# Public Chain Articoli collegati

Il Centro Notizie HTX fornisce gli articoli più recenti e le analisi più approfondite su "Public Chain", coprendo tendenze di mercato, aggiornamenti sui progetti, sviluppi tecnologici e politiche normative nel settore crypto.

After Aave's Exit and TVL's Sharp Fluctuation, Where Does MegaETH's Valuation Anchor Lie?

Following the withdrawal of Aave and a sharp drop in its Total Value Locked (TVL), the valuation of the high-performance DeFi blockchain MegaETH faces scrutiny. Once a highly anticipated project with a fully diluted valuation (FDV) reaching around $2 billion, MegaETH saw its TVL plummet from a May peak of $245 million to just over $30 million in July, a roughly 70% decline. Its native token, MEGA, currently trades around $0.048 with a market cap of approximately $54 million and an FDV of about $480 million. The report identifies a core vulnerability: MegaETH's TVL was heavily dependent on a single protocol, Aave V3, which at its peak contributed around 90% of the chain's TVL. A significant portion of this capital is attributed to leveraged yield-farming strategies involving stablecoins like USDe. When the profitability of these strategies diminished, capital rapidly exited, exposing the lack of diversified, sustainable activity. Three key mismatches between MegaETH's valuation and its fundamentals are highlighted: 1. **Valuation vs. Real Usage:** With an FDV of ~$4.8B but only ~$1M in annualized protocol revenue and ~2,600 daily active addresses, the valuation appears disconnected from current economic activity. 2. **Token Narrative vs. Ecosystem Reality:** Despite its DeFi narrative, nearly 80% of the chain's recent protocol revenue comes from a trading card game, Monster, not from core DeFi applications like Aave. The chain's native stablecoin, USDM, also shows low trading volume and a declining market cap. 3. **Short-Term Hype vs. Long-Term Delivery:** Initial hype from token generation, blue-chip integrations, and influencer support has faded. Major protocols like Uniswap now hold minimal TVL on the chain, indicating that early capital was largely transient and driven by incentives rather than organic demand. The situation reflects a broader market trend where investors are becoming less tolerant of valuations based on inflated TVL and narrative, demanding clearer evidence of sustainable transactions, revenue, and ecosystem development. While MEGA's price may experience short-term rebounds from market sentiment, a fundamental re-rating likely depends on the team's ability to convert its remaining resources into tangible, user-retaining applications and genuine ecosystem growth.

链捕手07/10 14:43

After Aave's Exit and TVL's Sharp Fluctuation, Where Does MegaETH's Valuation Anchor Lie?

链捕手07/10 14:43

Switching Chains for Another Shot at Success: Can It Really 'Change One's Destiny'?

Recent months have witnessed a wave of established blockchain projects migrating to new public chains, notably Base and Arbitrum, coupled with strategic pivots in their business models—essentially "re-starting" elsewhere. Examples include Sophon (moving from ZKsync to Base to cut $3M+ annual costs and focus on consumer apps), Moonbeam (shifting from Polkadot to Base to pursue decentralized AI), and Secret Network (planning a move from Cosmos to Arbitrum to explore privacy-AI integrations, though its token price plunged 30% post-announcement). A common thread is that these migrating projects are primarily layer-1 or layer-2 chains now seeking relevance in AI and real-world consumer applications. This trend highlights the relative stagnation of ecosystems like Polkadot and Cosmos, which are seeing significant outflows. However, the community remains skeptical about whether such chain-hopping truly enables a turnaround. Historical cases like y00ts NFTs (which moved from Solana to Polygon and back to Ethereum) and Synthetix (which retreated from a multi-chain strategy) show that migration often fails to deliver expected benefits and can add complexity. In today's more rational market, devoid of easy narrative or airdrop红利, simply changing chains is unlikely to be a silver bullet. For both migrating projects and destination chains, the real challenge lies not in attracting projects but in developing actual use cases that retain users.

marsbit07/10 10:12

Switching Chains for Another Shot at Success: Can It Really 'Change One's Destiny'?

marsbit07/10 10:12

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

NEAR Returns to AI Origins: From Payroll Struggles to Blockchain, Now Focusing on AI Agents and Privacy NEAR Protocol's journey began not with grand blockchain ambitions, but from a practical hurdle: its AI startup founders, including Transformer paper co-author Illia Polosukhin, couldn't efficiently pay international developers in 2017. This led them to pivot and build a high-performance, scalable blockchain. After years navigating various crypto narratives like sharding and cross-chain interoperability, NEAR is now leveraging its AI roots to re-enter the AI arena. A key driver is its "NEAR Intents" layer, which abstracts complex cross-chain transactions. Users simply state their goal (e.g., swap BTC for ETH), and a solver network finds the optimal route. This system has processed over $20B in cross-chain volume, generating significant fee revenue. A major growth area is private transactions via "Confidential Intents/Swaps," which hide trade details until settlement to protect against MEV and front-running. Remarkably, private swaps recently accounted for over 40% of NEAR's transaction volume, highlighting strong demand but also potential regulatory scrutiny. With its AI-founder pedigree, NEAR is positioning itself at the intersection of blockchain, AI agents, and privacy, aiming to become infrastructure for the emerging agent economy while navigating the challenges of its rapid adoption.

marsbit06/05 12:51

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

marsbit06/05 12:51

Bitroot Public Chain Invited to Attend Tencent Cloud Singapore AI Conference, Discussing the Future Alongside Solana

On May 19, Bitroot, an emerging Layer 1 blockchain, participated in the Tencent Cloud AI Summit in Singapore alongside key industry players like Solana Foundation. The event explored the intersection of AI infrastructure, enterprise applications, AI Agents, and Web3. Bitroot's invitation, despite being pre-mainnet, highlights industry interest in its focus on high-performance, AI-native architecture tailored for future AI Agent execution and verifiable on-chain automation. Bitroot CEO Juan Jose emphasized that AI competition is shifting from model performance to data, real-world application scenarios, and trust infrastructure. He argued that for AI Agents to evolve from assistants to autonomous executors managing transactions and assets, they require low-latency, low-cost, and high-throughput blockchain environments. Bitroot aims to address this through its EVM-compatible design, optimistic parallel execution, and a consensus mechanism targeting high scalability. Currently in its Testnet 5.0 phase, Bitroot reports metrics like over 50,000 peak TPS and sub-0.3 second average block time. Its narrative positions it within a growing landscape where next-generation Layer 1s like Monad and Aptos also compete on performance, while Bitroot differentiates by integrating AI computational capabilities natively across its stack. The summit underscored that the fusion of AI and Web3 is moving from concept to infrastructure competition, where networks balancing performance, security, and verifiability will be crucial for enabling scalable AI-driven applications.

marsbit05/27 08:13

Bitroot Public Chain Invited to Attend Tencent Cloud Singapore AI Conference, Discussing the Future Alongside Solana

marsbit05/27 08:13

From Singapore to Solana: Rebalancing Efficiency, Prosperity, and Cost

"From Singapore to Solana: Rebalancing Efficiency, Prosperity, and Cost" explores the governance of blockchain ecosystems through the lens of nation-building, drawing parallels between Singapore’s historical development and Solana’s evolution as a public blockchain. The article begins by comparing Singapore’s sudden independence in 1965 to Solana’s crisis following the collapse of FTX in 2022—both faced existential threats but leveraged unique advantages to survive. Singapore relied on its strategic geographic location, while Solana capitalized on its high throughput and low transaction costs. It traces Solana’s early dependence on FTX—akin to Singapore’s reliance on British military spending—and examines how both entities navigated periods of "grey" economic activity. For Solana, the meme coin boom (e.g., Bonk, WIF) served a similar role as Singapore’s early tolerance of ambiguous capital flows: attracting users, testing infrastructure, and sustaining economic activity during a downturn. The piece also analyzes token economics as monetary policy, comparing Singapore’s managed exchange rate system to Solana’s emission and burn mechanisms. It argues that dynamic, responsive monetary governance—rather than fixed tokenomics—is essential for long-term stability. Finally, it discusses community alignment using Singapore’s public housing system (HDB) as a model for incentivizing stakeholder commitment. Solana’s challenge is to unify diverse groups—speculators, developers, validators—by aligning their interests with the chain’s success. The conclusion emphasizes that blockchain competition is ultimately about governance: short-term narratives, mid-term technology, but long-term institutional and economic design. Solana, like Singapore, must transition from survival to sustainable, value-driven growth.

比推03/20 06:48

From Singapore to Solana: Rebalancing Efficiency, Prosperity, and Cost

比推03/20 06:48

VC Investment Trends Shift: Public Chains and AI Cool Down; Prediction and Payment Take the Lead

Venture capital investment in the crypto sector is shifting significantly, moving away from previously dominant areas like Layer 1 and Layer 2 blockchains and AI projects. According to recent data, out of 73 projects that raised over $10 million in the past three months, almost none were new public chains. Similarly, AI × Web3 sector saw only two major raises, totaling $22.8 million. Instead, prediction markets and payment systems are now attracting substantial capital. Prediction platforms Polymarket and Kalshi alone secured over $3.15 billion, driven by Polymarket’s accurate election forecasts and growing user engagement. The payment and banking sector raised nearly $1.3 billion, with companies like Ripple Labs and Rapyd leading large rounds. Stablecoin transaction volumes now rival Visa, highlighting the sector’s expansion. Real World Assets (RWA) are also gaining traction, with over $850 million raised—led by Figure’s $787.5 million IPO. Tokenized assets on-chain now exceed $36 billion. Additionally, user-friendly infrastructure projects, such as simplified wallets and onboarding tools, are receiving significant investment to attract mainstream adoption. While DeFi remains active with around $740 million in funding, it no longer dominates VC attention. The trend indicates a clear pivot toward applications with real-world use cases and revenue potential over pure infrastructure.

Odaily星球日报12/27 13:41

VC Investment Trends Shift: Public Chains and AI Cool Down; Prediction and Payment Take the Lead

Odaily星球日报12/27 13:41

Public Chain Moat Only 3/10? Alliance DAO Founder's Remarks Ignite Crypto Community Debate

Alliance DAO founder qw (@QwQiao) sparked intense debate in the crypto community by claiming that Layer 1 blockchains have "limited moats," rating them only 3/10 in terms of sustainable competitive advantage. This triggered strong reactions from key industry figures. Dragonfly Capital partner Haseeb strongly disagreed, arguing that Ethereum’s decade-long dominance despite well-funded challengers proves its strong moat. Others, like Multicoin’s Kyle Samani and researchers from Ethereum and Circle, questioned whether liquidity alone constitutes a real moat, with some calling it fleeting and unreliable. In response, qw elaborated on his moat rating framework, giving traditional giants like Microsoft, Apple, and Visa perfect scores (10/10) based on revenue models and infrastructure, while rating top crypto projects around 5/10. He notably rated Bitcoin at 9/10, citing its unique founding story and Lindy effect, but deducted a point due to uncertainties around security and quantum threats. The debate expanded into what truly constitutes a moat in crypto. Critics argued qw’s framework overemphasizes current revenue and undervalues network effects, trust, and technological ethos. Defenders of blockchain moats pointed to elements like developer ecosystems, brand strength, switching costs, and application diversity as core defensive attributes. The article concludes that the crypto industry is still young and small compared to traditional finance and tech giants. Rather than fixating on abstract moat concepts, the priority should be solving real user needs at scale, driving adoption, and expanding overall market reach.

marsbit12/13 03:06

Public Chain Moat Only 3/10? Alliance DAO Founder's Remarks Ignite Crypto Community Debate

marsbit12/13 03:06

活动图片