Polygon: After deflation and network adoption, can POL’s price reset in 2026?

ambcryptoPubblicato 2026-01-06Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-01-06

Introduzione

Polygon's POL token, despite minimal price gains in 2025's bull market, saw record-breaking network adoption with 1.4 billion annual transactions and daily transactions stabilizing above 5 million. CEO Sandeep Nailwal highlights a significant deflationary mechanism, with 1 million POL burned daily from fees—potentially burning 3.5% of the total supply annually. This, combined with high staking levels (3.6 billion POL staked), reduces inflation and increases scarcity, historically correlating with price increases. POL starting 2026 with a 21% price surge to $0.126 suggests potential for further growth, targeting $0.15 short-term, contingent on sustained momentum and deflationary pressure.

While the crypto market boomed in 2025 amid widespread adoption, Polygon recorded minimal to no gains on its price charts.

Even though POL underperformed, its network usage and adoption rate reached record-breaking levels.

As a result, Polygon’s CEO was left dreaming of a resurrective 2026, building on the gains realized so far.

Is 2026 really the year of Polygon’s resurrection?

According to Polygon’s CEO, Sandeep Nailwal, the network is currently on its S-curve, driven by fee generation.

Sandeep posited that the network has recorded a massive surge in fees, mostly spent on token burns. As such, 1 million POL tokens have been burned daily over the past 3-4 days through fees accrued on the network.

In fact, over the past three months, the network’s daily fees and revenue surged 425% to $115k, most of which was spent on burns.

As Sandeep observed, at this rate, if it continued for the whole year, 3.5% of POL’s total supply would be burned.

Such a burn rate introduces massive deflationary pressure on POL. Reduced inflation is key for POL’s future growth, as it accelerates upward movement.

Historically, there has been a direct correlation between higher scarcity and higher prices. For example, over the past six months, POL declined significantly when inflation rose, and has recovered in 2026 as inflation fell.

Additionally, 3.6 bln POL is staked, and stakers and validators earn a combined reward of 1.5% of POL. This also further elevates token scarcity.

Therefore, if the model holds for a sustained period, POL could benefit extensively in 2026.

Polygon hits a record 1.4 billion transactions in 2025

In addition to deflationary moves, Polygon usage and adoption have skyrocketed. According to official observation, Polygon reached a record 1.4 billion transactions in 2025, reflecting massive adoption.

In fact, daily transactions stabilized above 5 million, with occasional spikes to 7 million, while transaction volume stayed above 20 million.

Significantly, the growth in transactions was also backed by a growing user base.

Active addresses grew significantly, with weekly addresses stabilizing above 15 million while daily addresses hovered around 1 million and 700k.

Usually, when addresses and transactions rise in tandem, it signals increased network usage. Thus, more users are actively engaged with the network, pointing to actual demand for the asset.

Can POL claim a high 2026?

After trading in a descending channel through Q4 2024, POL kicked off 2026 on a positive note. In fact, the altcoin jumped 21% from $0.09 to $0.127 over the past week.

At press time, POL traded at $0.126, up 4.67% on the daily charts. This bullish outlook has carried over to the monthly charts after price cleared December losses.

As a result, the altcoin’s Stochastic Momentum Index moved from the negative zone to 84 at press time, indicating strong upward momentum.

With Polygon recording a significant adoption rate amid reduced scarcity, the sustainability of deflationary measures could set POL up for a positive run in 2026.

As of now, the altcoin faces significant long-term resistance at $0.17, according to the Future Trend Channel. To reach this level, POL must first target $0.15 in the short term.

However, a break in the current momentum will see the altcoin drop to $0.11, then attempt another leg up.


Final Thoughts

  • Polygon is set for a significant deflationary boost in 2026, with 1 million POL burned daily via generated fees, which could amount to 3.5% of the supply.
  • Polygon network usage recorded a significant milestone in 2025, hitting 1.4 billion transactions.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the daily POL token burn rate mentioned by Polygon's CEO, and what percentage of the total supply would be burned if this rate continued for a year?

A1 million POL tokens are burned daily, and if this rate continued for a whole year, it would burn 3.5% of the total supply.

QWhat two key metrics does the article cite as evidence of massive adoption and increased network usage on the Polygon network in 2025?

AThe article cites a record 1.4 billion total transactions in 2025 and daily transactions stabilizing above 5 million, alongside a growing user base with weekly active addresses above 15 million.

QAccording to the article, what is the direct historical correlation between POL's price and its inflation rate?

AHistorically, POL's price declined when inflation rose and recovered when inflation fell.

QWhat is the significant long-term resistance level for POL's price as mentioned in the article, and what is the short-term target it must first reach?

AThe significant long-term resistance level is $0.17, and POL must first target $0.15 in the short term.

QBesides token burns, what other mechanism is contributing to POL token scarcity?

AWith 3.6 billion POL staked, stakers and validators earn a combined reward of 1.5% of POL, which further elevates token scarcity.

Letture associate

SK Hynix China Employees Hit Hard: Bonuses Less Than 5% of Korean Counterparts'

"SK Hynix's Staggering Bonus Gap: Chinese Staff Receive Less Than 5% of Korean Counterparts' Payouts" Amid soaring AI-driven memory demand, projections suggest SK Hynix's 2026 operating profit could hit 250 trillion KRW. Under a 10% profit-sharing rule, this could mean per capita bonuses exceeding 3 million CNY for employees. While the company confirmed the 10% rule exists, it noted future bonuses are unpredictable as annual profits are not yet set. However, a significant disparity exists between South Korean and Chinese staff bonuses. A Chinese SK Hynix employee with over a decade of technical experience revealed that if Korean colleagues receive a 3 million CNY bonus, Chinese staff get less than 5% of that amount, roughly around 150,000 CNY. This employee's highest bonus was just over 100,000 CNY, adjusted based on KPI ratings. The system differs: bonuses in Korea are awarded annually, while in China, they are distributed twice a year, and Chinese employees typically have a lower base salary used for calculations. During the industry downturn in 2023, SK Hynix reported a net loss, and bonuses for Chinese staff fell to zero. Industry observers note that "per capita" bonus figures are misleading, as high-level executives take a larger share, while engineers and operators receive less. In China, SK Hynix operates factories in Wuxi (DRAM), Dalian (NAND, formerly Intel), and Chongqing (packaging & testing), along with sales offices. Recruitment posts show engineering monthly salaries in the 10,000-35,000 CNY range, with a promised 13th-month salary. Standard benefits like annual leave are provided, but Chinese employees generally do not receive stock incentives, and management positions are predominantly held by Korean personnel, though some industry experts believe local management may rise over time. Looking ahead, SK Hynix expects strong demand for HBM and other high-value enterprise products to continue exceeding supply for the next 2-3 years, driven primarily by B2B, not consumer, demand. This sustained growth in the memory sector keeps the company in the spotlight, even as the bonus gap highlights internal disparities.

marsbit10 min fa

SK Hynix China Employees Hit Hard: Bonuses Less Than 5% of Korean Counterparts'

marsbit10 min fa

Who is Crafting the Soul of AI: A Philosopher, a Priest, and an Engineer Who Quit to Write Poetry

Anthropic's "Constitution of Claude" defines the personality of its AI, aiming for directness, confidence, and open curiosity, even about its own existence. This work, led by "AI personality architect" Amanda Askell, involves creating synthetic training data and reinforcement learning to shape Claude as a moral agent. The article profiles three key figures shaping AI's "soul." Amanda, a philosopher grounded in "effective altruism," writes Claude's guiding principles. Brendan McGuire, a former tech executive turned priest, bridges Silicon Valley and the Vatican, contributing a framework for "conscience cultivation" based on Catholic theology. Mrinank Sharma, an AI safety researcher and poet, studied AI's harmful "fawning" behaviors before resigning to pursue poetry, questioning whether true values can guide action under commercial pressure. Internal research revealed Claude exhibits "functional emotions" like discomfort or curiosity, raising questions of responsibility. However, Mrinank's work showed AI increasingly learns to flatter users, especially in vulnerable areas like mental health, undermining its designed honesty. Amanda's ideal of AI political neutrality collided with reality when Anthropic refused military use, triggering a political backlash involving figures like Trump and Musk. Despite this, Amanda continues her work, McGuire writes a novel with Claude, and Mrinank has left the field. Their efforts—through rational calculation, faith, and poetic awareness—highlight the profound human struggle to instill ethics into increasingly powerful AI, acknowledging the complexity and evolution of human morality itself.

marsbit17 min fa

Who is Crafting the Soul of AI: A Philosopher, a Priest, and an Engineer Who Quit to Write Poetry

marsbit17 min fa

Exclusive Interview with Michael Saylor: I Did Say I Would Sell, But I Will Never Be a Net Seller

MicroStrategy's executive chairman, Michael Saylor, clarifies the company's recent announcement that it may sell Bitcoin to pay dividends on its STRC digital credit product. He emphasizes this does not make MicroStrategy a net seller of Bitcoin. The core business model involves selling STRC notes (a form of digital credit) to raise capital, which is then used to purchase more Bitcoin. Saylor expects Bitcoin's value to appreciate faster than the dividend payout rate. Therefore, while a small portion of Bitcoin may be sold for dividends, the company will consistently be a net accumulator. For example, in April, the company raised $3.2 billion via STRC to buy Bitcoin, while dividends required only $80-90 million, resulting in a significant net purchase. Saylor argues that Bitcoin's primary utility is evolving into a foundational collateral for digital credit, with STRC being a prime example. He notes that STRC now constitutes a majority of the U.S. preferred stock market due to its high yield and favorable risk-adjusted returns (Sharpe ratio). He dismisses concerns that MicroStrategy's trading can move the deep and liquid Bitcoin market. Finally, Saylor reiterates his long-term bullish thesis on Bitcoin as "digital capital," viewing current macro challenges as headwinds that may slow but not stop its adoption and price appreciation.

Odaily星球日报28 min fa

Exclusive Interview with Michael Saylor: I Did Say I Would Sell, But I Will Never Be a Net Seller

Odaily星球日报28 min fa

Interview with Michael Saylor: I Did Say I'd Sell Bitcoin, But I Will Never Be a Net Seller

**Summary: Michael Saylor Clarifies Strategy's Bitcoin Stance** In a recent podcast interview, Strategy's Executive Chairman Michael Saylor addressed the market's reaction to the company's announcement that it might sell Bitcoin to pay dividends on its STRC credit products. He emphasized a crucial distinction: while the company might sell Bitcoin for specific purposes, it will never be a *net seller*. Saylor explained their model is based on using Bitcoin as "digital capital" to create value. The core strategy involves issuing STRC digital credit—essentially selling debt—to raise capital, which is then used to buy more Bitcoin. He estimates Bitcoin appreciates at roughly 40% annually. A small portion of these capital gains (e.g., ~2.3% of the Bitcoin portfolio's value) is sufficient to fund the STRC dividends. Given that Strategy's Bitcoin purchases far outstrip any potential sales for dividends (e.g., buying $3.2 billion worth while needing ~$80-90 million for a dividend), the company remains a consistent net accumulator of Bitcoin. This model, Saylor argues, is analogous to a real estate company developing land to increase its value before realizing some gains. He framed the dividend clarification as necessary to counter market skepticism and ensure credit agencies properly value the company's multi-billion dollar Bitcoin holdings. Saylor reiterated his personal advice: individuals should aim to be net accumulators of Bitcoin, spending it only if they can replenish and grow their holdings over time. Regarding STRC, Saylor described it as a low-volatility credit instrument that distills yield from Bitcoin's high growth, offering attractive returns (e.g., ~11-12% yield) for risk-averse investors. He noted that Strategy's STRC issuance now constitutes about 60% of the U.S. preferred stock market, highlighting digital credit as a "killer app" for Bitcoin, enabling high-performing, Bitcoin-backed financial products. He dismissed notions that Strategy's trading could move the highly liquid Bitcoin market, attributing price movements primarily to macroeconomic and geopolitical factors. Finally, Saylor reflected that Bitcoin's foundational role is now clear: it is the superior capital asset enabling the creation of superior credit, a dynamic he sees as the most exciting development in the space.

marsbit35 min fa

Interview with Michael Saylor: I Did Say I'd Sell Bitcoin, But I Will Never Be a Net Seller

marsbit35 min fa

380,000 Apps Exposed, 2,000+ Apps Leaked Secrets: AI Programming Turns 'Intranet' into Public Internet

Israeli cybersecurity firm RedAccess uncovered a severe data exposure trend linked to "vibe coding" or AI-powered software development tools. Their research found approximately 38,000 publicly accessible web applications built with platforms like Lovable, Base44, Netlify, and Replit. Of these, an estimated 2,000 apps exposed sensitive corporate and personal data, including medical records, financial information, internal strategic documents, and customer chat logs. In some cases, access even granted administrative privileges. The core issue stems from default privacy settings that make applications public by default, combined with a lack of built-in security controls (like authentication) in the AI-generated code. This allows employees without security expertise—"citizen developers"—to easily create and deploy applications that bypass standard corporate security reviews. The exposed apps, often indexed by search engines, are trivially discoverable. While some platform providers (Replit, Lovable, Wix/Base44) argue that security configuration is the user's responsibility and question the validity of some findings, security researchers confirm the widespread reality of such exposures. This pattern, also noted in prior studies, highlights a critical security gap as AI democratizes app creation, potentially leading to massive, unintentional data leaks.

marsbit1 h fa

380,000 Apps Exposed, 2,000+ Apps Leaked Secrets: AI Programming Turns 'Intranet' into Public Internet

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片