Helium: Can HNT break $1.71 next as supply tightens?

ambcryptoPubblicato 2026-02-19Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-02-19

Helium [HNT] has posted a week of consistent gains. At press time, HNT surged 10% in the last 24 hours, pushing the price toward the next key resistance zone around $1.71.

Momentum is building, but the real question is whether it could be sustained.

Sending addresses drop

AMBCrypto’s analysis of the networks’ on-chain data indicates a significant reduction in sending addresses over the past 24 hours.

This suggests a reduced selling pressure as most investors choose to hold longer for further gains from an anticipated continuation rally. Usually, fewer sending addresses indicate that most investors are choosing to retain rather than distribute.

That behaviour aligns with Helium’s long-term conviction. When supply tightens during a rally and demand persists, prices are more likely to continue rising.

Revenue from Helium holders is making some gains

Helium’s revenues accumulated by long-term holders have steadily increased over recent weeks. This metric reflects growing network participation and broader distribution.

Historically, rising holder base revenues often strengthen price stability during pullbacks. It also supports structural bullish momentum as the holder may choose reinvest the earned revenue by taking more long positions.

Trading volume is still recovering

Trading volume has recorded gains over the last two days. However, it remains relatively muted compared to the broader multi-week decline. For the rally to accelerate decisively beyond $1.71, sustained volume expansion will be necessary.

Without strong participation, resistance zones tend to reject price advances.

What’s next for Helium?

The immediate resistance at the $1.71 price level seems to be the next key target if the current bullish momentum is sustained in the short run.

On‐chain sentiment shows reduced selling and rising holder revenues despite limited trading volume gains. A full recovery may only be a matter of time.

If volume strengthens while sending addresses remain low, Helium could break above $1.71 and extend its rally. Conversely, fading participation would likely lead to consolidation below resistance.


Final Summary

  • Helium surges by 10% as selling pressure declines and long-term holders strengthen their positions.
  • Price approaches the key $1.71 resistance — a breakout could extend the weekly bullish momentum.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the key resistance level that Helium (HNT) is approaching according to the article?

AThe key resistance level that Helium (HNT) is approaching is $1.71.

QWhat does a reduction in sending addresses on the Helium network typically indicate about investor behavior?

AA reduction in sending addresses typically indicates that most investors are choosing to hold their assets longer, reducing selling pressure, in anticipation of further gains from a continued rally.

QHow have the revenues of long-term Helium holders been trending recently, and what is its significance?

AThe revenues of long-term Helium holders have been steadily increasing over recent weeks. This reflects growing network participation, supports price stability during pullbacks, and can strengthen bullish momentum as holders may reinvest their earnings.

QWhat is the current state of Helium's trading volume, and why is it important for the price to break the resistance?

AHelium's trading volume has recorded gains over the last two days but remains relatively muted compared to the broader multi-week decline. Sustained volume expansion is necessary for the price to decisively break above the $1.71 resistance level, as strong participation is needed to overcome such zones.

QWhat are the two main factors the article suggests could lead to Helium breaking above the $1.71 resistance?

AThe two main factors are if trading volume strengthens and if the number of sending addresses remains low, indicating continued low selling pressure.

Letture associate

Raising Interest Rates Is Not a Tech Killer, EPS Is: A Strategy for Discarding the Weak and Retaining the Strong After the AI Theme's Sharp Decline

**Summary: Rising Interest Rates Are Not the Killer of Tech; EPS Is: The "Keep the Strong, Ditch the Weak" Strategy After the AI Theme Plunge** The author argues that the sharp sell-off in tech and AI-related stocks, triggered by a strong US jobs report that heightened Fed rate hike fears, represents a "pullback to pick up passengers" rather than a "car crash." The true end of a tech bull market is not determined by an extra 25 basis point hike, but by industry overcapacity and the disproval of earnings per share (EPS) expectations. Historical analysis shows that during past rate hike cycles, the Nasdaq-100 often outperformed, provided EPS growth remained strong. The current phase is seen as a shift from a "broad narrative-driven rally" to a "focused verification stage" for AI. The investment strategy should be to "keep the strong, ditch the weak." * **Retain exposure** to high-conviction AI infrastructure leaders with clear order visibility, stable margins, strong cash flow, and upward EPS revisions (e.g., AI servers, advanced packaging, optical modules, key cloud suppliers). * **Reduce exposure** to high-beta, narrative-driven stocks with unclear profit paths (e.g., some quantum computing, space, or speculative chip stocks), especially on rebounds. Valuation concerns should focus on whether earnings can catch up to high multiples, not on high P/E alone. Crowded positioning signals a concentration into quality assets, not necessarily a market top. The upcoming Q2 earnings season will be a key validation point. The core principle is to hold stocks with proven EPS, while using macro events (CPI data, central bank meetings) to manage timing and risk.

marsbit36 min fa

Raising Interest Rates Is Not a Tech Killer, EPS Is: A Strategy for Discarding the Weak and Retaining the Strong After the AI Theme's Sharp Decline

marsbit36 min fa

The Largest IPO in History Ignites Heated Debate: Is SpaceX Worth $1.77 Trillion?

SpaceX's potential IPO is priced at $135 per share, aiming to raise $75 billion and valuing the company at approximately $1.77 trillion, which would make it the largest IPO in history. This valuation has sparked intense debate among investors. Bullish analysts, including major underwriters Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley, argue the valuation is justified by SpaceX's long-term potential. They see it not just as a rocket company but as a future leader in space infrastructure, with key growth drivers being Starlink satellite internet, low-cost rocket launches, and future AI-related ventures. They project revenues reaching hundreds of billions to trillions of dollars by 2030-2040. ARK Invest's model suggests a 2030 enterprise value could reach $2.5 trillion. Bearish analysts from independent research firms like Morningstar, PitchBook, and New Constructs contend the IPO price is excessively high, already pricing in unrealistic future growth. Using DCF and sum-of-the-parts models, they estimate fair value between $780 billion and $1.7 trillion, significantly below the IPO target. They highlight risks such as the speculative nature of AI projections, over-dependence on Elon Musk, high growth expectations, and corporate governance concerns. Trefis set a target price of just $79 per share. While both sides acknowledge SpaceX's unique position in commercial space, the core disagreement centers on whether the $135 share price offers a reasonable margin of safety or is overly optimistic. Despite the valuation controversy, reported strong demand for the IPO indicates significant market interest.

marsbit2 h fa

The Largest IPO in History Ignites Heated Debate: Is SpaceX Worth $1.77 Trillion?

marsbit2 h fa

After the Passage of the GENIUS Act and the CLARITY Act, What Is the Correct Architecture for On-Chain Yield?

The article discusses the evolution of on-chain credit, distinguishing three markets: overcollateralized crypto lending, unsecured lending (largely unsuccessful), and asset-backed credit (ABC). ABC, backed by identifiable real-world collateral with legal recourse, is identified as the fastest-growing category and the only one credibly addressing adverse selection—the core problem in credit where the riskiest borrowers self-select. Current growth in on-chain Real World Assets (RWAs), particularly tokenized private credit funds (e.g., Maple Finance, Centrifuge), is substantial but often merely "wraps" existing fund structures, inheriting their risks rather than solving adverse selection at the protocol level. The regulatory landscape is a key driver, with the US GENIUS Act (prohibiting stablecoin issuers from paying yield) and the proposed CLARITY Act (closing loopholes on indirect yield) set to redefine permissible yield-bearing products. This makes vaults (like ERC-4626) the critical architecture—they become the primary compliant vehicle for delivering yield, functioning as issuance, disclosure, distribution, and recovery mechanisms. The author's thesis is that the correct post-GENIUS/CLARITY architecture involves building ABC solutions where credit assessment, structure, and recovery are encoded directly into the smart contract vault layer, moving beyond mere tokenized fund wrappers to solve adverse selection fundamentally and ensure regulatory compliance.

Foresight News3 h fa

After the Passage of the GENIUS Act and the CLARITY Act, What Is the Correct Architecture for On-Chain Yield?

Foresight News3 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片