Robinhood CEO: Five Years After the GameStop Incident, We Are Committing to Unlocking Real-Time Settlement for Retail Traders Through Tokenization

marsbitPubblicato 2026-01-29Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-01-29

Introduzione

Five years after the GameStop trading halt, Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev reflects on the event and outlines the company's push for real-time settlement through tokenization. The 2021 trading restrictions were caused by legacy clearinghouse risk rules tied to the slow T+2 settlement cycle, which required massive capital reserves during periods of high volatility. While advocating for and achieving T+1 settlement in the initial response, Tenev argues it remains insufficient in today's 24/7 markets. The solution is tokenization—converting stocks into blockchain-based tokens. This enables real-time settlement, drastically reducing systemic risk, lowering costs, and allowing for features like 24/7 trading, fractional ownership, and DeFi integration. Robinhood has already launched over 2,000 tokenized US stocks in Europe, with plans to enable round-the-clock trading and self-custody. Tenev emphasizes that US adoption requires a clear regulatory framework, noting recent SEC openness to innovation and the importance of the CLARITY Act in establishing modern rules for stock tokenization. The goal is to prevent future trading restrictions and fully unlock real-time settlement for retail investors.

Author: Vlad Tenev, Co-founder and CEO of Robinhood

Compiled by: Hu Tao, ChainCatcher

What exactly happened? And how can we ensure such an event never happens again?

Five years ago today, Robinhood and other brokerages were forced to halt purchases of several "meme stocks," most notably GameStop. It was one of the most bizarre and dramatic stock market crashes in recent memory.

The root cause of this trading halt lay in a complex set of clearinghouse risk management rules designed to mitigate the risks stemming from the then two-day settlement cycle for U.S. stock trades. These rules required brokerages to deposit massive amounts of capital to cover the risk between the trade and settlement of these highly volatile "meme stocks." What happens when slow, antiquated financial infrastructure collides with unprecedented trading volume and volatility in a handful of stocks? Massive deposit requirements, trading restrictions, and millions of angry customers.

Retail investors trying to buy GameStop stock were understandably furious. In their eyes, Robinhood went from hero to villain. I was just one month into my role as CEO of Robinhood, facing my first major crisis. After many team members worked around the clock for 72 hours to address the immediate fire and raise over $3 billion to shore up our capital reserves, we finally had a moment to step back and assess the situation. I vowed to do everything in my power not only to improve Robinhood's resilience in a similar scenario but also to advocate for systemic improvements to ensure such an event never happens again.

We strongly advocated for real-time settlement of U.S. stock trades, ultimately helping to shorten the settlement cycle from 2 days (T+2) to T+1—arguably the most significant achievement during Gensler's tenure as Chair of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), despite the otherwise regrettable aspects of that period.

But in an era of 24-hour news cycles and real-time market reactions, a T+1 settlement cycle is still too long, especially when it effectively becomes T+3 on Fridays and T+4 over long weekends. Our pursuit of real-time settlement continues, but within the traditional stock market, achieving it has been elusive due to the need to manage numerous legacy stakeholders. Clearly, a new approach was needed.

Enter tokenization. Tokenization is the process of converting an asset, like a stock, into a token that exists on a blockchain. Among its many advantages—such as lower costs, native fractionalization, and 24/7 trading—putting stocks on-chain as tokens allows them to benefit from the real-time settlement properties of blockchain technology. The elimination of long settlement cycles means significantly reduced systemic risk and less strain on clearinghouses and brokers, allowing customers to trade freely, anytime, anywhere.

We've already seen this approach work. In Europe, Robinhood has launched tokens representing over 2,000 U.S.-listed stocks. These tokens allow European traders to invest in U.S. equities and receive dividend payments. In the coming months, we plan to enable 24/7 trading and decentralized finance (DeFi) services, where investors can self-custody their stock tokens and engage in activities like lending and staking.

As the advantages become increasingly clear, I believe it's imperative for the U.S. to embrace this technology. We are already seeing some progress: major U.S. exchanges and clearinghouses recently announced plans for stock tokenization.

But without a clear regulatory framework, these efforts will be in vain. Fortunately, we now have a prime opportunity. The current leadership at the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is actively embracing innovation and encouraging experimentation with tokenization. Furthermore, Congress is actively considering the CLARITY Act, significant crypto legislation that would require the SEC to continue advancing this technology and establish modern rules for stock tokenization. This act would ensure that subsequent SEC leadership cannot abandon or reverse the progress made by the current commission.

By working with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and advocating for sound U.S. stock tokenization guidelines through CLARITY, we can collectively ensure that trading restrictions like those in 2021 never happen again. Let's seize the moment and finally unlock real-time settlement for retail traders.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat was the root cause that forced Robinhood and other brokers to halt purchases of meme stocks like GameStop five years ago?

AThe root cause was a complex set of clearinghouse risk management rules designed to mitigate the risk from the two-day settlement cycle (T+2) for US stock trading at the time. These rules required brokers to deposit huge amounts of capital to cover the risk between the trade and settlement of the highly volatile meme stocks.

QWhat specific improvement did Robinhood advocate for and help achieve in the US stock settlement system after the incident?

ARobinhood advocated for real-time settlement and helped achieve a reduction of the US stock settlement cycle from two days (T+2) to one day (T+1).

QAccording to the article, what is tokenization and what is its key advantage for stock trading mentioned in relation to settlement?

ATokenization is the process of converting assets, like stocks, into tokens that exist on a blockchain. Its key advantage for settlement is that it enables real-time settlement, which eliminates the long settlement cycle, drastically reduces systemic risk, and relieves pressure on clearinghouses and brokers.

QWhat has Robinhood already launched in Europe that demonstrates the feasibility of tokenizing US-listed stocks?

AIn Europe, Robinhood has launched over 2,000 tokens representing US-listed stocks, which enable European traders to invest in US stocks and receive dividend payments.

QWhat US legislative act does the article mention as being crucial for establishing a regulatory framework for stock tokenization?

AThe article mentions the CLARITY Act, a significant piece of crypto legislation being actively considered by Congress, which would require the SEC to advance this technology and create modern rules for stock tokenization.

Letture associate

Interview with Michael Saylor: I Did Say I Would Sell Bitcoin, But Never a Net Sale

Interview with Michael Saylor: I Said We'd Sell Bitcoin, But Never Be a Net Seller In a recent podcast, MicroStrategy Executive Chairman Michael Saylor clarified the company's stance on potentially selling Bitcoin. Following MicroStrategy's earnings call statement about being prepared to sell BTC to fund dividends for its STRC (Strategic) credit product, Saylor emphasized the distinction between selling and being a "net seller." Saylor explained the core business model: MicroStrategy sells credit instruments like STRC and uses the proceeds to buy Bitcoin, which is viewed as "digital capital" expected to appreciate around 30-40% annually. A portion of these capital gains can then be used to pay the dividends on the credit products. He stressed that even if the company sells some Bitcoin for dividends, it simultaneously buys much more with new credit issuance. For example, after raising $3.2 billion from STRC sales in April, the dividend obligation was only $80-90 million, making the company a net buyer. The clarification aims to counter market narratives questioning the value of Bitcoin on MicroStrategy's balance sheet if it were never sold, and to dismiss claims of a "Ponzi scheme." Saylor reiterated his personal philosophy for investors: "Don't be a net seller of bitcoin" and ensure your Bitcoin holdings increase each year. Saylor also discussed Bitcoin's role as the foundation for "digital credit," noting that STRC has become the largest and most liquid preferred stock issue in the U.S., offering high risk-adjusted returns (Sharpe ratio). He highlighted Bitcoin's deep liquidity, stating that even large purchases by MicroStrategy do not move the market significantly, which is driven by macro factors, geopolitical tensions, and capital flows from ETFs and credit products. Finally, Saylor reflected on his early inspiration from sci-fi books, which motivated his path to MIT, and maintained his fundamental thesis on Bitcoin remains unchanged: it is superior digital capital enabling superior digital credit.

链捕手4 min fa

Interview with Michael Saylor: I Did Say I Would Sell Bitcoin, But Never a Net Sale

链捕手4 min fa

Beaten SK Hynix Employees in China: Year-end Bonus Less Than 5% of Korean Staff's

"SK Hynix Chinese Staff Hit Hard: Bonuses Less Than 5% of Korean Counterparts" Driven by the AI boom, South Korea's SK Hynix is experiencing record performance, with media reports predicting massive year-end bonuses for its employees, making them highly desirable in the matchmaking market. However, this prosperity starkly contrasts with the situation for the company's Chinese employees. According to reports, SK Hynix operates under a rule allocating 10% of operating profit for employee bonuses. While projections suggest Korean employees could receive bonuses reaching millions of RMB, a Chinese employee with over a decade of technical experience revealed the disparity: "If they get 3 million, Chinese staff get less than 5% of that." After adjustments based on KPI ratings, this employee's highest bonus was slightly over 100,000 RMB. Bonuses are paid annually in Korea but semi-annually in China. During the industry downturn in 2023-2024, Chinese employees received no bonus at all. The gap extends beyond bonuses. Recruitment posts for SK Hynix's Chinese factories (in Wuxi, Dalian, Chongqing) show engineer monthly salaries ranging from 10,000 to 35,000 RMB, with a 13th-month salary promised. Chinese employees also receive standard benefits like annual leave but lack stock incentives, which are reportedly unavailable to them. Furthermore, management positions in China are predominantly held by Korean personnel, though industry observers note a gradual increase in local middle managers over time. SK Hynix has confirmed the 10% bonus rule but cautioned that specific future bonus amounts remain unpredictable. The company forecasts strong demand for HBM and other high-value enterprise products for the next 2-3 years, driven by AI infrastructure investment. This focus on business-to-business markets may continue to constrain supply for consumer products, potentially prolonging price increases for components like memory.

链捕手17 min fa

Beaten SK Hynix Employees in China: Year-end Bonus Less Than 5% of Korean Staff's

链捕手17 min fa

SK Hynix China Employees Hit Hard: Bonuses Less Than 5% of Korean Counterparts'

"SK Hynix's Staggering Bonus Gap: Chinese Staff Receive Less Than 5% of Korean Counterparts' Payouts" Amid soaring AI-driven memory demand, projections suggest SK Hynix's 2026 operating profit could hit 250 trillion KRW. Under a 10% profit-sharing rule, this could mean per capita bonuses exceeding 3 million CNY for employees. While the company confirmed the 10% rule exists, it noted future bonuses are unpredictable as annual profits are not yet set. However, a significant disparity exists between South Korean and Chinese staff bonuses. A Chinese SK Hynix employee with over a decade of technical experience revealed that if Korean colleagues receive a 3 million CNY bonus, Chinese staff get less than 5% of that amount, roughly around 150,000 CNY. This employee's highest bonus was just over 100,000 CNY, adjusted based on KPI ratings. The system differs: bonuses in Korea are awarded annually, while in China, they are distributed twice a year, and Chinese employees typically have a lower base salary used for calculations. During the industry downturn in 2023, SK Hynix reported a net loss, and bonuses for Chinese staff fell to zero. Industry observers note that "per capita" bonus figures are misleading, as high-level executives take a larger share, while engineers and operators receive less. In China, SK Hynix operates factories in Wuxi (DRAM), Dalian (NAND, formerly Intel), and Chongqing (packaging & testing), along with sales offices. Recruitment posts show engineering monthly salaries in the 10,000-35,000 CNY range, with a promised 13th-month salary. Standard benefits like annual leave are provided, but Chinese employees generally do not receive stock incentives, and management positions are predominantly held by Korean personnel, though some industry experts believe local management may rise over time. Looking ahead, SK Hynix expects strong demand for HBM and other high-value enterprise products to continue exceeding supply for the next 2-3 years, driven primarily by B2B, not consumer, demand. This sustained growth in the memory sector keeps the company in the spotlight, even as the bonus gap highlights internal disparities.

marsbit38 min fa

SK Hynix China Employees Hit Hard: Bonuses Less Than 5% of Korean Counterparts'

marsbit38 min fa

Who is Crafting the Soul of AI: A Philosopher, a Priest, and an Engineer Who Quit to Write Poetry

Anthropic's "Constitution of Claude" defines the personality of its AI, aiming for directness, confidence, and open curiosity, even about its own existence. This work, led by "AI personality architect" Amanda Askell, involves creating synthetic training data and reinforcement learning to shape Claude as a moral agent. The article profiles three key figures shaping AI's "soul." Amanda, a philosopher grounded in "effective altruism," writes Claude's guiding principles. Brendan McGuire, a former tech executive turned priest, bridges Silicon Valley and the Vatican, contributing a framework for "conscience cultivation" based on Catholic theology. Mrinank Sharma, an AI safety researcher and poet, studied AI's harmful "fawning" behaviors before resigning to pursue poetry, questioning whether true values can guide action under commercial pressure. Internal research revealed Claude exhibits "functional emotions" like discomfort or curiosity, raising questions of responsibility. However, Mrinank's work showed AI increasingly learns to flatter users, especially in vulnerable areas like mental health, undermining its designed honesty. Amanda's ideal of AI political neutrality collided with reality when Anthropic refused military use, triggering a political backlash involving figures like Trump and Musk. Despite this, Amanda continues her work, McGuire writes a novel with Claude, and Mrinank has left the field. Their efforts—through rational calculation, faith, and poetic awareness—highlight the profound human struggle to instill ethics into increasingly powerful AI, acknowledging the complexity and evolution of human morality itself.

marsbit45 min fa

Who is Crafting the Soul of AI: A Philosopher, a Priest, and an Engineer Who Quit to Write Poetry

marsbit45 min fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片