QNT jumps 12% as volume triples — Can Quant bulls defend THIS floor?

ambcryptoPubblicato 2026-01-18Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-01-18

Introduzione

Quant (QNT) surged 12.33% over 36 hours, with its daily trading volume tripling. The rally occurred as Bitcoin defended a key support level near $94.5k, potentially opening upward momentum toward $100k and creating room for altcoin gains. On the weekly chart, QNT maintains a bullish structure, having set a higher low at $58.60 in 2025 and defended the 78.6% Fibonacci retracement level at $75 since November. The recent 8% weekly gain suggests a possible long-term reversal. However, risks remain due to Bitcoin’s bearish weekly structure and key resistance zones at $101k and $108k. Traders may consider long positions given QNT’s bullish 4-hour structure and negative exchange netflow indicating accumulation. Key invalidation level is a close below $72.5, with profit targets at $90 and $110. Long-term holders should remain cautious due to potential Bitcoin-driven downside and neutral-to-fearful market sentiment. Overall, the rebound from a major Fibonacci level is encouraging, but the broader market outlook suggests elevated risk for QNT investors.

Quant [QNT] has rallied 12.33% in the past 36 hours, and its daily trading volume has tripled since Friday, the 16th of January. The strong gains and high volume came while BTC defended the $94.5k local support zone, which had been a resistance in December and until recently.

Bitcoin has scope for advancing toward $100k, which gives altcoins some room to make gains.

The long-term trend of QNT is bullish

The weekly chart showed that Quant [QNT] has a bullish structure on the weekly. The rally in November 2024 broke the previous high at $149.6. In 2025, the weekly chart showed QNT set a higher low at $58.60.

In recent months, it has retraced to the 78.6% Fibonacci retracement level at $75. The bulls have defended this support zone well since November.

The past week saw an 8.03% move higher for QNT, which could be an early sign of a long-term reversal.

The end of the retracement phase for Quant will give investors an opportunity, but it comes with risks. Bitcoin [BTC] itself has a bearish weekly structure, and the $101k and $108k were supply zones that could reject BTC bulls.

The bearish case for Quant investors

Long-term holders should be wary of the risks of a deeper price drop due to Bitcoin movements and the wider market sentiment, which was neutral to fearful at the time of writing. The timing of a long-term purchase was not ideal.

Traders’ call to action- Potential for a trade setup

The 4-hour structure was bullish, and there is reason for traders to go long. Capital rotation into altcoins is a possibility in the coming weeks, and Quant holders could make profits.

A 4-hour session close below $72.5 would invalidate this idea. The $90 and $110 were the sizeable supply zones overhead that bulls can look to take profits at.

QNT Exchange Netflow was negative over the past three days, indicative of accumulation.

Final Thoughts

The Quant rebound from the key long-term Fibonacci retracement level was an encouraging sign.
The longer-term Bitcoin and altcoin market outlook showed that QNT investors could be taking a risky step.

Disclaimer: The information presented does not constitute financial, investment, trading, or other types of advice and is solely the writer’s opinion.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the recent price performance of Quant (QNT) and its trading volume?

AQuant (QNT) has rallied 12.33% in the past 36 hours, and its daily trading volume has tripled since Friday, January 16th.

QWhat key support level have the QNT bulls been defending on the weekly chart?

AThe bulls have been defending the 78.6% Fibonacci retracement level at $75, which has acted as a key support zone since November.

QWhat is the primary risk for long-term QNT investors mentioned in the article?

AThe primary risk is the potential for a deeper price drop due to Bitcoin's movements and the wider market sentiment, which was described as neutral to fearful.

QWhat price level on the 4-hour chart would invalidate the bullish trading idea presented?

AA 4-hour session close below $72.5 would invalidate the bullish trading idea.

QWhat does the negative QNT Exchange Netflow over the past three days indicate?

AThe negative Netflow is indicative of accumulation, meaning more tokens are being withdrawn from exchanges than deposited.

Letture associate

Breaking: Google Earth Urgently Pulls Back Nano Banana 2 Image Generation Feature!

Google Earth's newly launched "Create image" feature, powered by the Nano Banana 2 AI image generation model, was abruptly withdrawn shortly after its release due to being "played" by users. The feature allowed users to generate and overlay AI-created visuals directly onto real-world satellite and 3D maps in Google Earth. The tool enabled creative applications like historical recreations (e.g., visualizing ancient Pompeii), generating informational graphics for landmarks, and envisioning architectural projects or futuristic cityscapes on real terrain. It operated under "geospatial grounding," meaning the AI respected the underlying geography, topography, and perspective of the chosen map view. The model also integrated with Gemini to retrieve relevant factual information. However, upon release, users quickly tested its limits. A prominent example involved reimagining Philadelphia's historic Independence Hall as a post-apocalyptic ruin overrun by "happy" zombies, evil clowns, and giant alien mechs. This highlighted both the feature's playful potential and its risks regarding the generation of inappropriate or misleading content on realistic maps, leading to its swift temporary removal. Google stated it would re-release the feature after implementing "enhanced guardrails." Analysts note this move strategically leverages Google's vast proprietary geospatial data, positioning its AI not just for artistic generation but for spatially accurate world visualization—a unique advantage in the competitive AI image generation landscape.

marsbit1 h fa

Breaking: Google Earth Urgently Pulls Back Nano Banana 2 Image Generation Feature!

marsbit1 h fa

Altman Admits: Overestimated AI Snatching Jobs! Huang Renxun: The Unemployment Narrative Is Completely Backwards

Sam Altman has revised his earlier predictions about AI rapidly replacing jobs, admitting he overestimated the speed at which AI would eliminate entry-level white-collar roles. Speaking on the "Invest Like the Best" podcast, he stated that people do not truly want an AI CEO, as accountability and human connection remain critical. He found that individuals prefer interacting with people who can be held responsible for decisions. Similarly, NVIDIA's Jensen Huang argued that the narrative of AI destroying jobs is misguided. He distinguishes between tasks and jobs, noting that while AI can automate specific tasks, entire jobs—encompassing communication, judgment, coordination, and accountability—are not eliminated. He cited examples like radiologists and software engineers, where demand for these roles has increased as AI handles repetitive tasks, allowing for business expansion and the creation of more positions. Data from a University of Maryland and LinkUp study supports this, showing that U.S. job postings for new graduates have actually risen, countering the fear of vanishing entry-level roles. However, a significant shift is occurring: the traditional entry-level tasks that help newcomers gain experience are being automated, making initial career access more challenging. The key insight is that as AI takes over standardized tasks, the enduring value of human work shifts toward areas of responsibility, trust-building, and final decision-making—aspects that AI cannot replicate. The real "moat" for professionals lies in these irreplaceable human elements.

marsbit1 h fa

Altman Admits: Overestimated AI Snatching Jobs! Huang Renxun: The Unemployment Narrative Is Completely Backwards

marsbit1 h fa

A Major Change at the Fed? Report: Wash Considers Reducing Frequency of Policy Meetings, Breaking 40-Year Precedent

The Federal Reserve Chairman is considering reducing the number of regular Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meetings held each year, a potential major shift from the current practice of eight meetings annually that has been in place since 1981. According to a report, the proposal was discussed internally, with possible details finalized ahead of the September meeting. This change would mean fewer formal opportunities to vote on interest rates and could diminish the Fed's ability to respond to economic data while reducing market access to policy signals, marking a reversal of the central bank's long-term trend towards greater transparency. While the 1935 Banking Act sets a legal minimum of four meetings per year, historical meeting frequency has varied. The move aligns with the Chairman's broader agenda of institutional reform since taking office, which includes revising communication practices and data usage. An internal memo from 1988 had previously concluded that the eight-meeting schedule remained appropriate. If implemented, this reduction in meetings would significantly reshape the Fed's operational rhythm and its interaction with financial markets.

marsbit1 h fa

A Major Change at the Fed? Report: Wash Considers Reducing Frequency of Policy Meetings, Breaking 40-Year Precedent

marsbit1 h fa

Weekly Editor's Picks (0725-0731)

Weekly Editor's Picks (0725-0731) provides a curated selection of deep analysis, filtering out market noise. Key themes from this week include: **Macro & Policy:** The Federal Reserve's upcoming meeting is marked by high uncertainty, balancing cooling inflation data against persistent price pressures. Meanwhile, the U.S. crypto regulatory Clarity Act faces critical political hurdles, with its 2026 passage probability seen as low. **Investing & Crypto:** Analysis suggests long-term crypto success depends on conviction through volatile cycles, focusing on assets like Bitcoin and core smart contract platforms. A trend noted is the increasing similarity between global equity markets (especially tech) and crypto, driven by narrative and leverage. Several major crypto protocols show strong revenue growth, but this isn't always translating to token price appreciation due to sell pressure and structural factors. **AI & Semiconductors:** Nvidia's rising credit default swap rates signal market concern over AI infrastructure financing risks. The storage sector experienced volatility as markets began pricing in potential 2027 oversupply. Despite a record profitable quarter, SK Hynix's results were deemed "below expectations," reflecting heightened investor demands for future growth visibility. **Markets & DeFi:** TradeXYZ demonstrated remarkable accuracy in pre-market pricing for a major A股 listing. The token ONDO saw gains, linked to its growing role in the on-chain tokenized stock ecosystem. **Ethereum:** Post-Pectra upgrade, a major structural shift is underway as Lido begins migrating millions of ETH to new validator architectures designed for capital efficiency. **Also Highlighted:** Butian's bullish stock market move; OpenAI's Altman promising major advances; Samsung and SK Hynix securing large AI chip deals; Apple reaching a $5T market cap; and ongoing discussions around exchange security following Poolin's bankruptcy case.

marsbit1 h fa

Low Investment Isn't Apple's Immunity Pass

While Meta and Google face investor scrutiny over ballooning AI capital expenditures, Apple's minimal AI investment has paradoxically become a strength. Its market cap recently reclaimed the global top spot, surpassing $5 trillion. The irony is deep: Apple's own AI efforts have lagged, with "Apple Intelligence" delayed and core talent lost, forcing reliance on partners like Google Gemini and Alibaba's Qianwen. Its Q3 FY2026 (Q2 CY) earnings initially seemed stellar. Revenue hit $109.4B (up 16% YoY), with iPhone and Mac sales, growing 22% and 29% respectively, driving most of the growth. However, the stock fell over 8% post-earnings. The primary concern was a weaker Q4 revenue growth forecast of 9-11%, below expectations, due to looming supply chain constraints. Apple is feeling the indirect cost of the AI boom. Soaring memory and chip prices, fueled by massive data center investments from Microsoft, Amazon, and others, are forcing Apple to raise Mac and iPad prices significantly. The upcoming iPhone launch is also expected to see substantial price hikes. Despite avoiding heavy AI infrastructure spending—its capital expenditures are actually down 28%—Apple cannot escape the industry-wide supply and cost pressures. While Apple's operating cash flow remains robust, its substantial R&D spending (up 32% YoY) has yet to yield major AI breakthroughs. As Tim Cook prepares to step down as CEO, Apple faces a challenging transition: balancing its premium hardware success against the strategic and cost pressures of the AI era it has so far cautiously navigated.

marsbit2 h fa

Low Investment Isn't Apple's Immunity Pass

marsbit2 h fa

Trading

Spot