Strategy Extends Bitcoin Accumulation With New 2,932 BTC Purchase

bitcoinistPubblicato 2026-01-27Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-01-27

Introduzione

Strategy, a leading Bitcoin treasury company, has expanded its holdings with a new purchase of 2,932 BTC, valued at approximately $264.1 million. This acquisition, funded through stock offerings, brings the company's total Bitcoin reserves to 712,647 BTC, representing about 3.57% of the circulating supply. These holdings are currently valued at $62.23 billion, reflecting an unrealized gain. In related news, Bitmine, another major corporate holder, added 40,302 ETH to its treasury and has staked over 2 million ETH, claiming to be the world's largest staker. Meanwhile, Bitcoin spot ETFs experienced significant net outflows of $1.33 billion last week, the highest since February 2025, nearly erasing the previous week's gains. Bitcoin's price has declined over 5% in the past week, trading around $88,000.

Bitcoin treasury company Strategy has unveiled its latest purchase of the cryptocurrency, this time tokens worth a total of $264.1 million.

Strategy Has Expanded Its Bitcoin Treasury By 2,932 BTC

In a new post on X, Strategy co-founder and chairman has shared the details related to the latest Bitcoin acquisition from the company. In total, the new purchase has added 2,932 tokens to the firm’s treasury at an average price of $90,061 per token.

According to the filing with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the buy took place between January 20th and 25th. Strategy funded the $264.1 million acquisition using proceeds from its STRC and MSTR at-the-market (ATM) stock offerings.

In the last two weeks, the company has made purchases involving a substantial size. Last week, the company added Bitcoin worth $2.13 billion, while the week before that, it spent $1.25 billion on the cryptocurrency. Compared to these, the latest buy isn’t too big, but nonetheless showcases continued resolve for accumulation from Saylor’s firm.

Following the latest purchase, Strategy’s Bitcoin reserves have grown to 712,647 BTC, equivalent to about 3.57% of the asset’s total circulating supply. Currently, these holdings are worth around $62.23 billion, up nearly 15% over the company’s investment of $54.19 billion.

Strategy is the largest digital asset corporate holder in the world, with its closest competition being Bitmine, a BTC mining company that pivoted to an Ethereum treasury strategy last year.

According to a Monday press release, Bitmine has also participated in accumulation during the past week, adding 40,302 ETH ($116.5 million) to its holdings. The firm’s total treasury reserve has now risen to 4,243,338 ETH ($12.24 billion), corresponding to a supply share of 3.52%.

Recently, Bitmine has been putting its Ethereum toward staking to earn a passive interest on its holdings. In the past week, the company has increased its locked stake by 171,264 ETH, taking total staked supply to more than 2 million tokens. “Bitmine has staked more ETH than other entities in the world,” said Tom Lee, Bitmine chairman.

In some other news, Bitcoin spot exchange-traded funds (ETFs) saw a high amount of net outflows in the past week, according to data from SoSoValue.

The trend in the BTC spot ETF netflow over the last couple of years | Source: SoSoValue

As displayed in the above graph, the weekly Bitcoin spot ETF netflow measured at -$1.33 billion last week. This is the highest outflow that these investment vehicles have witnessed since the end of February 2025.

Just a week prior, the market situation was the complete reverse, as spot ETFs saw net inflows amounting to $1.42 billion. The latest streak of outflows, however, have nearly entirely retraced this growth.

BTC Price

At the time of writing, Bitcoin is floating around $88,000, down more than 5% in the last seven days.

The price of the coin seems to have plunged recently | Source: BTCUSDT on TradingView

Domande pertinenti

QHow many Bitcoins did Strategy purchase in its latest acquisition, and what was the total value?

AStrategy purchased 2,932 BTC at a total value of $264.1 million.

QWhat is the primary source of funding for Strategy's latest Bitcoin purchase?

AThe purchase was funded using proceeds from its STRC and MSTR at-the-market (ATM) stock offerings.

QWhat percentage of Bitcoin's total circulating supply does Strategy now hold after this purchase?

AStrategy now holds 712,647 BTC, which is equivalent to about 3.57% of the asset's total circulating supply.

QHow did the net flow for Bitcoin spot ETFs perform last week according to the article?

ABitcoin spot ETFs saw net outflows of $1.33 billion last week, the highest since the end of February 2025.

QWhat significant action has Bitmine taken with its Ethereum holdings recently?

ABitmine has been staking its Ethereum to earn passive interest and has staked more than 2 million tokens, which it claims is more than any other entity in the world.

Letture associate

Has the 'Digital Gold' Narrative for BTC Failed?

**Title: Has the "Digital Gold" Narrative for Bitcoin Failed?** The article argues that Bitcoin's "digital gold" narrative remains valid despite a recent sharp price decline (from a peak near $126k in Oct 2025 to briefly under $61k in Feb 2026). It presents a long-term investment framework based on three core points: **1. Viewing Bitcoin as an Asset:** Bitcoin is presented as a superior potential store of value compared to gold. Key arguments are its absolute scarcity (21 million cap), superior portability, and transparent auditability via its public ledger. While acknowledging its current use in early, volatile stages (~3-4% global adoption), the author draws parallels to the early, disruptive phases of the internet and e-commerce. **2. Understanding the Recent Downturn:** The current ~50% correction is framed as a predictable, consensus-driven cycle following its post-halving peak (the 2024 halving preceded the Oct 2025 high). A crucial factor is a historic "changing of hands": the influx of new institutional buyers via ETFs allowed early, low-cost holders (miners, OG believers) to take profits. The author notes that while severe, Bitcoin's historical drawdowns (e.g., 93% in 2011, 77% in 2021-22) have been progressively smaller, suggesting maturing holder structure and decreasing volatility over time. **3. The Long-Term Perspective:** The long-term thesis hinges on Bitcoin capturing a portion of gold's market value. With Bitcoin's market cap at ~$1.4 trillion (at $70k) versus gold's ~$20 trillion, significant upside potential exists if the "digital gold" narrative is partially realized. However, the author strongly cautions that short-term risks remain, the bottom is unpredictable, and high volatility is inherent. The real risk is not Bitcoin failing but poor personal position management (over-leverage, wrong capital) and a lack of deep understanding, which can force investors out during severe downturns. The conclusion uses Amazon's 95% crash post-2000 dot-com bubble and subsequent 42x recovery as an analogy. The ultimate question is not if Bitcoin's price will rise, but if an investor's strategy and conviction can withstand the volatility to see the long-term play out. The recent divergence (gold up, Bitcoin down) is posed not as a narrative failure, but as potential evidence of this ongoing, painful transition from a speculative asset to a mainstream allocation.

marsbit23 min fa

Has the 'Digital Gold' Narrative for BTC Failed?

marsbit23 min fa

Has BTC's 'Digital Gold' Narrative Failed?

The article discusses Bitcoin's "digital gold" narrative, its recent price drop, and long-term outlook through the perspective of "Jason". It argues the narrative is not a failure but that Bitcoin represents a superior, new asset class due to its fixed supply (21 million), portability, and auditability. The piece compares its current ~3-4% global adoption rate to early internet/e-commerce, suggesting significant growth potential. Regarding the 2025-2026 price decline (from ~$126k to briefly under $61k), the author views it as a predictable, consensus-driven sell-off within Bitcoin's ~4-year cycle post-halving, exacerbated by a major "handover" from early, low-cost holders to new institutional buyers via ETFs. A key observation is that historical peak-to-trough drawdowns have lessened over time (e.g., 93% in 2011 to ~50% in 2026), indicating maturing volatility as holder structure changes. For the long term, the author uses a simple framework: Bitcoin's total market cap (~$1.4T at $70k) is only about 7% of gold's (~$20T). Even capturing 30-50% of gold's value would imply substantial upside. However, the article strongly cautions against viewing this as investment advice, emphasizing extreme volatility and the critical importance of risk management, position sizing, and deep fundamental understanding to survive severe drawdowns. It concludes by drawing a parallel to Amazon's 95% crash in 2000 and subsequent 42x recovery, stressing that the key is surviving market cycles to realize long-term potential.

链捕手33 min fa

Has BTC's 'Digital Gold' Narrative Failed?

链捕手33 min fa

From Code to Cognition: A Ten-Thousand-Word Guide to the Evolution of the Robot Brain

"From Code to Cognition: The Evolution of Robot Brains" The journey of robotic intelligence has shifted dramatically from manually coded systems to AI-driven brains. For decades, robots relied on layered software stacks—perception, state estimation, planning, control—each handcrafted. While predictable, they lacked adaptability. The 2010s saw deep learning revolutionize perception (e.g., object detection) and control (via reinforcement learning), but learned skills remained narrow. The arrival of Large Language Models (LLMs) marked a turning point. LLMs acted as high-level planners, interpreting natural language instructions and generating sequences of actions for traditional robotic systems to execute. However, true integration came with Visual-Language-Action (VLA) models, which fused vision, language, and motion prediction into a single network. Pioneered by models like RT-2 and open-source projects like OpenVLA, VLAs enable robots to reason and act directly from visual input and commands. The most advanced humanoid robots now employ a "dual-brain" architecture: a slow-thinking, large VLA (System 2) for reasoning and planning, and a fast-reacting, small network (System 1) for high-frequency motion control, sometimes with an even lower-level System 0 for balance. This split balances cognition with the physics of real-time movement. Computation is split between onboard hardware (e.g., NVIDIA Jetson) for safety-critical control loops and cloud/edge servers for non-critical tasks like learning and interfaces. A crucial driver is the open-source ecosystem—models like GR00T and OpenVLA allow startups to build upon pre-trained brains and fine-tune them with their own data, accelerating development. Despite progress, current systems struggle with recovery from errors, sample inefficiency, and long-horizon tasks. This has spurred the rise of **World Models**—neural networks that predict the consequences of actions. By simulating possible futures before acting (like NVIDIA Cosmos or Meta V-JEPA), robots can plan, recover, and generalize better. This represents the next frontier: shifting intelligence from learned reactions to an internal model of physics and cause-and-effect. The field is rapidly evolving. While not yet at its "ChatGPT moment," the convergence of cheaper hardware, scalable simulation, and world models points toward robots that are increasingly capable, adaptive, and useful. The question is shifting from "what can robots do?" to "what *should* they do?"

marsbit1 h fa

From Code to Cognition: A Ten-Thousand-Word Guide to the Evolution of the Robot Brain

marsbit1 h fa

AI Bubble Is Bursting

The AI Bubble is Bursting: A Necessary Purge on the Path to Ubiquitous Intelligence Market volatility has reignited debates about an AI bubble, with figures like Ray Dalio pointing to high valuations. However, this parallels the dot-com bubble, which, despite its crash, laid the physical infrastructure for today's internet era. The current AI investment frenzy, with tech giants planning trillions in infrastructure spending far outstripping current AI application revenues, appears similarly imbalanced. This 'bubble' is seen as an inevitable phase for a disruptive technology, paying the "innovation tax." Critically, AI inference costs have plummeted over 99.7% since 2023, making intelligence nearly free at the margin. This hasn't reduced spending but has instead unlocked massive new demand, as seen in enterprise AI cloud expenditure tripling. This follows the Jevons Paradox: efficiency gains lead to greater total consumption. The market is now entering a cleansing phase, weeding out speculative ventures lacking real moats. The deeper shift is a move from capital expenditure (CapEx) on hardware to value creation in operational expenditure (OpEx) through AI applications that solve real industry problems. While infrastructure valuations are high, rapid earnings growth from widespread AI adoption across sectors—from manufacturing and finance to law and healthcare—may digest these valuations over time. Ultimately, this creative destruction will leave behind robust infrastructure and optimized models, cheaply powering an AI-augmented future for all industries, much as the internet became indispensable after its own bubble burst. The core productive potential remains undiminished.

链捕手1 h fa

The AI Bubble is Bursting

The article argues that while a bubble in the AI sector is real and is currently showing signs of deflation, this is a typical, even necessary, phase for a transformative technology. It draws parallels to the dot-com bubble, where speculative excess was followed by the consolidation of internet infrastructure, enabling the digital age. Similarly, today's massive investments in AI infrastructure (data centers, power, cooling) far outpace current application-layer revenue, creating a valuation imbalance. However, the author contends this apparent bubble is not a sign of failure but of a transition. Key drivers include the plummeting cost of AI inference (over 99.7% in two years), which, per Jevons Paradox, has unleashed massive new demand as AI moves from simple tasks to complex agentic workflows across all industries. The market is now cleansing itself of shallow, speculative ventures, shifting value from capital expenditure (CapEx) on hardware to operational expenditure (OpEx) on transformative AI applications. The conclusion is that the underlying productive force of AI is undeniable. The current financial correction will eliminate weak players, leaving behind robust infrastructure and efficient models. This will ultimately fuel an "AI+" era where intelligence becomes as ubiquitous and essential as the internet, embedding itself into every sector of the economy.

marsbit1 h fa

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot

Futures