Ethena [ENA] surges 10% as whales step in – Yet THIS remains real test

ambcryptoPubblicato 2026-03-02Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-03-02

Introduzione

ENA surged nearly 10% in 24 hours, rebounding from repeated defenses of the $0.10 support level. Aggregated Open Interest rose to $110.5 million, indicating renewed derivatives activity. Whale orders increased during price dips, suggesting accumulation near support. Price stability above $0.10 is key; a break above $0.13 could shift momentum, while losing $0.10 may renew downside risk. Continuation depends on sustained spot volume and broader market conditions.

Ethena’s ENA token gained nearly 10% over the past 24 hours as buyers stepped in near key support. The move followed renewed positioning amid broader market uncertainty.

Daily data showed ENA traded around $0.1036 on the 1st of March, after bouncing from sub-$0.10 lows. That recovery drew fresh derivatives participation.

That shift set up a closer look at positioning metrics.

ENA’s Open Interest climbs

Ethena’s [ENA] Aggregated Open Interest rose to approximately $110.5 million, according to Coinalyze data. The chart showed a modest uptick alongside price stabilization.

Rising Open Interest during a rebound typically indicated fresh capital entering positions. In this case, the increase remained controlled rather than explosive.

Even so, the structure suggested traders reopened exposure near local support.

That left attention on order flow behavior.

Whale activity resurfaces

CryptoQuant’s Spot Average Order Size data showed periodic spikes in larger orders. Big whale orders appeared during recent price dips.

Such behavior often reflected accumulation during weakness. Larger participants typically stepped in before broader momentum shifted.

However, the broader trend in whale order size remained uneven. Sustained expansion would be needed to confirm a strong conviction.

That history kept sentiment cautious.

Ethena: Structure builds above $0.10

TradingView data showed ENA repeatedly defending the $0.10 zone. The level marked three recent reaction lows.

Price traded near $0.103–$0.104 at the time of writing. Holding above $0.10 kept short-term structure intact.

By contrast, overhead liquidity appeared concentrated near the $0.13 region. That area aligned with prior breakdown levels.

A break above $0.13 could shift near-term momentum. Failure to hold $0.10 may reopen downside risk.

ENA’s rebound coincided with steady Open Interest and visible whale participation. That combination suggested positioning rather than panic covering.

However, continuation depended on sustained Spot Volume and broader market stability.

For now, ENA held above key support. Whether bulls could reclaim higher liquidity zones remained the central question.

Final Summary

ENA gained nearly 10% in 24 hours, rebounding from repeated defenses of the $0.10 support zone.
Ethena’s Aggregated Open Interest rose to around $110.5 million, indicating renewed derivatives participation.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat was the percentage gain of Ethena's ENA token in the past 24 hours and what key support level did it bounce from?

AEthena's ENA token gained nearly 10% in the past 24 hours, rebounding from sub-$0.10 lows after repeatedly defending the $0.10 support zone.

QAccording to Coinalyze data, what was the value of Ethena's Aggregated Open Interest and what does its rise typically indicate?

AEthena's Aggregated Open Interest rose to approximately $110.5 million. A rising Open Interest during a rebound typically indicates fresh capital entering positions.

QWhat did the spikes in CryptoQuant's Spot Average Order Size data suggest about whale activity?

AThe periodic spikes in larger orders, as shown by the data, suggested that big whale orders appeared during recent price dips, which often reflects accumulation during periods of weakness.

QWhat are the two key price levels identified for ENA's near-term momentum, and what would a break above the higher level signify?

AThe two key levels are support at $0.10 and overhead liquidity near $0.13. A break above $0.13 could shift the near-term momentum for ENA.

QWhat two factors does the article suggest are necessary for ENA's price continuation?

AThe article states that ENA's price continuation depends on sustained Spot Volume and broader market stability.

Letture associate

ZEC Co-Founder Responds to Orchard Vulnerability: No Signs of Theft, Orchard Pool to Be Sealed

ZEC Co-Founder Addresses Orchard Vulnerability: No Signs of Theft, Plans to Sunset Orchard Pool A security vulnerability was recently discovered in Zcash's Orchard shielded pool, raising key concerns. The primary questions are whether the flaw was exploited, if user funds are safe, whether users can verify the total ZEC supply, and if other similar vulnerabilities exist. Analysis suggests the vulnerability was likely not exploited prior to its discovery. It was found proactively by a researcher using specialized tools, not due to an active breach. The development team and mining pools acted quickly to contain the issue. Typical financially-motivated attacks would likely have left visible on-chain evidence, which has not been observed. User funds in Orchard are considered safe and should be recoverable, assuming no prior exploitation. If the flaw was never used, all legitimate funds can be withdrawn. The article outlines risks associated with moving funds to transparent addresses or other pools, but concludes that leaving assets in place is a reasonable option. Currently, users cannot independently verify that the total ZEC supply hasn't been inflated due to this bug. However, the planned Ironwood network upgrade is designed to resolve this. It will permanently close the Orchard pool to new deposits and internal transfers, allowing only withdrawals. This mechanism will cap total withdrawals at the amount of legitimately deposited funds, enabling anyone to cryptographically verify the supply post-upgrade. Multiple teams, including Shielded Labs, have conducted extensive audits focused on counterfeiting vulnerabilities, assisted by advanced AI tools. No additional flaws of this type have been found so far, increasing confidence that no other similar undisclosed vulnerabilities exist. In summary, evidence indicates the Orchard bug was probably not used, user funds are secure, and no other counterfeiting flaws are currently known. The upcoming Ironwood upgrade will restore users' ability to independently verify the total ZEC supply, closing this chapter.

Foresight News5 min fa

ZEC Co-Founder Responds to Orchard Vulnerability: No Signs of Theft, Orchard Pool to Be Sealed

Foresight News5 min fa

Japan's Central Bank on the Verge of Raising Rates, Can the AI Bull Market Still Hold?

TL;DR: The impending Bank of Japan (BOJ) interest rate hike is shifting global market focus this week, raising questions about its potential impact on the AI-driven bull market and cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin. For years, the yen has served as a cheap global "funding currency," enabling carry trades where investors borrowed yen at low rates to buy higher-yielding assets. This dynamic amplified liquidity and risk appetite in global markets, benefiting high-beta assets like AI tech stocks and crypto. The BOJ's expected move to raise rates from 0.75% to 1.0% signals a shift away from this era of ultra-low-cost funding. The core concern isn't the 1% rate itself, but the direction of change and its potential to reduce global leverage and risk tolerance. An unwinding of yen carry trades could force investors to sell global assets to buy back yen for repayment, potentially triggering synchronized volatility in overvalued sectors. While AI fundamentals and crypto-specific drivers remain intact, the market impact will depend on whether the BOJ signals a faster-than-expected pace of normalization. Post-decision, watch for correlations between a strengthening yen, rising Japanese bond yields, and simultaneous pressure on tech stocks and cryptocurrencies to gauge if the market is pricing in a broader tightening of cheap global liquidity.

marsbit14 min fa

Japan's Central Bank on the Verge of Raising Rates, Can the AI Bull Market Still Hold?

marsbit14 min fa

Microsoft Announces Commercial-Grade Quantum Computer to be Completed in Three Years: Will the Boots Land?

Microsoft announces plans to build a commercially viable quantum computer by 2029, a significant acceleration from the previous industry consensus of a decade. The breakthrough is fueled by their new Majorana 2 quantum chip, which boasts a record-breaking average qubit lifetime of 20 seconds—a 1,000-fold reliability improvement over its predecessor. This leap was achieved by leveraging topological qubits, a theoretically more stable technology using Majorana zero modes, and switching the core superconducting material from aluminum to lead. Crucially, Microsoft's "Discovery" agentic AI platform accelerated the R&D process. AI agents autonomously analyzed vast experimental data, optimized manufacturing parameters (like the lead alloy composition), and solved issues like "ghost noise," dramatically speeding up experimentation. While the 20-second coherence time is a landmark, challenges remain: scaling from 12 qubits to the millions needed for practical applications, managing compilation costs, and verifying quantum results. Skeptics call for peer-reviewed data, and questions persist about whether even 20 seconds is sufficient for complex algorithms like breaking RSA encryption. The race is on with other approaches (superconducting, trapped ions), but Microsoft's confidence in its topological roadmap signals a potential shortcut to a scalable quantum future.

marsbit24 min fa

Microsoft Announces Commercial-Grade Quantum Computer to be Completed in Three Years: Will the Boots Land?

marsbit24 min fa

What Kind of People Is Anthropic Actually Hiring? Insights from 1,680 Resumes Provide the Answer

Contrary to the common perception of Anthropic as a PhD-heavy AI research lab, an analysis of 1,680 engineer profiles reveals its core talent is experienced "builders." The engineering team, largely assembled in the past 18 months (median tenure 10 months), hires senior engineers with a median of 12.2 years of prior experience. They primarily come from major engineering-focused companies like Google, Meta, Amazon, Microsoft, Stripe, Databricks, Snowflake, and Palantir, not primarily from other AI labs. Their backgrounds are infrastructure-heavy (40%), focusing on backend, distributed systems, databases, and security, with skills like Python, Java, C++, and AWS being common. Only 13.7% hold PhDs. The dominant job title is "Member of Technical Staff." For early-career hires (<6 years experience), entry is not based on standard work history but on prestigious signals: top internships (e.g., at FAANG or quant trading firms), competition rankings, research publications, or AI safety fellowship experience. The key insight for applicants is to present as infrastructure builders, highlighting experience with large-scale systems, not as pure researchers, reflecting Anthropic's identity as a highly engineered infrastructure company.

marsbit26 min fa

What Kind of People Is Anthropic Actually Hiring? Insights from 1,680 Resumes Provide the Answer

marsbit26 min fa

Is There Really a "World Cup Curse" in the Market?

Is there really a "World Cup Curse" affecting markets? Historical data shows global equity markets often underperform during the tournament. The S&P 500 has averaged negative returns of -1.5% to -2.11% across 19 World Cups since 1950, with declines in 58% of events. China's Shanghai Composite fell in 71% of tournaments since 1994. Studies confirm reduced trading activity during matches, with volumes dropping significantly, especially when a home nation plays. A team's loss can also lead to negative sentiment and selling pressure in its domestic market the next day. However, the "curse" may be partly attributed to seasonal weakness. Many tournaments are held in June-July, a historically weaker period for stocks ("Sell in May and go away"). The 2022 Qatar World Cup, held in November-December, saw a smaller drop in trading volume compared to summer events, suggesting timing plays a role. The cryptocurrency market's performance during World Cups has been mixed and largely driven by its own major catalysts (e.g., Mt. Gox hack, FTX collapse, halving cycles) rather than the tournament. Investment opportunities have shifted over time. Traditional beneficiaries like TV manufacturers have seen fading returns as streaming platforms become the core viewing channel. Classic consumer plays like beer and sportswear face challenges from changing consumption trends. Newer digital assets, like fractionalized collectible player cards on blockchain, have seen explosive growth. While gambling is a traditional sector, prediction markets are emerging. In conclusion, while a statistical correlation exists, the World Cup's direct impact on markets is likely limited and intertwined with seasonal patterns. With lower liquidity during the event, the simplest strategy for many might be to step back from trading and enjoy the games.

marsbit31 min fa

Is There Really a "World Cup Curse" in the Market?

marsbit31 min fa

Trading

Spot

Futures