March 11 Market Summary: The War Still Isn't Over, Oil Prices Drop Another 15%

marsbitPubblicato 2026-03-11Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-03-11

Introduzione

Market Summary March 11: War Continues, Oil Plunges 15% Wall Street remained indecisive as conflicting signals emerged regarding the Iran conflict. The Dow fell 34 points (-0.07%), the S&P 500 dropped 0.21%, and the Nasdaq barely moved (+0.01%). While Trump claimed the war was "largely over," the White House clarified that military operations were escalating and the Strait of Hormuz remained closed. Energy stocks led declines as oil prices continued to fall. Chip stocks, including Nvidia and Micron, rose on strong demand signals from TSMC. Oil prices crashed another 15%, with Brent at $87.80 and WTI at $83.45. Despite a two-day cumulative drop of over 30%, prices remain 25-30% above pre-war levels. Trump administration comments about war resolution triggered selling, but the Pentagon later emphasized the conflict would continue until "decisive victory." Gold surged 2.44% to $5,228/oz, and silver jumped 6.25%, erasing Monday’s losses. Lower oil prices eased inflation fears, boosting Fed rate cut expectations and safe-haven demand. Bitcoin briefly surpassed $70,000 before retreating to the $69,000–$69,500 range. It faces resistance near $71,500, but institutional buying and potential short squeeze conditions suggest upward momentum. The market’s core conflict remains: trusting Trump’s optimism about war resolution versus the Pentagon’s reality. If diplomacy succeeds, oil may fall below $70 and stocks could rally. If the war persists, oil may rebound above $100, r...

Author: Deep Tide TechFlow

US Stocks: Mixed Signals, Market Stagnates

On Tuesday, Wall Street was like a confused trader—unsure of whom to believe.

The Dow fell slightly by 34 points (-0.07%) to close at 47,707 points, the S&P 500 dropped 0.21%, and the Nasdaq was almost flat with a marginal gain of 0.01%. The three major indices fluctuated between gains and losses throughout the day, ultimately ending almost where they started.

Why is the market so conflicted? On Monday, Trump said the war was "almost over," and the market surged. But on Tuesday, the White House clarified: The Strait of Hormuz has not yet begun escort operations, US military actions are escalating, and diplomatic negotiations have limited prospects. This directly contradicted Monday's optimistic expectations.

The market initially rebounded on hopes of war de-escalation but then turned lower after the White House clarified that the Strait of Hormuz had not resumed escort operations. Investors quickly switched from the euphoria of "the war is ending" to the anxiety of "the war isn't over at all."

Sector performance was highly divergent: Among the 11 sectors of the S&P 500, nine declined, with the energy sector leading the losses. Energy stocks plummeted because oil prices continued to fall—even though the war isn't over, oil prices are still dropping, which is a double blow for energy stocks.

Chip stocks were the only bright spot. Nvidia rose 1.2%, Micron Technology surged 3.5%, and Intel gained 2.6%. The catalyst was strong sales data from TSMC, proving that chip demand remains robust. Amid geopolitical risks, inflation fears, and oil price volatility, chip stocks have become one of the market's few certainties.

Dow 30 components: 3M led gains with a 2.39% rise, Cisco Systems rose 1.84%, and Caterpillar gained 1.69%. The biggest decliners were Boeing, down 3.20%, Salesforce, down 1.95%, and Chevron, down 1.60%.

Year-to-date: The Dow is still in the red, with some distance to go before reversing its annual losses.

Oil Prices: Another 15% Drop, But Still 30% Higher Than Pre-War Levels

On Tuesday, oil prices continued to plummet, but the pace of decline began to slow.

Brent crude plunged 11.28% to close at $87.80 per barrel. WTI crude plummeted 11.94% to settle at $83.45 per barrel. This marked the second consecutive day of sharp declines—Monday's drop from $120 to $95, followed by Tuesday's further decline to the $83–$88 range.

The cumulative two-day drop exceeded 30%, but prices remain 25–30% higher than pre-war levels. Pre-war (February 28), Brent was around $73, and WTI was around $67. Even after two days of steep declines, oil prices are still about $20–$25 per barrel higher than pre-war levels.

The catalyst for Tuesday's plunge was again Trump's statement in a CBS interview that the war was "basically done." The market chose to believe the president's words over clarifications from other White House officials.

However, US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth later poured cold water on this optimism. Hegseth stated at a Pentagon briefing that the war would not end until "the enemy is thoroughly and decisively defeated," which would proceed on America's timeline. This suggests the war could last for weeks or even months.

International Energy Agency (IEA) Executive Director Fatih Birol issued a statement on Tuesday, noting that IEA member countries would meet to assess current supply security and market conditions. This hints that the IEA might release strategic petroleum reserves—if it does, oil prices could fall further.

Saudi Arabia warned of catastrophic consequences. Saudi Aramco, the world's largest oil exporter, cautioned on Tuesday that if oil flows through the Strait of Hormuz cannot resume, it would have "catastrophic consequences" for the oil market.

Oil prices are now in a delicate balance: Trump says the war is ending → oil prices plummet; the Pentagon says the war isn't over → but the market no longer believes it.

Gold: Surges 2.4%, Back Above $5,200

On Tuesday, gold staged a strong rebound.

Gold surged 2.44% to $5,228 per ounce, gaining $124.70 in a single day. This completely erased Monday's losses and set a new rebound high. Silver performed even more impressively, soaring 6.25% to $89.81 per ounce, with gains 2.5 times those of gold.

Why did safe-haven assets surge? There are three reasons:

First, oil prices plummeted from nearly $120, easing inflationary pressures and boosting expectations for Fed rate cuts. Lower oil prices → lower inflation expectations → higher probability of Fed rate cuts → gold benefits.

Second, the US dollar's rally stalled. The dollar's surge on Monday suppressed gold, but its momentum paused on Tuesday, giving gold a breather.

Third, geopolitical risks haven't truly disappeared. Although Trump said the war is ending, the Pentagon says it isn't, the Strait of Hormuz remains closed, and Saudi Arabia warns of catastrophic consequences—all of which support safe-haven demand.

Gold has risen about 100% year-to-date, and silver has gained about 150%. Even after Monday's plunge, the long-term trend remains intact.

Cryptocurrencies: Bitcoin Breaks $70,000 but Pulls Back

On Tuesday, the crypto market performed steadily with slight gains.

According to CoinGecko data, the global crypto market cap is approximately $2.46 trillion, with Bitcoin's dominance at 56.9%. Bitcoin briefly broke above $70,000 during Tuesday's session but later retreated to the $69,000–$69,500 range.

Bitcoin faces resistance from whale sell orders near $71,500, which is the main obstacle to short-term gains. If this resistance level is breached, the next target is $75,000.

Strategy firms purchased $1.28 billion worth of Bitcoin, bringing their total holdings to over 738,000 BTC. Institutional funds continue to enter the market, providing a floor for Bitcoin.

Bitcoin shows conditions for a potential short squeeze: negative funding rates and dominant short positions. Historically, extreme shorting often precedes price reversals. If shorts are forced to cover, Bitcoin could surge rapidly.

Technical outlook: Bitcoin has been oscillating in the $65,000–$75,000 range for over two weeks. If the war truly ends, oil prices fall, inflationary pressures ease, and Fed rate cut expectations rise, Bitcoin could break above $75,000. But if the war persists, the market will remain cautious.

Today's Summary: The War Isn't Over, the Market Is in Self-Delusion

March 11, the 12th day of the US-Iran war, and the market is mired in conflicting signals and self-delusion:

US Stocks: The Dow fell slightly by 34 points (-0.07%), the S&P 500 dropped 0.21%, and the Nasdaq edged up 0.01%, with all three indices nearly flat. The market is torn between Monday's optimism from Trump's "war is ending" and Tuesday's reality from the White House: "Hormuz not restored, military actions escalating." Chip stocks were the only bright spot, with Nvidia up 1.2% and Micron up 3.5%, while energy stocks led the declines.

Oil Prices: Brent crude plunged 11.28% to $87.80, and WTI plummeted 11.94% to $83.45, marking a cumulative two-day drop of over 30%. Trump said the war is "basically done," but Defense Secretary Hegseth stated, "The war won't end until the enemy is彻底 defeated." Oil prices are still 25–30% higher than pre-war levels, and Saudi Arabia warns that closing the Strait of Hormuz would have "catastrophic consequences."

Gold: Surged 2.44% to $5,228, and silver soared 6.25% to $89.81, completely erasing Monday's losses. Plummeting oil prices eased inflationary pressures, boosting Fed rate cut expectations, while safe-haven demand remains strong.

Cryptocurrencies: Bitcoin broke above $70,000 during the session but retreated to $69,000–$69,500, with a global market cap of $2.46 trillion. It faces resistance from whale sell orders at $71,500, institutions bought $1.28 billion, and conditions for a potential short squeeze are forming.

The core market contradiction now: Trump says the war is ending, the Pentagon says it isn't—whom to believe?

Oil prices plummeted from $120 to $83, and the market chose to believe the president. But the Strait of Hormuz remains closed, Saudi Arabia warns of disaster, and the Pentagon vows to彻底 defeat the enemy—all these facts point to the war being far from over.

The market is now betting that Trump will use diplomacy to end the war quickly. If the bet pays off, oil prices will continue to fall below $70, and US stocks will rebound strongly. If the bet fails and the war drags on for weeks, oil prices could return above $100, and the market could crash again.

At least for today, one thing is very clear: The market would rather believe the president's optimism than the Pentagon's reality. How long can this self-delusion last? Tomorrow's CPI data might provide the answer.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat was the performance of the US stock market on March 11th, and why was it described as 'confused'?

AThe Dow Jones fell 34 points (-0.07%), the S&P 500 fell 0.21%, and the Nasdaq was almost flat with a 0.01% gain. The market was described as 'confused' because it was torn between the optimism from Trump's statement that the war was 'almost over' on Monday and the reality check from the White House on Tuesday that the Strait of Hormuz had not reopened and military action was escalating.

QHow much did oil prices fall on March 11th, and what was the main catalyst for this decline?

ABrent crude oil fell 11.28% to $87.80 per barrel, and WTI crude oil fell 11.94% to $83.45 per barrel. The main catalyst for this decline was President Trump's statement in a CBS interview that the war was 'basically finished,' which the market chose to believe.

QWhy did gold and silver prices surge on March 11th?

AGold surged 2.44% and silver surged 6.25% due to three main reasons: 1) Falling oil prices eased inflation pressure, increasing expectations for Fed rate cuts, which benefits gold. 2) The US dollar's upward momentum stalled, giving gold a breather. 3) Geopolitical risks had not truly disappeared, supporting safe-haven demand.

QWhat key resistance level is Bitcoin facing according to the article, and what could help it break through?

ABitcoin is facing significant whale sell-order resistance near $71,500. A break above this level could be aided by the war actually ending, leading to falling oil prices, easing inflation pressure, and rising expectations for Federal Reserve interest rate cuts.

QWhat is the core contradiction the market is facing regarding the war, according to the article's summary?

AThe core contradiction is that President Trump says the war is ending, while the Pentagon (Defense Secretary Hegseth) says the war will not end until the enemy is 'thoroughly and decisively defeated.' The market is choosing to believe the President's optimism and betting on a swift diplomatic end to the war, despite facts on the ground suggesting it is far from over.

Letture associate

From South Korea to the United States: Blue-Collar Jobs Are Becoming Increasingly Popular, Thanks to AI

AI is reshaping the labor market's value proposition. The traditional four-year college degree is losing its appeal as a guaranteed career path, while skilled blue-collar trades like electricians, welders, and plumbers are experiencing historic demand and wage premiums. This shift is driven by dual pressures: AI's displacement of certain white-collar roles and a booming need for physical infrastructure and data center construction. Data confirms the trend. In the U.S., vocational school revenue surged, and a significant portion of recent layoffs are AI-related. Surveys show a majority of Gen Z adults plan to pursue blue-collar work, citing better job security against AI automation. Vocational education interest has exploded recently. Experts cite a psychological shift as younger generations seek tangible, AI-resistant careers and avoid high student debt. In many cases, salaries for skilled trades now match or exceed those requiring a bachelor's degree. In South Korea, semiconductor vocational high schools boast near-total employment, with graduates securing high-paying roles at companies like Samsung. The shortage is structural, exacerbated by a retiring baby boomer workforce and massive infrastructure projects. Companies like JPMorgan Chase, Meta, and Lowe's are investing heavily in training programs. However, overcoming historical stigma and a "perception gap" around trade careers remains a key challenge to closing the talent gap.

marsbit1 h fa

From South Korea to the United States: Blue-Collar Jobs Are Becoming Increasingly Popular, Thanks to AI

marsbit1 h fa

Qualcomm: AI Hype Subsides, When Will Smartphones Emerge from the Gloom?

Qualcomm reported its Q3 FY2026 results (ending June 2026), with revenue of $9.95B, down 4% YoY but above expectations. Gross margin declined to 53.1%, pressured by rising costs across manufacturing and memory. Key business segments showed mixed performance: Handset revenue fell 19.6% YoY to $5.09B, dragged by an 11% decline in non-Apple Android shipments and weaker high-end mix. Conversely, Automotive revenue surged 61% to $1.59B, and IoT grew 9% to $1.83B. Core operating profit dropped 41% YoY due to margin compression and higher expenses. Management's Q4 FY2026 guidance projects revenue of $9.7B-$10.5B, in line with consensus, but Non-GAAP EPS guidance of $2.05-$2.25 fell short of expectations. Amidst persistent weakness in its core handset market, Qualcomm is pursuing growth in AI, focusing on Edge AI (smartphones, PCs, automotive) and Data Center AI. Its data center strategy includes four pillars: AI accelerators (e.g., AI200), commercial CPUs (Dragonfly C1000), custom silicon, and connectivity solutions. While these initiatives initially boosted its stock, concerns over AI capital expenditure sustainability have since erased those gains. The company targets $5B in data center revenue for FY2027 and $15B for FY2029. The report concludes that with the traditional handset business still under pressure, the data center opportunity is currently viewed as a longer-term option, and a more conservative valuation based on core operations may be warranted until AI contributions materialize.

marsbit1 h fa

Qualcomm: AI Hype Subsides, When Will Smartphones Emerge from the Gloom?

marsbit1 h fa

From TPU to Self-Evolving Agents: How Jeff Dean Predicts the Next Step in AI

At the 2026 YC Startup School, Jeff Dean outlined his vision for AI's next phase, shifting focus from simply scaling models to building intelligent, autonomous systems. He believes AI's progress is no longer just about creating smarter models, but about integrating them into systems capable of long-term, iterative work, automated experimentation, and continuous learning. This evolution moves the competition from "who has the bigger model" to "who can best organize intelligence." Dean suggests AI capabilities are now comparable to a junior engineer, enabling the automation of complex workflows. However, the true challenge and opportunity lie in managing these AI "workers" at scale. He emphasizes the importance of **context engineering**—structuring tools, memory, and feedback loops—over raw model power. For startups, this means building deep expertise in niche domains where general models currently fail (near 0-1% success rates), leveraging proprietary data, specialized tools, and domain-specific evaluators. A recurring theme is re-examining fundamental constraints. Dean's past work, like moving Google's search index to memory or creating the TPU, stemmed from questioning outdated assumptions about hardware and cost. He sees similar inflection points today, particularly in **specialized inference hardware** to drastically reduce latency and energy consumption for real-time Agent operation. Notably, he points out that in modern AI systems, the dominant cost is often not computation but **data movement**. Reliable, long-running Agents require robust system design, borrowing concepts from distributed computing like checkpointing, state management, and parallel exploration to handle failures and maintain progress over days or weeks. As AI automates execution, the scarcest human skills will shift to **defining clear specifications**, **judging what problems are worth solving** (taste), and designing effective feedback loops. Ultimately, Dean's framework prioritizes understanding the problem deeply, identifying the true bottlenecks, and systematically building closed-loop systems where AI can not only perform tasks but also improve AI itself.

marsbit1 h fa

From TPU to Self-Evolving Agents: How Jeff Dean Predicts the Next Step in AI

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片