Is altseason finally brewing? Only if THESE 2 indicators flip first

ambcryptoPubblicato 2026-02-03Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-02-03

Introduzione

Hopes for an altcoin season in 2026 are building as investors look beyond Bitcoin, but conditions for a full altcoin rally are not yet firmly in place. Two key indicators need to flip first. The latest ISM Manufacturing PMI reached 52.6%, its highest in nearly 40 months, pushing U.S. manufacturing into expansion territory. Historically, altcoin rallies followed periods when ISM moved decisively higher, particularly above the 55 mark, as seen in 2017 and 2021. While current levels are below that threshold, a potential turning point may be emerging. However, Ethereum (ETH), a known harbinger of altseason, has closed in the red for 12 of the last 15 months, showing a prolonged stretch of weakness with uneven gains and frequent drawdowns. Sustained altseasons have almost always followed a clear and consistent uptrend in Ethereum. Furthermore, the Altcoin Season Index from CoinGlass was at 39, below the level that usually indicates a rotation away from Bitcoin. At the same time, Bitcoin dominance (BTC.D) remained high near 60% on the daily chart. Altseasons typically begin with a clear decline in BTC dominance as investors move down the risk curve, a shift that has not yet occurred. Overall, while altseason expectations are growing, they may be premature. Early macro signals are improving, but the market lacks a trigger for a true altseason, and capital remains firmly in Bitcoin.

Hopes for an altcoin season in 2026 are starting to build, with investors beginning to look beyond Bitcoin.

That said, it may still be too soon to call it. While expectations are rising, the conditions needed for a full altcoin rally are not firmly in place yet.

Altseason within sight?

The latest ISM Manufacturing PMI came in at 52.6%, its highest reading in nearly 40 months. This pushed U.S. manufacturing back into expansion territory.

Source: X

Past altcoin rallies have tended to follow periods when ISM moved decisively higher. In both 2017 and 2021, altseasons took shape only after PMI readings climbed above the 55 mark.

While current levels remain below that threshold, it looks like a potential turning point may be in order.

But that’s not all…

Ethereum [ETH] – famously known as a harbinger of altseason – has closed in the red in 12 of the last 15 months with a prolonged stretch of weakness.

Source: X

The monthly returns chart makes this slowdown obvious, showing uneven gains with frequent drawdowns across 2024 and into early 2026. Even during brief comebacks, follow-through has been limited.

This is important. Sustained altseasons have almost always followed a clear and consistent uptrend in Ethereum.

Altcoin signs look weak

Source: CoinGlass

CoinGlass’ Altcoin Season Index was at 39 at the time of writing, below the level that usually indicates a rotation away from Bitcoin [BTC]. Despite growing macro optimism, capital has yet to flow into altcoins on a larger scale.

Source: TradingView

At the same time, BTC.D was close to 60% on the daily chart.

Altseasons usually started with a clear decline in BTC dominance, with investors moving down the risk curve. For now, that shift has not yet happened.

Overall, while altseason expectations are beginning to fire up, they may very well be premature. Only time will tell.


Final Thoughts

  • Early macro signals are improving, but the market lacks a trigger for a true altseason.
  • With altcoin season index at 39, capital is still firmly in Bitcoin.
Next: White House talks expose stablecoin rewards as fault line in U.S. crypto legislation
Share
  • Share
  • Tweet

Domande pertinenti

QWhat are the two key indicators that need to flip for an altseason to begin according to the article?

AThe two key indicators are the ISM Manufacturing PMI rising above the 55 mark and a clear decline in Bitcoin dominance (BTC.D) as capital flows into altcoins.

QWhat was the current reading of the Altcoin Season Index mentioned in the article, and what does it indicate?

AThe Altcoin Season Index was at 39 at the time of writing, indicating that capital is still firmly in Bitcoin and below the level that usually signals a rotation into altcoins.

QHow has Ethereum's performance been described in relation to predicting altseasons?

AEthereum has closed in the red in 12 of the last 15 months with prolonged weakness, and sustained altseasons have almost always followed a clear and consistent uptrend in Ethereum's price.

QWhat significant level did the latest ISM Manufacturing PMI reach, and why is this important for altcoins?

AThe latest ISM Manufacturing PMI came in at 52.6%, its highest reading in nearly 40 months, pushing U.S. manufacturing into expansion territory. Past altcoin rallies have followed periods when ISM moved decisively higher, particularly above 55.

QWhat is the current state of Bitcoin dominance (BTC.D) and its implication for an altseason?

ABTC.D was close to 60% on the daily chart, indicating that the shift of investors moving down the risk curve into altcoins has not yet happened, which is necessary for an altseason to start.

Letture associate

The Gold Buy-on-the-Dip Guide: Watch Interest Rates, Not Just War

"Gold Buying Guide: Focus on Interest Rates, Not Just War" Four months ago, gold buyers likely didn't anticipate buying at a peak that even a war couldn't sustain. After hitting a record high of $5,596 on January 29, gold entered a bear market just 91 days later, its fastest decline since 2008. A key trigger was the Fed's hawkish shift, highlighting that monetary policy, not geopolitics, is the primary driver. The article argues that the traditional "buy gold in turmoil" script has changed. While the US-Iran conflict initially boosted prices, the sustained rally in oil prices heightened inflation fears, forcing central banks to maintain or consider tighter policy. Since gold yields no interest, higher rates increase its opportunity cost, eroding its appeal. This dynamic was evident when gold fell sharply on May 18 despite positive peace talks, as lower oil prices eased inflation and thus rate hike pressures. The recent sell-off is also part of a broader market deleveraging. Correlations between gold, Nasdaq, and Bitcoin spiked as leveraged investors sold liquid assets to cover losses, creating a synchronized downturn. Historically, gold bottoms align with policy shifts, not conflict resolutions. The 2008 and 2022 bear markets ended with shifts to extreme easing and peak inflation expectations, respectively. For potential buyers, the author suggests monitoring three signals: 1) Peak interest rate hike expectations, 2) Reopening of the Strait of Hormuz (to ease oil/inflation pressure), and 3) A return to net inflows for Gold ETFs, indicating the end of forced selling. While predicting the exact bottom is impossible, the author's personal strategy involves scaling into a position across price levels like $4000, $3700, and $3500, committing no more than 30% of the intended total allocation initially, and adding the remainder only if key signals emerge. The core conclusion: In turbulent times, watching interest rates is more crucial than watching wars.

marsbit6 min fa

The Gold Buy-on-the-Dip Guide: Watch Interest Rates, Not Just War

marsbit6 min fa

Recent On-Chain Review: No Clear Narrative Under U.S. Stock Market Pressure, Just Hype

This article analyzes the current state of the Solana meme coin and community token ecosystem, highlighting a market caught between two dominant forces: attention-based PvP and a gradual return to community-centric projects. The first part explores the "Attention PvP" dynamic, where success is driven by celebrity endorsements, viral events, and speed. Examples include $JOTCHUA, which surged after its meme creator's social media activity, and $WORLDCUP, which outperformed a similar Base chain project ($PITCH) largely due to influencer support. The recent "pump.fun GO" feature, allowing bounty tasks for token promotion, is critiqued for fostering sensationalist and often negative stunts—like people getting token tickers tattooed on their bodies for rewards—reminiscent of old internet shock content. In contrast, the article points to a resurgence of organic, community-driven tokens that survive market volatility through strong holder bases and shared ideology, not just hype. Influencer Ansem is cited, arguing that durable meme coins rely on communities willing to endure losses and promote their core message daily. Examples given are older tokens like $neet (anti-work ethos), $troll, $buttcoin, and $triplet, which have maintained relative price stability. A prime example of this community-build model is the new project $KINS, the token for the browser-based MMORPG Kintara. Its success stems not from advanced graphics but from consistently delivering updates, fostering player trust, and creating genuine engagement (e.g., in-game economies, events, property auctions). It has attracted a growing player base and even notable KOLs as participants, demonstrating that sustainable growth can come from building trust rather than orchestrating pumps. The article concludes by questioning whether the market is ultimately a game of mutual trust or mutual deception, expressing hope that such reflection might lead to a healthier ecosystem.

marsbit6 min fa

Recent On-Chain Review: No Clear Narrative Under U.S. Stock Market Pressure, Just Hype

marsbit6 min fa

On-Chain Scene on Opening Day: $20 Billion Already Staked, How Do On-Chain Contracts Know Who Wins?

On the opening day of the 2026 World Cup, over $2 billion had already been wagered on just the "tournament winner" contracts on platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi. This article explores how these blockchain-based prediction markets actually function once the games begin. It breaks down the massive volume and explains how single-game and tournament-long contracts are priced, with values moving between 1-99 cents to reflect implied probabilities. A key mechanism highlighted is "elimination zeroing," where a team's "champion yes" contract immediately settles to zero once they are mathematically eliminated. The core technical question answered is: how does a smart contract "know" who won a real-world match? The answer lies in oracles. The article details two primary paradigms: UMA's "optimistic oracle" (used by most of Polymarket), which allows a challenge period after a proposed result, and Chainlink's multi-source data aggregation (used by FIFA partners like ADI Predictstreet), which automates settlement with minimal dispute windows. Finally, the article injects a note of caution, citing research estimating that a significant portion of historical trading volume on these platforms might be "wash trading" to inflate numbers. It concludes by contrasting the legal status of these "event contracts" under CFTC rules in the U.S. versus traditional, state-regulated sports betting. As the tournament progresses, the real-time operation of this multi-billion dollar machine—its settlements, eliminations, and underlying mechanisms—becomes a story as compelling as the football itself.

marsbit21 min fa

On-Chain Scene on Opening Day: $20 Billion Already Staked, How Do On-Chain Contracts Know Who Wins?

marsbit21 min fa

Sequoia Dialogue with Jensen Huang: Computing Model Undergoes a 60-Year Transformation; You Won't Be Replaced by AI, But You Will Be Dimensionality-Reduced by 'Those Who Master AI'

NVIDIA founder and CEO Jensen Huang, in a conversation with Sequoia Capital's Konstantine Buhler, argues that we are witnessing the most significant computing shift in 60 years—from retrieval-based to generative computing. Instead of just storing and retrieving data, future systems will generate highly personalized content (text, images, video) on demand, powered by massive "AI factories." Huang envisions a global "intelligence network" that will envelop the planet, following the historical patterns of energy and communication grids. He outlines a five-layer investment framework: 1) Energy, 2) Chips/Computers, 3) Infrastructure (data centers), 4) AI Models, and 5) Applications. He predicts this ecosystem will reach a scale of $20 trillion annually. Crucially, Huang pushes back against fears of AI-driven job loss. He distinguishes between specific "tasks" (e.g., typing, analyzing images) and overall "jobs" (e.g., CEO, radiologist). While AI automates tasks, it increases efficiency and demand for the higher-value problem-solving aspects of professions, thus creating more jobs and "up-leveling" careers. The real risk, he asserts, is not being replaced by AI, but being outperformed by someone who effectively leverages it. He urges everyone to embrace AI as a tool for augmented capability and innovation.

marsbit1 h fa

Sequoia Dialogue with Jensen Huang: Computing Model Undergoes a 60-Year Transformation; You Won't Be Replaced by AI, But You Will Be Dimensionality-Reduced by 'Those Who Master AI'

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片