# Diversity Articoli collegati

Il Centro Notizie HTX fornisce gli articoli più recenti e le analisi più approfondite su "Diversity", coprendo tendenze di mercato, aggiornamenti sui progetti, sviluppi tecnologici e politiche normative nel settore crypto.

Prompt Engineering Paper Accepted at ICML 2026 Sparks Heated Debate Among Netizens

A paper on prompt engineering, titled "Verbalized Sampling (VS)," has been accepted by the prestigious machine learning conference ICML 2026, sparking significant debate online. The paper addresses the problem of "mode collapse" in large language models (LLMs), where models tend to produce repetitive, safe, and homogeneous outputs. Instead of proposing new training algorithms or model architectures, the authors introduce a simple yet effective prompt-based method. The core technique, Verbalized Sampling, instructs the model to generate multiple responses (e.g., five jokes) while also outputting a possible probability value for each. This prompt adjustment alone was shown to significantly increase output diversity by 1.6x to 2.1x in creative writing tasks, without compromising factual accuracy or safety. The authors argue that the root cause of mode collapse lies not in optimization algorithms but in the "typicality bias" present in human preference data used for alignment. Human annotators naturally favor familiar and fluent text, which steers models toward conservative outputs. The VS method aims to counteract this by leveraging the model's inherent pre-training distribution during inference. The paper's acceptance has led to polarized reactions. Critics argue that prompt engineering lacks the theoretical depth and algorithmic innovation expected from top-tier conferences like ICML, questioning its novelty, generalizability across models, and experimental scale. Some draw parallels to reproducibility crises in other fields, citing a potential over-reliance on empirical results. Supporters, including an author who responded online, defend the work's rigor. They emphasize its comprehensive problem analysis, theoretical grounding, mathematical derivation, and extensive quantitative experiments. Proponents compare VS to seminal techniques like Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting, suggesting that inference-stage methods are becoming a core part of ML research capable of expanding model capabilities without retraining. The research was conducted by a team from Northeastern University, Stanford University, and West Virginia University, with Jiayi Zhang, Simon Yu, and Derek Chong as co-first authors.

marsbit07/15 07:56

Prompt Engineering Paper Accepted at ICML 2026 Sparks Heated Debate Among Netizens

marsbit07/15 07:56

From "Manual Rules" to "AI Mind Reading": X's New Algorithm Reshapes the Information Flow, More Accurate and More Dangerous

Elon Musk's X (formerly Twitter) has transitioned from a recommendation system based on "manually stacked rules and heuristic algorithms" to one that relies entirely on a large AI model to predict user preferences. The new algorithm, For You," mixes content from accounts a user follows with posts from across the platform that the AI believes the user will like. The process begins by building a user profile based on historical interactions (likes, retweets, dwell time) and user features (following list, preferences). The system then gathers candidate posts from two sources: the user's direct network ("Thunder") and a broader network of potentially interesting content from strangers ("Phoenix"). After data hydration and an initial filtering step to remove duplicates, old posts, or content from blacklisted authors, the core scoring process begins. A Transformer model (Phoenix Grok) predicts the probability of a user taking various positive actions (like, retweet, reply, click) or negative ones (block, mute, report) on each post. A final score is calculated by weighting these probabilities. An Author Diversity Scorer is then applied to reduce the visibility of multiple posts from the same author in a single batch. The highest-scoring posts undergo a final filter to remove policy-violating content and remove duplicates from the same thread before being sorted into the user's feed. The shift represents a move from "telling the machine what to do" to "letting the machine learn what to do." While this can lead to more accurate recommendations and a fairer system that breaks the monopoly of large accounts, it also risks deepening users' "information cocoons" and making them more susceptible to targeted emotional content.

比推01/20 13:38

From "Manual Rules" to "AI Mind Reading": X's New Algorithm Reshapes the Information Flow, More Accurate and More Dangerous

比推01/20 13:38

活动图片