Stablecoin usage in Venezuela likely to keep expanding amid economic instability

cointelegraphPubblicato 2025-12-14Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-12-14

Introduzione

Venezuela's economic instability and hyperinflation are driving increased reliance on stablecoins, particularly USDT, as essential tools for daily transactions and as a store of value. According to TRM Labs, nearly a decade of economic crisis, sanctions, and failing traditional infrastructure has made crypto adoption a necessity. Peer-to-peer platforms and crypto-to-fiat conversions are critical in a low-banking environment, with over 38% of Venezuelan crypto site visits going to a major P2P service. Despite regulatory uncertainty, stablecoins are primarily used for payroll, remittances, and commerce rather than speculation. Venezuela ranks 9th globally in crypto adoption when adjusted for population size.

Venezuelans are already heavily reliant on blockchain technology for banking after suffering through a decade of economic pressures; however, usage is likely to keep growing if conditions worsen in the South American country, blockchain intelligence firm TRM Labs says.

As regional and geopolitical tensions continue to rise, driven in part by US-Venezuela tensions, the TRM Labs team predicted in a report on Thursday that macroeconomic instability and the bolívar’s continued devaluation will likely sustain demand for stablecoins as both a store of value and a medium of exchange.

At the same time, regulatory ambiguity and continued uncertainty surrounding the country’s crypto regulator, SUNACRIP’s, authority and enforcement capacity, and eroding trust in traditional banking infrastructure could prolong the population’s dependence and drive more usage.

“Absent a material shift in Venezuela’s macroeconomic conditions or the emergence of cohesive regulatory oversight, the role of digital assets — particularly stablecoins — is poised to expand.”
Source: TRM Labs

Venezuela is 18th globally for crypto adoption, the Chainalysis 2025 Crypto Adoption Index report found, but its rank increased to 9th when adjusted for population size.

Peer-to-peer transactions a key service for Venezuelans

Peer-to-peer (P2P), transfers made from one person to another through an intermediary, along with USDT (USDT) to-fiat conversions, have emerged as key services Venezuelans are using in the absence of reliable domestic banking channels, according to TRM Labs.

The blockchain intelligence firm tracked Venezuelan IP addresses and found that more than 38% of site visits were to a lone global platform that offers P2P trading functionality, which underscores its “role in facilitating crypto access in Venezuela’s low-banking environment.”

“A significant share of crypto-to-fiat activity is facilitated through platforms supporting informal settlement rails — even amid reports of intermittent service disruptions.”

Related: Venezuela blocks Binance, X amid presidential election dispute

“Local platforms also play a key role, particularly those offering mobile wallets and bank integrations suited to domestic users,” the team added.

Venezuela’s crypto industry created out of desperate necessity

Venezuela’s crypto ecosystem is ultimately the product of nearly a decade of economic collapse, international sanctions pressure, and state experimentation with digital financial alternatives, the TRM Labs team said.

Stablecoins, especially USDT, play a central role in household and commercial transactions in Venezuela, and despite compliance and sanction evasion concerns, stablecoins remain “overwhelmingly driven by necessity rather than speculation or criminal intent.”

“For most Venezuelans, stablecoins now operate as a substitute for retail banking — facilitating payroll, family remittances, vendor payments, and cross-border purchases in the absence of consistent domestic financial services.”

Magazine: Quantum attacking Bitcoin would be a waste of time: Kevin O’Leary

Letture associate

Earning Six Figures and Still Struggling to Rent in San Francisco

A couple in San Francisco with a combined tech income over $360,000 struggled for months to find a one-bedroom apartment under $5,000 per month. Their story highlights how the AI wealth boom, driven by upcoming IPOs from companies like OpenAI and Anthropic, is dramatically escalating the city's cost of living. Even six-figure salaries are becoming insufficient for a comfortable lifestyle. The article details the financial reality for tech workers earning around $180,000 annually. After taxes, retirement contributions, and healthcare, take-home pay is roughly $7,000 per month. With average rents exceeding $3,800 and one-bedrooms often costing $4,500-$5,200, discretionary income shrinks to $1,500-$2,500. This contrasts sharply with reported median total compensations of $640,000 at OpenAI and $420,000 at Anthropic. The AI gold rush is identified as the primary driver. The scale of potential wealth from these IPOs, far surpassing previous tech booms, is flooding the housing market. Data shows San Francisco's average rent is now the highest in the U.S., with vacancy rates in desirable neighborhoods plummeting to around 3%. The overall cost of living is 65.6% above the national average. The piece features multiple professionals, including a 25-year-old with a $250,000 salary, facing housing instability, fierce competition for rentals, and a persistent, low-grade financial anxiety despite high earnings. It concludes that the rapid concentration of AI wealth is redefining what constitutes a "high salary" in San Francisco, pushing out mid-tier tech talent and creating a stark divide between those in the AI sector and everyone else.

marsbit47 min fa

Earning Six Figures and Still Struggling to Rent in San Francisco

marsbit47 min fa

Rate Hikes to Save STRC, Selling Bitcoin to Preserve Credit: Strategy Picks Its Two Most Expensive Paths

Over the past six weeks, Strategy has faced a significant crisis of confidence, with its core securities MSTR and STRC experiencing sharp price declines. The situation escalated as the company utilized dollar reserves intended for dividends and interest payments to repurchase debt, and then sold a small amount of Bitcoin for the first time since 2022—an action that contradicted its "never sell" narrative and signaled potential liquidity strain. In response, Strategy introduced a Digital Credit capital framework. This formalized a series of measures to manage the pressure down its capital structure: ordinary shareholders have already borne costs through equity dilution from an $11.5 billion ATM offering; new rules enforce a hard dollar reserve covering at least 12 months of expected dividend and interest payments; the STRC dividend rate was increased from 11.5% to 12%; and, most notably, Bitcoin was officially integrated into the capital toolkit, with board authorization to sell up to $1.25 billion worth if needed to support obligations and repurchase programs. The market reacted with a mix of relief and skepticism. While the announcement triggered a sharp single-day rally in both MSTR and STRC, the preferred shares still trade at a significant discount. Supporters view the framework as pragmatic crisis management that provides a price floor and clearer rules. Critics argue that institutionalizing Bitcoin sales undermines the core investment thesis and, with Bitcoin's price below the company's average cost basis, amounts to selling assets at a loss to maintain its financial structure. The broader context shows institutional Bitcoin buying drying up, highlighting that Strategy's challenges and new framework are now a key indicator for overall market risk sentiment. Ultimately, the framework buys time, but STRC's return to par value depends on market belief in the company's ability to cover dividends without further dilution or substantial Bitcoin sales—a task that would be easier if Bitcoin's price recovers.

链捕手53 min fa

Rate Hikes to Save STRC, Selling Bitcoin to Preserve Credit: Strategy Picks Its Two Most Expensive Paths

链捕手53 min fa

Has Bitcoin Bottomed? Unpacking 12 Key Data Indicators

Author: BitalkNews **Title: Has Bitcoin Bottomed? Analyzing 12 Key Data Indicators** The current Bitcoin price is around $59,600, representing a maximum drawdown of approximately 53% from the 2025 high. The market is in a deep correction phase. Multiple indicators suggest valuations are nearing historical lows, but a confirmed bottom requires more time. **Summary of Key Indicators:** 1. **Fear & Greed Index:** At 16, indicating "Extreme Fear," similar to levels seen during the 2022 FTX collapse. 2. **Rainbow Chart:** BTC has fallen into the "Bitcoin is dead" zone, only the second such occurrence historically. 3. **MVRV Ratio:** Currently around 1.13, near the lower historical band, pointing to a bottoming valuation area (approx. $53,200-$53,400). 4. **Realized Price:** The aggregate cost basis is ~$53,400; the current price is only about 12% above it but hasn't broken below yet. 5. **UTXO Profit/Loss Ratio:** Has dropped to its lowest level this cycle, signaling a potential "capitulation" event often seen near cycle bottoms. 6. **Long-Term Holder SOPR:** For holders >155 days, it's at 0.662, now negative, indicating seasoned investors are selling at a loss. 7. & 8. **Miner Health:** ~20% of miners are unprofitable, and actual miner revenue is below theoretical levels, indicating ongoing miner stress. 9. **ETF Flows:** U.S. spot BTC ETFs have seen sustained net outflows, including a 13-day streak with over $1.7B in weekly outflows. 10. **Strategy Risk:** Strategy's stock premium has significantly contracted, pressuring the traditional "borrow-to-buy" model. 11. **Bear Duration & Drawdown:** The correction has lasted >265 days with a ~52.5% drawdown, shorter in depth but lengthy in duration. 12. **Market Expectations (Polymarket):** Betting markets suggest an ~80% probability of BTC falling below $55,000 and a notable chance below $50,000. **Conclusion:** Bitcoin is in a deep correction with potential bottom formation. Valuation metrics are in historically low ranges, and on-chain capitulation signals are accumulating. However, a complete shakeout isn't finished—the realized price hasn't been breached, and ETF demand hasn't reversed. The area below $60,000 holds long-term appeal, but patience is advised. Key signals to watch for include a return to ETF inflows, a recovery in the Long-Term Holder SOPR, and easing miner pressure.

marsbit1 h fa

Has Bitcoin Bottomed? Unpacking 12 Key Data Indicators

marsbit1 h fa

Valuation Inversion Emerges, Bitcoin Treasury Companies Face Trust Crisis

"Valuation Inversion Emerges, Sparking Trust Crisis for Bitcoin Treasury Firms" The investment thesis for corporate Bitcoin treasury stocks has fundamentally shifted. Investors are no longer rewarding companies simply for accumulating more Bitcoin. Instead, the focus is now on net Bitcoin per share, with intense scrutiny on whether new financings truly benefit existing shareholders or merely dilute their stake. Key indicators highlight the new reality. Metaplanet's market capitalization has fallen below the total value of its Bitcoin holdings, indicating a valuation discount. While MicroStrategy maintains a premium, its core metric—Bitcoin per diluted share for common shareholders—has been declining due to dilution from financing activities, primarily through its STRAT permanent preferred shares. This marks a transition from a pure "asset accumulation" phase to an "equity attribution" phase. Investors now deduct costs like preferred dividends and debt to calculate the actual Bitcoin claim for common equity. The widespread adoption of spot Bitcoin ETFs has removed the scarcity value these stocks once held, forcing them to justify their structure with superior leverage, dividends, or capital efficiency. European entrants like France's Capital B and Sweden's BTC AB are testing this new environment with ambitious funding plans backed by relatively small Bitcoin holdings. They are asking investors to bear complex capital structures, betting future Bitcoin purchases will cover all dilution and dividend costs. The sector's core risk is a broken financing loop. Once a company's stock trades below its Bitcoin net asset value, it loses the ability to issue equity for accretive purchases. It is then left with unpalatable choices: dilutive financing at a discount, venturing into new businesses like Bitcoin lending, or selling assets. The winners in this next phase will be those that demonstrably increase Bitcoin per share for common shareholders with every financing move.

Foresight News1 h fa

Valuation Inversion Emerges, Bitcoin Treasury Companies Face Trust Crisis

Foresight News1 h fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片