Story Protocol Delays Token Unlock to August as Team Focuses on Long-Term Growth

TheNewsCryptoPubblicato 2026-02-09Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-02-09

Introduzione

Story Protocol, a project focused on tokenizing media and creative content, has delayed its first major token unlock by six months to August. According to co-founder S.Y. Lee, the move prevents insiders from selling tokens and gives the project more time to build real usage before new supply enters the market. Lee addressed investor concerns over the network’s current lack of fee revenue, explaining that Story is not a typical trading platform. Instead, it aims to generate revenue through business licensing agreements, particularly with AI companies, by providing legally compliant data such as voice, video, and human-made content. The decision to postpone the token unlock is intended to avoid selling pressure and allow more time to develop data markets and attract AI firms. Lee cited Worldcoin’s similar strategy as a positive precedent.

S.Y. Lee, co-founder of Story Protocol, says that the project needs time to build real usage and has decided to delay its first major token unlock by six months in August. By delaying this release, the insiders will not be able to sell their tokens. According to Lee, this delay helps to project more time to grow real usage before the new supply reaches the markets.

Investors’ Concern and Lee’s Reply

Data from DeFiLlama shows that in September 2025, Story generated over $43,000 per day in fees, and right now the number is zero. This makes investors worry and raises concerns that the network is actually making money.

Lee argues that people are focusing on the wrong measurement. He says that Story is not like the other trading platforms, which generate profits from the transaction fees. Instead, the project is designed to record who owns the data and define how it can be used, while setting rules for future payments. Lee says that most of the money is expected to come from the business licensing agreements, especially with the AI companies.

Story is now concentrating on tokenized media and creative content. This includes collecting real human-made data that AI firms need, voice and video recordings, and other materials that are difficult to copy legally from the internet. Lee believes that demand for this type of data will grow in the upcoming years.

Large token releases often create selling pressures, and by postponing the unlock, Story reduces the risk of sudden selling and keeps supply lower. Lee said that if the founders think of the quick gains, they would prefer a shorter lock period. Lee mentioned how Worldcoin previously extended lockups for the insiders. This move gave the project more time to build, and the market responded positively. This lockup extension gives Story extra time to prove it can attract AI firms and build useful data markets.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Crypto Fear and Greed Index Drops to Extreme Fear at 9

Domande pertinenti

QWhy did Story Protocol decide to delay its token unlock?

AStory Protocol delayed its first major token unlock by six months to August to allow more time to build real usage and grow before new supply reaches the markets, preventing insiders from selling their tokens prematurely.

QWhat concern did investors raise about Story Protocol's revenue?

AInvestors were concerned because data from DeFiLlama showed that Story generated over $43,000 per day in fees in September 2025, but currently generates zero fees, raising questions about the network's ability to make money.

QHow does Story Protocol plan to generate revenue according to co-founder S.Y. Lee?

AAccording to S.Y. Lee, Story Protocol is designed to record data ownership and define usage rules for future payments, with most revenue expected to come from business licensing agreements, especially with AI companies, rather than transaction fees.

QWhat type of data is Story Protocol focusing on collecting?

AStory Protocol is concentrating on tokenized media and creative content, including real human-made data needed by AI firms, voice and video recordings, and other materials that are difficult to copy legally from the internet.

QWhat positive example did Lee mention regarding token lockup extensions?

ALee mentioned that Worldcoin previously extended lockups for insiders, which gave the project more time to build and resulted in a positive market response, similar to Story's current strategy.

Letture associate

iQiyi Is Too Impatient

The article "iQiyi Is Too Impatient" discusses the controversy surrounding the Chinese streaming platform IQiyi's recent announcement of an "AI Actor Library" during its 2026 World Conference. IQiyi claimed over 100 actors, including well-known names like Zhang Ruoyun and Yu Hewei, had joined the initiative. CEO Gong Yu suggested AI could enable actors to "star in 14 dramas a year instead of 4" and that "live-action filming might become a world cultural heritage." The announcement quickly sparked backlash. Multiple actors named in the list issued urgent statements denying they had signed any AI-related authorization agreements. This forced IQiyi to clarify that inclusion in the library only indicated a willingness to *consider* AI projects, with separate negotiations required for any specific role. The incident, which trended on social media with hashtags like "IQiyi is crazy," is presented as a sign of the company's growing desperation. Facing intense competition from short-video platforms like Douyin and Kuaishou, as well as Bilibili and Xiaohongshu, IQiyi's financial performance has weakened, with revenues declining for two consecutive years. The author argues that IQiyi is "too impatient" to tell a compelling AI story to reassure the market, especially as it pursues a listing on the Hong Kong stock exchange. The piece concludes by outlining three key "AI questions" IQiyi must answer: defining its role as a tool provider versus a content creator, balancing the "coldness" of AI with the human element audiences desire, and properly managing the interests of platforms, actors, and viewers. The core dilemma is that while AI can reduce costs and increase efficiency, it risks creating homogenized, formulaic content and devaluing human performers.

marsbit36 min fa

Jensen Huang Publicly Challenges Google and Amazon, Is the Chip Business Entirely Sustained by Anthropic?

In a candid interview, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang challenged competitors like Google and Amazon, admitted past strategic errors, and criticized U.S. export controls on AI chips. He framed Nvidia’s role as turning “electricity in, tokens out,” emphasizing the complexity and value of AI inference. Huang dismissed rival custom chips like Google’s TPU and Amazon’s Trainium as inflexible and niche, claiming their growth relies heavily on clients like Anthropic. He also acknowledged missing early investment opportunities in OpenAI and Anthropic. On China, Huang warned that export restrictions risk pushing the country toward self-sufficiency and could cost U.S. leadership in AI. Finally, he explained Nvidia’s acquisition of Groq as a move to serve premium, low-latency token markets. Throughout, Huang emphasized ecosystem trust and Nvidia’s central role in global AI infrastructure.

marsbit42 min fa

Jensen Huang Publicly Challenges Google and Amazon, Is the Chip Business Entirely Sustained by Anthropic?

marsbit42 min fa

ARK's SpaceX IPO Investment Guide: $1.75 Trillion Valuation, 95x Price-to-Sales Ratio, Where Is the Money Going?

ARK Invest, a major investor in SpaceX, provides an analysis following SpaceX's confidential IPO filing on April 1, 2026, targeting a $1.75 trillion valuation and up to $75 billion in funding for a Nasdaq listing around June 2026. This would be the largest IPO in history. The valuation implies a price-to-sales ratio of ~95x based on ~$18.5B in projected 2025 revenue. ARK argues this reflects future potential, not current reality. Key drivers include Starlink, with over 10M users and $20B+ in 2026 revenue, launch services which have reduced costs by ~95% since 2008, and the strategic merger with xAI in February 2026, enabling vertically integrated AI and orbital computing. ARK’s investment thesis is based on SpaceX's proven execution of ambitious goals, like reusable rockets and global satellite internet. The firm notes that significant value creation often occurs pre-IPO, and its Venture Fund offers exposure to SpaceX’s earlier private stages. Post-IPO, the fund will manage the position per standard lock-up and rebalancing processes, maintaining flexibility to reinvest in other private innovations. The analysis is based on public estimates and ARK research; the S-1 filing is not yet public. This is not investment advice.

marsbit43 min fa

ARK's SpaceX IPO Investment Guide: $1.75 Trillion Valuation, 95x Price-to-Sales Ratio, Where Is the Money Going?

marsbit43 min fa

Stablecoin Hype Overblown? Moody’s Says Banks Aren’t In Danger

The article discusses the legislative stalemate in the US over the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025 (CLARITY Act), which aims to regulate crypto assets. A key point of contention is whether stablecoins should be allowed to pay interest, with crypto companies opposing a ban and banks supporting it. Moody's analyst Abhi Srivastava states that, for now, stablecoins do not pose a significant threat to traditional banks due to existing efficient payment systems and the current prohibition on yield-bearing stablecoins. This limits their appeal for pulling deposits from banks at scale. However, with the stablecoin market cap exceeding $300 billion and growth in tokenized assets, banks could face future pressure from deposit outflows. The crypto industry warns that failure to pass the bill could lead to stricter regulatory crackdowns. Negotiations continue with little progress, despite both sides desiring a resolution.

bitcoinist1 h fa

Stablecoin Hype Overblown? Moody’s Says Banks Aren’t In Danger

bitcoinist1 h fa

Not a Price Hike, but a Supply Cut? Oil Prices Have Crossed the Tipping Point

The global oil market has passed a critical point, shifting the focus from price increases to potential physical supply shortages. The core issue is a time mismatch: even if the Strait of Hormuz reopens, shipping disruptions have already caused significant delays, which will continue to deplete onshore crude inventories for weeks. Refinery behavior acts as an amplifier. Reduced runs in Asia and Europe don’t reflect weaker demand but instead shrink product inventories, raising fuel prices and refining margins, which in turn encourages higher runs—creating a self-reinforcing cycle. If the Strait remains closed beyond April, traditional pricing models may fail. The market could face an unprecedented physical shortfall of 11-13 million barrels per day—roughly four times historical disruption levels. In such a scenario, price becomes an inadequate balancing tool. The only way to rebalance the market would be policy-driven demand destruction, similar to COVID-era lockdowns. Current prices around $95/barrel are insufficient to balance the market. Key signals to watch include inventory levels, policy announcements, and the pace of involuntary demand contraction. Geopolitically, the situation appears likely to worsen before improving, with little room for compromise between the US and Iran.

marsbit3 h fa

Not a Price Hike, but a Supply Cut? Oil Prices Have Crossed the Tipping Point

marsbit3 h fa

Trading

Spot

Futures