SEC plans ‘token taxonomy’ for crypto assets even if CLARITY Act fails

ambcryptoPubblicato 2026-03-05Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-03-05

Introduzione

U.S. regulators are advancing crypto guidelines independently of the stalled CLARITY Act. The SEC is developing a 'token taxonomy' to clarify how federal securities laws apply to crypto assets, providing regulatory obligations for firms and investors. Simultaneously, the CFTC is proposing rules for prediction markets and plans to issue guidance on crypto perpetual contracts. These efforts aim to establish enforceable frameworks even without broader legislation, as bipartisan support for the CLARITY Act remains uncertain due to disputes over stablecoin regulations.

U.S regulators could still offer clear guidelines for the crypto sector even if the broader market structure bill, the CLARITY Act, fails to become law.

Notably, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has already issued interpretive guidance on how to apply federal securities law to certain crypto assets.

The guidance is under White House review, with Bloomberg reporting that it will establish a ‘token taxonomy’ to help categorize crypto assets that fall under SEC jurisdiction.

An SEC spokesperson further clarified that,

“As Chairman Atkins said, the Commission will consider interpretive guidance around a token taxonomy for crypto assets – in line with market structure legislation – to ensure that investors and innovators have a clear understanding of their regulatory obligations.”

Worth noting that this is separate from the SEC’s pending rulemaking proposal on crypto asset offerings.

For ETF Prime’s Nate Geraci, the move would be net positive, especially if the CLARITY Act stalls.

“CLARITY Act would be better, but SEC apparently not waiting around for politicians to figure out how to classify crypto assets...”

Such regulatory clarity would establish an enforceable framework that allows crypto firms to register with the regulator, conduct disclosure requirements, and engage with investors, amongst other things.

In fact, some analysts who viewed the CLARITY Act as a ‘bad bill’ advocated for this route to safeguard the market.

CFTC pushes for prediction market rules

Separately, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), which handles derivatives trading, has pledged to unveil clear rules for booming prediction markets.

Like the SEC, the CFTC also submitted a proposal for rulemaking for the multi-billion-dollar prediction markets.

Besides, CFTC Chairman Mike Selig had pledged to unveil crypto perps guidelines by next month. Collectively, these regulatory moves could allow key players to operate even if the CLARITY Act fails to hit the finish line.

In fact, the bill stalled earlier in the year as the crypto and banking industries failed to reach a stablecoin yield deal.

Surprisingly, the White House has openly criticized banks for their hardline stance on stablecoin rewards and sided with the crypto industry. The ongoing rift could make it challenging to have full bipartisan support to advance the bill.

Even so, the current pro-crypto regulators may still offer the much-needed guidelines for players to operate with clear rules for the road.


Final Summary

  • The SEC submitted proposed guidelines on how to treat crypto assets that fall within federal securities law.
  • CFTC also pushed for rules for prediction markets, with experts billing the updates as ‘better’ if the CLARITY Act stalls.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the SEC planning to establish for crypto assets, even if the CLARITY Act fails?

AThe SEC is planning to establish a 'token taxonomy' to help categorize crypto assets that fall under its jurisdiction.

QWhich U.S. regulatory body has pledged to unveil clear rules for prediction markets?

AThe Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has pledged to unveil clear rules for prediction markets.

QWhat did the CFTC Chairman pledge to release by next month regarding crypto?

ACFTC Chairman Mike Selig pledged to unveil crypto perps (perpetuals) guidelines by next month.

QWhy did the CLARITY Act stall earlier in the year?

AThe CLARITY Act stalled because the crypto and banking industries failed to reach a stablecoin yield deal.

QAccording to the article, what would regulatory clarity from the SEC establish for crypto firms?

ARegulatory clarity would establish an enforceable framework that allows crypto firms to register with the regulator, conduct disclosure requirements, and engage with investors.

Letture associate

iQiyi Is Too Impatient

The article "iQiyi Is Too Impatient" discusses the controversy surrounding the Chinese streaming platform IQiyi's recent announcement of an "AI Actor Library" during its 2026 World Conference. IQiyi claimed over 100 actors, including well-known names like Zhang Ruoyun and Yu Hewei, had joined the initiative. CEO Gong Yu suggested AI could enable actors to "star in 14 dramas a year instead of 4" and that "live-action filming might become a world cultural heritage." The announcement quickly sparked backlash. Multiple actors named in the list issued urgent statements denying they had signed any AI-related authorization agreements. This forced IQiyi to clarify that inclusion in the library only indicated a willingness to *consider* AI projects, with separate negotiations required for any specific role. The incident, which trended on social media with hashtags like "IQiyi is crazy," is presented as a sign of the company's growing desperation. Facing intense competition from short-video platforms like Douyin and Kuaishou, as well as Bilibili and Xiaohongshu, IQiyi's financial performance has weakened, with revenues declining for two consecutive years. The author argues that IQiyi is "too impatient" to tell a compelling AI story to reassure the market, especially as it pursues a listing on the Hong Kong stock exchange. The piece concludes by outlining three key "AI questions" IQiyi must answer: defining its role as a tool provider versus a content creator, balancing the "coldness" of AI with the human element audiences desire, and properly managing the interests of platforms, actors, and viewers. The core dilemma is that while AI can reduce costs and increase efficiency, it risks creating homogenized, formulaic content and devaluing human performers.

marsbit39 min fa

iQiyi Is Too Impatient

marsbit39 min fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片