Strategy Watch #5

insights.glassnodePubblicato 2026-06-26Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-06-26

Introduzione

Strategy Watch #5 analyzes institutional digital asset trends in May, highlighting diverging flows. While corporate treasuries continued accumulating Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH), spot ETF investors reduced exposure. Market-neutral strategies benefited as CME basis yields turned positive, reviving cash-and-carry trades. A deep dive into DeFi notes that while outflows slowed, total value locked (TVL) continued declining. The report also covers fund performance, on-chain vault yields, manager positioning as cash balances rise, and new institutional expansion initiatives.

The full report is freely available in PDF format.

Download PDF version

Welcome to Strategy Watch #4

Strategy Watch was built to address a clear demand for high-signal, impartial analysis of fund-level performance and allocation trends in digital assets.

Our objective is straightforward — to make Strategy Watch a must-read monthly publication for the digital asset investment community.

This publication is strengthened by direct input from market participants. Funds and allocators that contribute data and insights help shape a more complete and valuable view of the landscape. If you have insights, data, or allocation updates worth sharing, we welcome your contribution.

Present your latest initiatives and updates to a curated audience of institutional allocators.

Share updates ↗

Inside the Latest Strategy Watch

The report is structured across six core sections, each focused on a distinct dimension of institutional activity in digital assets:

01 Institutional Flow Monitor | Institutional demand split by vehicle in May. ETF allocators reduced exposure while digital asset treasuries kept accumulating. What does this divergence signal for allocator positioning?

02 Fund and SMA Performance | Market-neutral strategies kept compounding gains, while the strongest directional returns came from stock selection rather than market beta.

03 Strategy Deep Dive: DeFi/Yield | A CIO's perspective on why fundamentals matter more than ever, and where the next wave of crypto value creation will accrue.

04 On-chain Vault Performance | On-chain credit continues to stabilize, but can vault yields compete with Treasury rates and native ETH staking?

05 Manager Monitor | Find out how managers are positioning as cash balances rise and fundraising conditions remain subdued.

06 Allocation Updates | Institutional expansion continued through new investment firms, dedicated crypto divisions, and quant fund launches.

in partnership with

The Premier Digital Assets Allocator Platform. Learn more


Institutional Flow Monitor

  • Bitcoin flows hovered near neutral while Ethereum outflows deepened and stablecoin inflows reversed sharply into month-end.

April's tentative stabilization carried into May for Bitcoin alone. BTC flows held close to neutral, spiking to +$2.9B on May 07 before drifting back to -$0.3B at the close. Ethereum again diverged, deepening from -$1.7B to a -$2.4B trough late in the month before ending at -$2.1B. The sharper signal came from stablecoins, which reversed from a +$6.1B peak early in May to -$2.5B by month-end, a decisive swing into net outflow. That rotation out of dollar liquidity points to allocators trimming risk into June rather than redeploying into spot.

ETF & DAT Net Flows

  • Spot ETF flows for both Bitcoin and Ethereum swung from early-month highs into outflows while treasury vehicles kept accumulating.

Institutional demand split by vehicle in May. Spot ETF flows peaked early, with Bitcoin at +46.8k BTC and Ethereum at +283.4k ETH on May 05, before both rolled over into net redemptions, closing at -33.1k BTC and -261.5k ETH as ETF outflows reached a monthly record. Digital asset treasuries told the opposite story and stayed positive throughout. BTC DAT flows held between +26.1k and +60.4k BTC, ending at +42.9k, while ETH DAT flows ran from +302.4k to +439.2k ETH before settling at +330.8k. The divergence suggests balance-sheet buyers kept accumulating into weakness even as ETF allocators de-risked.

DeFi TVL & Stablecoin Cap

  • Ethereum DeFi TVL ground to new monthly lows even as the pace of net outflows eased through the second half of May.

The contraction that followed April's lending exploit persisted through May, though its intensity faded. Ethereum TVL slipped from $45.1B to $41.7B, closing at the monthly low after peaking at $46.1B on May 11. The flow picture was more constructive than the level implied. Thirty-day net flows stayed negative throughout but recovered from a -$13.3B trough on May 18 to -$3.2B by month-end, the shallowest outflow pace since the exploit. The combination of a falling TVL base alongside decelerating outflows suggests the forced deleveraging phase is largely complete, though fresh inflows remain absent.

CME Basis Yield

  • CME basis yields for both Bitcoin and Ethereum climbed back into positive territory through May, reviving the cash-and-carry trade.

Here we measure the return available to institutions running cash-and-carry trades. After April left both curves in backwardation, May delivered a clean reversal. BTC basis yield bottomed at -$29.3M on May 09 before rising steadily to +$16.0M, the monthly high reached at the close. ETH followed the same path, recovering from -$6.2M at the open to +$12.8M by month-end. Both series finished May at their peaks, with futures reclaiming a premium to spot for the first time since March. The rebuild restores a positive carry to market-neutral strategies, and a continuation into June would mark the firmest premium environment in several months.


Disclaimer: This report does not provide any investment advice. All data is provided for information and educational purposes only. No investment decision shall be based on the information provided here and you are solely responsible for your own investment decisions.
Exchange balances presented are derived from Glassnode’s comprehensive database of address labels, which are amassed through both officially published exchange information and proprietary clustering algorithms. While we strive to ensure the utmost accuracy in representing exchange balances, it is important to note that these figures might not always encapsulate the entirety of an exchange’s reserves, particularly when exchanges refrain from disclosing their official addresses. We urge users to exercise caution and discretion when utilizing these metrics. Glassnode shall not be held responsible for any discrepancies or potential inaccuracies. Please read our Transparency Notice when using exchange data.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the primary objective of the Strategy Watch publication, and how does it seek to strengthen its content?

AThe primary objective of Strategy Watch is to become a must-read monthly publication for the digital asset investment community by providing high-signal, impartial analysis of fund-level performance and allocation trends. It is strengthened by direct input and contributions of insights and data from funds and allocators.

QAccording to the report, how did the demand for Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs versus Digital Asset Treasuries (DATs) diverge in May?

AIn May, demand diverged significantly. ETF flows for both Bitcoin and Ethereum peaked early before rolling over into net outflows. Conversely, Digital Asset Treasuries (DATs) kept accumulating throughout the month, with BTC and ETH DAT flows staying positive. This suggests balance-sheet buyers accumulated assets while ETF allocators were de-risking.

QWhat trend was observed in the CME basis yields for Bitcoin and Ethereum in May, and what is its significance?

AIn May, CME basis yields for both Bitcoin and Ethereum climbed from negative territory back into positive territory, reviving the cash-and-carry trade. This reversal restores a positive carry to market-neutral strategies, marking the firmest premium environment in several months.

QWhat is the current state of Ethereum DeFi Total Value Locked (TVL) based on the May data, and how did the outflow trends change?

AEthereum DeFi TVL continued to decline in May, grinding to new monthly lows, slipping from $45.1B to $41.7B. However, the pace of net outflows decelerated through the second half of the month, recovering from a -$13.3B trough to -$3.2B by month-end, suggesting the forced deleveraging phase is largely complete.

QWhat sharp signal from stablecoin flows did the report highlight as a key indicator of allocator behavior in late May?

AThe report highlighted that stablecoin inflows reversed sharply into month-end, swinging from a +$6.1B peak early in May to a -$2.5B net outflow by month-end. This decisive swing into net outflow points to allocators trimming risk into June rather than redeploying capital into spot markets.

Letture associate

Google Shaken, Market Cap Evaporates Hundreds of Billions. Can Gemini Spark Save the Day?

Google is facing a turbulent period marked by a significant brain drain of top AI talent. Key figures like Noam Shazeer, John Jumper, Jonas Adler, and Alexander Pritzel have recently left for competitors OpenAI and Anthropic, causing investor concern and a sharp stock decline wiping hundreds of billions from Alphabet's market cap. Amidst this talent exodus and the delayed launch of the anticipated Gemini 3.5 Pro model, Google has unveiled its major new offering: Gemini Spark. This is not a standard chatbot but a persistent, cloud-based AI agent designed to automate multi-step workflows across Google's ecosystem (Gmail, Calendar, Docs, Drive, etc.) and some third-party apps. Powered by the Antigravity framework with Tasks, Skills, and Schedules, it aims to function as a continuous digital assistant. However, its high price point—exclusive to the $100/month AI Ultra tier—has drawn criticism. The article positions Spark as Google's critical, albeit late, move into the AI agent arena, where AI transitions from a tool to an autonomous workforce. While competitors and startups are already advancing in this space, Google's vast integration with Workspace gives it a potential edge, though its historical caution due to scale and risk may have cost it the lead. Ultimately, Spark represents a necessary shift for Google, but the question remains whether this "digital employee" can compensate for the loss of foundational talent and restore investor confidence in the company's future.

marsbit4 min fa

Google Shaken, Market Cap Evaporates Hundreds of Billions. Can Gemini Spark Save the Day?

marsbit4 min fa

24/5 Settlement Is Here for US Stocks, but Cryptocurrency Didn't Get a Ticket

The U.S. National Securities Clearing Corporation (NSCC), a subsidiary of the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC), has announced the implementation of 24-hour clearing operations on weekdays. This move, approved by the SEC and being rolled out in phases, fundamentally challenges a core narrative of the cryptocurrency industry: that digital assets offer a unique advantage with their 7x24 trading availability, unlike traditional markets that close at 4 p.m. The transition to near-continuous clearing for stocks and other traditional assets diminishes this perceived crypto edge. While crypto markets still operate on weekends, the article notes that DTCC could potentially expand to weekend clearing in the future if demand warrants. The development is presented as another instance where DTCC has disappointed crypto enthusiasts. Despite frequent speculation from communities supporting Ethereum, XRP Ledger, and others that DTCC would integrate public blockchains, the clearing giant consistently opts for private, permissioned distributed ledger solutions for its projects, such as its Ion platform and a recent U.S. Treasury tokenization initiative on the Canton network. The article concludes that the successful launch of this traditional finance "always-on" market relied entirely on existing mature infrastructure, with the cryptocurrency industry failing to secure a role or "admission ticket" in its implementation.

Foresight News19 min fa

24/5 Settlement Is Here for US Stocks, but Cryptocurrency Didn't Get a Ticket

Foresight News19 min fa

Karpathy's Genius Strikes Again, Challenging RAG, Turning Your Notes into a Second Brain

Andrej Karpathy has proposed a revolutionary concept for managing personal knowledge: treating notes as immutable "source code" and using LLMs as "compilers" to build a structured, interlinked wiki. This approach fundamentally shifts the cognitive workflow away from the limitations of RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation), which merely retrieves and pieces together fragments, leading to contradictions and "digital mummies"—unused, decaying notes. The LLM-Wiki framework introduces a three-layer architecture: the **Raw Layer** for original, immutable notes; the **Schema Layer** defining rules for structuring knowledge; and the **Wiki Layer**, where the LLM continuously compiles and maintains a coherent, cross-referenced knowledge base. Key operations are **Ingest** (adding new material, which triggers updates across related pages), **Query** (asking the compiled wiki, with answers that can become new pages), and **Lint** (periodic AI audits to find contradictions, outdated claims, or gaps). This system automates the tedious maintenance—updating links, resolving conflicts, keeping summaries fresh—that has historically made large-scale personal knowledge management unsustainable. It realizes Vannevar Bush's 1945 "Memex" vision by finally solving the maintenance problem. Karpathy's proposal represents a third piece in human-AI collaboration, following "Vibe Coding" and "Agentic Engineering." It liberates human attention from organizational drudgery, refocusing it on what matters: deciding what to read and deriving meaning.

marsbit28 min fa

Karpathy's Genius Strikes Again, Challenging RAG, Turning Your Notes into a Second Brain

marsbit28 min fa

Claude Science Completes Two Years' Work in a Few Weeks, Is 10x Research Acceleration Really Here?

Claude Science, a new AI workbench from Anthropic, is being tested by scientists, reportedly accelerating specific research workflows by up to 10x. A neuro-scientist at the Allen Institute completed a lengthy literature review in weeks instead of nearly two years using the tool, which automates tasks like citation verification. The platform is an integrated environment for macOS and Linux, connecting to local or remote computing resources. It streamlines the fragmented research process—literature analysis, computation, visualization, and drafting—into a single, auditable workflow. A key feature is its emphasis on reproducibility: every chart generated includes the exact code, environment, and history used to create it. Claude Science uses a multi-agent system. A coordinator manages over 60 pre-configured skills for life sciences (genomics, proteomics, etc.) and can spawn specialized agents. A dedicated reviewer agent checks citations and calculations for accuracy, creating a form of internal AI peer review. The system operates with a human-in-the-loop, requiring user approval for major steps. Initial applications are in life sciences. Examples include target identification for biotech company Manifold Bio and germline variant analysis for glioma research at UCSF, completing analyses in roughly one-tenth the previous time. The approach contrasts with competitors: Google focuses on proprietary models like AlphaFold, while OpenAI is advancing models' scientific reasoning with benchmarks like GeneBench-Pro. Claude Science differentiates by automating and integrating the practical research pipeline, not just the model's intelligence, aiming to make AI-aided science more reproducible and integrated into daily lab work.

marsbit32 min fa

Claude Science Completes Two Years' Work in a Few Weeks, Is 10x Research Acceleration Really Here?

marsbit32 min fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片