Gen-Z now drives 72% of P2P crypto payments – Report

ambcryptoPubblicato 2026-03-06Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-03-06

Introduzione

A new report from crypto exchange NoOnes reveals that Generation Z is the dominant force in peer-to-peer (P2P) crypto payments, accounting for 72% of all transfers. Millennials follow at 24%, while Gen X trails significantly at 4%. Regionally, Asia leads in P2P usage (74%), followed by Latin America (62%) and Africa (54%), with Europe and North America showing the lowest adoption rates. This trend aligns with broader crypto adoption, where the APAC region saw a massive surge in activity. The report notes that younger generations are more receptive to new technologies, and the convenience of mobile security features is driving usage. However, despite this strong adoption, P2P payment growth is being outpaced by crypto card payments, which surged 106% to $1.6 billion in the last three years compared to just 5% for P2P. While P2P is the second most dominant stablecoin payment method by value after B2B, cards are a strong third. The findings suggest that for crypto firms to scale, a mobile-first strategy is essential.

The younger generation, particularly Gen Z, has emerged as the major driver of peer-to-peer (P2P) crypto payments.

According to a survey by crypto exchange NoOnes, Gen Z now accounts for 72% of overall P2P crypto transfers, followed closely by millennials at 24% while Gen X trails at 4%.

From a regional perspective, Asia led in P2P usage with 74%, followed by Latin America and Africa at 62% and 54%, respectively. On the other hand, Europe and North America recorded the lowest adoption rate.

Broader crypto and payment adoption

Unsurprisingly, the dataset mirrored the broader adoption trend Chainalysis reported last year.

According to Chainalysis, crypto activity in the larger APAC region surged by nearly 70% in 2025, from $1.4 trillion to $2.4 trillion – Marking the highest annual adoption rate. Latin America and Africa ranked among the top three regions with the highest crypto adoption rates.

Besides, Gen Z leading the adoption was not surprising, as the younger generation tends to be more receptive to new technologies.

However, NoOnes noted that usage across mobile devices has surged due to perceived security guarantees offered by biometric and two-factor authentication mechanisms. This would mean crypto firms have to prioritize a mobile-first approach to scale across this active demographic.

Worth noting that major crypto platforms like Hyperliquid are yet to roll out a dedicated mobile app despite their resounding success and three years of operation. Hence, expanding via mobile apps could be a sustainable strategy.

That being said, P2P transfers are part of broader retail crypto or stablecoin payments. Despite the strong adoption among the younger population, its growth has been relatively muted compared to card payments or business-to-consumer (B2B) payments.

Notably, cards have become a crucial and convenient way for users to spend their crypto for daily expenses. In the last three years alone, card payments surged by 106% to $1.6 billion, compared with 5% for P2P payments.

It remains to be seen whether crypto cards will effectively flip P2P payments in the near future.

However, the most dominant stablecoin payment method in terms of transfer value remains B2B, followed by P2P, with cards coming in at a third place.


Final Summary

  • Gen Z dominates P2P crypto payments at 72%, with Asia, Latin America, and Africa leading the adoption.
  • Still, P2P payments face stiff competition from crypto card payments, which have doubled over the past three years.

Domande pertinenti

QWhich generation is the primary driver of P2P crypto payments according to the NoOnes survey, and what percentage do they account for?

AGen Z is the primary driver, accounting for 72% of overall P2P crypto transfers.

QWhich three regions lead in P2P crypto payment usage, and what are their respective percentages?

AAsia leads with 74%, followed by Latin America at 62%, and Africa at 54%.

QWhat is the main reason cited for the surge in crypto usage across mobile devices?

AThe perceived security guarantees offered by biometric and two-factor authentication mechanisms.

QHow does the growth rate of crypto card payments compare to that of P2P payments over the last three years?

ACard payments surged by 106% to $1.6 billion, compared to a 5% growth for P2P payments.

QWhat are the three most dominant stablecoin payment methods in terms of transfer value, listed in order?

ABusiness-to-business (B2B) is first, followed by peer-to-peer (P2P), with cards in third place.

Letture associate

If the AI Bubble Is Already Bursting, Who Will Truly Survive?

If the AI Bubble is Bursting, Who Will Remain? The debate over an AI bubble is intensifying, with figures like Ray Dalio warning of high levels and Jensen Huang seeing immense, early-stage opportunity. Both views hold truth: a speculative bubble in capital markets likely exists, mirroring the dot-com era, but the underlying technological shift is real and transformative. History shows that while bubbles burst—wiping out overvalued companies and speculative capital—they often leave behind critical physical and digital infrastructure. The dot-com bust, for instance, eliminated many firms but left the global fiber optic networks and data centers that enabled the rise of Amazon, Netflix, and cloud computing. Today's massive AI infrastructure investments (projected at trillions by 2030) in data centers, power, cooling, and GPUs may follow a similar path, creating the foundation for future applications. A key divergence from past bubbles is the "Jevons Paradox" effect in AI. As the cost of AI inference has plummeted by over 99.7% since 2023, enterprise spending on AI has skyrocketed. Cheap "tokens" have unlocked vast, previously uneconomical use cases, moving AI from simple chatbots into core business workflows—code generation, legal document review, scientific simulation, and financial analysis. The market is now in a phase of self-correction, weeding out superficial "API-wrapper" startups, but this cleansing process strengthens the ecosystem. The long-term trajectory is clear. The value is gradually shifting from capital expenditure (CapEx) on hardware to operational expenditure (OpEx) on transformative applications. As AI becomes a utility, the winners will be firms that deeply integrate it to solve vertical industry problems in law, healthcare, finance, and manufacturing. The泡沫 will recede, but the foundational shift towards an AI-powered era across all sectors is irreversible. The underlying productive force of AI contains no bubble.

marsbit25 min fa

If the AI Bubble Is Already Bursting, Who Will Truly Survive?

marsbit25 min fa

If the AI Bubble Is Already Bursting, Who Will Truly Remain?

**Summary: If the AI Bubble is Bursting, What Will Remain?** The debate around an AI bubble is intensifying, with figures like Ray Dalio warning of high valuations while Jensen Huang sees immense opportunity. This echoes the dot-com bubble, which saw massive wealth destruction but ultimately left behind critical infrastructure like undersea cables and broadband, enabling future giants like Amazon and Netflix. Similarly, today's AI boom involves trillions invested in data centers, power, cooling, and GPUs, while application-layer revenue remains comparatively modest. This investment-disparity signals a bubble. However, the core technological progress is real and accelerating. AI inference costs have plummeted by over 99.7% since 2023, making intelligence increasingly cheap and accessible. This cost collapse is unlocking vast new demand. Instead of reducing spending, enterprises are tripling their AI cloud expenditure. Cheap "tokens" enable AI to move beyond simple chatbots into complex workflows—automating code writing, legal document review, financial analysis, and scientific research. This follows "Jevons's paradox": improved efficiency leads to greater total consumption. The market is now undergoing a necessary purification, weeding out "API-wrapper" startups with no real moat. The deeper evolution involves a shift from capital expenditure (CapEx) on infrastructure to operational expenditure (OpEx) on value-creation in applications. While hardware vendors currently profit most, long-term value will migrate to AI-native firms solving vertical industry problems. Ultimately, a market correction will cleanse speculative excess but will not reverse the AI+ trend. The massive physical and algorithmic infrastructure being built will endure, becoming a cheap, utility-like foundation. Just as the internet became indispensable to all industries post-2000, AI is poised to empower and redefine every sector, moving society irreversibly toward an intelligence-augmented era. The bubble may burst, but the underlying productive momentum is solid.

链捕手32 min fa

If the AI Bubble Is Already Bursting, Who Will Truly Remain?

链捕手32 min fa

Microsoft CEO: In the AI Era, How Do You Define a Company's Moat?

Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella argues that in the AI era, a company's true competitive edge, or "moat," is not determined by choosing the single most powerful model, but by its ability to build a continuous "learning loop." This system integrates and evolves by connecting human workflows, domain expertise, organizational judgment, and employee experience. He posits that future companies will accumulate two types of capital: Human Capital (employee knowledge, judgment, creativity) and "Token Capital" (a firm's own built and owned AI capabilities). Importantly, AI amplifies rather than devalues human capital. Human direction is essential to guide progress, as computational power alone is aimless. The core opportunity lies in creating a closed-loop system where human and token capital reinforce each other in a compound, self-improving cycle. A company must be able to preserve its unique institutional knowledge—its "company veteran" expertise—even if it switches underlying general-purpose AI models. This requires private evaluation benchmarks, reinforcement learning environments based on internal data, and queryable knowledge bases. Nadella warns against a future where economic value is concentrated by a few dominant models that commoditize entire industries' knowledge. Instead, the priority should be building a broad "frontier ecosystem" where every company, industry, and nation can own its learning loop. This allows organizations to retain control of their intellectual property, amplify employee capabilities, and ensure the economic value created by AI is captured within their own businesses and communities. True corporate sovereignty in the AI age comes from turning organizational knowledge into a compounding system that creates enduring, defensible value.

marsbit1 h fa

Microsoft CEO: In the AI Era, How Do You Define a Company's Moat?

marsbit1 h fa

ETFs Are Just the Ticket: The True Institutionalization of Bitcoin Is Happening Where You Can't See It

Beyond the Bitcoin ETF spotlight, a deeper institutionalization is underway, leveraging Bitcoin as a foundational financial primitive. Institutions are using Bitcoin for purposes long reserved for assets like U.S. Treasuries and gold: as collateral for loans, insurance reserves, and the backbone of rated bonds. Examples include a Barbados-based insurer capitalizing with $40M in Bitcoin reserves and Ledn's $188M securitization of Bitcoin-backed loans, which received the first-ever investment-grade rating (BBB-) from S&P for a digital asset-backed security. This structure was stress-tested during a 27% price drop in early 2026, triggering automatic liquidations that functioned as designed but revealed the systemic risk of synchronized selling across leveraged positions. Infrastructure is evolving to support this, with platforms like Anchorage Digital's Atlas network enabling secure, institutional-grade settlement and collateral management. Strategies like basis trades and corporate treasuries (exemplified by companies like MicroStrategy issuing billions in equity and debt to fund Bitcoin acquisitions) further integrate Bitcoin into financial mechanics. While ETFs solved "how to own" Bitcoin, these developments answer "what to do with it," embedding the asset into the working machinery of finance—as collateral upon which loans, derivatives, and structured products are built. The real, enduring institutional shift is happening in these largely invisible plumbing and financing systems.

marsbit1 h fa

ETFs Are Just the Ticket: The True Institutionalization of Bitcoin Is Happening Where You Can't See It

marsbit1 h fa

ZEC Co-Founder Responds to Orchard Vulnerability: No Signs of Theft, Orchard Pool to Be Sealed

ZEC Co-Founder Addresses Orchard Vulnerability: No Signs of Theft, Plans to Sunset Orchard Pool A security vulnerability was recently discovered in Zcash's Orchard shielded pool, raising key concerns. The primary questions are whether the flaw was exploited, if user funds are safe, whether users can verify the total ZEC supply, and if other similar vulnerabilities exist. Analysis suggests the vulnerability was likely not exploited prior to its discovery. It was found proactively by a researcher using specialized tools, not due to an active breach. The development team and mining pools acted quickly to contain the issue. Typical financially-motivated attacks would likely have left visible on-chain evidence, which has not been observed. User funds in Orchard are considered safe and should be recoverable, assuming no prior exploitation. If the flaw was never used, all legitimate funds can be withdrawn. The article outlines risks associated with moving funds to transparent addresses or other pools, but concludes that leaving assets in place is a reasonable option. Currently, users cannot independently verify that the total ZEC supply hasn't been inflated due to this bug. However, the planned Ironwood network upgrade is designed to resolve this. It will permanently close the Orchard pool to new deposits and internal transfers, allowing only withdrawals. This mechanism will cap total withdrawals at the amount of legitimately deposited funds, enabling anyone to cryptographically verify the supply post-upgrade. Multiple teams, including Shielded Labs, have conducted extensive audits focused on counterfeiting vulnerabilities, assisted by advanced AI tools. No additional flaws of this type have been found so far, increasing confidence that no other similar undisclosed vulnerabilities exist. In summary, evidence indicates the Orchard bug was probably not used, user funds are secure, and no other counterfeiting flaws are currently known. The upcoming Ironwood upgrade will restore users' ability to independently verify the total ZEC supply, closing this chapter.

Foresight News1 h fa

ZEC Co-Founder Responds to Orchard Vulnerability: No Signs of Theft, Orchard Pool to Be Sealed

Foresight News1 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片