National-Level Players Enter the Game: The 2025 Revelation of Cryptocurrency Crime Spiraling Out of Control

marsbitPubblicato 2026-01-10Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-01-10

Introduzione

Summary: In 2025, state-level cryptocurrency activity surged, marking a new phase in the maturation of illicit on-chain ecosystems. Illicit addresses received at least $154 billion, a 162% year-over-year increase, largely driven by a 694% spike in transactions involving sanctioned entities. Stablecoins dominated these flows, accounting for 84% of all illicit transaction volume. Key trends include North Korean hackers stealing a record $2 billion, including the largest crypto theft in history from Bybit. Russia launched the ruble-backed A7A5 token, which saw $93.3 billion in transaction volume within a year, facilitating large-scale evasion. Chinese money laundering networks emerged as dominant, sophisticated operators offering full-service criminal enterprises. Iran-linked proxy networks moved over $2 billion for activities including oil sales and weapons procurement. Illicit actors and nations increasingly rely on full-stack infrastructure providers resistant to takedowns and sanctions. Furthermore, the connection between crypto and real-world violent crime is growing, with increased use in human trafficking and a rise in violent coercion attacks to seize crypto assets during price peaks. Collaboration between law enforcement, regulators, and crypto firms is crucial to counter these evolving, interconnected threats.

Original Author: Chainalysis

Original Compilation: Chopper, Foresight News

In 2025, we observed a significant increase in cryptocurrency-related activities at the national level, marking a new mature stage in the development of the illegal on-chain ecosystem. Over the past few years, the professionalization of the cryptocurrency crime sector has deepened; illegal organizations have now established large-scale on-chain infrastructure to support transnational criminal networks in procuring goods and services and laundering proceeds from crypto crimes. Against this backdrop, governments have also begun to enter this field, leveraging these mature professional service providers on one hand, while building their own customized infrastructure on the other to evade sanctions on a large scale. As governments connect to this cryptocurrency supply chain originally built for cybercriminals and organized crime groups, government agencies, compliance, and security teams now face severe challenges in terms of consumer rights protection and national security.

What are the specific on-chain manifestations of these trends and other industry changes? Next, we will analyze them by combining data and macro trends.

According to our monitoring data, the scale of funds flowing into illegal cryptocurrency addresses in 2025 reached at least $154 billion, a sharp increase of 162% year-on-year. This growth was primarily driven by a surge in fund inflows to sanctioned entities, which soared by 694% year-on-year. However, even excluding the growth from sanctioned entities, 2025 was still a record year for cryptocurrency crime, as the scale of the vast majority of illegal activities increased.

Nevertheless, the scale of these illegal transactions still pales in comparison to the overall cryptocurrency economy, as the main participants in the cryptocurrency market remain legitimate transactions. According to our estimates, although the proportion of illegal transactions in the total traceable cryptocurrency transaction volume in 2025 increased slightly compared to 2024, it remained below 1%.

As shown in the figure below, we also observed a continuous shift in the types of assets involved in cryptocurrency crimes.

Over the past few years, stablecoins have gradually become the dominant asset in illegal transactions, currently accounting for 84% of the total illegal transaction volume. This trend aligns with the overall development characteristics of the cryptocurrency ecosystem: with advantages such as convenient cross-border transfers, low volatility, and wide application scenarios, stablecoins continue to expand their share in the overall cryptocurrency transactions.

The following sections will delve into the core trends that defined the cryptocurrency crime landscape in 2025, which remain worthy of attention in the future.

National-Level Threats Drive Transaction Scale: North Korea Sets New Record in Theft, Russia's A7A5 Token Facilitates Large-Scale Sanction Evasion

In 2025, stolen funds remained a major threat to the cryptocurrency ecosystem, with hacking groups linked to North Korea alone stealing $2 billion. This figure was primarily driven by several highly destructive large-scale hacking incidents, the most notable of which was the attack on the Bybit exchange in February. The incident involved nearly $1.5 billion, making it the largest digital asset theft in the history of cryptocurrency. Although North Korean hackers have long been a major force threatening the cryptocurrency ecosystem, the past year set new records both in terms of the amount stolen and the sophistication of intrusion and money laundering methods.

Particularly noteworthy is that the scale of on-chain activities by governments reached unprecedented levels in 2025. Russia introduced relevant legislation in 2024 to promote the use of cryptocurrencies to evade sanctions, and this measure was officially implemented in February 2025. The country launched the ruble-backed token A7A5, which achieved a transaction volume of over $93.3 billion in less than a year since its launch.

Meanwhile, over the past few years, Iran's proxy networks have conducted money laundering, illegal oil transactions, and bulk commodity procurement for weapons through confirmed wallet addresses that have been placed on the sanctions list, with a cumulative transaction volume exceeding $2 billion. Despite multiple military strikes, Iran-supported terrorist groups such as Hezbollah, Hamas, and the Houthis continue to use cryptocurrencies on an unprecedented scale.

In 2025, Chinese money laundering networks emerged as a dominant force in the illegal on-chain ecosystem. These organizations operate with high precision, greatly driving the diversification and professionalization of cryptocurrency crimes, offering specialized criminal services including "money laundering services." Building on early illegal operation models such as "Huiyin Guarantee," these networks have established full-service criminal enterprises, covering areas such as fraud, scams, laundering proceeds from North Korean hacking thefts, sanction evasion, and terrorism financing.

Full-Stack Illegal Infrastructure Providers Fuel Malicious Network Activities

While governments are increasing their use of cryptocurrencies, traditional cybercrime activities remain rampant: ransomware operators, child sexual abuse and cybercrime platforms, malware distributors, scammers, and illegal trading markets still rely on extensive support networks to maintain operations. Illegal actors and governments are increasingly dependent on full-stack on-chain infrastructure providers, including domain registrars, secure and reliable hosting services, and other technical infrastructure that can be used to carry out malicious network activities.

These infrastructure providers have evolved into comprehensive infrastructure platforms capable of resisting platform takedowns, abuse complaints, and sanction enforcement. As the scale of these services continues to expand, they may become key drivers in expanding the scope of malicious network activities for economic crime and state-supported forces.

The Increasing Correlation Between Cryptocurrency and Violent Crime

In the perception of many, cryptocurrency crime is still confined to the virtual world. The masterminds are merely anonymous figures hiding behind keyboards, posing no real-world threat. However, in reality, the connection between on-chain activities and violent crime is deepening. Human trafficking groups are increasingly using cryptocurrencies for transactions; at the same time, disturbingly, the number of violent coercion attacks has risen significantly, with criminals using violent means to force victims to transfer crypto assets, and such assaults often occur during peak cryptocurrency price periods.

Looking ahead, collaboration between law enforcement agencies, regulatory bodies, and cryptocurrency companies will be key to addressing these complex, ever-changing, and interconnected threats. Although the proportion of illegal transactions in legitimate cryptocurrency transaction volume remains limited, maintaining the integrity and security of the cryptocurrency ecosystem has never been more important.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat was the total value of illicit cryptocurrency transactions in 2025, and what was the primary driver of this growth?

AThe total value of illicit cryptocurrency transactions in 2025 reached at least $154 billion, representing a 162% year-over-year increase. This growth was primarily driven by a massive 694% surge in transaction volume from sanctioned entities.

QWhich asset has become the dominant currency for illicit transactions and what percentage of the total illicit volume does it represent?

AStablecoins have become the dominant asset for illicit transactions, currently accounting for 84% of the total illicit transaction volume.

QWhat significant role did nation-states play in the 2025 crypto crime landscape according to the article?

ANation-states significantly escalated their involvement in 2025. Russia launched the ruble-backed A7A5 token, which processed over $93.3 billion in volume to circumvent sanctions. North Korean hacking groups stole a record $2 billion, and Chinese money laundering networks emerged as dominant, sophisticated players in the illicit ecosystem.

QWhat new concerning trend connects cryptocurrency to real-world physical violence?

AA concerning trend is the rise in violent coercion attacks, where criminals use physical violence to force victims to transfer their cryptocurrency assets. These attacks often occur during periods of peak cryptocurrency prices.

QDespite the growth in illicit activity, how does its scale compare to the overall cryptocurrency economy?

ADespite the significant growth, illicit transactions still represent less than 1% of the total traceable cryptocurrency transaction volume, meaning the vast majority of cryptocurrency market activity remains legitimate.

Letture associate

Has Hook Summer Really Arrived? sato, Lo0p, FLOOD Ignite the New Narrative of Uniswap v4

"Hook Summer" Arrives? Sato, Lo0p, FLOOD Ignite Uniswap v4 Narrative Amidst a slight market recovery, attention within the Ethereum ecosystem has shifted to Meme coins built on Uniswap v4's Hook protocol. Following ASTEROID, tokens like sato, sat1, Lo0p, and FLOOD have become market focal points, with market caps ranging from millions to tens of millions, bringing concentrated liquidity to a narrative-dry market. Uniswap v4 Hooks are "plugin smart contracts" that allow developers to inject custom logic at key points in a liquidity pool's lifecycle (initialization, adding/removing liquidity, swaps, etc.), making the AMM programmable. Recent representative projects include: * **sato**: Market cap peaked over $38M; uses a v4 curve mechanism for minting/burning, locking ETH as reserve. * **sat1**: Market cap briefly exceeded $10M, positioning as an "optimized sato," but later declined significantly. * **Lo0p**: Market cap neared $6.6M; a "lending AMM protocol" allowing users to borrow ETH against deposited LO0P tokens without immediate selling pressure. * **FLOOD**: Market cap approached $6M; channels trading reserves into Aave v3 to generate yield, which is retained in the pool. The emergence of these Hook-based tokens could drive long-term growth for the Uniswap ecosystem by attracting users and liquidity to v4 pools. Combined with Uniswap's activated fee switch (partially used to burn UNI), the long-term outlook for UNI appears positive. However, short-term UNI price appreciation is not directly guaranteed. Factors include the sustainability and lifecycle of these new tokens, their price volatility, overall market conditions, and regulatory pressures. Currently, Uniswap v4's TVL ($595M) lags behind v3 and v2, indicating Hook adoption still requires time to mature. In summary, the Hook ecosystem serves as "long-term nourishment" for UNI, but acts more as a "catalyst" than a direct "booster" in the short term. Note: These are early-stage experimental tokens and may carry unknown risks.

marsbit16 min fa

Has Hook Summer Really Arrived? sato, Lo0p, FLOOD Ignite the New Narrative of Uniswap v4

marsbit16 min fa

Has Hook Summer Truly Arrived? sato, Lo0p, FLOOD Ignite the New Uniswap v4 Narrative

With the broader market showing signs of recovery, a new wave of interest has emerged around Ethereum-based meme coins. Following ASTEROID, tokens like sato, sat1, Lo0p, and FLOOD, built upon the Uniswap v4 Hook protocol, are capturing market attention. Their market capitalizations range from millions to tens of millions of dollars, injecting much-needed focused liquidity into a market lacking narratives. This article explores whether this trend signifies an incoming "Hook Summer" and its potential impact on UNI's price. Hooks are essentially plug-in smart contracts for Uniswap v4 liquidity pools, allowing developers to inject custom logic at key points in a pool's lifecycle (like initialization, adding/removing liquidity, swaps). This transforms the AMM into programmable building blocks. Key highlighted projects include: * **sato**: Peaked over $38M market cap. It utilizes a v4 curve for minting/burning; buying locks ETH as reserve to mint new tokens, while selling redeems ETH from the reserve and burns tokens. * **sat1**: Market cap briefly exceeded $10M, promoted as an "optimized sato," but later declined significantly. * **Lo0p**: Reached nearly $6.6M. It's a lending AMM protocol where buying LO0P tokens locks them as collateral, allowing users to borrow ETH from the pool reserve at 40% LTV, aiming to improve capital efficiency for idle ETH in LPs. * **FLOOD**: Peaked near $6M. Its mechanism directs asset reserves from buys into Aave v3 to generate yield, with fees and interest retained in the pool to potentially influence the token's price long-term. In the long term, the development of the Hook ecosystem can attract users and liquidity to Uniswap v4, benefiting UNI's fundamentals—especially combined with the recent activation of the protocol fee switch, where a portion of fees is used to burn UNI. However, in the short term, these Hook-based tokens are unlikely to directly drive significant UNI price appreciation. Their impact is moderated by factors like token sustainability, price volatility, and broader market and regulatory conditions. Currently, Uniswap v4's TVL ($595M) still trails behind v2 and v3, indicating adoption and growth will take time. The article concludes that while the Hook ecosystem provides long-term "nourishment" for UNI, its short-term role is more of a "catalyst" than a "booster." Readers are cautioned that these are early-stage experimental tokens and may carry unknown risks.

Odaily星球日报28 min fa

Has Hook Summer Truly Arrived? sato, Lo0p, FLOOD Ignite the New Uniswap v4 Narrative

Odaily星球日报28 min fa

Interview with Michael Saylor: I Did Say I Would Sell Bitcoin, But Never a Net Sale

Interview with Michael Saylor: I Said We'd Sell Bitcoin, But Never Be a Net Seller In a recent podcast, MicroStrategy Executive Chairman Michael Saylor clarified the company's stance on potentially selling Bitcoin. Following MicroStrategy's earnings call statement about being prepared to sell BTC to fund dividends for its STRC (Strategic) credit product, Saylor emphasized the distinction between selling and being a "net seller." Saylor explained the core business model: MicroStrategy sells credit instruments like STRC and uses the proceeds to buy Bitcoin, which is viewed as "digital capital" expected to appreciate around 30-40% annually. A portion of these capital gains can then be used to pay the dividends on the credit products. He stressed that even if the company sells some Bitcoin for dividends, it simultaneously buys much more with new credit issuance. For example, after raising $3.2 billion from STRC sales in April, the dividend obligation was only $80-90 million, making the company a net buyer. The clarification aims to counter market narratives questioning the value of Bitcoin on MicroStrategy's balance sheet if it were never sold, and to dismiss claims of a "Ponzi scheme." Saylor reiterated his personal philosophy for investors: "Don't be a net seller of bitcoin" and ensure your Bitcoin holdings increase each year. Saylor also discussed Bitcoin's role as the foundation for "digital credit," noting that STRC has become the largest and most liquid preferred stock issue in the U.S., offering high risk-adjusted returns (Sharpe ratio). He highlighted Bitcoin's deep liquidity, stating that even large purchases by MicroStrategy do not move the market significantly, which is driven by macro factors, geopolitical tensions, and capital flows from ETFs and credit products. Finally, Saylor reflected on his early inspiration from sci-fi books, which motivated his path to MIT, and maintained his fundamental thesis on Bitcoin remains unchanged: it is superior digital capital enabling superior digital credit.

链捕手32 min fa

Interview with Michael Saylor: I Did Say I Would Sell Bitcoin, But Never a Net Sale

链捕手32 min fa

Beaten SK Hynix Employees in China: Year-end Bonus Less Than 5% of Korean Staff's

"SK Hynix Chinese Staff Hit Hard: Bonuses Less Than 5% of Korean Counterparts" Driven by the AI boom, South Korea's SK Hynix is experiencing record performance, with media reports predicting massive year-end bonuses for its employees, making them highly desirable in the matchmaking market. However, this prosperity starkly contrasts with the situation for the company's Chinese employees. According to reports, SK Hynix operates under a rule allocating 10% of operating profit for employee bonuses. While projections suggest Korean employees could receive bonuses reaching millions of RMB, a Chinese employee with over a decade of technical experience revealed the disparity: "If they get 3 million, Chinese staff get less than 5% of that." After adjustments based on KPI ratings, this employee's highest bonus was slightly over 100,000 RMB. Bonuses are paid annually in Korea but semi-annually in China. During the industry downturn in 2023-2024, Chinese employees received no bonus at all. The gap extends beyond bonuses. Recruitment posts for SK Hynix's Chinese factories (in Wuxi, Dalian, Chongqing) show engineer monthly salaries ranging from 10,000 to 35,000 RMB, with a 13th-month salary promised. Chinese employees also receive standard benefits like annual leave but lack stock incentives, which are reportedly unavailable to them. Furthermore, management positions in China are predominantly held by Korean personnel, though industry observers note a gradual increase in local middle managers over time. SK Hynix has confirmed the 10% bonus rule but cautioned that specific future bonus amounts remain unpredictable. The company forecasts strong demand for HBM and other high-value enterprise products for the next 2-3 years, driven by AI infrastructure investment. This focus on business-to-business markets may continue to constrain supply for consumer products, potentially prolonging price increases for components like memory.

链捕手46 min fa

Beaten SK Hynix Employees in China: Year-end Bonus Less Than 5% of Korean Staff's

链捕手46 min fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片