SEC Weighs Shift to Semiannual Earnings Reporting

TheNewsCryptoPubblicato 2026-03-17Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-03-17

Introduzione

The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is considering a proposal that would allow public companies to report earnings semiannually instead of quarterly. The rule, which may be introduced in the coming month, would make quarterly disclosures optional rather than mandatory. Regulators have been consulting with major stock exchanges regarding potential changes to listing requirements if the proposal moves forward. Quarterly reporting has been a standard practice in U.S. markets since 1970. Supporters argue that reducing reporting frequency could alleviate short-term pressure on corporate management and lower compliance costs, potentially reversing the decline in the number of publicly listed companies. Critics, however, warn that less frequent reporting could reduce transparency and delay the release of critical financial information investors rely on. The European Union eliminated mandatory quarterly reporting in 2013, and the UK followed suit several years later. The SEC's proposal would undergo a standard rulemaking process, including a public comment period, before any final decision is made. There is no confirmation that the rule will be approved.

The US Securities and Exchange Commission is planning to roll out a proposal that would permit public firms to report earnings twice a year rather than the long-standing quarterly reporting need.

As per the report published by The Wall Street Journal, the proposal can roll out anytime in the upcoming month. Before publishing the rule, regulators have been having words with prominent stock exchanges regarding how their listing needs might need to change if firms are given the option to report results every six months rather than every quarter.

If the proposal were officially issued, it would also interfere with the SEC’s rulemaking process, which comprises a public comment duration that normally lasts around 30 days before the commission votes on whether to adopt the change.

However, there is not confirmation that the rule will eventually be passed and approved. The plan would not kick out the quarterly report completely. Rather than this, it would make quarterly disclosure optional, permitting firms to choose whether to carry on publishing financial updates every three months.

No Official Confirmation

Quarterly earnings reports have remained an integral part of U.S. capital markets since 1970, when regulators rolled out the Form 10-Q filing need to offer investors regular updates on firms’ performance.

Supporters of the change claim that quarterly reporting supports excessive short-term pressure on corporate management and imposes prominent compliance costs for public firms.

Advocates mention that suppressing the frequency of needed disclosure could help reverse the long-term fall in the number of publicly listed firms in the United States. Although critics have alerted that less frequent reporting could weaken transparency.

Along with that, it could also delay the release of significant financial information that investors depend on to access corporate performance and risk. The European Union terminated its mandatory quarterly disclosure rule in 2013. Talking about the UK, it curbed its requirement several years later.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

SEC Drops Securities Fraud Case Against BitClout Founder Nader Al-Naji

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the SEC planning to propose regarding corporate earnings reporting?

AThe SEC is planning to propose allowing public companies to report earnings twice a year instead of the current quarterly requirement.

QAccording to the article, what is one potential benefit of less frequent earnings reporting mentioned by supporters?

ASupporters claim that less frequent reporting could help reduce excessive short-term pressure on corporate management and lower significant compliance costs for public companies.

QWhat significant change did the European Union make regarding quarterly reporting in 2013?

AThe European Union eliminated its mandatory quarterly disclosure rule in 2013.

QWould the SEC proposal completely eliminate quarterly earnings reports if implemented?

ANo, the proposal would not eliminate quarterly reports completely. Instead, it would make quarterly disclosure optional, allowing companies to choose whether to continue publishing financial updates every three months.

QSince when have quarterly earnings reports been a standard requirement in U.S. capital markets?

AQuarterly earnings reports have been a standard requirement in U.S. capital markets since 1970 when regulators introduced the Form 10-Q filing requirement.

Letture associate

OpenAI Launches Workflow Agent, GPTs Begin Countdown

OpenAI has launched Workspace Agents, an evolution of GPTs designed for teams. This new feature allows users to create reusable, shareable agents that automate repetitive workflows. Driven by Codex, these agents operate within their own workspace, can access files, call tools, and run continuously in the background. Users describe a workflow—such as collecting information, making judgments, generating results, and sending outputs—to ChatGPT, which then builds the agent. The entire team can use and refine the agent via ChatGPT or Slack. Once set up, the agent runs autonomously. Workspace Agents are team-shared, code-free, and manageable with predefined permissions and controls. They are suitable for structured, repeatable tasks involving multiple tools and continuous operation, such as software review, feedback整理, report generation, sales follow-up, and risk assessment. The system operates within clear rules, with sensitive actions requiring human confirmation. It aims to transform workflows from being person-dependent to being documented, executable, and reusable—akin to scientific management principles. Competing solutions from Microsoft and Google are also emerging in this space.

marsbit3 min fa

OpenAI Launches Workflow Agent, GPTs Begin Countdown

marsbit3 min fa

The Richest Fed Chair in History? Three Challenges Kevin Warsh Is About to Face

Kevin Warsh, nominated by Trump as the next Federal Reserve Chair, faces three major challenges as he prepares to take office. With a personal investment portfolio exceeding $130 million, including holdings in crypto protocols and public chains, he is set to become the wealthiest Fed chair in history. Warsh, known for his historically hawkish stance, has recently shifted his position, arguing that AI is a powerful deflationary force that could boost productivity. However, rising CPI and energy prices pose a risk to this outlook. He strongly defended Fed independence, stating that it is eroded not by political pressure but by the institution’s own missteps, such as blurring the lines between monetary and fiscal policy during the 2021-2022 inflation period. Additionally, Warsh advocates for significant balance sheet reduction while potentially cutting rates—a combination that markets find unsettling. He also proposes modernizing inflation measurement with real-time data, including stablecoins and on-chain pricing, to improve policy responsiveness. His confirmation is currently delayed due to a political investigation into current Chair Powell, adding uncertainty to his appointment.

marsbit16 min fa

The Richest Fed Chair in History? Three Challenges Kevin Warsh Is About to Face

marsbit16 min fa

Rivaling a Documentary, OpenAI President Recounts the 72-Hour Internal Strife

OpenAI President Greg Brockman details the 72-hour internal crisis following CEO Sam Altman's sudden firing by the board. Both were blindsided by the decision, leading Brockman to resign immediately in solidarity. They began planning a new company at Altman’s home, aiming to take all OpenAI employees with them. Despite intense recruitment efforts by competitors, not a single employee accepted an external offer. The situation shifted when co-founder Ilya Sutskever publicly supported the employees' petition, leading to Altman’s reinstatement. Brockman reflects on OpenAI’s origins, its shift from non-profit to capped-profit for computational scale, key breakthroughs like Dota project and GPT, and the importance of resilience and mission-focused leadership. He emphasizes AI’s potential for global benefit and the need for broad access to compute power, while acknowledging risks and the necessity of iterative deployment for safety and alignment.

marsbit24 min fa

Rivaling a Documentary, OpenAI President Recounts the 72-Hour Internal Strife

marsbit24 min fa

AI "Transfer Station" Earning Millions Monthly? Five Questions Uncover the Truth of Token Arbitrage

The article "AI 'Transfer Station' Earns Millions Monthly? Five Questions Uncover the Truth of Token Arbitrage" explores the emerging business of API token transfer stations, which profit from global AI service price disparities and access barriers. These intermediaries purchase low-cost tokens from overseas AI providers (e.g., OpenAI, Claude) through grey-market methods—such as exploiting enterprise credits, bulk accounts, or subscription benefits—and resell them to Chinese users at a markup. Key drivers include the high cost of using top AI models (e.g., Claude Code costs ~$5 per million tokens), the performance gap between domestic and foreign models, and mismatches between subscription and API pricing. However, the practice carries significant risks: upstream token sources may be unstable or illegal; user data passing through intermediaries can be harvested or injected with hidden prompts; and models might be downgraded without disclosure. The market is evolving, with some operators now exporting cheaper Chinese models (e.g., Qwen3.5 at ~$0.11 per million tokens) to overseas users, leveraging price gaps. Yet, sustainability is low due to compliance crackdowns, instability, and reputational risks. Users are advised to employ detection methods (e.g., prompt adherence tests) and avoid sensitive data usage. The authors caution that while transfer stations offer short-term arbitrage, they lack long-term reliability and security compared to official APIs.

marsbit26 min fa

AI "Transfer Station" Earning Millions Monthly? Five Questions Uncover the Truth of Token Arbitrage

marsbit26 min fa

The Cost of an 11.5% Annualized Return: Will MicroStrategy's STRC Face a Moment of Reckoning?

This article analyzes the potential risks associated with MicroStrategy's (MSTR) use of structured financial products like STRC to leverage its BTC exposure. While these tools have enabled impressive returns (e.g., 11.5% annualized) and fueled significant capital inflows ($13.5B outstanding), they also create substantial annual dividend obligations (~$400M). The author argues that this structure, while effective in a bull market, could become a liability if BTC price stagnates or declines. The core risk is a potential negative feedback loop: the growing dividend burden from continued STRC issuance may eventually outweigh the benefits of increased BTC holdings. To meet these obligations, MicroStrategy might need to use new issuance proceeds for dividends instead of buying more BTC, which could disappoint equity investors. If the market capitalization (mNAV) falls below the value of its BTC holdings, the company could be forced to sell BTC instead of issuing new shares, potentially triggering a panic. The author estimates a potential inflection point in 6 months, where annual dividend costs reach $3-4B. At that stage, CEO Michael Saylor might face a difficult choice: sell BTC to meet obligations or sacrifice the credibility of the preferred shares by halting dividends. The article concludes that this financial engineering, while powerful, could ultimately "backfire" on MicroStrategy if market conditions turn.

marsbit1 h fa

The Cost of an 11.5% Annualized Return: Will MicroStrategy's STRC Face a Moment of Reckoning?

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot

Futures