How MegaETH targets 15K–35K TPS in 7-day mainnet stress test

ambcryptoPubblicato 2026-01-21Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-01-21

Introduzione

MegaETH, a real-time EVM-compatible blockchain, is launching its mainnet on January 22nd with a 7-day stress test aiming to process 11 billion transactions. The project targets a sustained throughput of 15,000–35,000 transactions per second (TPS), having achieved nearly 47,000 TPS in testing. It also boasts a 10-millisecond block time, significantly faster than other blockchains. While prioritizing speed and low latency, concerns about decentralization and potential censorship risks due to centralized sequencing have been noted. The stress test will involve user interaction with gaming applications and backend transactions through a decentralized exchange. Following the test, the public mainnet will launch alongside select DeFi and consumer applications.

MegaETH, the real-time EVM-compatible blockchain, announced that it will launch its mainnet on the 22nd of January. Dubbed the MegaETH stress test, it aims to process 11 billion transactions in 7 days.

They were ” opening mainnet to users for several latency-sensitive apps while the chain is under intense, sustained load.”

The project aims to achieve performance levels comparable to high-speed blockchains such as Solana [SOL] while also providing extremely low latency and high throughput.

It has achieved nearly 47k transactions per second (TPS), noted growthepie in a post on X. MegaETH was targeting a sustained, true TPS of 15k-35k across the 7 days of the stress test.

“In the end, MegaETH will have the largest tx count in history across all EVM chains while users frictionlessly play with the chain.”

Messari reported that the MegaETH testnet achieved a 10‐millisecond block time, far faster than any other blockchain.

While the design prioritizes speed, the report raised concerns about decentralization and potential censorship risks due to centralized sequencing.

MegaETH to push the boundaries of blockchain capabilities

“Stress tests only matter if they’re uncomfortable”, said the blockchain’s post on X. During the test, users can interact with gaming applications such as Stomp.gg, Smasher.fun, and Crossy Fluffle.

On the backend, the team will push a mix of ETH transfers and v3 automated market maker swaps through the decentralized exchange Kumbaya.xyz.

The public mainnet will launch after the global stress test. A selection of day-one DeFi and consumer applications powered by its native stablecoin, USDm, will also be launching.

Messari also documented that in October 2025, MegaETH raised $50 million during the MEGA token sale, which became oversubscribed within minutes. This figure was part of the nearly $75 million raised from various grassroots funding efforts.

Final Thoughts

MegaETH is an EVM-compatible blockchain aiming to deliver real-time crypto performance, with a 10 ms blocktime and nearly 47k TPS in testing.
The global stress test targets a total of 11 billion transactions in 7 days, starting on the 22nd of January.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the main goal of MegaETH's 7-day mainnet stress test starting on January 22nd?

AThe main goal is to process 11 billion transactions in 7 days, targeting a sustained true TPS of 15,000-35,000.

QWhat key performance metrics has MegaETH achieved in testing according to the article?

AMegaETH has achieved nearly 47,000 TPS and a 10-millisecond block time in testing.

QWhat are some of the applications users can interact with during the MegaETH stress test?

AUsers can interact with gaming applications such as Stomp.gg, Smasher.fun, and Crossy Fluffle.

QWhat concerns did the Messari report raise about MegaETH's design?

AThe report raised concerns about decentralization and potential censorship risks due to centralized sequencing.

QHow much funding did MegaETH raise during its MEGA token sale in October 2025?

AMegaETH raised $50 million during the MEGA token sale, which was part of nearly $75 million raised from various grassroots funding efforts.

Letture associate

Breaking: Google Earth Urgently Pulls Back Nano Banana 2 Image Generation Feature!

Google Earth's newly launched "Create image" feature, powered by the Nano Banana 2 AI image generation model, was abruptly withdrawn shortly after its release due to being "played" by users. The feature allowed users to generate and overlay AI-created visuals directly onto real-world satellite and 3D maps in Google Earth. The tool enabled creative applications like historical recreations (e.g., visualizing ancient Pompeii), generating informational graphics for landmarks, and envisioning architectural projects or futuristic cityscapes on real terrain. It operated under "geospatial grounding," meaning the AI respected the underlying geography, topography, and perspective of the chosen map view. The model also integrated with Gemini to retrieve relevant factual information. However, upon release, users quickly tested its limits. A prominent example involved reimagining Philadelphia's historic Independence Hall as a post-apocalyptic ruin overrun by "happy" zombies, evil clowns, and giant alien mechs. This highlighted both the feature's playful potential and its risks regarding the generation of inappropriate or misleading content on realistic maps, leading to its swift temporary removal. Google stated it would re-release the feature after implementing "enhanced guardrails." Analysts note this move strategically leverages Google's vast proprietary geospatial data, positioning its AI not just for artistic generation but for spatially accurate world visualization—a unique advantage in the competitive AI image generation landscape.

marsbit1 h fa

Breaking: Google Earth Urgently Pulls Back Nano Banana 2 Image Generation Feature!

marsbit1 h fa

Altman Admits: Overestimated AI Snatching Jobs! Huang Renxun: The Unemployment Narrative Is Completely Backwards

Sam Altman has revised his earlier predictions about AI rapidly replacing jobs, admitting he overestimated the speed at which AI would eliminate entry-level white-collar roles. Speaking on the "Invest Like the Best" podcast, he stated that people do not truly want an AI CEO, as accountability and human connection remain critical. He found that individuals prefer interacting with people who can be held responsible for decisions. Similarly, NVIDIA's Jensen Huang argued that the narrative of AI destroying jobs is misguided. He distinguishes between tasks and jobs, noting that while AI can automate specific tasks, entire jobs—encompassing communication, judgment, coordination, and accountability—are not eliminated. He cited examples like radiologists and software engineers, where demand for these roles has increased as AI handles repetitive tasks, allowing for business expansion and the creation of more positions. Data from a University of Maryland and LinkUp study supports this, showing that U.S. job postings for new graduates have actually risen, countering the fear of vanishing entry-level roles. However, a significant shift is occurring: the traditional entry-level tasks that help newcomers gain experience are being automated, making initial career access more challenging. The key insight is that as AI takes over standardized tasks, the enduring value of human work shifts toward areas of responsibility, trust-building, and final decision-making—aspects that AI cannot replicate. The real "moat" for professionals lies in these irreplaceable human elements.

marsbit1 h fa

Altman Admits: Overestimated AI Snatching Jobs! Huang Renxun: The Unemployment Narrative Is Completely Backwards

marsbit1 h fa

A Major Change at the Fed? Report: Wash Considers Reducing Frequency of Policy Meetings, Breaking 40-Year Precedent

The Federal Reserve Chairman is considering reducing the number of regular Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meetings held each year, a potential major shift from the current practice of eight meetings annually that has been in place since 1981. According to a report, the proposal was discussed internally, with possible details finalized ahead of the September meeting. This change would mean fewer formal opportunities to vote on interest rates and could diminish the Fed's ability to respond to economic data while reducing market access to policy signals, marking a reversal of the central bank's long-term trend towards greater transparency. While the 1935 Banking Act sets a legal minimum of four meetings per year, historical meeting frequency has varied. The move aligns with the Chairman's broader agenda of institutional reform since taking office, which includes revising communication practices and data usage. An internal memo from 1988 had previously concluded that the eight-meeting schedule remained appropriate. If implemented, this reduction in meetings would significantly reshape the Fed's operational rhythm and its interaction with financial markets.

marsbit1 h fa

A Major Change at the Fed? Report: Wash Considers Reducing Frequency of Policy Meetings, Breaking 40-Year Precedent

marsbit1 h fa

Weekly Editor's Picks (0725-0731)

Weekly Editor's Picks (0725-0731) provides a curated selection of deep analysis, filtering out market noise. Key themes from this week include: **Macro & Policy:** The Federal Reserve's upcoming meeting is marked by high uncertainty, balancing cooling inflation data against persistent price pressures. Meanwhile, the U.S. crypto regulatory Clarity Act faces critical political hurdles, with its 2026 passage probability seen as low. **Investing & Crypto:** Analysis suggests long-term crypto success depends on conviction through volatile cycles, focusing on assets like Bitcoin and core smart contract platforms. A trend noted is the increasing similarity between global equity markets (especially tech) and crypto, driven by narrative and leverage. Several major crypto protocols show strong revenue growth, but this isn't always translating to token price appreciation due to sell pressure and structural factors. **AI & Semiconductors:** Nvidia's rising credit default swap rates signal market concern over AI infrastructure financing risks. The storage sector experienced volatility as markets began pricing in potential 2027 oversupply. Despite a record profitable quarter, SK Hynix's results were deemed "below expectations," reflecting heightened investor demands for future growth visibility. **Markets & DeFi:** TradeXYZ demonstrated remarkable accuracy in pre-market pricing for a major A股 listing. The token ONDO saw gains, linked to its growing role in the on-chain tokenized stock ecosystem. **Ethereum:** Post-Pectra upgrade, a major structural shift is underway as Lido begins migrating millions of ETH to new validator architectures designed for capital efficiency. **Also Highlighted:** Butian's bullish stock market move; OpenAI's Altman promising major advances; Samsung and SK Hynix securing large AI chip deals; Apple reaching a $5T market cap; and ongoing discussions around exchange security following Poolin's bankruptcy case.

marsbit1 h fa

Low Investment Isn't Apple's Immunity Pass

While Meta and Google face investor scrutiny over ballooning AI capital expenditures, Apple's minimal AI investment has paradoxically become a strength. Its market cap recently reclaimed the global top spot, surpassing $5 trillion. The irony is deep: Apple's own AI efforts have lagged, with "Apple Intelligence" delayed and core talent lost, forcing reliance on partners like Google Gemini and Alibaba's Qianwen. Its Q3 FY2026 (Q2 CY) earnings initially seemed stellar. Revenue hit $109.4B (up 16% YoY), with iPhone and Mac sales, growing 22% and 29% respectively, driving most of the growth. However, the stock fell over 8% post-earnings. The primary concern was a weaker Q4 revenue growth forecast of 9-11%, below expectations, due to looming supply chain constraints. Apple is feeling the indirect cost of the AI boom. Soaring memory and chip prices, fueled by massive data center investments from Microsoft, Amazon, and others, are forcing Apple to raise Mac and iPad prices significantly. The upcoming iPhone launch is also expected to see substantial price hikes. Despite avoiding heavy AI infrastructure spending—its capital expenditures are actually down 28%—Apple cannot escape the industry-wide supply and cost pressures. While Apple's operating cash flow remains robust, its substantial R&D spending (up 32% YoY) has yet to yield major AI breakthroughs. As Tim Cook prepares to step down as CEO, Apple faces a challenging transition: balancing its premium hardware success against the strategic and cost pressures of the AI era it has so far cautiously navigated.

marsbit2 h fa

Low Investment Isn't Apple's Immunity Pass

marsbit2 h fa

Trading

Spot