# Stagnation Articoli collegati

Il Centro Notizie HTX fornisce gli articoli più recenti e le analisi più approfondite su "Stagnation", coprendo tendenze di mercato, aggiornamenti sui progetti, sviluppi tecnologici e politiche normative nel settore crypto.

Three Years of 'Decentralization' Promises Unfulfilled: Is Base Still at a Standstill?

**Summary: "Three Years of 'Decentralization' Promises Unfulfilled – Has Base Stagnated?"** This article critically examines Coinbase's layer-2 blockchain, Base, arguing that its three-year promise of decentralization remains unfulfilled. Originally launched in 2023 with a roadmap towards decentralization, Base has consistently been rated at "Stage 0" (fully centralized) by industry monitors like L2Beat, indicating no meaningful decentralization progress. Key points include: * **Broken Promises:** Coinbase's 2023 and 2024 decentralization roadmaps and commitments, made in partnership with Optimism, have been largely abandoned without substantial progress. In 2026, Coinbase scrapped its original plan and consolidated all administrative control (via multi-signature wallets) under its own authority. * **Centralized Reality:** The article asserts Base is effectively a centralized, inefficient distributed database run by Coinbase employees, not a decentralized network. This was highlighted by two network outages in June 2026, where Coinbase directly modified code and rolled back the blockchain to fix issues. * **Regulatory and Legal Concerns:** The author raises significant questions about compliance. Base operates without mandatory KYC/AML checks, which may conflict with Coinbase's existing financial licenses that require such oversight. The prolonged lack of progress challenges the legitimacy of continued regulatory forbearance. * **Broader Industry Problem:** The stagnation is framed as part of a wider industry failure, where most Ethereum layer-2s have made slow or no progress toward the technically challenging "Stage 2" full decentralization envisioned by figures like Vitalik Buterin. In conclusion, the article posits that Base represents a case of "decentralization theater," where marketing and complex terminology obscure a centrally-controlled service that may be operating in a regulatory gray area for an unreasonably long period without delivering on its core promise.

marsbit07/20 09:19

Three Years of 'Decentralization' Promises Unfulfilled: Is Base Still at a Standstill?

marsbit07/20 09:19

Avon Co-founder's Viral Article: Why Has DeFi Lost Its Charm?

The article "Why DeFi Has Lost Its Charm" by Avon co-founder Prince argues that DeFi is no longer perceived as innovative or exciting, despite continued development and maturation. The core issue is a shift in user psychology from curiosity to caution, and a convergence of user behavior around incentives rather than genuine utility. DeFi Summer represented a period of rapid innovation and market structure formation, but today's DeFi often feels like a repetition of established patterns with better execution. User behavior has become highly speculative and optimized around trading, leverage, and easy exits. This has shaped the ecosystem's expectations: participation is now something that requires monetary compensation, rather than being driven by a product's inherent usefulness. Lending in DeFi, for example, has evolved into short-term financing for positions like leverage and arbitrage, rather than functioning as a true credit market. Yield has become a baseline expectation for participation, justified by the numerous risks (smart contract, governance, oracle, bridge risks). This leads to a "rented" adoption—activity spikes during incentive programs but vanishes afterward, making it difficult to build sustainable, long-term projects. Trust has also been eroded by years of exploits, scams, and governance failures, making users more cautious and less willing to explore new projects. This risk aversion, combined with the high compensation demanded for risk, has compressed the space for experimentation. The author concludes that DeFi hasn't failed; it has successfully optimized for a specific set of behaviors (liquidity, speed, exit ease) but in doing so, has made it harder to expand into new use cases. For DeFi to regain its charm, it must create structures that make different user behaviors rational—where capital stays for reasons beyond incentives, and yield represents a responsible decision rather than a headline number. This would lead to quieter, slower, but more sustainable growth driven by genuine need.

Odaily星球日报12/24 09:51

Avon Co-founder's Viral Article: Why Has DeFi Lost Its Charm?

Odaily星球日报12/24 09:51

活动图片