Investors Pull $414M From Crypto Funds As Inflation, MidEast War Jitters Mount

bitcoinistPubblicato 2026-03-31Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-03-31

Introduzione

Investors withdrew $414 million from crypto funds last week, ending a five-week inflow streak. Spot Bitcoin ETFs saw $296 million in outflows, reversing earlier gains. Ether suffered the largest outflows at $222 million, pushing its year-to-date performance negative. Bitcoin remained positive for the year despite $194 million in outflows. XRP was an exception, attracting $16 million. The sell-off was driven by inflation concerns, shifting expectations for U.S. interest rate hikes, and rising Middle East tensions, causing a broad shift away from riskier assets. Total assets under management fell to near $130 billion, levels last seen in early February.

Spot Bitcoin ETFs snapped a four-week run of gains last week, posting $296 million in net outflows after pulling in more than $2.2 billion earlier in the month. The crypto reversal was swift — and it wasn’t limited to Bitcoin.

Ether Takes The Hardest Hit

Ether led all assets in outflows, shedding $222 million in a single week. That brought its year-to-date total into the red, with a net loss of $273 million — the worst performance among tracked assets.

Spot Ether ETFs also recorded $206 million in outflows for a second straight week, a sign that institutional demand for the second-largest cryptocurrency has been cooling steadily.

Bitcoin fared better in the long run. Despite $194 million leaving Bitcoin funds last week, the asset remains up $964 million in net inflows for the year.

A small group of investors even moved in the opposite direction — short-Bitcoin products drew $4 million in fresh capital, suggesting some are betting on more losses ahead.

Across the board, total assets under management in digital asset products dropped to close to $130 billion.

According to CoinShares head of research James Butterfill, that figure puts the market back at levels not seen since early February — broadly in line with where things stood in April 2025 during the first wave of US President Donald Trump’s tariffs.

Solana lost a little over $12 million over the same period. XRP was the exception. Reports from CoinShares show the token attracted close to $16 million in new capital, standing apart from the widespread exodus hitting nearly every other major asset.

What Spooked Investors

Three things rattled markets last week: inflation fears, shifting expectations around US interest rates, and rising tensions in the Middle East.

The most consequential of the three may be the rate outlook. Expectations heading into the June Federal Open Market Committee meeting moved away from potential cuts and toward possible hikes — a major shift that historically pushes investors away from riskier assets.

BTCUSD now trading at $67,744. Chart: TradingView

Digital assets tend to feel that pressure quickly. When borrowing costs look like they’re going up, money moves toward safer ground.

A Five-Week Streak Comes To An End

The $414 million in total outflows snapped what had been five consecutive weeks of inflows. Data from CoinShares shows the pullback reflected a broader shift toward risk-off behavior among investors, driven more by macroeconomic forces than anything specific to crypto markets.

Whether last week marks a turning point or a brief pause will likely depend on what signals come out of the Fed in the weeks ahead. For now, the money has moved — at least temporarily — to the sidelines.

Featured image from Getty Images, chart from TradingView

Domande pertinenti

QWhat was the total amount of net outflows from crypto funds last week, ending a five-week streak?

AThe total net outflows from crypto funds last week were $414 million, which ended a five-week streak of inflows.

QWhich cryptocurrency asset suffered the largest outflows and what was the amount?

AEther (ETH) suffered the largest outflows, shedding $222 million in a single week.

QAccording to the article, what were the three main factors that spooked investors and rattled the markets?

AThe three main factors were inflation fears, shifting expectations around US interest rates, and rising tensions in the Middle East.

QWhat was the notable exception to the widespread outflows, and how much capital did it attract?

AXRP was the notable exception; it attracted close to $16 million in new capital.

QWhat does the shift in expectations for the June Federal Open Market Committee meeting indicate, and how does it typically affect investor behavior?

AExpectations shifted away from potential interest rate cuts and toward possible hikes. This shift historically pushes investors away from riskier assets, as higher borrowing costs make safer investments more attractive.

Letture associate

Zcash Bug Could Have Minted Unlimited ZEC Undetected

A critical vulnerability in Zcash's Orchard shielded pool, discovered by researcher Taylor Hornby on May 29, 2026, could have allowed an attacker to create an unlimited amount of undetectable counterfeit ZEC. The flaw, involving an under-constrained element in the Orchard circuit, existed from the pool's 2022 activation until an emergency fix was deployed by June 2, 2026. Hornby identified the bug using AI-assisted auditing tools and confirmed its exploitability in a test environment. Due to Orchard's privacy features, which hide transaction amounts and history, there is no cryptographic way to prove whether the vulnerability was exploited before the fix. While Shielded Labs assesses prior exploitation as unlikely, this uncertainty has sparked a debate on proving supply integrity in privacy-preserving systems. In response, Shielded Labs and other developers are exploring a network upgrade, potentially involving a new shielded pool and formal verification of the circuit rules to prevent future vulnerabilities and allow verification of the ZEC supply's integrity. ZEC's price fell nearly 45% following the disclosure.

bitcoinist2 min fa

Zcash Bug Could Have Minted Unlimited ZEC Undetected

bitcoinist2 min fa

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbit1 h fa

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbit1 h fa

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbit1 h fa

marsbit1 h fa

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

In 2026, a historic shift occurred in AI as major cloud providers' inference spending surpassed training spending for the first time, signaling a move from "building large models" to "using large models." This shifts the core challenge from computing power to the "memory wall"—the bottleneck of data movement (model weights, activations, KV Cache) between external DRAM and processors, where energy and latency from data transfer far exceed computation itself. Companies like Nvidia face GPU idle time due to bandwidth limits. In contrast, Cerebras Systems adopts a radical "wafer-scale" approach with its Wafer-Scale Engine (WSE). Instead of cutting a silicon wafer into many chips, Cerebras uses almost the entire wafer as one massive chip (WSE-3). This design provides 44GB of on-chip SRAM, delivering memory bandwidth thousands of times higher than traditional HBM (e.g., 21 PB/s vs. Nvidia B200). For LLM inference, weights are streamed layer-by-layer from external MemoryX storage to the chip, avoiding HBM bottlenecks. This results in token generation speeds 1.5–5 times faster than Nvidia's B200 in some models and significant advantages in first-token latency and long-context tasks. Additionally, Cerebras's architecture offers much lower interconnect power consumption (0.15 pJ/bit vs. GPU's ~10 pJ/bit). However, Cerebras faces challenges: SRAM scaling has slowed with advanced nodes, limiting future capacity gains; the chip requires specialized liquid cooling and custom software stacks; and its external I/O bandwidth (150 GB/s) is low compared to NVLink, hindering multi-system scaling for very large models. Competition is intensifying. Major players are pursuing three paths: 1) Developing proprietary inference ASICs (e.g., Google TPU, Microsoft Maia), 2) Leveraging advanced packaging (e.g., TSMC's SoW) to democratize wafer-scale-like integration, potentially eroding Cerebras's process advantage within a few years, and 3) Exploring optical interconnects for ultimate bandwidth. Commercially, Cerebras is transitioning from a hardware vendor to a service provider, facing the immense challenge of building high-power, specialized data centers to meet large contracts (e.g., 250MW/year from 2026–2028). In conclusion, the AI inference era presents a fundamental architectural trade-off. Cerebras opts for extreme physical optimization for low-latency, single-task performance, while Nvidia prioritizes versatility and massive cluster throughput. The path forward remains uncertain, with technology and business models still evolving in the race toward advanced AI.

marsbit1 h fa

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

marsbit1 h fa

Has Bitcoin's 'Rebound Ended', Officially Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?

**Title: Has Bitcoin's Rebound Ended, Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?** **Summary:** Bitcoin's price has declined by 13% this week, signaling a potential return to late-stage bear market conditions. The price fell to around $67k, positioned between the Realized Price and Realized Cap Weighted Average. For the first time since early 2022, the Short-Term Holder cost basis has dropped below this key average, confirming a hallmark of late-cycle bear markets. Profitability metrics have collapsed sharply. The 7-day average of the Realized Profit/Loss ratio plummeted from a local high of 3.16 to 0.29, mirroring the February panic sell-off. Critically, the 90-day average never breached the threshold of 2, indicating the recent rally to $82k was a bear market bounce, not a structural shift. Realized losses surged to $1.35 billion daily, with $770 million coming from Long-Term Holders selling at a loss. This accelerating redistribution of supply from weak to strong hands is a necessary but ongoing process for a market bottom. The rally stalled almost precisely at the aggregate cost basis (~$83k) of US spot Bitcoin ETF investors, turning that level into strong resistance and leaving the average ETF holder underwater again. Spot market flows have turned decisively negative, showing sellers are dominating order books despite the price drop. While a significant futures long liquidation event cleared over $400 million in leverage, providing a potential reset, sustained spot demand is yet to materialize. Options markets continue to price in higher future volatility (Implied Volatility) than recent price action (Realized Volatility) has shown, with a persistent skew towards put options, indicating ongoing demand for downside protection. In conclusion, multiple metrics point to a fragile market structure. Resistance at the ETF cost basis, accelerating realized losses, dominant spot selling, and cautious options pricing all suggest the bear market trend persists. A sustainable recovery likely requires a resurgence of spot demand, ETF holders returning to profit, and a clear reduction in selling pressure.

marsbit1 h fa

Has Bitcoin's 'Rebound Ended', Officially Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot

Futures

Articoli Popolari

Come comprare WAR

Benvenuto in HTX.com! Abbiamo reso l'acquisto di WAR (WAR) semplice e conveniente. Segui la nostra guida passo passo per intraprendere il tuo viaggio nel mondo delle criptovalute.Step 1: Crea il tuo Account HTXUsa la tua email o numero di telefono per registrarti il tuo account gratuito su HTX. Vivi un'esperienza facile e sblocca tutte le funzionalità,Crea il mio accountStep 2: Vai in Acquista crypto e seleziona il tuo metodo di pagamentoCarta di credito/debito: utilizza la tua Visa o Mastercard per acquistare immediatamente WARWAR.Bilancio: Usa i fondi dal bilancio del tuo account HTX per fare trading senza problemi.Terze parti: abbiamo aggiunto metodi di pagamento molto utilizzati come Google Pay e Apple Pay per maggiore comodità.P2P: Fai trading direttamente con altri utenti HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): Offriamo servizi su misura e tassi di cambio competitivi per i trader.Step 3: Conserva WAR (WAR)Dopo aver acquistato WAR (WAR), conserva nel tuo account HTX. In alternativa, puoi inviare tramite trasferimento blockchain o scambiare per altre criptovalute.Step 4: Scambia WAR (WAR)Scambia facilmente WAR (WAR) nel mercato spot di HTX. Accedi al tuo account, seleziona la tua coppia di trading, esegui le tue operazioni e monitora in tempo reale. Offriamo un'esperienza user-friendly sia per chi ha appena iniziato che per i trader più esperti.

199 Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2024.12.11Aggiornato il 2026.06.02

Discussioni

Benvenuto nella Community HTX. Qui puoi rimanere informato sugli ultimi sviluppi della piattaforma e accedere ad approfondimenti esperti sul mercato. Le opinioni degli utenti sul prezzo di WAR WAR sono presentate come di seguito.