# Portfolio Rebalancing Articoli collegati

Il Centro Notizie HTX fornisce gli articoli più recenti e le analisi più approfondite su "Portfolio Rebalancing", coprendo tendenze di mercato, aggiornamenti sui progetti, sviluppi tecnologici e politiche normative nel settore crypto.

Who is Selling, Who is Holding, Who is Still Buying? The Divergence of U.S. Old Money's Crypto ETF Holdings

"American Institutional Crypto ETF Holdings Show Divergence in Q1 2026. Amidst a quarter of market pullback, major institutional 13F filings reveal distinct strategies towards crypto ETFs. Key sell-offs/trimming: Harvard Management cut its iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) holdings by ~43% and fully exited its iShares Ethereum Trust (ETHA) position, reallocating some funds toward AI/tech stocks. Goldman Sachs reduced its overall crypto ETF exposure, notably clearing its XRP and Solana ETF holdings while adding to selected crypto-related equities like Circle and Galaxy Digital. Hedge funds Millennium Management and Capula Management also significantly reduced or fully exited major Bitcoin and Ethereum ETF positions. Holders maintaining positions: Brown University kept its IBIT stake unchanged, demonstrating a long-term allocation approach. Dartmouth College maintained its core Bitcoin ETF holding while shifting some Ethereum exposure to a staking ETF and initiating a position in a Bitwise Solana Staking ETF. Strategic buyers increasing exposure: Sovereign wealth fund Mubadala increased its IBIT holdings by ~16%. JPMorgan significantly boosted its IBIT stake by 174%, while Wells Fargo raised its Ethereum ETF allocations. Market maker Jane Street rebalanced, cutting Bitcoin ETF holdings but adding ~$82 million in Ethereum ETF exposure. The filings indicate institutions are actively sorting crypto assets by perceived risk and liquidity, with Bitcoin often treated as a 'core' holding, Ethereum facing mixed treatment, and altcoins like Solana and XRP being the first to be cut or used for tactical 'elastic' allocations by some. It's crucial to note that 13F data is a lagging snapshot (as of March 31) and doesn't reveal entry costs or potential off-balance-sheet hedging strategies."

marsbit05/22 02:59

Who is Selling, Who is Holding, Who is Still Buying? The Divergence of U.S. Old Money's Crypto ETF Holdings

marsbit05/22 02:59

How Did Institutions Adjust Their Crypto Asset Holdings in Q1? Who Increased and Who Exited?

The Q1 2026 13F filings reveal a sharply divided picture of institutional activity in crypto assets. Sovereign wealth funds and bank capital increased exposure, while major endowment funds notably de-risked. The most significant buying came from the Abu Dhabi sovereign wealth fund Mubadala, which expanded its position in the iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT). JPMorgan Chase dramatically increased its IBIT exposure by 174%, with other global banks like RBC, Scotiabank, and Barclays also adding to Bitcoin ETF holdings, while using options for asymmetric protection. Conversely, the Harvard Management Company (Harvard University's endowment), once a major academic holder, cut its IBIT position by 43% and fully exited a BlackRock Ethereum ETF. The reallocated capital flowed into traditional assets like TSMC, Microsoft, and gold. Other Ivy League endowments showed varied strategies: Brown and Dartmouth maintained Bitcoin positions, with Dartmouth making a nuanced shift by moving Ethereum exposure to a staking ETF and adding a Solana staking ETF to capture yield. Hedge fund Jane Street significantly reduced Bitcoin ETF holdings, locking in profits, while Wells Fargo increased its Ethereum stake. Overall, institutions are deploying traditional capital market tactics—buying, selling, hedging, and rotating—within crypto via spot ETFs. The Q2 reports will be crucial to determine if Harvard's retreat is an outlier or the start of a broader trend among endowments.

marsbit05/18 02:55

How Did Institutions Adjust Their Crypto Asset Holdings in Q1? Who Increased and Who Exited?

marsbit05/18 02:55

活动图片

Market Analysisright-arrow

Othersright-arrow