Hong Kong to Issue First Stablecoin Licences in Early 2025

TheNewsCryptoPubblicato 2026-01-21Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-01-21

Introduzione

Hong Kong is set to issue its first batch of stablecoin licences in the first quarter of 2025, as part of its strategy to become a regional hub for digital assets. Financial Secretary Paul Chan announced the plan at the World Economic Forum in Davos, emphasizing the city’s responsible and sustainable approach to crypto regulation. The licensing regime, introduced last year, imposes strict requirements on stablecoin issuers, including rules on reserve backing, governance, and risk management. This initiative is part of a broader effort to build a comprehensive digital asset ecosystem, which also includes licensed trading platforms and tokenised financial products. Hong Kong has already licensed 11 virtual asset trading platforms, including OSL and HashKey, and is advancing in tokenisation through initiatives like Project Ensemble. Meanwhile, regulators are developing additional proposals for licensing crypto-related services, though concerns have been raised about potential compliance costs affecting traditional asset managers.

Hong Kong is getting ready to issue its first batch of stablecoin issuer licences in Q1 of 2025, accelerating its efforts to place itself as a regional hub for digital assets at a time of increasing global competition.

The Financial Secretary of Hong Kong, Paul Chan, spoke at the World Economic Forum in Davos about how the approach of the city towards crypto regulation is responsible and sustainable, as revealed by the South China Morning Post.

The financial secretary committed that the starting round of stablecoin licences is anticipated to be allowed in the near future. Chan established stablecoins as a segment of a wider push to make a complete digital asset ecosystem in Hong Kong, bridging regulated stablecoin issuance, licensed trading platforms and tokenised financial products.

He characterised digital finance as a strategic growth pillar as the city looks to maintain its status as a global financial centre. The stablecoin licensing regime passed last year describes strict requirements for fiat-referenced stablecoin issuers.

These comprise rules on reserve backing, redemption rights, governance, and risk management, showing the focus of regulators on financial stability and consumer protection after volatility in global crypto markets.

The Other Works By the Country

The stablecoin plans of the company stand beside a so far active framework for crypto trading platforms. As per the rules imposed by the Securities and Futures Commission, 11 virtual asset trading platforms have got licences to date.

Approved operators comprise OSL, HashKey and Bullish, as per the public disclosures of the regulator. After trading in stablecoins, Hong Kong is also delving deeper into tokenisation.

Last year, in November, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority rolled out a pilot under Project Ensemble to test actual-value transactions leveraging tokenised deposits and digital assets, comprising major banks and asset managers.

Meanwhile, regulators are working on additional proposals that would roll out new licensing regimes for crypto asset dealing, advisory, and management services. At the start of this week, the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Professionals Association alerted that tighter virtual asset management regulations could put off traditional asset managers by increasing compliance costs and decelerating institutional participation.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Binance has Announced Listing Ripple’s Stablecoin, RLUSD

Domande pertinenti

QWhen is Hong Kong planning to issue its first batch of stablecoin licences?

AIn Q1 of 2025.

QWho is the Financial Secretary of Hong Kong and where did he discuss the city's crypto regulation approach?

APaul Chan, and he spoke about it at the World Economic Forum in Davos.

QWhat are some of the key requirements for stablecoin issuers under Hong Kong's new licensing regime?

AThe requirements include rules on reserve backing, redemption rights, governance, and risk management.

QName two licensed virtual asset trading platforms in Hong Kong mentioned in the article.

AOSL and HashKey.

QWhat is the name of the project launched by the Hong Kong Monetary Authority to test tokenised transactions?

AProject Ensemble.

Letture associate

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

"Beyond the Pitch: The Profit Game Around the World Cup" The FIFA World Cup transcends being a sporting spectacle, evolving into a massive global arena for speculation and profit-seeking. The 2026 tournament has amplified this dynamic, creating a multi-layered ecosystem of financial opportunism alongside the football. **Prediction markets** have surged into the mainstream. Platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi saw trading volumes for World Cup contracts soar, attracting new users with their financial trading model and high-profile, chain-based wealth stories that overshadow traditional sports betting in terms of growth and narrative. However, **traditional sportsbooks** remain the dominant force, leveraging established user habits, legal markets, and comprehensive product offerings to handle the vast majority of speculative wagers, with projections suggesting record-breaking betting volumes. Capital markets also react. **"Concept stocks"** in countries like South Korea and Japan experience volatile price swings based on team performance and anticipated fan spending on items like chicken, beer, and viewing parties, effectively becoming a stock market reflecting fan sentiment. The **ticket resale market** has become a sophisticated arena for arbitrage. Prices fluctuate wildly based on team draws and star power, with sellers sometimes listing tickets they don't yet own in a practice akin to short-selling, while FIFA's own "Right to Buy" tokens add another layer of speculative trading. **Collectibles and merchandise** offer another avenue. Panini sticker albums, with their inherent scarcity and nostalgic value, can become high-value collectibles. Limited-edition or locally themed jerseys command significant premiums on secondary markets, and even counterfeit vendors profit from fans' desire for affordable match-day identity. The **cryptocurrency** space has seen a frenzy of speculative, unauthorized World Cup-themed meme coins on chains like Solana. These tokens, often exploiting team names and player imagery, experience extreme pump-and-dump cycles, creating stories of massive gains for a few early entrants and steep losses for many others. Finally, an entire industry thrives on **providing information and tools** to other speculators. Developers create platforms like SeatSidekick to track ticket inventory and prices, while paid Telegram groups and subscriptions sell betting tips and predictions, monetizing the widespread desire for an informational edge. In essence, the World Cup has become a compressed, global laboratory for speculation. While the games determine champions on the field, a parallel, complex network of financial transactions—spanning prediction contracts, bets, stocks, tickets, collectibles, crypto, and information services—settles its own scores in the global market.

marsbit4 min fa

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

marsbit4 min fa

Hyperliquid ETF Claim Draws Attention As HYPE Narrative Builds On X

A social media claim has brought attention to Hyperliquid (HYPE) and the growth of its related ETF products. According to a June 20 post on X by AlphaOnChain, three Hyperliquid ETFs launched in May 2026 have collectively amassed $158 million in assets under management, led by a Bitwise fund with $88 million and a 21Shares fund with $66 million. The article notes this claim is from social media and not verified by official issuer data, advising caution. Nonetheless, the report highlights that HYPE is gaining traction as a notable altcoin narrative. Its focus on on-chain perpetual trading and exchange infrastructure places it at the intersection of DeFi and derivatives, attracting traders looking for high-conviction plays beyond Bitcoin and Ethereum. The key takeaway is that while social momentum can influence short-term markets, sustainable growth for HYPE would require confirmed demand, liquidity, and continued ecosystem development.

bitcoinist1 h fa

Hyperliquid ETF Claim Draws Attention As HYPE Narrative Builds On X

bitcoinist1 h fa

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

This article explains the three primary methods for Codex to interact with a computer, each with distinct use cases, permission boundaries, and trust levels. **1. Computer Use:** This offers the broadest access, allowing Codex to visually control and interact with the graphical user interface of authorized macOS/Windows apps, system settings, and even iOS simulators. It's ideal for tasks lacking APIs or structured tools, such as operating legacy software or multi-app workflows. However, it's the slowest method and has the widest permission scope, requiring careful supervision for sensitive actions. **2. Chrome Extension:** This grants Codex access to the user's logged-in Chrome browser state, including cookies, profiles, and open tabs. It's best for tasks requiring user identity across websites like Gmail, LinkedIn, Salesforce, or internal dashboards. Its key advantage is multi-tab control for complex workflows. While more powerful for browser-based tasks than Computer Use, it carries higher sensitivity as actions are performed under the user's identity. **3. In-App Browser:** This is a browser isolated within the Codex thread, separate from the user's personal browsing data. It excels in web development and debugging scenarios—previewing local servers, testing responsive layouts, or annotating designs directly on the page. Its isolation is a strength for development but a limitation for tasks requiring login sessions. The core principle is to choose the narrowest, safest, and most structured interface for the task. Use plugins or MCPs first, resort to visual control (Computer Use) only for GUI-dependent tasks, employ the Chrome extension for identity-reliant browser work, and prefer the In-App Browser for isolated development. **Appshots** are clarified as a fourth, complementary tool for *inputting* context—capturing a screenshot of a window to point Codex to something—rather than a method for Codex to *act*. Together, this layered approach highlights a key to AI agent productization: not granting unlimited permissions, but constraining them within clear boundaries for specific tasks while preserving user oversight.

marsbit1 h fa

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

marsbit1 h fa

The "Iron Rule" of Chip Equipment Is Being Broken

For years, the semiconductor equipment industry followed an unwritten "iron rule": suppliers offered steep discounts for new tool introductions (Design-in) and faced consistent price pressure during repeat orders, especially during market downturns. This long-standing buyer's market dynamic is now being upended. Recently, SK Hynix's primary equipment suppliers have reportedly requested a 3-4% price *increase*, a nearly unprecedented move. This shift is driven by a severe supply-demand imbalance fueled by the AI compute boom. Securing equipment has become an urgent arms race as chipmakers' expansion speed dictates their ability to fulfill massive AI chip orders. Key areas feeling the strain include: **TCB (Thermal Compression Bonding) Equipment:** Demand is exploding, driven by the simultaneous needs of HBM4 memory stacking, AI chip Chip-on-Substrate (C2S), and logic Chiplet Chip-on-Wafer (C2W) packaging. Players like Hanmi Semiconductor, Hanwha Semitech, and ASMPT are receiving major orders. While hybrid bonding is seen as the future, TCB remains the pragmatic choice for HBM4 mass production, with its lifecycle extended by relaxed specifications and ongoing technological upgrades. **Test Equipment Bottlenecks:** Ironically, AI-driven shortages are now crippling test equipment manufacturing. Critical components like FPGAs, Driver ICs, and CPUs face severe shortages and extended lead times (up to 52 weeks for FPGAs), as AI data center and server vendors prioritize supply. This creates a paradoxical cycle: AI chip shortages drive fab expansion, which requires more test equipment, whose production is delayed because its key parts are diverted to make AI chips. The industry is entering a broad, AI-powered upcycle. SEMI forecasts global semiconductor equipment sales to hit a record $156 billion by 2027, fueled by investment in advanced logic/foundry, HBM-driven DRAM, and advanced packaging (like CoWoS). Major players like TSMC, SK Hynix, and Micron are aggressively ramping capital expenditure. In conclusion, leading equipment vendors are no longer just selling tools; they are selling the critical capability to deliver AI-era capacity. Pricing power is shifting decisively to those with indispensable technology in key process nodes like advanced logic, HBM, and advanced packaging, rewriting the industry's traditional power structure.

marsbit1 h fa

The "Iron Rule" of Chip Equipment Is Being Broken

marsbit1 h fa

Weekly Token Unlock: XPL to Release Millions in Token Value

Weekly Token Unlocks: XPL and SoSoValue Tokens Worth Over $10 Million Set for Release This week sees significant token unlocks for two projects. SoSoValue, an AI-powered crypto investment research platform, will unlock 13.03 million tokens, valued at approximately $3.87 million. The project aims to merge CeFi efficiency with DeFi transparency. Separately, Plasma, a Layer 1 blockchain designed for global stablecoin payments, will unlock 110 million tokens worth about $10.42 million. The network focuses on high throughput, stablecoin-native features, and full EVM compatibility. Both projects have provided their detailed token release schedules.

marsbit2 h fa

Weekly Token Unlock: XPL to Release Millions in Token Value

marsbit2 h fa

Trading

Spot

Futures