Losing Retail Traders Keep Trading, Winning Retail Traders Know When to Rest

深潮Pubblicato 2025-12-09Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-12-09

Introduzione

Stop Losing Money in Crypto: Why Day Trading is a Structural "Scam" for Retail Investors The author, drawing from personal trading experience since adolescence, argues that day trading is fundamentally rigged against ordinary investors. Retail traders lack critical advantages like real order flow data, liquidity maps, or execution speed. While infrequent trading might be survivable, high-frequency trading almost guarantees eventual ruin due to mathematical inevitability, even with strong discipline and risk management. The key insight isn't about winning—it's about keeping the money. Major losses often follow big wins when traders don't step back. The author transformed his results by becoming a low-frequency swing trader who pauses after profitable trades. The piece warns that the current social media-driven day trading culture misleads young people (e.g., on TikTok or Discord) into believing it's a learnable skill, not gambling. This false sense of control is dangerous—it prevents them from quitting. Unlike a casino, which is openly a gamble, day trading is disguised as a legitimate "system," making it harder to recognize the risk. In reality, most profitable retail traders are simply lucky, catching a trend and having enough discipline to stop temporarily. True success lies not in making money, but in preserving it.

Author:Pickle Cat

Compiled by: Deep Tide TechFlow

Want to stop losing money in the cryptocurrency market? First, stop your day trading!

Because for the average investor, day trading is structurally a "scam."

This article is long, but if you're willing to spend 120 seconds reading it, I guarantee you'll thank yourself years from now.

I started trading when I was a teenager.

I've had wins that made me feel like "Batman," and I've had painful failures that shattered me inside—wounds I'm still healing from today.

I've tried every trading strategy an average investor can find.

There was even a whole year when I was obsessed with day trading, thinking it would finally turn things around for me, but I failed so miserably that it still stings every time I look back.

My profit and loss (PNL) was so bad that my grandma's automated Bitcoin buying plan made more money than I did.

Later, I transformed into a low-frequency swing trader, rarely adjusting my positions. After making a profit, I would decisively exit and then take a break from trading for a while.

It was only then that my life started to improve, and everything began to make sense.

I'm no saint. I'm writing this to save my younger, foolish, naive, and impulsive self.

First, as an average day trader, you're engaging in high-frequency trading with no informational edge (no order flow data, no clear liquidity maps, no market maker position insights, no execution advantages, nothing).

If you only trade a few times per quarter, you might survive.

But what if you trade more than 10 times a week?

Even if you have the strongest "discipline" and "risk management" skills in the world, the math will eventually make you lose everything.

The reason average investors fail isn't that they never win; it's that they never stop. The only outcome of high-frequency trading is one: ruin.

That's why I set up a "penalty system" for myself—if I exceed my quarterly trading limit, I face consequences.

Every major loss I've experienced came after a big win, when I kept trading instead of stepping away.

And all my big wins (the ones where I actually held onto the money for a long time) happened because I caught a major trend and then chose to rest and cool off.

The pattern is so obvious it hurts.

"Winning" isn't just about making a lot of money suddenly; real "winning" is being able to keep that money instead of losing it all the next year.

Now I see 14-year-olds on TikTok calling themselves day traders, drawing a few lines on TradingView, thinking that buying some "guru's" course or joining a Discord group means they've mastered some daily executable trading system.

It makes me sick. If they knew they were gambling, I wouldn't mind—at least they'd know they're playing a game.

But the current day trading craze is even bigger than the "drop-shipping hype" of 2016 and 2017. And we all know how that ended.

People underestimate the difficulty of trading and severely overestimate their own abilities.

The problem isn't just mathematical. Yes, the more you trade and the less you stop, the harder it is to sustain profits.

The real issue is that young retail traders genuinely believe that with "discipline" and "risk management," they're not gambling at all. They think day trading is a "skill" that can be executed like a daily habit.

This doesn't just apply to cryptocurrency day trading; it's the same for the U.S. stock market and almost every other market.

High-frequency trading is only for institutions.

Take the U.S. stock market, for example.

Do you know what institutional traders don't even look at? Candlestick charts and TradingView.

They use Bloomberg terminals, which contain data retail investors will never see.

Sure, you might already know this. But 14- to 18-year-olds don't. They think their indicators are the tools everyone uses.

That's the real danger.

If you know you're gambling, at least part of you will know when to stop.

But once you believe it's a "system," you'll never quit.

You'll keep clicking until the market empties you out.

Day Trading: A Casino Disguised as a Café

It really is like a casino in plain sight.

When you walk into Las Vegas or Macau, you know what kind of place you're entering. You see the lights, the tables, the dealers, the noise. Your brain immediately recognizes: this is gambling.

But day trading today is like a casino disguised as a coffee shop.

New traders walk in thinking they're there to "learn a skill," unaware that they've already sat down at a table designed to slowly drain them.

So they don't stop.

That's the essence of the tragedy, not the losses themselves.

The truly sad part is that they truly believe they're not gambling, and it's that belief that keeps them going until they lose everything.

As for those retail traders who seem to be "making money" (like I once was)... honestly, most of them just caught a wave.

They had good luck at the right time, combined with a little discipline learned from previous losses, and finally learned to stop after winning.

Even so, such lucky ones make up less than one percent of all retail traders.

Making money in trading isn't actually that hard; what's truly difficult is keeping it.

Crypto di tendenza

Domande pertinenti

QWhy does the author believe that day trading is structurally a 'scam' for retail investors?

AThe author argues that retail day traders operate without any informational advantages (such as real order flow, liquidity maps, or market maker positioning), execution edge, or other institutional tools, making consistent profits mathematically improbable and leading to inevitable ruin through frequent trading.

QWhat key realization helped the author start improving their trading results?

AThe author improved their results by transitioning to low-frequency swing trading, taking profits decisively after wins, and then pausing trading for extended periods, which allowed them retain gains and avoid subsequent losses.

QAccording to the author, what is the true danger for young retail traders engaged in day trading?

AThe true danger is that young traders genuinely believe day trading is a skill-based system reliant on discipline and risk management, not gambling. This false belief prevents them from stopping even as losses accumulate, unlike in a casino where the gambling nature is obvious.

QHow does the author describe the environment of modern day trading for newcomers?

AThe author compares modern day trading to a casino disguised as a café—newcomers think they are learning a skill but are actually at a table designed to slowly drain their funds, unaware they are gambling.

QWhat does the author identify as the hardest part about making money in markets?

AThe hardest part is not making money, but keeping it. True winning is defined by the ability to retain profits over time, rather than giving them back in subsequent trades.

Letture associate

Coinbase Vice President: The Wars Over Cryptocurrency Regulation Are Over

Coinbase's new Vice President, Ryan VanGrak, declared that regulatory wars in the cryptocurrency sector are over. Since taking office on July 9, 2026, he has shifted the company's approach from litigation and sanctions to focusing on growth and innovation. The industry can now concentrate on development rather than fighting for its right to exist. He highlighted that the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act (CLARITY Act), which aims to establish a clear federal regulatory framework dividing oversight between the SEC and CFTC, has gained significant momentum. This framework is intended to provide proper supervision, investor protection, and maintain U.S. leadership in digital assets. VanGrak's appointment marks a strategic shift from a "wartime" to a "peacetime" advisor, replacing former Chief Legal Officer Paul Grewal, who oversaw major litigation, including a dismissed 2023 SEC lawsuit. With his background at Citadel Securities and the SEC, VanGrak brings deep regulatory and institutional finance expertise as Coinbase expands beyond a simple exchange into a broader financial services provider, offering stocks, futures, prediction markets, and AI tools. For investors, bipartisan support for crypto legislation like the CLARITY Act represents a major shift from the enforcement-focused environment of 2023-2024. Lawmakers are now focused on *how* to regulate crypto, not *if* it should exist. However, risks remain, as the bill's passage is not yet guaranteed.

cryptonews.ru11 min fa

Coinbase Vice President: The Wars Over Cryptocurrency Regulation Are Over

cryptonews.ru11 min fa

Deep Dive into FWA: An Intriguing Experiment Turning NFTs into "On-Chain Gachapon"

A Deep Dive into FWA: The “On-Chain Gacha” Experiment for NFTs Fake World Assets (FWA), created by TokenWorks, introduces an innovative “NFT gacha machine” fully operating on-chain. Users can deposit eligible NFTs paired with ETH (called Backing) to create a Position, acting as a prize pool. Others can then pay a uniform Acquisition Price for a chance to win a random NFT from the pool. The core mechanism features a reverse probability system: Positions with lower Backing have a higher chance of being selected, serving as common prizes, while high-Backing Positions are rare “jackpots.” The acquisition price is calculated based on the harmonic mean of all Backings, keeping entry costs low. When a Position is won, the purchaser must choose: keep the NFT or accept the Standing Bid (85% of the Backing, claimable in ETH or $FWA tokens), returning the NFT to the original depositor. The protocol involves two main roles. Depositors provide liquidity (NFT + ETH), earning a share of fees from each draw, distributed equally per active Position, plus potential $FWA rewards. Purchasers pay to spin the gacha, receiving $FWA rewards for participation. A special “Crown” reward goes to the Position with the highest Backing. The $FWA token has a fixed supply and is initially obtainable only through protocol participation (depositing or purchasing), with external buying disabled early on to reduce sell pressure. Its value is supported by a built-in buy pressure: when purchasers opt for the $FWA settlement on a Standing Bid, the protocol uses the backing ETH to buy $FWA from the market. Revenue for the protocol comes from a 1% fee on each draw, a 1% settlement fee when an NFT is kept, and the 15% discount from Standing Bid settlements (currently allocated to the protocol). The design cleverly blends Uniswap-style liquidity provision, gacha mechanics, and tokenomics to create a novel, self-regulating marketplace for NFT liquidity and engagement.

marsbit26 min fa

Deep Dive into FWA: An Intriguing Experiment Turning NFTs into "On-Chain Gachapon"

marsbit26 min fa

10,000 Scientists Get 1 Year of Free Access: OpenAI Brings the Scientific Research Pipeline into ChatGPT

OpenAI has launched the "ChatGPT for Academic Researchers" program, offering free one-year access to its flagship models for 100,000 university researchers globally, with 10,000 spots available this summer. Selected institutions include prestigious centers like ENS Paris and the IAS at Princeton. The initiative provides an integrated research workspace within ChatGPT, bundling tools like ChatGPT, ChatGPT Work, and Codex, along with expanded Deep Research capabilities, higher usage limits, and specialized tools for life sciences. The suite connects to platforms like Zotero and GitHub, aiming to streamline the entire research workflow from literature review and coding to data analysis and manuscript drafting. OpenAI notes that about 1.3 million people already use ChatGPT weekly for advanced science and math. The program targets building long-term user dependency by embedding these tools into daily research habits. However, access comes with limitations: it does not include API credits or model weights, and eligibility is restricted to verified academic researchers from supported countries. This approach contrasts with Anthropic's "AI for Science" program, which offers API credits but not an integrated workspace. Both companies emphasize preventing misuse by withholding model weights, a point of contention for AI researchers seeking transparency. The core strategy remains clear: provide a powerful, integrated environment to foster user reliance ahead of the post-free period.

marsbit31 min fa

10,000 Scientists Get 1 Year of Free Access: OpenAI Brings the Scientific Research Pipeline into ChatGPT

marsbit31 min fa

What's Going On with Gigadevice? Major Shareholder Cashes Out 44 Billion, Then Announces 20 Billion Buyback

Gigadevice Innovation, a leading Chinese memory chip company, has executed a controversial financial maneuver. The company's controlling shareholder and chairman, Zhu Yiming, sold approximately 44 billion RMB worth of his shares between early May and mid-June 2026, capitalizing on a soaring stock price that peaked at 846.66 RMB on June 29th. Following a subsequent stock crash—plummeting to around 350 RMB in 22 trading days and erasing over 330 billion RMB in market value—Zhu announced a combined "market rescue" plan on July 29th. This plan includes his personal commitment to buy back at least 1 billion RMB in shares and a company proposal to repurchase 1 to 2 billion RMB worth of stock. This sequence of high-selling followed by a low-buying plan has confused and unsettled many of the company's 240,000 retail investors. The stock's dramatic decline was attributed to several factors: the successful IPO of its sister company, Changxin Technologies, which ended Gigadevice's status as a primary investment proxy for the domestic memory sector; a Morgan Stanley report warning of a potential peak in the memory chip cycle; and a severe loss of market confidence triggered by the chairman's massive sell-off. While the sell-off was procedurally compliant, its timing has been criticized. The company's fundamentals appear strong, with preliminary H1 2026 results showing revenue up 177% year-on-year to 11.5 billion RMB and net profit skyrocketing 1099% to 6.9 billion RMB, driven by a boom in memory chips and MCU demand. However, a significant portion (2.05 billion RMB) of this profit came from non-recurring gains like securities investment, and the memory industry is notoriously cyclical. Analysts highlight the company's role in the domestic substitution of niche DRAM and NOR Flash memory, with some maintaining bullish price targets. Yet, the recent events underscore key risks: its fabless model creates dependency on foundries like Changxin, and the chairman's actions have raised serious questions about management's alignment with minority shareholders. The promised buybacks cannot commence until December 13th due to a mandatory six-month cooling-off period following an insider sale, leaving the stock vulnerable in the interim.

marsbit31 min fa

What's Going On with Gigadevice? Major Shareholder Cashes Out 44 Billion, Then Announces 20 Billion Buyback

marsbit31 min fa

Trading

Spot

Articoli Popolari

Come comprare T

Benvenuto in HTX.com! Abbiamo reso l'acquisto di Threshold Network Token (T) semplice e conveniente. Segui la nostra guida passo passo per intraprendere il tuo viaggio nel mondo delle criptovalute.Step 1: Crea il tuo Account HTXUsa la tua email o numero di telefono per registrarti il tuo account gratuito su HTX. Vivi un'esperienza facile e sblocca tutte le funzionalità,Crea il mio accountStep 2: Vai in Acquista crypto e seleziona il tuo metodo di pagamentoCarta di credito/debito: utilizza la tua Visa o Mastercard per acquistare immediatamente Threshold Network TokenT.Bilancio: Usa i fondi dal bilancio del tuo account HTX per fare trading senza problemi.Terze parti: abbiamo aggiunto metodi di pagamento molto utilizzati come Google Pay e Apple Pay per maggiore comodità.P2P: Fai trading direttamente con altri utenti HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): Offriamo servizi su misura e tassi di cambio competitivi per i trader.Step 3: Conserva Threshold Network Token (T)Dopo aver acquistato Threshold Network Token (T), conserva nel tuo account HTX. In alternativa, puoi inviare tramite trasferimento blockchain o scambiare per altre criptovalute.Step 4: Scambia Threshold Network Token (T)Scambia facilmente Threshold Network Token (T) nel mercato spot di HTX. Accedi al tuo account, seleziona la tua coppia di trading, esegui le tue operazioni e monitora in tempo reale. Offriamo un'esperienza user-friendly sia per chi ha appena iniziato che per i trader più esperti.

456 Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2024.12.10Aggiornato il 2026.06.02

Come comprare T

Discussioni

Benvenuto nella Community HTX. Qui puoi rimanere informato sugli ultimi sviluppi della piattaforma e accedere ad approfondimenti esperti sul mercato. Le opinioni degli utenti sul prezzo di T T sono presentate come di seguito.

活动图片