Ripple Secures Full EU Payments License in Luxembourg and  Expands Regulated Crypto Services Across Europe

TheNewsCryptoPubblicato 2026-02-02Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-02-02

Introduzione

Ripple has obtained a full Electronic Money Institution (EMI) license from Luxembourg’s financial regulator, allowing it to expand regulated digital payment and asset services across the European Union. The license, granted by the Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier, enables Ripple to offer cross-border payment solutions to European businesses under a single regulatory framework using Luxembourg as its EU hub. This follows recent regulatory milestones, including an EMI license in the UK, and reinforces Ripple’s strategy of operating within financial regulations. The company now holds over 75 global approvals and continues to develop new products, such as Ripple Treasury for integrated cash and digital asset management.

Ripple has officially secured an Electronic Money Institution (EMI) license from the Luxembourg financial regulator. This makes the major shift for Ripple to expand its regulated payment and digital asset service throughout Europe. The license was granted by the Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier, converting the preliminary approval issued in January to the full authorization.

What Ripple can do with this License

The EMI license enables Ripple to provide regulated digital payments across the EU and support cross-border payments for European businesses. It is also able to operate under the single regulatory framework using Luxembourg as its EU hub.

Ripple said that Europe has always been a key market, and this approval helps companies with faster digital payments. Getting approval from Luxembourg gives Ripple strong regulatory credibility and easier access to customers across EU member states.

Ripple’s regulatory approvals across the globe

Last month, the Financial Conduct Authority granted Ripple an EMI license and a crypto asset registration, which allows it to expand in the UK. Within a few days, Ripple got an EU license, which now gives Ripple strong regulatory coverage across Europe.

Ripple says that it holds more than 75 regulatory approvals across the globe, which shows Ripple’s clear strategy of working inside the financial rules and targeting banks and large institutions to replace old cross-border payment systems with blockchain-based tools.

Apart from the payments, Ripple is launching new products. Recently, it launched Ripple Treasury, which helps companies to manage cash and digital assets together. Ripple also signed a multi-year deal with LMAX Group, which includes a $150 million financial commitment from Ripple and uses Ripple’s RLUSD as collateral to support institutional crypto trading.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Senator Warren Presses for Probe Into Trump-Linked UAE Crypto Deal

TagsCryptocurrencyRipplexrp

Domande pertinenti

QWhat type of license did Ripple secure from the Luxembourg financial regulator?

ARipple secured an Electronic Money Institution (EMI) license from the Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier in Luxembourg.

QHow does the EMI license benefit Ripple's operations in Europe?

AThe EMI license allows Ripple to provide regulated digital payments across the EU, support cross-border payments for European businesses, and operate under a single regulatory framework using Luxembourg as its EU hub.

QWhich other major European country recently granted Ripple regulatory approval?

ALast month, the Financial Conduct Authority in the United Kingdom granted Ripple an EMI license and a crypto asset registration.

QWhat is one of Ripple's new products mentioned in the article?

ARipple recently launched Ripple Treasury, a product that helps companies manage both cash and digital assets together.

QHow many regulatory approvals does Ripple hold globally according to the article?

ARipple holds more than 75 regulatory approvals across the globe.

Letture associate

Arbitrum Pretends to Be the Hacker, 'Steals' Back the Money Lost by KelpDAO

Title: Arbitrum Poses as Hacker to Recover Stolen Funds from KelpDAO Last week, KelpDAO suffered a hack resulting in nearly $300 million in losses, marking the largest DeFi security incident this year. Approximately 30,765 ETH (worth over $70 million) remained on an Arbitrum address controlled by the attacker. In an unprecedented move, Arbitrum’s Security Council utilized its emergency authority to upgrade the Inbox bridge contract, adding a function that allowed them to impersonate the hacker’s address and initiate a transfer without access to its private key. The council’s action, approved by 9 of its 12 members, moved the stolen ETH to a frozen address in a single transaction before reverting the contract to its original state. The operation was coordinated with law enforcement, which attributed the attack to North Korea’s Lazarus Group. Community reactions are divided: some praise the recovery of funds, while others question the centralization of power, as the council can upgrade core contracts without governance votes. However, such emergency mechanisms are common among major L2s. Despite the partial recovery, over $292 million was stolen in total, with more than $100 million in bad debt on Aave and remaining funds scattered across other chains. The incident highlights escalating security challenges in DeFi, with state-sponsored hackers employing advanced tactics and L2s responding with elevated countermeasures.

marsbit11 min fa

Arbitrum Pretends to Be the Hacker, 'Steals' Back the Money Lost by KelpDAO

marsbit11 min fa

iQiyi Is Too Impatient

The article "iQiyi Is Too Impatient" discusses the controversy surrounding the Chinese streaming platform IQiyi's recent announcement of an "AI Actor Library" during its 2026 World Conference. IQiyi claimed over 100 actors, including well-known names like Zhang Ruoyun and Yu Hewei, had joined the initiative. CEO Gong Yu suggested AI could enable actors to "star in 14 dramas a year instead of 4" and that "live-action filming might become a world cultural heritage." The announcement quickly sparked backlash. Multiple actors named in the list issued urgent statements denying they had signed any AI-related authorization agreements. This forced IQiyi to clarify that inclusion in the library only indicated a willingness to *consider* AI projects, with separate negotiations required for any specific role. The incident, which trended on social media with hashtags like "IQiyi is crazy," is presented as a sign of the company's growing desperation. Facing intense competition from short-video platforms like Douyin and Kuaishou, as well as Bilibili and Xiaohongshu, IQiyi's financial performance has weakened, with revenues declining for two consecutive years. The author argues that IQiyi is "too impatient" to tell a compelling AI story to reassure the market, especially as it pursues a listing on the Hong Kong stock exchange. The piece concludes by outlining three key "AI questions" IQiyi must answer: defining its role as a tool provider versus a content creator, balancing the "coldness" of AI with the human element audiences desire, and properly managing the interests of platforms, actors, and viewers. The core dilemma is that while AI can reduce costs and increase efficiency, it risks creating homogenized, formulaic content and devaluing human performers.

marsbit1 h fa

iQiyi Is Too Impatient

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片