Predicting the 'Side Hustles' of Market Giants: From Online Betting to Offline Store Openings

比推Pubblicato 2026-02-04Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-02-04

Introduzione

The competition between leading prediction market platforms Kalshi and Polymarket has expanded from online to offline. On February 4, Kalshi distributed free groceries (up to $50 per person) at a market in New York City, promoting its event-based trading platform with the slogan “We believe in free markets.” The campaign targeted economic concerns like inflation and aimed to attract users by lowering entry barriers. On the same day, Polymarket announced plans to open a permanent free grocery store in New York, supported by a $1 million donation to address food security. The store, set to open on February 12, aligns with Polymarket’s mission to make prediction markets accessible and socially impactful. This offline move reflects intensifying competition. Kalshi, compliant in the U.S., has partnered with platforms like Coinbase and reported annualized trading volume exceeding $100 billion. Polymarket faces regulatory challenges, including bans in Ukraine and Portugal, and restrictions in Nevada. It also competes with new entrants like Opinion, which raised millions and gained rapid traction. Other players, including Crypto.com, Kraken, Robinhood, and Hyperliquid, are also entering the prediction market space, driven by growing user interest in event-based trading. As global events like elections and sports continue to attract attention, prediction markets are poised for further growth, keeping platforms like Kalshi and Polymarket in a fierce battle for users.

Author: Ma He, Foresight News

Original Title: Behind the 'Side Hustles' of Prediction Market Giants: Opening Offline Grocery Stores Out of Anxiety?

Who would have thought that the competition between the two online prediction market giants, Kalshi and Polymarket, has already extended from purely online to offline.

At 12:00 PM on February 4th, Kalshi gave away free groceries to residents at the West Side Market on 84 Third Avenue in New York City, with a limit of up to $50 per person.

Kalshi CEO Tarek Mansour stated, "We believe in free markets," making it clear that this move aims to promote the concept of prediction markets through tangible benefits to the public.

The highlight of the event lies in its clever marketing strategy. First, it directly ties into current economic hot topics—inflation and rising living costs have become pain points for the American public. By offering free groceries, Kalshi not only provides immediate value but also positions itself as an "event contract exchange," allowing users to trade on events such as politics, economics, and sports.

For example, users can predict fluctuations in grocery prices or changes in economic indicators on the platform, thereby transforming the offline experience into online participation. Second, the event’s location in a high-density, high-consumption city like New York maximizes exposure. Official videos show crowds rushing in at the opening moment, likened to "Christmas revisited."

The event had a low barrier to entry: no app download was required to participate; one only needed to shop in-store, and Kalshi would cover the bill. This not only lowered the entry barrier for users but also reinforced the platform’s approachable image.

Unlike Kalshi’s short-term promotion, Polymarket’s offline activity is more long-term and ambitious.

On February 4th, Polymarket announced it would open a "free grocery store" in New York, located at 7 Madison Avenue, scheduled to officially open on February 12th. The store is supported by the Food Bank for New York City, with the project breaking ground in late 2025 and a lease agreement already signed. Additionally, Polymarket donated $1 million to address security concerns.

Polymarket’s announcement coincidentally came on the same day as Kalshi’s event, even with overlapping opening times, which is seen as a direct response.

The highlight of Polymarket’s activity lies in its innovation and emphasis on social responsibility. First, this is not a one-time promotion but a permanent store where users can obtain groceries for free, addressing food security issues in New York. Second, this aligns closely with the platform’s core philosophy of revealing truth and allocating resources through prediction markets.

Polymarket founder Shayne Coplan stated that this move is an expansion of the platform from online to offline, aiming to "make prediction markets accessible."

Polymarket incorporates its signature blue logo into the store, with a simple and stylish interior design. Compared to Kalshi’s $50 cap, Polymarket’s free model is more attractive and is expected to reach more low-income groups.

Intensified Rivalry Between the Two Platforms

The offline activities of Kalshi and Polymarket are a microcosm of the fierce competition in the prediction market.

Kalshi uses U.S. compliance as its moat, rapidly expanding its territory. It has not only integrated with various Web3 wallets like Phantom but also partnered with Coinbase to extend its services to all 50 U.S. states. Coinbase users can trade prediction market contracts with as little as $1. In January of this year, Kalshi officially announced that its annualized trading volume exceeded $100 billion.

Polymarket has not only strengthened collaborations with crypto-native players like Jupiter and Phantom but has also expanded its traffic channels by sponsoring events such as the Hollywood Golden Globe Awards.

However, the latest data shows that its market share is still being eroded by Kalshi.

To make matters worse, Polymarket faces troubling regulatory issues.

In January of this year, Ukraine banned Polymarket, as the country’s current legal framework does not recognize prediction markets. Portuguese regulators have also ordered Polymarket to cease operations in the country.

In February, a Nevada court issued a temporary restraining order, prohibiting Polymarket from offering event contract services to Nevada residents before a preliminary hearing on February 11th.

Additionally, many regions in Asia view Polymarket as a gambling platform and have blocked its IP address.

Another competitor backed by Binance is also eyeing the market. Opinion completed a tens of millions of dollars funding round in December 2025. Driven by airdrop expectations, the platform’s trading volume exceeded $5 billion in just one month, with daily fee revenue consistently surpassing $100,000.

Meanwhile, various exchanges, DEXs, and traditional financial institutions are also entering the prediction market.

Bloomberg reported that Crypto.com announced on Tuesday that it would launch a dedicated prediction market platform, OG, just days before the Super Bowl. Its co-founder and CEO, Kris Marszalek, stated that its event contract business has grown 40 times week-over-week in the past six months, making the launch of an independent product necessary. Another crypto trading platform, Kraken, plans to launch prediction market services in 2026, as revealed by its Global Consumer Business Head, Mark Greenberg, on the Crypto World show.

Robinhood had already launched a prediction market before Trump’s election and plans to introduce more new event contracts. In October 2025, Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev stated in an interview with Bloomberg that its prediction market segment is one of the fastest-growing sectors and one of its nine business lines with annual revenue exceeding $100 million.

Derivatives DEX leader Hyperliquid is also testing a native prediction market on its testnet. Hyperliquid announced that HyperCore will support Outcome Trading (HIP-4). Outcome Trading involves fully collateralized contracts settled within a fixed range. This is a universal foundational trading element applicable to scenarios such as prediction markets and bounded option-like instruments.

It features non-linear, time-bound contracts, offering a form of derivatives trading without leverage or liquidation, and can be combined with portfolio margin and HyperEVM. Currently, this feature is still under development and is only being tested on the testnet. Once technical development is complete, Hyperliquid will deploy standardized markets denominated in USDH.

The store openings by Kalshi and Polymarket are not just marketing but also battles to capture user attention.

Wars, political events, elections, and sports competitions are gathering global users online, enabling 24/7 non-stop global betting. Rule disputes, wealth stories, and insider trading are all unfolding simultaneously, with only money and brains never sleeping. Perhaps future hot events like the World Cup and U.S. elections will continue to drive prediction market trading volumes and recognition to new heights.

Before the final outcome is determined, no participant dares to let their guard down.

Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

Bitpush TG Discussion Group:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

Bitpush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7608693

Domande pertinenti

QWhat was the main purpose of Kalshi's free grocery giveaway event in New York?

AKalshi's free grocery event aimed to promote the concept of prediction markets by providing immediate value to the public, linking economic concerns like inflation to their platform where users can trade on events such as politics, economics, and sports.

QHow does Polymarket's approach to a physical store differ from Kalshi's event?

APolymarket's store is a permanent establishment in partnership with Food Bank for New York City, focusing on long-term social responsibility and addressing food insecurity, while Kalshi's was a temporary promotional event with a spending limit per person.

QWhat regulatory challenges is Polymarket currently facing?

APolymarket faces bans in Ukraine and Portugal, a temporary restriction order in Nevada, and is blocked in several Asia-Pacific regions where it is viewed as a gambling platform.

QWhich companies are emerging as new competitors in the prediction market space?

ANew competitors include Opinion, which received funding and rapid growth, Crypto.com's OG platform, Kraken's planned service, Robinhood's expanding prediction market, and Hyperliquid's testing of native prediction market features.

QWhat is the significance of the competition between Kalshi and Polymarket expanding to physical locations?

AThe expansion into physical locations represents a strategic move to capture user attention and market share beyond online platforms, using real-world engagement to drive awareness and participation in prediction markets amid growing competition.

Letture associate

How Likely is it for TradeXYZ to Go Solo from Hyperliquid?

The article analyzes the possibility of TradeXYZ, a dominant project on Hyperliquid's HIP-3 real-world asset (RWA) perpetual contracts market, splitting off to build its own independent trading platform. With TradeXYZ commanding over 90% of HIP-3 volume and over 35% of Hyperliquid's total open interest, its leverage and influence are significant. The primary motive for a split is seen as capturing the underlying protocol fees, of which TradeXYZ currently receives only half. However, several factors strongly discourage such a move. First, replicating Hyperliquid's high-performance infrastructure would be challenging and could degrade TradeXYZ's product quality. Second, Hyperliquid serves as a crucial distribution channel, with most users accessing TradeXYZ's liquidity through its frontend. Third, the close, trusting relationship between the founders of both projects makes a hostile "betrayal" unlikely. The conclusion is that a split would likely result in a lose-lose scenario. Hyperliquid would lose its main growth narrative and see its valuation impacted, while TradeXYZ would face immense technical hurdles, lose its primary user channel, and damage its reputation. Instead of a full separation, the more probable path is for TradeXYZ to negotiate better terms while deepening integration, focusing on enhancing its own brand and user ownership.

marsbit19 min fa

How Likely is it for TradeXYZ to Go Solo from Hyperliquid?

marsbit19 min fa

"Teletubbies" Robot Cleaning Service, $30/Hour, Pure·Manual·Intelligence

Anthropomorphic "Teletubby" robot offers cleaning services in San Francisco at $30/hour, but it's entirely remote-controlled. The robot, created by startup Tau Robotics, can perform household tasks like washing hands, mopping floors, and taking out trash. While the initial demo videos appear impressive and are notably shown at normal speed (unlike many sped-up robot demos), the company reveals the actions are performed via human teleoperation, not autonomous AI. Tau Robotics, founded in 2024, argues this "cheat" is a strategic way to bridge the current capability gap, ensure task completion, and collect real-world home data to eventually train autonomous systems. Their service features three robot models: Chelsea for kitchens/bathrooms, Elon for regular tidying with memory, and Tony for deep cleaning. Priced at $30 per hour, it's cheaper than average human cleaners in the US. The article discusses the broader challenge of deploying humanoid robots in homes, comparing Tau's approach to others like China's Ziliang and the US's 1X Neo, which also use teleoperation. A key reason for choosing a humanoid form is to make remote control more intuitive for human operators. The piece also notes the potential "emotional value" of having a humanoid servant. The service is currently invite-only in San Francisco.

marsbit34 min fa

"Teletubbies" Robot Cleaning Service, $30/Hour, Pure·Manual·Intelligence

marsbit34 min fa

From South Korea to the United States: Blue-Collar Jobs Are Becoming Increasingly Popular, Thanks to AI

AI is reshaping the labor market's value proposition. The traditional four-year college degree is losing its appeal as a guaranteed career path, while skilled blue-collar trades like electricians, welders, and plumbers are experiencing historic demand and wage premiums. This shift is driven by dual pressures: AI's displacement of certain white-collar roles and a booming need for physical infrastructure and data center construction. Data confirms the trend. In the U.S., vocational school revenue surged, and a significant portion of recent layoffs are AI-related. Surveys show a majority of Gen Z adults plan to pursue blue-collar work, citing better job security against AI automation. Vocational education interest has exploded recently. Experts cite a psychological shift as younger generations seek tangible, AI-resistant careers and avoid high student debt. In many cases, salaries for skilled trades now match or exceed those requiring a bachelor's degree. In South Korea, semiconductor vocational high schools boast near-total employment, with graduates securing high-paying roles at companies like Samsung. The shortage is structural, exacerbated by a retiring baby boomer workforce and massive infrastructure projects. Companies like JPMorgan Chase, Meta, and Lowe's are investing heavily in training programs. However, overcoming historical stigma and a "perception gap" around trade careers remains a key challenge to closing the talent gap.

marsbit1 h fa

From South Korea to the United States: Blue-Collar Jobs Are Becoming Increasingly Popular, Thanks to AI

marsbit1 h fa

Qualcomm: AI Hype Subsides, When Will Smartphones Emerge from the Gloom?

Qualcomm reported its Q3 FY2026 results (ending June 2026), with revenue of $9.95B, down 4% YoY but above expectations. Gross margin declined to 53.1%, pressured by rising costs across manufacturing and memory. Key business segments showed mixed performance: Handset revenue fell 19.6% YoY to $5.09B, dragged by an 11% decline in non-Apple Android shipments and weaker high-end mix. Conversely, Automotive revenue surged 61% to $1.59B, and IoT grew 9% to $1.83B. Core operating profit dropped 41% YoY due to margin compression and higher expenses. Management's Q4 FY2026 guidance projects revenue of $9.7B-$10.5B, in line with consensus, but Non-GAAP EPS guidance of $2.05-$2.25 fell short of expectations. Amidst persistent weakness in its core handset market, Qualcomm is pursuing growth in AI, focusing on Edge AI (smartphones, PCs, automotive) and Data Center AI. Its data center strategy includes four pillars: AI accelerators (e.g., AI200), commercial CPUs (Dragonfly C1000), custom silicon, and connectivity solutions. While these initiatives initially boosted its stock, concerns over AI capital expenditure sustainability have since erased those gains. The company targets $5B in data center revenue for FY2027 and $15B for FY2029. The report concludes that with the traditional handset business still under pressure, the data center opportunity is currently viewed as a longer-term option, and a more conservative valuation based on core operations may be warranted until AI contributions materialize.

marsbit1 h fa

Qualcomm: AI Hype Subsides, When Will Smartphones Emerge from the Gloom?

marsbit1 h fa

From TPU to Self-Evolving Agents: How Jeff Dean Predicts the Next Step in AI

At the 2026 YC Startup School, Jeff Dean outlined his vision for AI's next phase, shifting focus from simply scaling models to building intelligent, autonomous systems. He believes AI's progress is no longer just about creating smarter models, but about integrating them into systems capable of long-term, iterative work, automated experimentation, and continuous learning. This evolution moves the competition from "who has the bigger model" to "who can best organize intelligence." Dean suggests AI capabilities are now comparable to a junior engineer, enabling the automation of complex workflows. However, the true challenge and opportunity lie in managing these AI "workers" at scale. He emphasizes the importance of **context engineering**—structuring tools, memory, and feedback loops—over raw model power. For startups, this means building deep expertise in niche domains where general models currently fail (near 0-1% success rates), leveraging proprietary data, specialized tools, and domain-specific evaluators. A recurring theme is re-examining fundamental constraints. Dean's past work, like moving Google's search index to memory or creating the TPU, stemmed from questioning outdated assumptions about hardware and cost. He sees similar inflection points today, particularly in **specialized inference hardware** to drastically reduce latency and energy consumption for real-time Agent operation. Notably, he points out that in modern AI systems, the dominant cost is often not computation but **data movement**. Reliable, long-running Agents require robust system design, borrowing concepts from distributed computing like checkpointing, state management, and parallel exploration to handle failures and maintain progress over days or weeks. As AI automates execution, the scarcest human skills will shift to **defining clear specifications**, **judging what problems are worth solving** (taste), and designing effective feedback loops. Ultimately, Dean's framework prioritizes understanding the problem deeply, identifying the true bottlenecks, and systematically building closed-loop systems where AI can not only perform tasks but also improve AI itself.

marsbit1 h fa

From TPU to Self-Evolving Agents: How Jeff Dean Predicts the Next Step in AI

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot