Has Hook Summer Really Arrived? sato, Lo0p, FLOOD Ignite the New Narrative of Uniswap v4

marsbitPubblicato 2026-05-11Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-05-11

Introduzione

"Hook Summer" Arrives? Sato, Lo0p, FLOOD Ignite Uniswap v4 Narrative Amidst a slight market recovery, attention within the Ethereum ecosystem has shifted to Meme coins built on Uniswap v4's Hook protocol. Following ASTEROID, tokens like sato, sat1, Lo0p, and FLOOD have become market focal points, with market caps ranging from millions to tens of millions, bringing concentrated liquidity to a narrative-dry market. Uniswap v4 Hooks are "plugin smart contracts" that allow developers to inject custom logic at key points in a liquidity pool's lifecycle (initialization, adding/removing liquidity, swaps, etc.), making the AMM programmable. Recent representative projects include: * **sato**: Market cap peaked over $38M; uses a v4 curve mechanism for minting/burning, locking ETH as reserve. * **sat1**: Market cap briefly exceeded $10M, positioning as an "optimized sato," but later declined significantly. * **Lo0p**: Market cap neared $6.6M; a "lending AMM protocol" allowing users to borrow ETH against deposited LO0P tokens without immediate selling pressure. * **FLOOD**: Market cap approached $6M; channels trading reserves into Aave v3 to generate yield, which is retained in the pool. The emergence of these Hook-based tokens could drive long-term growth for the Uniswap ecosystem by attracting users and liquidity to v4 pools. Combined with Uniswap's activated fee switch (partially used to burn UNI), the long-term outlook for UNI appears positive. However, short-term UNI pr...

Original | Odaily Planet Daily (@OdailyChina)

Author | Wenser(@wenser 2010 )

After a slight recovery in the broader market, the heat for Meme coins in the Ethereum ecosystem has rekindled. Following ASTEROID, ecological tokens backed by the Uniswap v4 Hook protocol, such as sato, sat1, Lo0p, and FLOOD, have gradually become the focus of market attention, with market capitalizations ranging from millions to tens of millions of dollars, bringing rare concentrated liquidity to the narrative-dry crypto market. Odaily Planet Daily will briefly summarize the information about these tokens in this article and explore whether this boom can drive a recovery in the price of UNI.

Has Hook Summer Arrived? 4 Major Ecological Tokens, Intelligent Liquidity Management

According to Uniswap official documentation, Hook is a "plugin smart contract" tailored for liquidity pools in Uniswap v4. Unlike traditional Uniswap V2/V3 which only has a fixed constant product curve (x*y=k), it allows developers to automatically inject custom logic before and after key lifecycle nodes of the pool (initialization, adding/removing liquidity, Swap, Donate, etc.), thereby turning the entire AMM (Automated Market Maker) into programmable "Lego bricks". Aside from the previous uPEG, recent representative related projects are as follows:

sato: Market Cap Peak Exceeded $38 Million

CA:0x829f4b62eebe12af653b4dd4ffc480966f7d7f09

Current Market Cap: ~$28 Million

On May 4th, when sato first emerged, Odaily Planet Daily provided a brief introduction. At that time, its market cap was only $9 million. This token is minted and burned through the Uniswap v4 curve mechanism. Buying generates new tokens and locks ETH as reserves, while selling exchanges ETH from the reserves and burns tokens. By then, its cumulative buy volume had approached 1000 ETH. Subsequently, sato's market cap once exceeded $30 million.

Although community users later discovered its curve mechanism had a buy-sell spread, causing its market cap to once fall below $13 million, its innovative mechanism and first-mover advantage keep its current market cap around $28 million, with a 24-hour trading volume close to $6 million.

sat1: Market Cap Peak Exceeded $10 Million

CA:0x8f66337a0c2a02202fd91dd596c411cf977c6060

Current Market Cap: ~$800,000

On May 8th, sat1, under the concept of "optimized sato", reached its speculative peak. Thanks to vigorous promotion by crypto KOL Han Ba Long Wang in WeChat groups, the token's market cap once surpassed $10 million. However, with subsequent backlash, the project eventually spiraled down, losing over 90% of its value.

Lo0p: Market Cap Peak Approached $6.6 Million

CA:0x20ea861b3acec90d3a15b4755d9a1cf1f161496e

Current Market Cap: ~$960,000

Official Account: https://x.com/lo0pio

On May 10th, Lo0p's market cap once exceeded $6 million, with a daily increase of over 110x. Similarly, Lo0p's main concept is "a lending AMM protocol based on Uniswap v4 Hook," aiming to solve the idle ETH capital efficiency problem in LP pools. Users buy LO0P tokens by binding the curve, locking them as collateral (without selling), and can directly borrow ETH from the pool reserves at a 40% LTV. Borrowing does not directly impact the spot price; after liquidation, the mechanism attempts to refill the LP band. The Hook injects custom logic during the Swap/liquidity lifecycle, achieving "collateral lending + LP收益 + loan interest" compound returns while maintaining pool price stability. Its core mechanism lies in "built-in lending."

FLOOD: Market Cap Peak Near $6 Million

CA:0xff003fbe8b8d5e7f271a9cb9f2780003daed2aa8

Current Market Cap: ~$1.4 Million

Official Account: https://x.com/flood_markets

On May 10th, FLOOD's market cap once broke $5 million. As the speculative heat cooled down, the current market cap is around $1.4 million. It is reported that FLOOD has a total supply of 50 million tokens. Its special mechanism is: asset reserves generated from user purchases enter the corresponding Aave v3 market to earn yield; transaction fees are also retained in the pool, used to increase reserves and affect the token price. The core lies in Aave integration for automatic yield, with the Hook mechanism playing the role of "automatic rebalancing and yield recycling". No wonder some community users bluntly stated: "Buying funds enter the pool → pool assets generate interest on Aave → interest stays in the pool → long-term price push, so this is using my money to deposit and earn interest?"

Hook Mechanism Tokens Drive Uniswap Ecosystem Development: UNI Bullish Long-Term, But Limited Short-Term Gains

Thanks to the rapid development of the Uniswap v4 Hook mechanism, ecological tokens in this sector have now become a type of Meme coin and project ecological token. In the long run, they can further attract users and capital liquidity to participate in Uniswap v4 liquidity pool trading and development.

Combined with the previous news that "Uniswap has opened the fee switch, with part of the protocol fees used to burn UNI tokens," the long-term fundamentals of UNI show a steady and positive trend.

However, in the short term, the emergence of Hook mechanism tokens cannot directly drive the price increase of the UNI token. Intermediate factors include the token lifecycle and sustainability, token price volatility and transaction fee proportions, and the impact of crypto regulatory policies and overall market trends on the UNI token.

Therefore, in summary, the Hook ecosystem is "long-term nourishment" for UNI, but in the short term, it's more like a "catalyst" than a "booster."

Also according to the Uniswap official website page, the current v4 TVL is temporarily reported at $595 million, slightly lower than v3 ($792 million) and v2 ($966 million) liquidity pools. Therefore, v4 and the Hook ecosystem still need time to accumulate strength and gradually grow into mainstream liquidity management protocols in the market.

Finally, Odaily Planet Daily reminds readers that the above tokens are early-stage technological innovation experimental products and may contain unknown bugs or other risks. Please be aware of the relevant risks when participating in trading. The above information does not constitute investment advice.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is a Hook in Uniswap v4 according to the article?

AA Hook in Uniswap v4 is a plugin-style smart contract designed for liquidity pools. Unlike the fixed constant product curve in traditional Uniswap V2/V3, Hooks allow developers to inject custom logic automatically at key lifecycle points of a pool, such as initialization, adding/removing liquidity, swaps, and donations, making the AMM programmable like Lego blocks.

QWhat was the core mechanism of the Lo0p token mentioned in the article?

AThe Lo0p token's core mechanism was 'built-in lending.' It functioned as a lending AMM protocol based on Uniswap v4 Hooks, aiming to solve the idle ETH capital efficiency problem in LP pools. Users could buy LO0P tokens, lock them as collateral, and borrow ETH directly from the pool reserves at a 40% LTV. This process did not directly impact the spot price, and after liquidation, the mechanism would attempt to refill the LP band.

QHow does the FLOOD token's mechanism integrate with Aave v3, and what was a community member's humorous critique of it?

AFLOOD's mechanism involved channeling the asset reserves generated from user purchases into the corresponding Aave v3 market to earn yield. Trading fees were also retained within the pool to increase reserves and influence the token price. A community member humorously critiqued it by saying, 'Buying funds enter the pool -> pool assets go to Aave to earn interest -> interest stays in the pool -> pushes the price up in the long run. So this is using my money to deposit and earn interest?'

QWhat is the article's view on the impact of Hook-based tokens on the UNI token's price in the short and long term?

AThe article views Hook-based tokens as 'long-term nutrients' for UNI, potentially attracting users and liquidity to the Uniswap v4 ecosystem, which is positive for its long-term fundamentals. However, in the short term, they are seen more as a 'catalyst' rather than a 'booster' for UNI's price, as immediate price movement is influenced by other factors like token lifecycle, fee proportions, crypto regulations, and overall market trends.

QWhat warning does Odaily Planet Daily give to readers regarding the tokens discussed in the article?

AOdaily Planet Daily warns readers that the discussed tokens are early-stage technological innovation experiments that may contain unknown bugs or other risks. It advises participants to be aware of the associated risks when trading and clarifies that the information provided does not constitute investment advice.

Letture associate

The AI Agent Era Accelerates Its Arrival: Questflow Defines a New Paradigm of Financial Intelligence with On-Chain AI Brokerage

The AI Agent era is accelerating, with the CB Insights AI 100 list highlighting global investment confidence. The focus has shifted from whether AI works to its speed of deployment and ability to manage complex workflows, with autonomous AI Agents driving this transformation. At the forefront is Questflow, a Singapore-based startup redefining financial intelligence through its on-chain AI brokerage. Unlike tools that merely provide data dashboards, Questflow deploys AI Agents that proactively scan markets, form judgments, and execute trades via a conversational interface—operating 24/7 without requiring manual confirmation for each decision. This embodies the new AI paradigm of agents capable of executing multi-step workflows autonomously. Questflow's mission is to democratize institutional-grade trading intelligence. Historically reserved for the ultra-wealthy, this capability is now accessible starting from just $1 through Questflow's "AI Clone + Copy Trade" model. The platform charges only a 1% execution fee, aligning its incentives directly with users and eliminating traditional management or performance fees. The timing is opportune, aligning with key trends identified by CB Insights: the scalable deployment of AI Agents, accelerated AI adoption in financial services, and the maturation of on-chain infrastructure. With robust liquidity on platforms like Hyperliquid and Polymarket, alongside advancements in AI reasoning and non-custodial wallet security, Questflow is positioned to merge the roles of broker, fund, and exchange into a single, accessible platform for millions.

链捕手4 min fa

The AI Agent Era Accelerates Its Arrival: Questflow Defines a New Paradigm of Financial Intelligence with On-Chain AI Brokerage

链捕手4 min fa

Why Pricing Social Interactions is Doomed to Fail?

Titled "Why Putting a Price on Social Interaction Is Doomed to Fail," this article critiques attempts to monetize social networks directly through SocialFi models, arguing their inevitable failure stems from a fundamental misunderstanding of media dynamics. Using Marshall McLuhan's theory of "hot" and "cold" media, the author posits that social networks are inherently "cold" media. Their value isn't contained in individual posts but is co-created through user participation, interpretation, and fragmented, ongoing interaction (e.g., replies, shares). This ambiguity and need for user involvement are core to their function. The article asserts that SocialFi projects like Friend.tech failed because introducing real-time, tradable financial pricing (a definitive "hot" signal) into this "cold" environment doesn't add a layer—it replaces the medium's essence. The unambiguous price signal overshadows and nullifies the nuanced, participatory social signal. Users become traders, not participants, and when speculative profits vanish, the underlying social ecosystem—never genuinely cultivated—collapses entirely. This principle extends beyond crypto. The author argues platforms like Twitter have gradually "heated up" through metrics (likes, retweets counts, algorithmically defined value), shifting users from participants to performers and eroding organic engagement. The solution isn't to abandon capital but to manage its entry point. Successful models like Substack, Patreon, or Bandcamp allow capital to "condense" at specific, isolated nodes (e.g., subscriptions, one-time payments) without permeating and "heating" every social interaction. They preserve the core "cold," participatory medium while enabling monetization at designated boundaries. The NFT boom and bust serves as a stark parallel: the ancient "cold" medium of collecting (valued for story, community, gradual accumulation) was rapidly destroyed by platforms that introduced real-time floor prices, rarity scores, and trading dashboards, transforming collectors into speculators and vaporizing cultural value when prices fell. The core lesson: "Liquidity equals heat." Injecting high liquidity and definitive pricing into a "cold" participatory medium doesn't optimize it; it fundamentally alters and destroys its value-creating mechanism. The future lies not in pricing every social gesture but in finding precise, non-invasive points for capital to condense without overheating the entire ecosystem.

marsbit12 min fa

Why Pricing Social Interactions is Doomed to Fail?

marsbit12 min fa

Jensen Huang's CMU Speech: In the AI Era, Don't Just Watch, Build

Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA and a first-generation immigrant, delivered the commencement address to Carnegie Mellon University's class of 2026. He shared his personal journey from a humble background to founding NVIDIA, emphasizing resilience, learning from failure, and the responsibility that comes with leadership. Huang framed the present moment as the dawn of the AI revolution, a shift he believes is more profound than previous computing waves. He described AI as fundamentally resetting computing—moving from human-written software to machines that understand, reason, and use tools. This will create a new industry for generating intelligence and transform every sector. While acknowledging AI's potential to automate tasks and displace some jobs, Huang distinguished between the *tasks* of a job and its core *purpose*. He argued AI will augment human capability, not replace humans. The real risk, he stated, is not AI itself, but people being left behind by those who effectively use AI. He presented AI as a generational opportunity for massive infrastructure investment—in chip factories, data centers, energy grids, and advanced manufacturing—that could re-industrialize nations like the U.S. and bridge the digital divide by making computing and intelligent tools accessible to all. Huang called for a balanced approach: advancing AI safely and responsibly, establishing prudent policies, ensuring broad access, and encouraging universal participation. He urged the graduates not to fear the future but to engage with optimism and ambition, reminding them of CMU's motto, "My heart is in the work." His core message was clear: this is their moment to actively build and shape the AI-powered future, not merely observe it.

marsbit1 h fa

Jensen Huang's CMU Speech: In the AI Era, Don't Just Watch, Build

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片