Winter for Crypto IPOs: Consensys and Ledger Withdraw Applications

marsbitPubblicato 2026-05-16Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-05-16

Introduzione

The crypto IPO window is tightening significantly in 2026, marked by prominent companies delaying or pausing their public listing plans. Following a successful 2025 "harvest year" that saw Circle, Bullish, and Gemini go public amidst a bull market, the tide has turned. Consensys, developer of MetaMask, recently postponed its IPO until at least fall 2026. Hardware wallet leader Ledger also suspended its planned US listing due to unfavorable market conditions, with Kraken having previously delayed its own plans. This shift is driven by a cooling market in 2026, characterized by a significant Bitcoin price correction, declining trading volumes, and reduced investor risk appetite for crypto stocks. The poor post-IPO performance of 2025 listings like Circle and Bullish, which saw major share price declines, has heightened investor caution. This contrasts sharply with the current AI sector, where companies like SpaceX, OpenAI, and Anthropic are commanding massive valuations and investor enthusiasm based on narratives of stable, exponential growth. Crypto companies now face pressure to transition from hype-driven models to demonstrating reliable cash flows and robust compliance. While the paused IPO plans may lead to valuation resets and affect ecosystem liquidity, they also accelerate industry consolidation toward stronger, more compliant infrastructure players. A potential recovery in Bitcoin's price and clearer regulations could reopen the IPO window in the latter half of 2026.

Author: Ma Ke, Foresight News

On May 14th, Consensys, the developer of MetaMask wallet, temporarily postponed its IPO to at least the Fall of this year. Meanwhile, crypto hardware wallet giant Ledger also suspended its US IPO plan on May 13th. Previously, the exchange Kraken had repeatedly delayed its listing plans. This series of IPO postponements and suspensions signals a significant narrowing of the 2026 IPO window following the 2025 boom in crypto company listings.

2025 was considered a "bumper year for IPOs" in the industry: stablecoin issuer Circle successfully listed on the NYSE, and several companies including Bullish and Gemini completed their listings, initially opening an exit channel for crypto VCs. Crypto-related IPOs in 2025 raised approximately $14.6 billion, and VC deal volume soared to $19.7 billion. BTC price once surged to a record high of $126,000, institutional capital flowed in, the regulatory environment was relatively friendly, and multiple crypto stocks saw strong first-day performance.

Entering 2026, Bitcoin's price corrected significantly, trading volume declined, and investor risk appetite for crypto stocks cooled rapidly. BitGo, as the first crypto IPO of 2026, priced at $18 in January for its listing. Although it briefly rose on its debut, it subsequently fell back, once dropping to $7, and has now recovered to $11.9.

Specifically, the listing pace of several leading companies has clearly slowed. Payward, the parent company of Kraken, confidentially filed an S-1 form in November 2025, originally planning to proceed in Q1 2026 with a valuation target once aiming for $20 billion. On March 18th this year, the company paused its plans due to "difficult market conditions." Co-CEO Arjun Sethi stated that although the valuation dropped to $13.3 billion in a recent funding round, the IPO filing remains valid, awaiting the optimal window.

Arjun Sethi

Ledger's suspension was more abrupt. Known for its hardware wallets and enterprise-grade infrastructure, reports in January 2026 indicated it had hired investment banks to prepare for a US listing targeting a $4 billion valuation. Citing sources familiar with the matter, unfavorable market conditions led Ledger to decide to pause, without initiating the formal filing process. A company spokesperson declined to comment but suggested the possibility of turning to private financing to sustain growth.

Notably, just in March, Ledger appointed former Circle executive John Andrews as CFO and opened a New York office to strengthen its US business layout. This expansion shows its business strategy remains unchanged; the IPO pause is more due to external factors.

Meanwhile, MetaMask parent company Consensys also joined the wait-and-see ranks. The company had hired JPMorgan and Goldman Sachs as underwriters, originally planning to submit an S-1 form around the end of February with a target to list in 2026. However, due to market weakness, Consensys has postponed its IPO to at least this Fall.

Behind these crypto companies' IPO suspensions are, of course, the combined result of multiple factors.

The stock performance of the first wave of crypto IPOs in 2025 has intensified market caution toward the 2026 listing window.

This year, Circle's stock price has fallen from a high of $300 to below $50, Bullish dropped from $118 to below $25. Even BitGo, the first crypto IPO of 2026 opening the year, couldn't escape—after pricing at $18 and listing in January, it briefly rebounded but then fell all the way to near $7 at its lowest.

This year's performance collectively confirms that crypto-related stocks are prone to capital chasing at the tail end of a bull market but struggle to withstand valuation resets during cyclical downturns. Traditional institutional investors' required risk premium for "cycle-bound" assets has significantly increased.

In stark contrast to the "cooling-off period" for crypto IPOs, the AI sector in 2026 is in the midst of a dual boom in IPOs and fundraising.

SpaceX has begun IPO preparations, targeting a staggering valuation of $1.75 to $2 trillion, becoming one of the world's most anticipated tech listing projects.

OpenAI's valuation is approaching $1 trillion and is in close communication with several investment banks regarding its listing path; Anthropic's valuation has neared $900 billion and is also actively preparing IPO materials. The AI narrative, with its promise of a "productivity revolution," has attracted a massive influx of long-term capital. Even in an environment of macro uncertainty, AI-related IPOs can garner a much higher risk appetite than crypto assets.

In comparison, crypto companies are highly dependent on Bitcoin prices and trading volumes, with stronger revenue volatility, making it difficult to offer the "exponential growth" certainty promised by AI companies. This cross-sectoral divergence between hot and cold further amplifies investor wait-and-see sentiment towards crypto IPOs, also forcing crypto companies to accelerate their transition from "storytelling" to "telling cash flow stories, telling compliance stories."

Furthermore, crypto companies are shifting towards more pragmatic strategies: although private financing has shrunk in scale, it can still provide a buffer; some companies choose to first optimize product lines, expand into stablecoins or institutional services, and wait for Bitcoin to stabilize at a higher range and for market conditions to improve before proceeding with a listing.

The implications of this phenomenon for the industry warrant deeper thought.

On one hand, it accelerates survival of the fittest. Weaker projects face increased fundraising difficulty, and resources concentrate towards companies with strong compliance and solid infrastructure, such as Ledger's institutional-grade platform and Kraken's custody business. On the other hand, it highlights the crypto industry's transition from narrative-driven to performance-driven. Companies truly capable of weathering cycles are building anti-volatility cash flows and enhancing transparency to win long-term trust. However, in the short term, the narrowing IPO window may lead to valuation resets and affect confidence and liquidity across the entire ecosystem.

Looking ahead, if Bitcoin returns to $90,000 or higher, and regulatory bills are further enacted, the second half of 2026 may usher in a second wave of IPO windows.

Domande pertinenti

QWhich two major crypto companies have recently postponed or paused their IPO plans, and what is the timeline for one of them?

AConsensys, the developer of MetaMask, and Ledger, the hardware wallet giant, have both postponed or paused their IPO plans. Consensys has temporarily delayed its IPO until the earliest this fall.

QWhat was the total amount raised by crypto-related IPOs and the total VC deal volume in the year 2025, as mentioned in the article?

AIn 2025, crypto-related IPOs raised approximately $14.6 billion, and the total VC deal volume surged to $19.7 billion.

QWhat key factor is cited as contrasting with the crypto IPO 'cooling-off period' in 2026, and name one prominent example company in that sector?

AIn contrast to the crypto IPO 'cooling-off period', the AI sector is experiencing a dual climax of IPOs and financing in 2026. A prominent example is SpaceX, which has initiated IPO preparations with a target valuation of $1.75 to $2 trillion.

QAccording to the article, why are investors showing more caution towards crypto IPOs in 2026 compared to AI companies?

AInvestors are more cautious towards crypto IPOs because crypto companies are highly dependent on Bitcoin price and trading volume, resulting in stronger revenue volatility and an inability to provide the 'exponential growth' certainty promised by AI companies. AI's 'productivity revolution' narrative attracts long-term capital.

QWhat potential future developments could lead to a second wave of IPO opportunities in the second half of 2026, as per the article's outlook?

AAccording to the article's outlook, if Bitcoin returns to $90,000 or higher and regulatory legislation further materializes, the second half of 2026 could see a second wave of IPO opportunities.

Letture associate

The Jacobian Conjecture that plagued Yitang Zhang for 7 years was overturned and disproven by Fable 5 overnight

**Summary:** The mathematical community was shocked when the longstanding **Jacobi Conjecture**—a core problem in polynomial mapping that had remained open for 87 years—was reportedly **disproven** by **Fable 5** (an AI model from Anthropic). The conjecture, first posed in 1939, asks whether a polynomial map with a constant, non-zero Jacobian determinant must have a polynomial inverse. Despite seeming intuitive, it had resisted numerous proof attempts by leading mathematicians. The breakthrough came when a researcher, Levent Alpoge, shared a succinct counterexample generated by Fable 5: a specific polynomial map from ℂ³ to ℂ³ whose Jacobian is the constant -2, yet which is not injective (mapping three distinct points to the same image). This elegantly falsifies the conjecture in its general form for dimensions ≥3. The counterexample is simple enough to be verified by hand or with tools like Wolfram Alpha. The event sparked intense discussion, with other AI models like GPT-5.6 quickly analyzing the result and even proposing a refined conjecture. It demonstrated AI's emerging capacity for genuine mathematical creativity, not just pattern matching. The story carries a poignant human dimension: renowned mathematician **Yitang Zhang** had devoted seven years of his early career to this problem under his PhD advisor, using a flawed lemma provided by the advisor. This setback contributed to Zhang leaving academia for years, including a period working at Subway, before his later breakthrough on the Twin Prime Conjecture. The AI's swift resolution underscores the tragic waste of his early effort on a conjecture now shown to be false in higher dimensions. It's important to note the disproof specifically targets the generalized (n-dimensional, n≥3) conjecture. The 2-dimensional case, which Zhang worked on, remains open and is considered mathematically distinct and even more challenging. Nonetheless, the event marks a significant moment, prompting reflections on AI's future role in mathematical discovery.

marsbit25 min fa

The Jacobian Conjecture that plagued Yitang Zhang for 7 years was overturned and disproven by Fable 5 overnight

marsbit25 min fa

Bought Bitcoin at $117,000, Sold at $62,000 in Tears: This Company’s Faith Only Lasted a Year

Wall Street's once-hot trend of corporate "Bitcoin hoarding" has hit a painful reality check. Empery Digital, formerly an electric motorcycle company, pivoted to Bitcoin in July 2025, accumulating over 4,000 BTC at an average cost of approximately $117,600 each. As Bitcoin's price plummeted, the company faced massive paper losses exceeding its total market value by early 2026, triggering internal conflict with a major shareholder demanding a sale. In a stark reversal from its earlier refusal to sell, Empery Digital recently sold 1,400 BTC at an average price of $62,000, locking in a significant loss of roughly $77 million on just those coins. The proceeds were used to pay down $10 million in debt, prepare for legal fees related to shareholder lawsuits, and, most notably, fund a new strategic shift: a $65 million investment for a 25% stake in an AI data center facility. This move completes a cycle of chasing market trends—from electric vehicles to Bitcoin treasury and now to AI infrastructure. Empery's case exposes the leveraged nature of the corporate "treasury model," where buying Bitcoin with borrowed money works only while prices rise. Once the asset fell below its cost basis, the company was forced to sell at a loss to service debt and pivot to the next opportunity. The company's remaining assets are 1,514 BTC and its ambitions in AI, demonstrating that its stated "long-term belief" in Bitcoin had a clear price tag: a 50% discount.

marsbit35 min fa

Bought Bitcoin at $117,000, Sold at $62,000 in Tears: This Company’s Faith Only Lasted a Year

marsbit35 min fa

Visa Joins the Stablecoin Arena: Not to Eliminate Stablecoins, but to 'Collect Rent' from Them

Visa is entering the stablecoin arena by launching a stablecoin platform, aiming not to eliminate existing stablecoins but to facilitate and profit from their broader adoption. The platform will enable banks, financial institutions, and fintech companies to more easily issue, manage, and integrate stablecoins into Visa's existing global payment network, which spans over 200 million merchants and 15,000 financial institutions. This move is expected to expand the overall stablecoin market by creating more use cases. For USDC (Circle), it presents a short-term benefit due to likely direct integration and its compliance advantages, though long-term competition may increase from bank-issued or consortium stablecoins. For USDT (Tether), the impact could be more significant in traditional payment and settlement areas, as Visa's platform may favor more transparent, compliant options, though USDT is expected to remain strong in pure crypto trading contexts. Regarding Ethereum, Visa's initiative is seen as neutral to slightly positive. It could drive more traditional capital into the Ethereum ecosystem in the form of stablecoins, increasing network activity and demand for Ethereum as a settlement layer, especially with Layer-2 scaling solutions. While the platform will support multiple blockchains, Ethereum's maturity and decentralization make it a likely primary choice for compliant stablecoins. In essence, Visa's strategy is to embrace stablecoins, collect fees from increased transaction volume on its network, and grow the overall market, rather than displace major incumbents like USDC and USDT directly.

marsbit1 h fa

Visa Joins the Stablecoin Arena: Not to Eliminate Stablecoins, but to 'Collect Rent' from Them

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片