putin's Windfall

Before the Iran war began, Urals crude was trading at less than $60 per barrel. This price had been locked in for nearly three years, a direct result of Western sanctions. After the Russia-Ukraine war broke out, Europe and the US imposed a price cap on Russian oil, maintaining a long-term discount of $30 to $40 between Urals crude and the international benchmark Brent. This discount was the most直观 signal of the sanctions working.

The Iran war changed all that. Following the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, a huge gap appeared in the global oil market, forcing buyers to seek alternative supplies. According to data from the Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air (CREA), Russia's total fossil fuel export revenue reached 7.7 billion euros in the first two weeks of March, averaging 513 million euros per day, an 8.7% increase from February's 472 million euros per day. Daily oil export revenue averaged 372 million euros, earning an extra 672 million euros (approximately $777 million) over those two weeks.

Urals crude rose from under $60 to around $90 within three weeks, a surge of nearly 80%. As reported by Al Jazeera, energy analyst George Voloshin pointed out that Brent also rose from around $65 to over $110 during the same period, but the key is not the absolute price, but the spread between them. The discount of Urals to Brent narrowed significantly from the pre-war level of about $40. The Moscow Times reported on March 16 that Urals crude delivered to India briefly traded at a premium to Brent, something that had not happened since the sanctions took effect.

In other words, a significant part of the economic wall built by three years of Western sanctions was dismantled by three weeks of war in Iran.

The Trump administration announced a 30-day sanctions waiver on March 12, allowing countries to purchase Russian oil en route, with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent stating it would release about 140 million barrels of supply. However, analysts widely believe the waiver's condition of "not generating significant financial benefit" is nearly impossible to enforce. Concurrently, the IEA announced the release of 400 million barrels from strategic petroleum reserves, the largest such release in history. This waiver is set to expire on April 11, at which point the market will face a new round of uncertainty.

India is the most direct actor. CREA data shows that India's purchases of Russian fossil fuels totaled 1.3 billion euros in the first two weeks of March, averaging 89 million euros per day, a 48% increase from February's daily average of 60 million euros. Al Jazeera confirmed that at least 7 tankers originally bound for China changed course to India mid-voyage, with one ship named Aqua Titan arriving at an Indian port on March 21. While the world worries about oil prices, oil trade between Moscow and New Delhi is accelerating.

Who is Paying?

Losses on the supply side and gains on the beneficiary side ultimately get passed on to the consumer. American consumers are bearing the most direct burden.

AAA data shows the US national average price for gasoline rose from $2.98 before the war to $3.96 on March 23, a 33% increase. The average price in California reached $5.56, while the lowest, in Kansas, was $3.23. The average diesel price hit $5.07, the highest since 2022.

Fortune reported that this round of oil price increases has effectively swallowed up the tax refunds American families just received.

The aviation industry was among the first to feel the impact. Platts assessment data shows US jet fuel prices rose over 60% in three weeks, doubling in some regions. United Airlines became the first major US carrier to officially announce capacity cuts. CEO Scott Kirby stated in an internal memo that the company is preparing for oil prices to probe $175 per barrel, which would mean an annual fuel cost increase of about $11 billion, more than double the company's "best annual profit in history." United will cut 5% of its flights in the second and third quarters.

The effects are spreading globally. According to a CNBC report on March 21, Delta Air Lines also warned it might reduce capacity. Euronews reports show that Qantas, SAS, and Thai Airways have already raised prices, and Air New Zealand has canceled over 1,000 flights.

Even the gig economy is affected. According to a Philadelphia Inquirer report on March 23, DoorDash began issuing weekly gas subsidies of $5 to $15 and 10% cash back on gas to drivers, in response to reduced order acceptance due to rising fuel costs. When a food delivery platform has to pay for a war in the Middle East, the length of the shock transmission chain needs no further explanation.

Three weeks into the Iran war, the world loses 11 million barrels of oil daily, Russia made nearly $800 million extra in 15 days, American consumers are paying a third more for gas, and this transmission chain will continue to lengthen after the sanctions waiver expires on April 11.

Crypto di tendenza

Domande pertinenti

QAccording to the IEA, what was the daily global oil supply loss caused by the Iran war after three weeks?

AThe daily global oil supply loss was 11 million barrels of oil per day.

QWhich country's fossil fuel exports saw a significant financial gain, and what was the increase in its daily export revenue in the first two weeks of March?

ARussia's fossil fuel exports saw significant gains. Its daily export revenue increased to 513 million euros per day in the first two weeks of March, up 8.7% from 472 million euros in February.

QHow did the price of U.S. gasoline change from pre-war levels to March 23rd, and what was the national average price on that date?

AThe U.S. national average gasoline price rose 33% from the pre-war price of $2.98 to $3.96 on March 23rd.

QWhat action did United Airlines take in response to the surge in jet fuel prices, and what was the cited potential annual cost increase?

AUnited Airlines announced it would cut its capacity by 5% in the second and third quarters. The company stated that if oil prices reached $175 a barrel, its annual fuel cost would increase by approximately $11 billion.

QWhat major sanction policy change did the Trump administration announce on March 12th regarding Russian oil, and when was it set to expire?

AThe Trump administration announced a 30-day sanctions exemption allowing countries to purchase Russian oil that was already in transit. This exemption was set to expire on April 11th.

Letture associate

When the World Cup Collides with Agents: From Web2 to Web3, How Are Wallets Evolving into Agentic Wallets?

World Cup as a Catalyst for Agentic Wallets: From Web2 to Web3 This article explores how the World Cup provides a real-world scenario for observing the evolution of digital wallets from simple asset managers towards "Agentic Wallets"—intelligent, AI-powered interfaces. Using the example of prediction markets like Polymarket, it illustrates how AI Agents can lower the barrier to Web3 interaction. Instead of navigating complex DApps, users can express intent in natural language (e.g., "I think Portugal will win") within platforms like Discord or web pages. The Agent then interprets this intent, finds the relevant market, and seamlessly guides the user through the on-chain transaction via their wallet. The core shift is from wallets as mere "function menus" for signing transactions to "intent interpreters" that understand user goals. The article highlights parallel developments in traditional finance, such as Mastercard's "Agent Pay" and WeChat Pay's AI tests, which focus on granting AI controlled, authorized, and auditable payment capabilities. This underscores a broader trend of AI entering the financial layer. However, the article emphasizes that the primary challenge for Agentic Wallets in Web3 is not automation but establishing clear security boundaries. Unlike traditional systems with chargebacks, on-chain transactions are often irreversible. Therefore, future wallets must ensure users retain ultimate control and comprehension. They need to transparently communicate an Agent's permissions, spending limits, authorized durations, and provide easy ways to pause or revoke access. The World Cup experiments represent early steps toward wallets that are not just applications but ubiquitous, intelligent interfaces that simplify Web3 while keeping users securely in control.

marsbit32 min fa

When the World Cup Collides with Agents: From Web2 to Web3, How Are Wallets Evolving into Agentic Wallets?

marsbit32 min fa

Options Don't Work in DeFi? Vitalik Might Not Agree

For years, the prevailing view has been that options struggle to gain traction in DeFi due to complexity, fragmented liquidity, and lack of natural demand compared to products like perpetual futures. However, a recent algorithmic stablecoin design proposed by Vitalik Buterin presents a different perspective, using options not as a standalone trading product, but as foundational infrastructure for other financial instruments. In this design, one unit of ETH is split into two components: a "stable" side (P) that retains value up to a specified strike price, and an "upside" side (N) that captures all appreciation above that strike. Combined, they always equal one ETH, eliminating debt, margin, and liquidation risks inherent in typical collateralized debt position (CDP) stablecoins. The stable component essentially mimics the payoff of a covered call option. To function as a stablecoin, this structure requires continuously rolling deep in-the-money calls, which introduces challenges like rollover slippage, predictable transaction flow vulnerable to front-running, and persistent liquidity needs. A core hurdle is finding consistent buyers for the leveraged ETH upside exposure (N). While it offers leverage without funding rates or liquidation, it must compete with simpler alternatives like direct call options or perpetuals. The system's scalability depends on a sustained demand for this specific form of leverage. The author draws parallels to their experience with Rysk, where earlier versions of DeFi options protocols struggled. The breakthrough came with Rysk V12, which aligns incentives: asset holders generate yield by selling covered calls against their holdings, while market makers efficiently acquire the desired option exposure. This demonstrates that options can find product-market fit when embedded as a risk distribution and pricing engine within structured products, stablecoins, or yield-generating assets, rather than marketed as a complex direct trading instrument. Vitalik's proposal reinforces this architectural approach—using fully collateralized, non-custodial, and physically settled options as a fundamental building block. The real opportunity for options in DeFi may lie not in becoming the next perpetual swap, but in powering the next generation of on-chain financial products.

marsbit1 h fa

Options Don't Work in DeFi? Vitalik Might Not Agree

marsbit1 h fa

Conversation with Investor Zheng Di: MicroStrategy's Coin Sale Experiment, AI Economy, and Opportunities in US Stocks

Frontier tech investor Zheng "Didier" Di discusses the recent Bitcoin price drop, the financial strategy shift at MicroStrategy, the AI-driven surge in U.S. stocks, and the evolving role of crypto exchanges. Didier posits that the recent BTC decline stems less from macro factors or ETF outflows, and more from market repricing due to MicroStrategy's new financial structure. Following a wave of preferred stock and debt issuance (STRC, STRZ, etc.), MicroStrategy must now manage cash flow to pay dividends, potentially leading to a market expectation of sustained, small-scale BTC sales to maintain its "per-share bitcoin neutral" principle. Didier views this as a financial "experiment" testing market capacity for such recurring sell pressure, which, while creating near-term structural headwinds, likely avoids a true "death spiral" absent major new external shocks. Shifting to AI, Didier argues that tokens are becoming the new form of labor, with AI models and compute (tokenized inputs) increasingly replacing human roles in execution and middle-management. This drives enterprise efficiency and higher margins, fueling the sustained rally in U.S. semiconductor, data center, and infrastructure stocks. He foresees an emerging "machine economy" where automated agents transact and collaborate on-chain. Regarding crypto exchanges offering U.S. equities, Didier sees this as a natural evolution. With few crypto-native assets generating lasting value, exchanges are pivoting towards real-world assets (RWAs) like stocks and bonds. This doesn't necessarily cannibalize crypto but reflects a maturing industry focusing on blockchain's core utilities: decentralized choice and efficient settlement. He notes that trading logic for crypto natives doesn't need to drastically change, as meme-driven and fundamentalist strategies find analogs in U.S. markets. The "1011 event" (likely referring to a major market crash) severely damaged crypto market liquidity, marking a probable end to the altcoin speculative cycle, with capital flowing towards the deeper liquidity of U.S. markets. For the macro outlook, Didier is cautious about near-term market pressure from potential mega-IPOs (e.g., SpaceX) and the U.S. midterm elections, which could bring more regulatory scrutiny. Long-term, he remains bullish on AI's productivity gains and its convergence with blockchain/Web3, predicting a shift from speculative frenzy to a more institutionalized, industrial phase for the crypto sector.

marsbit1 h fa

Conversation with Investor Zheng Di: MicroStrategy's Coin Sale Experiment, AI Economy, and Opportunities in US Stocks

marsbit1 h fa

Playnance’s $GCOIN Lists on KoinBX Amid Rapid Growth in India

Playnance's native token, $GCOIN, has been listed on the cryptocurrency exchange KoinBX as of June 18. This move aims to enhance accessibility for its rapidly growing community, particularly in India, where the blockchain-powered Web3 iGaming ecosystem has gained significant traction. Over 130 partners in Playnance's "Be the Boss" program have built communities engaging thousands of active players in the region. The "Be the Boss" model allows participants to create and manage their own gaming communities, earning rewards tied to community activity. CEO Pini Peter noted India's high engagement, with community leaders successfully building player networks. One partner, Dr. Nicolas, reported earning over $57,000 through the program in recent months, highlighting both the financial rewards and the opportunity to grow an engaged community. $GCOIN serves as the ecosystem's core utility token, incentivizing participation and aligning the interests of players and community leaders ("Bosses"). The listing on KoinBX is part of Playnance's strategy to expand globally, increasing the token's utility and accessibility by combining community ownership, gamified engagement, and blockchain-based incentives. Founded in 2020, Playnance is a Web3 iGaming infrastructure company focused on creating live, non-custodial, on-chain products to onboard mainstream users. It currently processes approximately one million transactions daily, aiming to simplify the user experience while maintaining full on-chain transparency.

TheNewsCrypto2 h fa

Playnance’s $GCOIN Lists on KoinBX Amid Rapid Growth in India

TheNewsCrypto2 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures

Articoli Popolari

Come comprare WAR

Benvenuto in HTX.com! Abbiamo reso l'acquisto di WAR (WAR) semplice e conveniente. Segui la nostra guida passo passo per intraprendere il tuo viaggio nel mondo delle criptovalute.Step 1: Crea il tuo Account HTXUsa la tua email o numero di telefono per registrarti il tuo account gratuito su HTX. Vivi un'esperienza facile e sblocca tutte le funzionalità,Crea il mio accountStep 2: Vai in Acquista crypto e seleziona il tuo metodo di pagamentoCarta di credito/debito: utilizza la tua Visa o Mastercard per acquistare immediatamente WARWAR.Bilancio: Usa i fondi dal bilancio del tuo account HTX per fare trading senza problemi.Terze parti: abbiamo aggiunto metodi di pagamento molto utilizzati come Google Pay e Apple Pay per maggiore comodità.P2P: Fai trading direttamente con altri utenti HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): Offriamo servizi su misura e tassi di cambio competitivi per i trader.Step 3: Conserva WAR (WAR)Dopo aver acquistato WAR (WAR), conserva nel tuo account HTX. In alternativa, puoi inviare tramite trasferimento blockchain o scambiare per altre criptovalute.Step 4: Scambia WAR (WAR)Scambia facilmente WAR (WAR) nel mercato spot di HTX. Accedi al tuo account, seleziona la tua coppia di trading, esegui le tue operazioni e monitora in tempo reale. Offriamo un'esperienza user-friendly sia per chi ha appena iniziato che per i trader più esperti.

214 Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2024.12.11Aggiornato il 2026.06.02

Come comprare WAR

Discussioni

Benvenuto nella Community HTX. Qui puoi rimanere informato sugli ultimi sviluppi della piattaforma e accedere ad approfondimenti esperti sul mercato. Le opinioni degli utenti sul prezzo di WAR WAR sono presentate come di seguito.

活动图片