The Truth About Global Payments, Revealed by Airwallex

链捕手Pubblicato 2026-05-28Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-05-28

Introduzione

The article discusses Airwallex's approach to global payments, highlighting the key challenges and different strategic paths in the industry. It begins by addressing common user questions about platform reliability, cryptocurrency payments, and the necessity of Airwallex's "heavy" infrastructure model. The core argument is that while many payment platforms appear similar on the surface—offering features like global acquiring and multi-currency accounts—their underlying capabilities differ drastically. The piece identifies three primary paths for global payment providers: 1. **Bypassing Traditional Infrastructure (Web3/Crypto):** This path promises efficiency through stablecoins and on-chain settlements but faces significant regulatory hurdles and offers little advantage over established players for mainstream use, often serving only niche or non-compliant markets. 2. **Aggregating/Packaging Existing Infrastructure:** The most common route, where companies layer a better user experience over legacy banking and partner networks. While fast to market, this approach does not solve fundamental issues like dependency on intermediaries, correspondent banking risks, and compliance fragility. 3. **Building Proprietary Global Infrastructure:** The path chosen by Airwallex and similar firms. This involves obtaining local licenses, building direct regulatory relationships, establishing local teams, and controlling the compliance and technology stack. This is the most difficult and...

Author: Gang Ge

After the last article was published, many people messaged me privately, with questions mainly falling into the following categories:

"Such and such platform seems similar, is it reliable?"

"Is digital currency payment less troublesome?"

"Airwallex makes payment so heavy, is it necessary?"

To answer these questions, one can look at the popular article by Airwallex founder Jack Zhang on their official account and X.com (formerly Twitter), titled "The Path of Maximal Resistance: The Spectrum of Global Payments Infrastructure".

Figure 1 Jack Zhang's original tweet

This article not only explains why Airwallex chose the "heavy asset" path but also exposes a long-hidden problem in the global payments industry.

So, what exactly did he talk about? Let me break it down for you.
[Full text: 2966 words, estimated reading time: 10 minutes]

01 Superficial Homogeneity, Core Heterogeneity

When corporate clients choose a payment platform, they are often confused by one problem: the payment companies they talk to all seem to have similar capabilities.

For instance, nearly a hundred global payment companies use a similar script to describe their products: instant settlement, global coverage, serving modern enterprises. Even their features and interfaces are becoming more and more alike.

  • Everyone has global acquiring: By integrating a packaged Visa/MasterCard channel, they can claim to "support 200+ countries and regions";

  • Everyone has global accounts: By partnering with a few banks, they can claim to "collect payments globally with one account, covering 20+ major currencies".

The problem is, while surface-level features look increasingly similar, the underlying capabilities are worlds apart.

Figure 2 Superficial homogeneity masks vast underlying differences

Users also can't see the real differences between platforms in product descriptions, which is why they scrutinize payment institutions over and over regarding costs, background, licenses, and risks.

Ultimately, what corporate clients truly care about is not just the onboarding experience, but also the stability of the fund flow, the robustness of the compliance system, and whether they can operate smoothly after entering a new market.
Therefore, to judge whether a payment platform is reliable, one should not only look at the front-end appearance but also see whether the platform absorbs the complexity itself or passes it on to the client.

02 Three Paths in Global Payments

Since the front-end can't reveal core capabilities, we must return to the underlying layer and clarify the common paths in this industry.

Breaking down the mainstream players in the industry, there are roughly three paths.

Figure 3 Three divergent paths in the evolution of global payments

2.1 First Path: Bypassing Traditional Channels

First path: Web3 Digital Currency Payments

This path generally tells the same story: stablecoins, on-chain settlement, programmable payments, peer-to-peer payments. Compared to traditional payments, it promises a shorter path, faster speed, lower cost; and it hopes to penetrate the consumer retail scene with a low-value, high-frequency narrative.

However, you will find that very few digital currency payment players on this path have survived.

The core reason is not that this path lacks efficiency, but that compared to mainstream payment platforms, new entrants have no substitution advantage, and too much regulatory friction is difficult to resolve in the short term.

Figure 4 First Path: On-chain settlement bypasses traditional channels

Now, mainstream global payment platforms not only possess global payment networks but also deeply integrate into local ecosystems worldwide, building operational teams, forming comprehensive advantages over digital currency payments in technology, service, compliance, and products.
  • Technology: Global payments settle in seconds; merchant settlement to card D1/D0 available;

  • Service: Highly competitive payment costs, mature local operations teams serving clients' last mile;

  • Compliance: Regulatory concerns persist across jurisdictions, leading to significant friction;

  • Product: Mainstream platforms also focus on stablecoin payments; once regulations are clear, they can readily integrate and substitute.

Thus, new players on this path often find themselves left with only fragmented markets mainstream payment institutions are unwilling to serve, and clients in gray/black markets they dare not serve.

This is why many entrepreneurs with Web3 payment dreams ultimately have to bow out.

2.2 Second Path: Wrapping Traditional Infrastructure

This is the most traveled path in the industry: relying on partners, intermediaries, to wrap a layer of packaging around the complex and antiquated underlying architecture, then using better product experience and faster marketing to drive market expansion.

The advantages of this path are also obvious: quick results, fast business development, rapid coverage expansion, making it the natural choice for most players.

But the problem is, it mostly optimizes the front-end rather than rewriting the underlying layer.

Jack Zhang's judgment on this point is straightforward: The core problems remain unchanged—correspondent bank chains, bilateral partnerships, compliance dependency risks, they're all still there.
He also believes: "A sleek interface is already a standard feature, but this doesn't shake the underlying operational logic of global payments."

Figure 5 Second Path: Aggregated gateways wrap infrastructure

Actually, Stripe, with the fastest-growing global market value, tried to acquire Airwallex in 2019 (rejected), and in 2026, there were rumors of acquiring PayPal (also reportedly rejected).

This at least indicates one thing: even the international payment giants that grew rapidly through "tech + light asset connectivity" eventually have to go back and learn the lesson of building infrastructure.

Often, the seemingly lighter path doesn't avoid infrastructure; it just postpones it.

2.3 Third Path: Self-building Global Financial Infrastructure

This is the path chosen by companies like Airwallex, Ant International, Pingpong, LianLian Global: obtaining licenses in jurisdictions where they operate, doing localized operations, maintaining regular communication with regulators, and keeping compliance, technology, and underlying networks as much as possible in their own hands.

This path is the most difficult because it offers almost no shortcuts. It requires sustained high investment, longer cycles, and also implies heavier responsibility.

But Airwallex has been even more resolute in this regard, self-developing full-stack infrastructure, never relying on agents or intermediaries.
This means they must invest heavily to acquire licenses globally, and as a licensed entity, engage in deep communication with local regulators, continuously connect to local compliance institutions, establish local teams, and serve clients to the last mile.

Figure 6 Third Path: Self-building global infrastructure

This heavy-asset investment obviously makes many think it's "not clever enough." Who wouldn't want to take shortcuts? It's just a matter of what value you want to deliver to your clients. If the underlying capabilities are still in someone else's hands, the ones ultimately bearing the uncertainty will definitely be the clients.

03 Platform's "Heaviness" in Exchange for Client's "Lightness"

For corporate clients going global, the most expensive cost is never a payment processing fee, but the fund flow risks that are usually invisible but fatal when problems arise.

For example, a market that was already running smoothly might suddenly have its accounts frozen by banks; a client who already paid for goods might have the funds stuck halfway by a correspondent bank, unable to arrive for a long time; regulatory rule upgrades might require submitting additional documents, collateral, or processes.

These problems may not occur daily, but just one occurrence is enough to disrupt a company's rhythm.

Figure 7 Platform's "heaviness" exchanged for client's "lightness"

Therefore, building solid infrastructure is essentially about keeping as much of the complexity that would otherwise fall on the client within one's own system to digest, using one's own "heaviness" to exchange for the client's "lightness."

04 What Clients Truly Gain

Corporate clients are very pragmatic; they never buy concepts but the value they receive. In cross-border payments, the so-called value boils down to three things: more stable, more cost-effective, more certain.

Figure 8 The value corporate clients truly need

  • More stable, because enterprises don't need to adapt to a new set of partnerships every time they enter a market.

  • More cost-effective, not just saving on processing fees, but also eliminating massive duplicated system costs, communication costs, and compliance costs.

  • More certain, because when market conditions change or regulatory rules tighten, clients rely not on a temporarily patched-together channel, but on a more complete, durable, and cycle-transcending underlying capability.

This is also why Airwallex's growth logic is more like compound interest than explosive growth.

Figure 9 Compound growth brought by infrastructure investment

According to public information, Airwallex took 9 years to achieve $500 million in annualized revenue (ARR), but only one year to grow from $500 million to $1 billion. The initial "slowness" wasn't inefficiency but rather accumulating underlying potential for later acceleration.

05 Final Words

Returning to the initial question, why does Airwallex build its own global financial infrastructure?

Because, the hardest part is precisely the part that cannot be outsourced, is most worthy of long-term investment, and creates the most value for clients.

Figure 10 Underlying capability is the true watershed

For corporate clients, choosing a global payment platform is essentially choosing a long-term partner, a foundation that can help digest complexity and allow you to operate your business more stably.

For the global payments industry, shortcuts may help you run faster, but only by making the hardest part your own capability can you go further.

[References]

[1] Airwallex Official Article: The Path of Maximal Resistance

https://www.airwallex.com/cn/blog/the-path-of-max-resistance-the-spectrum-of-global-payments-infrastructure

[2] Airwallex Official Article: The Last Mile of Global Payments

https://www.airwallex.com/cn/blog/the-last-mile-of-global-payments

[3] Sina: Reshaping the Future of Finance

https://finance.sina.com.cn/cj/2025-10-11/doc-inftnpwr8889861.shtml

Crypto di tendenza

Domande pertinenti

QAccording to the article, what are the three main paths in the global payment industry landscape?

AThe article outlines three main paths: 1) Web3/Digital Currency Payments, which seeks to bypass traditional financial infrastructure. 2) Wrapping Traditional Infrastructure, where companies layer a better user experience on top of existing, often complex, partner networks. 3) Building Global Financial Infrastructure, which involves obtaining local licenses, building in-country operations, and owning the underlying technology and compliance frameworks.

QWhat is the core argument for why Airwallex and similar companies choose the 'heavy' path of building their own global infrastructure?

AThe core argument is that by building and owning the foundational infrastructure—including licenses, local operations, and compliance networks—the platform absorbs complexity and risk. This allows the company to 'use its own "heaviness" to exchange for the customer's "lightness,"' providing clients with more stability, lower long-term operational costs, and greater certainty when navigating different markets and regulatory changes.

QWhat key problem does the article identify with the 'Wrapping Traditional Infrastructure' approach taken by many payment platforms?

AThe key problem is that this approach primarily optimizes the front-end user experience but does not fundamentally change the underlying payment logic. Core issues like reliance on correspondent banking networks, dependencies on bilateral partnerships, and compliance risks are still present and managed by third parties, meaning the complexity and potential instability are merely masked, not eliminated.

QWhy does the article suggest Web3/digital currency payment startups have struggled to compete with mainstream payment platforms?

AThe article suggests they struggle because mainstream platforms already offer highly efficient services (e.g., fast global payments, low costs, local support) and possess a comprehensive advantage in technology, service, and product. Furthermore, digital currency payments face significant unresolved compliance and regulatory friction. This leaves new Web3 players often serving only fragmented markets or high-risk clients that mainstream platforms avoid.

QWhat three concrete values do enterprise customers ultimately seek from a global payment platform, as stated in the article?

AEnterprise customers seek three concrete values: 1) More Stability ('geng wen'), meaning a consistent operational framework across different markets. 2) More Savings ('geng sheng'), which refers not just to transaction fees but reduced costs for system integration, communication, and compliance. 3) More Certainty ('geng que ding'), which is the assurance of a robust, long-term underlying capability that can withstand market and regulatory shifts.

Letture associate

After Three Consecutive Quarters of Decline, Can the Crypto Market Find a Window for Stabilization in Q3?

The cryptocurrency market has just concluded its worst-performing quarter since 2022, with total capitalization dropping 12.6% to $2.1 trillion. All core metrics indicate capital is leaving the sector, not just rotating within it. Bitcoin fell 14.2% and Ethereum dropped 25.4% in Q2, breaking their previous correlation with US tech stocks. A key driver is the reversal in US spot Bitcoin ETF flows, which saw a net outflow of approximately $4.67 billion in Q2, including a record monthly outflow near $4.5 billion in June. While recent data suggests long-term holders are accumulating again, sustained ETF outflows mean continued selling pressure. Market focus is now singularly on the Federal Reserve. The upcoming July FOMC meeting is seen as the most critical event for Q3. A dovish signal could support Bitcoin reclaiming a $68,000-$84,000 range, while a hawkish stance might establish a new trading band around $50,000-$56,000. Additionally, regulatory uncertainty persists, with the progress of the crucial *CLARITY Act* stalling in the Senate, reducing its perceived 2026 passage probability to 40-45%. Despite the broad downturn, a few sectors showed growth. Prediction markets saw nominal volume surge 48.7% year-over-year to $113.8 billion, and tokenized collectibles transaction volume rose 143% quarterly to $1.4 billion. The Real-World Asset (RWA) tokenization sector also continued steady growth, now representing ~$28.1 billion in on-chain value. The market's foundation for an extreme crash appears limited, with Bitcoin price hovering near its 200-week moving average. However, the trading paradigm has shifted from narrative-driven speculation to decisions based on price action, policy developments, and interest rate expectations, making a broad sentiment-driven rally unlikely in the near term.

marsbit4 h fa

After Three Consecutive Quarters of Decline, Can the Crypto Market Find a Window for Stabilization in Q3?

marsbit4 h fa

BIT Trading Moment: BTC Still Suppressed by Weekly 200 EMA, Rejection May Restart Decline; Storage and Semiconductors that Surged Last Night Begin Falling in Evening Trading

**Crypto & Stock Market Wrap: Bitcoin Tests Resistance, Stocks Retreat After AI Surge** Bitcoin consolidates around $66,000, facing key resistance near $68,000—an area seen as a major psychological and technical hurdle where previous rallies have failed. Analysts note the cryptocurrency is caught between its 200-week moving average (~$63,333) and 200-week EMA (~$68,328). A clear break above $68k is needed to signal a stronger bullish trend, while a rejection could lead to a retest of $63k support. Market sentiment remains cautious, with low futures open interest pointing to a low-liquidity rebound rather than a full bull market. Bitcoin spot ETFs saw another $203 million inflow. US stock futures pointed lower after a strong Tuesday session led by a massive rebound in semiconductors and memory stocks. The rally was fueled by renewed optimism about AI-driven hardware demand, with Micron, SanDisk, and SK Hynix surging. However, those gains reversed in pre-market trading. Super Micro Computer (SMCI) soared over 20% after hours on strong guidance and a record backlog. Other standouts included Rocket Lab and nuclear energy plays Oklo and X-Energy. Rising oil prices (Brent above $91) and climbing Treasury yields (10-year near 4.64%), however, are reigniting inflation concerns and acting as a headwind for equities. In Asia, markets were mixed. South Korea's KOSPI pared early gains to close slightly higher as semiconductor stocks like SK Hynix gave back initial surges. Japan's Nikkei edged lower as the yen hit a fresh 38-year low against the dollar, raising fears of potential market intervention. Key events to watch include the Samsung Galaxy launch, AMD's AI event, and a slew of major tech earnings from Alphabet, Tesla, and IBM after the close on Wednesday, followed by the ECB meeting and Intel's earnings on Thursday.

marsbit4 h fa

BIT Trading Moment: BTC Still Suppressed by Weekly 200 EMA, Rejection May Restart Decline; Storage and Semiconductors that Surged Last Night Begin Falling in Evening Trading

marsbit4 h fa

Former CFTC Chairman, Circle President Tarbert: Preaching Long-Termism While Cashing Out $30 Million Himself

Former CFTC Chairman and Circle President Heath Tarbert has consistently advocated for a long-term vision in public, urging patience from investors as Circle’s stock price has fallen significantly from its peak. However, it has been revealed that since Circle’s IPO, Tarbert has continuously sold his CRCL shares through pre-arranged trading plans, cashing out approximately $30 million, without making any public market purchases. This contrast between his public messaging and personal actions has drawn criticism. Tarbert joined Circle in July 2023 as Chief Legal Officer, leveraging his regulatory experience to help guide the company through its IPO and expansion. Despite promoting stablecoins as long-term infrastructure, he established a 10b5-1 trading plan just before Circle went public, leading to substantial stock sales over the following year. In March 2026, he initiated another plan to sell more shares. His career trajectory highlights a pattern of moving between high-level regulatory roles and influential positions in the financial sector. After resigning as CFTC Chairman in early 2021, he joined Citadel Securities as Chief Legal Officer just 27 days later, during a period of intense regulatory scrutiny for the firm. He later joined Circle, aiding its efforts to navigate regulatory challenges for its public listing. While Tarbert's expertise in policy and compliance is valuable to companies like Circle, his actions—advocating long-term confidence while personally divesting—raise questions about the alignment between his public statements and his private financial decisions, leaving investors who followed his advice to bear the market risks.

marsbit4 h fa

Former CFTC Chairman, Circle President Tarbert: Preaching Long-Termism While Cashing Out $30 Million Himself

marsbit4 h fa

Gate Research Institute: The 'Wall Street-ization' Wave of Crypto Financial Products – Competition or Integration?

The article titled "Gate Research Institute: Are Crypto Financial Products Sparking a 'Wall Street' Wave—Competition or Convergence?" explores the evolving relationship between the crypto ecosystem and traditional finance (TradFi). The piece begins by reflecting on Bitcoin's original 2009 vision of decentralization, disintermediation, and moving away from banks. It then contrasts this with the 2024 landscape, where key crypto assets like Bitcoin are increasingly held through Wall Street products like ETFs issued by giants like BlackRock. The article questions whether this signifies that TradFi is systematically taking over the rights to issue, price, custody, and distribute crypto financial assets. The core argument is that this is not a zero-sum takeover but rather a bidirectional convergence where each side addresses the other's weaknesses. Crypto offers 24/7 global markets, programmable settlement, and open access but lacks compliant channels, institutional-grade custody, deep fiat liquidity, and mainstream distribution. TradFi possesses these but is constrained by legacy systems, limited operating hours, and slow settlement. Two primary convergence paths are highlighted: * **Path A (CEX to TradFi):** Exemplified by Gate, which has progressed from offering tokenized stocks and CFDs to providing direct, real stock trading (US, Hong Kong, South Korea) within its platform, using USDT. * **Path B (TradFi to Crypto):** Exemplified by Robinhood, which has integrated crypto trading, acquired exchanges like Bitstamp, and is moving traditional assets like stocks onto the blockchain via tokenization and its own Layer 2. Both paths are ultimately competing to become the next-generation, unified financial account—a "super account" where users can seamlessly trade cryptocurrencies, stocks, ETFs, RWA (Real World Assets), and tokenized treasury products in one interface. The growth of RWA and tokenized treasuries (e.g., BlackRock's BUIDL) is presented as the asset-layer fusion, providing stable, yield-bearing assets on-chain and acting as a bridge between the two worlds. In conclusion, the "Wall Street-ization" of crypto is framed as a mutual transformation. Decentralized ideals persist in the protocol layer, while at the application layer, a more efficient, global, and accessible unified capital market is emerging from this convergence. The future competition lies not between crypto exchanges and stockbrokers, but between platforms vying to offer the most comprehensive asset coverage, liquidity, and user experience within a single account.

marsbit4 h fa

Gate Research Institute: The 'Wall Street-ization' Wave of Crypto Financial Products – Competition or Integration?

marsbit4 h fa

Trading

Spot

Articoli Popolari

Come comprare PEOPLE

Benvenuto in HTX.com! Abbiamo reso l'acquisto di ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE) semplice e conveniente. Segui la nostra guida passo passo per intraprendere il tuo viaggio nel mondo delle criptovalute.Step 1: Crea il tuo Account HTXUsa la tua email o numero di telefono per registrarti il tuo account gratuito su HTX. Vivi un'esperienza facile e sblocca tutte le funzionalità,Crea il mio accountStep 2: Vai in Acquista crypto e seleziona il tuo metodo di pagamentoCarta di credito/debito: utilizza la tua Visa o Mastercard per acquistare immediatamente ConstitutionDAOPEOPLE.Bilancio: Usa i fondi dal bilancio del tuo account HTX per fare trading senza problemi.Terze parti: abbiamo aggiunto metodi di pagamento molto utilizzati come Google Pay e Apple Pay per maggiore comodità.P2P: Fai trading direttamente con altri utenti HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): Offriamo servizi su misura e tassi di cambio competitivi per i trader.Step 3: Conserva ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE)Dopo aver acquistato ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE), conserva nel tuo account HTX. In alternativa, puoi inviare tramite trasferimento blockchain o scambiare per altre criptovalute.Step 4: Scambia ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE)Scambia facilmente ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE) nel mercato spot di HTX. Accedi al tuo account, seleziona la tua coppia di trading, esegui le tue operazioni e monitora in tempo reale. Offriamo un'esperienza user-friendly sia per chi ha appena iniziato che per i trader più esperti.

508 Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2024.12.12Aggiornato il 2026.06.02

Come comprare PEOPLE

Discussioni

Benvenuto nella Community HTX. Qui puoi rimanere informato sugli ultimi sviluppi della piattaforma e accedere ad approfondimenti esperti sul mercato. Le opinioni degli utenti sul prezzo di PEOPLE PEOPLE sono presentate come di seguito.

活动图片