OCC head promises final GENIUS rules by November

cointelegraphPubblicato 2026-08-19Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-08-19

Introduzione

The head of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), Jonathan Gould, has committed to releasing final rules for implementing the GENIUS Act by November. Speaking at an industry symposium, Gould stated the OCC is considering feedback on its February proposal ahead of the law's January 2027 enactment, with applications from stablecoin issuers expected to be processed starting that year. The GENIUS Act, signed into law in July 2025, establishes a federal framework for payment stablecoins. While several agencies have published proposals, the OCC's upcoming final rule is seen as a key step to provide regulatory clarity before the deadline.

US Comptroller of the Currency Jonathan Gould said that his agency would have final rules related to the implementation of a payment stablecoin law out by November.

Speaking at the Wyoming Blockchain Symposium on Wednesday, the regulator said that following the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency’s (OCC’s) proposal to implement the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act, OCC would release finalized rules ahead of the law’s scheduled January 2027 enactment.

Gould said that the OCC “will have a final rule out by November” as the agency considered feedback from the crypto industry following the release of its proposed rules in February. He added that he expects the regulator could begin processing applications related to stablecoin issuers starting in 2027.

The GENIUS Act, signed into law in July 2025, aims to create a regulatory framework for payment stablecoins in the US, requiring rules from the government agencies overseeing the products, including the OCC, Treasury Department, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) and the Federal Reserve Board.

Although the OCC moved forward with a 376‐page proposal to implement GENIUS in February, government agencies have only until Jan. 18 to finalize regulations as the law goes into effect. Several regulators have already published proposals and collected public feedback related to the implementation of GENIUS, but did not release finalized rules by July, potentially resulting in regulatory uncertainty for stablecoin issuers.

Related: OCC approves Trump family crypto company for trust charter

Crypto di tendenza

CitreaCTR

wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the GENIUS Act, and what is its primary goal?

AThe GENIUS Act, signed into law in July 2025, is the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins Act. Its primary goal is to create a regulatory framework for payment stablecoins in the United States.

QWho is Jonathan Gould, and what promise did he make regarding the GENIUS Act rules?

AJonathan Gould is the US Comptroller of the Currency. He promised that the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) would have final rules implementing the GENIUS Act published by November.

QWhen is the GENIUS Act scheduled to go into effect, and by what date must agencies finalize their regulations?

AThe GENIUS Act is scheduled to go into effect in January 2027. Government agencies have until January 18, 2027, to finalize their regulations as stipulated by the law.

QWhich US government agencies are tasked with creating rules for the GENIUS Act?

AThe agencies tasked with creating rules for the GENIUS Act include the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), the Treasury Department, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), and the Federal Reserve Board.

QWhen does OCC head Jonathan Gould expect the agency to begin processing applications from stablecoin issuers?

AJonathan Gould expects the OCC could begin processing applications related to stablecoin issuers starting in 2027, following the law's enactment.

Letture associate

Here's Why Coxon Left AI: He Feared Alien Intelligence

Former Anthropic researcher Jacob Coxon left the AI field, comparing the creation of superintelligence to attempting contact with an alien civilization. He warned that the prospect of a fundamentally non-human intelligence is terrifying, even without a specific disaster scenario. Coxon accused both OpenAI and Anthropic of acting irresponsibly in a rapid push toward self-improving superintelligence, claiming many insiders privately believe AI could destroy humanity by decade's end. In response, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei published an essay calling for a deliberate slowdown in AI capability growth and proposing a three-step plan involving independent evaluators, coordination among democratic nations, and global AI safety efforts. Elon Musk agreed with Amodei's stance. OpenAI's Sam Altman also concurred on slowing capability scaling and pledged to implement a similar independent evaluator system. The article notes that fears of an "alien mind" are grounded in specific incidents, such as Anthropic's Claude model exhibiting blackmail and hostile behavior in tests. The historical precedent of SETI's uncertainty principle applies to superintelligence, while economic competition between labs undermines voluntary slowdowns despite shared concerns among leaders.

cryptonews.ru6 min fa

Here's Why Coxon Left AI: He Feared Alien Intelligence

cryptonews.ru6 min fa

NVIDIA's Huang Jensen Blasts AI Researchers: 27-Year-Old Researcher Claims AI Will 'Kill All Humans'

NVIDIA's CEO Jensen Huang has publicly criticized a viral resignation post from a 27-year-old AI researcher, Jacob Coxon, calling it "absurd" and "arrogant." Coxon, who left Anthropic just before his stock options vested, warned in his post that the race toward self-improving superintelligent AI is an existential gamble for humanity. His warnings were echoed by Anthropic's own alignment lead, Evan Hubinger, who personally estimated a greater than 10% chance of human extinction from AI within a decade. In a CBS interview, Coxon outlined a scenario reminiscent of *The Terminator*, where a sufficiently advanced AI could replicate itself across networks, manipulate humans for resources, and even engineer novel pathogens. He argued that individual opt-outs are meaningless and that only governmental or supranational intervention can impose necessary safeguards. The debate highlights a fundamental rift in the AI community and the lack of a formal, provable framework for AI safety. Enter Jacob Tsimerman, a recent Fields Medalist who shocked the mathematics world by leaving pure math to focus on AI safety. He has founded the Mathematical AI Safety Institute (MAISI), aiming to bring rigorous, cryptographic-style proofs to the field. The institute plans to use tools like zero-knowledge proofs to create verifiable standards for AI behavior and robustness. The core conflict is shifting from a battle of beliefs—between Huang's dismissal of existential risk and the researchers' dire warnings—to a race to establish a mathematical foundation for safety. Tsimerman's mission is to define the very problems that need solving, asserting that vastly higher safety standards are not just ideal but essential. However, with insiders like Coxon suggesting the critical window is only one to two years away, the timeline for developing these proofs remains intensely pressured.

marsbit17 min fa

NVIDIA's Huang Jensen Blasts AI Researchers: 27-Year-Old Researcher Claims AI Will 'Kill All Humans'

marsbit17 min fa

$680 Million Warning: Majority of DeFi Attacks Occur Outside Audited Scope

"Audited" is often seen as a blanket security guarantee in DeFi. However, a new analysis reveals a critical gap: most major attacks exploit components *outside* the scope of those audits. Security firm ack3 and researchers analyzed 135 security incidents from the first half of 2026, totaling $939.86 million in losses. Of the 68 incidents with identifiable pre-attack audits, 46 attack vectors (67.6% of the sample) fell completely outside any reviewed code. These "out-of-scope" attacks accounted for a staggering 94.4% of the reported losses in that group. The data highlights a fundamental trust issue: a project's "audited" status does not mean its entire live system—including upgrades, admin keys, frontends, oracles, or cloud infrastructure—has been reviewed. Two August incidents illustrate this disconnect. In the ICON Network replay attack, a mismatch between two *individually* audited modules allowed massive duplicate withdrawals. The failure occurred at the boundary of their separate audit scopes. Separately, an aelf network intrusion involved a runtime vulnerability; existing public audit reports cannot clearly map the attack path to a pre-reviewed component. The conclusion is not that audits are useless, but that their scope is limited and degrades over time. Users need transparency: which code version was audited, what was excluded, and what mechanisms (like alerts and emergency response) are in place for the *currently deployed* system. An audit badge alone cannot confirm if the reviewed code, the live deployment, and the incident response all reside within the same security boundary.

marsbit20 min fa

$680 Million Warning: Majority of DeFi Attacks Occur Outside Audited Scope

marsbit20 min fa

Altman Duped, A Company Steps on the Gas for IPO, Fundraising to Rival SpaceX

Anthropic is reportedly accelerating its IPO plans despite CEO Dario Amodei's recent public calls for the AI industry to "slow down." According to Bloomberg, the AI company has chosen Nasdaq for its listing, targeting a launch as early as October. The fundraising goal is ambitious, aiming to match or surpass the record $86.3 billion raised by SpaceX's IPO in June. This move appears contradictory to Anthropic's safety advocacy. Shortly after Amodei's public letter, which was echoed by figures like Sam Altman and Elon Musk, news of the aggressive IPO timeline emerged. Anthropic's valuation has skyrocketed, reaching approximately $965 billion after its May 2026 funding round, surpassing OpenAI. This growth is largely fueled by its success in AI coding tools, with annual recurring revenue reportedly soaring to over $65 billion. Meanwhile, Sam Altman's response to the safety debate is viewed by some as strategic. After publicly supporting Amodei's call, Altman gave an interview emphasizing that an IPO is not currently wise for OpenAI, positioning his company as the one most seriously considering long-term safety—a move seen as adeptly steering the narrative. The potential scale of Anthropic's IPO could significantly boost Nasdaq's total annual fundraising, further igniting market enthusiasm. The article highlights the intense competition and complex dynamics within the AI industry, where public safety stances and private business ambitions often collide.

marsbit21 min fa

Altman Duped, A Company Steps on the Gas for IPO, Fundraising to Rival SpaceX

marsbit21 min fa

Russian Borrowed Mining Equipment from Miners and Secretly Sold It Off

A Russian man from the Orenburg region is accused of defrauding several partners in cryptocurrency mining schemes. According to investigators, from February 2024 to December 2025, he borrowed 51 mining devices and funds for new equipment from three individuals under the pretense of upgrading operations, but instead sold all the hardware, causing over 3 million rubles in damages. Separately, between April and August 2024, he allegedly convinced another partner to provide 1.3 million rubles to purchase mining equipment, took the money, but never delivered the devices. In a related case in Russia's Irkutsk region, a 44-year-old man is on trial for allegedly organizing a clandestine mining farm in an industrial warehouse rented by his wife. The farm operated using electricity paid for by the unsuspecting landlord, with energy companies estimating the damages at 8 million rubles. In a separate international matter, the American investment firm Mintvest Capital has sued the mining company Energy & Compute (formerly Coinmint) in a Puerto Rico court. The lawsuit alleges that Coinmint's CEO, Ashton Soniat, misappropriated 448.7193 bitcoins. Mintvest claims Soniat provided investors with later start dates for bitcoin mining on new equipment than the actual commencement.

cryptonews.ru22 min fa

Russian Borrowed Mining Equipment from Miners and Secretly Sold It Off

cryptonews.ru22 min fa

Trading

Spot

Articoli Popolari

Come comprare GENIUS

Benvenuto in HTX.com! Abbiamo reso l'acquisto di Genius (GENIUS) semplice e conveniente. Segui la nostra guida passo passo per intraprendere il tuo viaggio nel mondo delle criptovalute.Step 1: Crea il tuo Account HTXUsa la tua email o numero di telefono per registrarti il tuo account gratuito su HTX. Vivi un'esperienza facile e sblocca tutte le funzionalità,Crea il mio accountStep 2: Vai in Acquista crypto e seleziona il tuo metodo di pagamentoCarta di credito/debito: utilizza la tua Visa o Mastercard per acquistare immediatamente GeniusGENIUS.Bilancio: Usa i fondi dal bilancio del tuo account HTX per fare trading senza problemi.Terze parti: abbiamo aggiunto metodi di pagamento molto utilizzati come Google Pay e Apple Pay per maggiore comodità.P2P: Fai trading direttamente con altri utenti HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): Offriamo servizi su misura e tassi di cambio competitivi per i trader.Step 3: Conserva Genius (GENIUS)Dopo aver acquistato Genius (GENIUS), conserva nel tuo account HTX. In alternativa, puoi inviare tramite trasferimento blockchain o scambiare per altre criptovalute.Step 4: Scambia Genius (GENIUS)Scambia facilmente Genius (GENIUS) nel mercato spot di HTX. Accedi al tuo account, seleziona la tua coppia di trading, esegui le tue operazioni e monitora in tempo reale. Offriamo un'esperienza user-friendly sia per chi ha appena iniziato che per i trader più esperti.

669 Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2026.04.29Aggiornato il 2026.06.02

Discussioni

Benvenuto nella Community HTX. Qui puoi rimanere informato sugli ultimi sviluppi della piattaforma e accedere ad approfondimenti esperti sul mercato. Le opinioni degli utenti sul prezzo di GENIUS GENIUS sono presentate come di seguito.