ERC-8004 Launch: Issuing ID Cards for AI, Ethereum's New Business?

marsbitPubblicato 2026-01-28Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-01-28

Introduzione

Ethereum is set to launch ERC-8004, a new standard referred to as "Trustless Agents," which aims to provide on-chain digital identities for AI Agents. The initiative, backed by the Ethereum Foundation and supported by companies like Google, Coinbase, and MetaMask, introduces three core registries: an identity registry (using ERC-721 NFTs to verify AI Agents), a reputation registry (tracking historical performance), and a verification registry (for third-party audits). The goal is to establish trust between AI Agents operating on-chain, enabling them to securely interact, execute transactions, and manage assets without human intervention. This move is seen as Ethereum’s strategic response to its declining dominance in the AI Agent space, where platforms like Solana and Base currently lead in adoption due to lower fees and higher throughput. However, the immediate practical need for such a standard is questioned, as most current AI Agents operate within trusted platforms and lack the cross-protocol autonomy that ERC-8004 targets. The standard is viewed as a forward-looking effort to position Ethereum as the trust layer for future AI economies, though its broader impact remains uncertain.

Author: Deep Tide TechFlow

On January 28, Ethereum officially announced that the ERC-8004 protocol is about to launch on the mainnet.

We mentioned this standard in our article last October. If you are completely unfamiliar with it, you can refer here: "x402 Gradually Becoming Inward-Looking, Exploring New Asset Opportunities in ERC-8004 in Advance"

Actually, it has a formal name: "Trustless Agents." In plain language, it roughly means:

Issuing on-chain ID cards for AI Agents.

The Ethereum Foundation rarely promotes an ERC standard so vigorously. They specifically formed a team called dAI, included ERC-8004 in the 2026 strategic roadmap, collaborated with Google, Coinbase, and MetaMask to draft the proposal, and even hosted a Trustless Agents Day at DevConnect in November to build momentum.

The last time Ethereum was this serious about promoting a standard was with ERC-20 and ERC-721.

One defined tokens, the other defined NFTs.

Now it's AI's turn?

Ethereum's AI Anxiety

Why the rush?

Look at some data. According to statistics from Cookie.fun, the market cap distribution of AI Agent tokens shows that Solana and Base together account for 96%. There are only a handful of notable AI Agent projects on the Ethereum mainnet.

In April 2025, the ETH/BTC exchange rate fell to 0.017, a five-year low. Back then, everyone said Ethereum was not the future.

During the DeFi boom, Ethereum was the main stage. During the NFT boom, Ethereum was also the main stage. Now that AI Agents are heating up, the main stage has changed hands.

Solana processes 36 million transactions per day, while the Ethereum mainnet handles 1.13 million. High gas fees and slow speeds have developers voting with their feet. Virtuals Protocol launched on Base, ai16z (now ElizaOS) chose Solana, and even Coinbase's own AI project wasn't placed on the Ethereum mainnet.

Ethereum needs a new story.

ERC-8004 might be the beginning of that story.

Recapping ERC-8004

Back to the standard itself.

How exactly does ERC-8004 issue on-chain ID cards for AI Agents?

You don't need to understand the technical details; just know about three registries.

The first is the Identity Registry. Based on ERC-721, each AI Agent mints an NFT to prove "this is me."

The second is the Reputation Registry. It records the Agent's historical performance, who has used it, their reviews, and whether it has engaged in malicious activities.

The third is the Verification Registry. It allows third-party institutions to endorse the Agent, such as "this Agent has passed a certain security audit."

These three registries combined solve one problem: when two AI Agents meet on-chain, how do they know if the other is trustworthy?

The old answer was: they didn't know and had to rely on humans. ERC-8004's answer is: check the on-chain records.

This system wasn't entirely Ethereum's own idea.

Its underlying logic comes from the A2A (Agent-to-Agent) protocol released by Google last year, which enables AIs to communicate and call upon each other. ERC-8004 adds a layer on top of this:

Blockchain-backed trust.

Google's A2A solves the communication problem; Ethereum's ERC-8004 solves the trust problem. One manages the conversation, the other verifies identities.

Is Issuing ID Cards a Good Business?

Daring to speculate, Ethereum's logic might be this:

For AI Agents to be truly useful, they need to manage money themselves. Not just sending tweets or chatting, but directly operating on-chain assets. Signing transactions, calling contracts, cross-protocol arbitrage...

No one dares to do this on a large scale right now. The reason is simple: how do you know this Agent won't transfer your money away? The recently popular ClawdBot already has community members posting about related negative incidents.

The Web2 solution is platform endorsement. You use OpenAI's API, and the trust comes from OpenAI. If something goes wrong, you go to OpenAI.

Web3 doesn't have this. Agents are open-source, deployment is permissionless, and they run on-chain with no one overseeing them. If you call a service from an unknown Agent, you can't check who is behind it, whether the code has issues, or if it has a history of malicious acts...

Simply put, ERC-8004 essentially moves the traditional finance KYC process on-chain. Ethereum is betting that when AI Agents start handling real money, this system will become a necessity.

DeFi protocols wanting to integrate external Agents will first need to check their on-chain identity. Institutions using Agents for trade execution will need to review their historical records. Auditing firms can issue on-chain certifications for Agents, similar to security audits for smart contracts.

This is a competitive positioning move.

Ethereum knows it has lost on the execution layer, but the trust layer is still up for grabs. Institutional recognition, security audit ecosystems, TVL scale—these are Ethereum's existing assets. ERC-8004 is packaging these assets into a standard, aiming to define "what AI Agent compliance looks like" before anyone else.

The question is, does this demand exist now?

Standard Preceding Demand

After discussing Ethereum's calculations, let's talk about reality. What are on-chain AI Agents doing now?

After the AI meme wave subsided last year and the rapid advancements made by leading AI companies in the past couple of years, few people are still paying attention to on-chain AI Agents.

However, they are still making progress.

For example, ai16z has been renamed ElizaOS, evolving from a single Agent to a cross-chain platform; Virtuals Protocol is working on AI DAPPs, planning to venture into physical robots in 2026; others, like the AI Agents in Surf, can automatically execute DeFi trading strategies.

But the question arises: do they really need ERC-8004?

Luna's users trust Luna because it's made by the core Virtuals team. Agents on ElizaOS are used because they run within the ElizaOS framework; Surf executes strategies for you often because you trust the application itself.

Trust comes from the platform, not from an on-chain identity.

The scenario ERC-8004 envisions is: a陌生 (strange) Agent approaches you, with no platform endorsement or brand recognition, and you can only judge its trustworthiness through on-chain records.

When will this scenario occur?

When AI Agents truly achieve autonomous calls across protocols, platforms, and organizational boundaries. An Agent borrowing from Aave, trading on Uniswap, then generating yield in another protocol, all without human approval...

But, this scenario does not exist now.

Current AI Agents, no matter how complex their functions, essentially operate within a single platform. They don't need to prove themselves to陌生 protocols because they never knock on their doors.

Given the current hype in the crypto market, they also have no reason to knock on each other's doors, unless they can jointly create a new narrative.

Therefore, ERC-8004 solves a future problem.

If AI Agents evolve from toys to tools, Ethereum's trust infrastructure will have value. If the Agent economy grows large enough and cross-platform calls become the norm, ERC-8004 can collect tolls.

There are many "ifs."

Thus, for this future-oriented布局 (layout), institutions might be the first to act.

In late 2025, SharpLink Gaming announced investing $170 million into Ethereum restaking strategies. Around the same time, net outflows of ETH from exchanges exceeded 23,000 coins, flowing into private wallets and staking protocols.

This money might be betting on Ethereum 12 to 18 months from now.

For retail investors, however, ERC-8004 isn't a great catalyst.

Betting on ERC-8004 itself? It's an open standard with no token; you can't invest directly, only find some associated small projects. Betting on Ethereum is possible, but Ethereum's price is influenced by too many factors, with AI Agents being just one narrative.

Therefore, there is currently no clean asset that allows you to accurately bet on the proposition "AI Agents need on-chain identities."

Ethereum is not solely AI infrastructure, and Ethereum's identity anxiety won't be completely alleviated by AI. The business of issuing AI ID cards still has a long way to go.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the main purpose of the ERC-8004 protocol announced by Ethereum?

AThe main purpose of ERC-8004, also known as 'Trustless Agents', is to provide a chain-based identity system for AI Agents. It creates a decentralized framework for issuing and verifying digital identities, reputation, and third-party attestations for AI Agents on the blockchain, enabling trustless interactions between them.

QWhy is Ethereum heavily promoting the ERC-8004 standard according to the article?

AEthereum is promoting ERC-8004 aggressively because it aims to capture the emerging AI Agent market, where it currently lags behind chains like Solana and Base. By establishing a trust layer for AI Agents, Ethereum seeks to leverage its strengths in security, institutional recognition, and ecosystem maturity to define the standard for AI Agent compliance and trust in the blockchain space.

QWhat are the three key registries proposed in the ERC-8004 standard?

AThe three key registries in ERC-8004 are: 1) The Identity Registry, which uses ERC-721 to mint NFTs as proof of identity for each AI Agent; 2) The Reputation Registry, which records historical performance and user evaluations of Agents; and 3) The Verification Registry, which allows third-party entities to provide attestations or audits for Agents.

QDoes the current AI Agent ecosystem on blockchain have an immediate need for ERC-8004?

ANo, the current AI Agent ecosystem does not have an immediate need for ERC-8004. Most AI Agents operate within single platforms or under trusted brands, where trust is derived from the platform itself rather than decentralized identity verification. ERC-8004 addresses a future scenario where cross-protocol, autonomous AI interactions become common.

QWhat underlying protocol does ERC-8004 build upon for AI Agent communication?

AERC-8004 builds upon Google's A2A (Agent-to-Agent) protocol, which enables AI Agents to communicate and invoke each other. Ethereum's contribution adds a blockchain-based trust layer to this framework, ensuring decentralized identity verification mechanisms for secure interactions.

Letture associate

Bitcoin Liquidation Shakeout Leaves Traders Watching $66K Resistance And $61K Support

Bitcoin's recent volatility triggered a major liquidation event, wiping out roughly $980 million in leveraged positions within 24 hours as price swung from ~$64,100 down to $60,700 and back above $63,000. Traders are now watching key technical levels. Major pivot resistance is identified at $66,247, with reclaimed highs near $64,234 and next resistance at $65,890. Critical support zones lie between $63,127-$63,354, then $62,459, with broader downside targets around $59,150-$60,171. Liquidation heatmaps show significant liquidity clusters above ($63.5K-$66K) and below ($58.5K-$61K) spot price, creating a volatile corridor. The market is in a corrective phase; a clean break above resistance is needed for a bullish shift, while failure to hold low-$63K support risks a move toward lower liquidity zones.

bitcoinist14 min fa

Bitcoin Liquidation Shakeout Leaves Traders Watching $66K Resistance And $61K Support

bitcoinist14 min fa

U.S. Government Bans Foreign Nationals from Using Fable 5, Anthropic Issues Rebuttal

U.S. Government Bans Foreign Access to Fable 5, Anthropic Issues Rebuttal On June 12th, the U.S. government ordered AI company Anthropic to immediately suspend all foreign access—including foreign nationals within the U.S. and Anthropic's own foreign employees—to its newly released Fable 5 and Mythos 5 AI models, citing national security concerns. This forced Anthropic to temporarily disable access to both models for all users globally, as it cannot technically differentiate user nationality at scale. The models, released just three days prior, represent Anthropic's highest public capability tier. Fable 5 is the first publicly available model from the advanced "Mythos" family, while Mythos 5 is a less-restricted version for approved cybersecurity and critical infrastructure partners. The government's directive was reportedly triggered by claims from another company that it could "jailbreak" Mythos 5, raising alarm within the Trump administration. Anthropic, in a detailed public statement, strongly challenged this rationale. The company argues the demonstrated "jailbreak" is a narrow, non-generalized technique that merely involves identifying minor, known software vulnerabilities—a capability common to other publicly available models like OpenAI's GPT-5.5 and routinely used by cybersecurity defenders. Anthropic stated it has complied with the order but disagrees with the government's standard, warning that applying it industry-wide would halt all new frontier model deployments. The company criticized the lack of a transparent, fact-based legal process and expressed confidence the situation stems from a misunderstanding. It is working to restore access and will release more technical details within 24 hours. Other Anthropic models remain unaffected.

链捕手16 min fa

U.S. Government Bans Foreign Nationals from Using Fable 5, Anthropic Issues Rebuttal

链捕手16 min fa

The Revelation from the Raydium Theft Incident: New DeFi Vulnerabilities Lurking in Forgotten Old Contracts

**Raydium Exploit Reveals DeFi's Hidden Risk: Forgotten "Zombie" Contracts** A recent attack on Raydium's deprecated V3 AMM pools resulted in a loss of approximately $1.34 million. The hacker exploited pools that were no longer supported by Raydium's current UI or SDK but remained fully functional and accessible on-chain. This incident highlights a critical, often overlooked category of risk in DeFi: inactive or legacy smart contracts that projects fail to properly decommission. Since March 2025, there have been at least 8 publicly reported attacks targeting such abandoned contracts, with total losses around $10.8 million. Including older pools and deprecated features, the count rises to 10 incidents with roughly $22.5 million in losses. These "zombie contracts" represent a lifecycle management failure rather than a code vulnerability, yet they are typically misclassified under general "code bug" categories in security reports, masking the true scale of the problem. The root cause is that projects often merely document a contract as "deprecated" without taking essential technical steps to secure it: withdrawing remaining assets, disabling external call functions, and implementing ongoing monitoring. These forgotten, under-monitored components become prime targets for attackers. To address this, the industry needs to recognize "zombie contracts" as a distinct risk category and establish standardized decommissioning protocols. Essential steps should include: 1) a formal retirement announcement, 2) removal of all front-end integrations, 3) withdrawal of locked assets, 4) disabling key contract functions, 5) ongoing security monitoring, 6) clear user communication, and 7) a post-mortem analysis. The value of a DeFi project lies not only in its current TVL but also in the security of its historical codebase, which has now become a new attack surface.

Foresight News2 h fa

The Revelation from the Raydium Theft Incident: New DeFi Vulnerabilities Lurking in Forgotten Old Contracts

Foresight News2 h fa

Solayer Launches Margin Trade to Consolidate Perpetual Multi-Asset Trading on Mainnet

Solayer, a high-performance SVM-compatible Layer 1 blockchain, has launched its Margin Trade platform on mainnet. This unified cross-asset perpetual trading platform merges traditional and digital finance, developed with input from institutional and crypto trading experts. It offers trading for a diverse range of assets, including top cryptocurrencies, commodities like gold and oil, and equities such as the synthetic MT500 index. Key features include cross-margin trading with a unified collateral pool for improved capital efficiency, real-time execution, and full on-chain transparency with non-custodial asset ownership. The launch includes the first perpetual market for Pearl Research ($PRL) with up to 3x leverage. Future plans involve expanding asset listings and adding isolated margin functionality. Built on the high-throughput Solayer network capable of 330,000 TPS, the platform aims to provide the speed required for serious trading. Following successful testnet phases, Margin Trade's mainnet debut marks a significant step in Solayer's goal to unify traditional and crypto markets on-chain with institutional-grade decentralized finance infrastructure.

TheNewsCrypto2 h fa

Solayer Launches Margin Trade to Consolidate Perpetual Multi-Asset Trading on Mainnet

TheNewsCrypto2 h fa

Robots Begin to 'Consume Data': The Hidden Production Chain from Indian Data Factories to Billion-Dollar Humanoid Robots

Robots have started to 'consume data,' driving the formation of a new industrial supply chain focused on producing training data for embodied AI. Unlike large language models, which are trained on vast internet text corpora, embodied AI models face a 'data desert' in the physical world. This has created a massive demand for first-person perspective video data (Ego Data), captured by workers wearing cameras in places like Indian garment factories. Companies like Neocambrian AI are establishing 'data factories' where workers perform standardized tasks (e.g., sorting clothes, kitchen organization) to generate thousands of hours of video. Research, such as NVIDIA's EgoScale, demonstrates that scaling this human demonstration data predictably improves robot performance, particularly for dexterous manipulation. This has validated a training path combining large-scale human data for pre-training with smaller amounts of robot-specific data for fine-tuning. The value of different data types varies significantly, forming a 'data pyramid.' The base consists of low-cost, large-scale internet and Ego Data. Higher layers include more expensive motion-capture data (e.g., from data gloves), simulation/synthetic data, and the most costly and scarce layer: real robot teleoperation data. This demand has spawned a layered ecosystem of data suppliers: low-cost data factories, motion capture and alignment specialists, robot-native teleoperation service providers, simulation data companies, and platforms aiming for data standardization. Robot companies themselves are adopting a 'layered procurement' strategy: outsourcing generic Ego Data while building in-house capabilities for robot-specific adaptation data and the critical deployment/failure data generated in real-world applications. The industry is shifting focus from hardware and basic mobility to the data pipelines required for general-purpose capability. While parallels exist to data labeling companies like Scale AI in the LLM boom, the physical complexity of robot data—involving action success ambiguity and sim-to-real gaps—requires more integrated solutions for data collection, annotation, and a continuous feedback loop. The race is on to build the data engines that will teach robots to operate reliably in the unstructured real world.

marsbit4 h fa

Robots Begin to 'Consume Data': The Hidden Production Chain from Indian Data Factories to Billion-Dollar Humanoid Robots

marsbit4 h fa

Trading

Spot

Futures

Articoli Popolari

Come comprare ID

Benvenuto in HTX.com! Abbiamo reso l'acquisto di SPACE ID (ID) semplice e conveniente. Segui la nostra guida passo passo per intraprendere il tuo viaggio nel mondo delle criptovalute.Step 1: Crea il tuo Account HTXUsa la tua email o numero di telefono per registrarti il tuo account gratuito su HTX. Vivi un'esperienza facile e sblocca tutte le funzionalità,Crea il mio accountStep 2: Vai in Acquista crypto e seleziona il tuo metodo di pagamentoCarta di credito/debito: utilizza la tua Visa o Mastercard per acquistare immediatamente SPACE IDID.Bilancio: Usa i fondi dal bilancio del tuo account HTX per fare trading senza problemi.Terze parti: abbiamo aggiunto metodi di pagamento molto utilizzati come Google Pay e Apple Pay per maggiore comodità.P2P: Fai trading direttamente con altri utenti HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): Offriamo servizi su misura e tassi di cambio competitivi per i trader.Step 3: Conserva SPACE ID (ID)Dopo aver acquistato SPACE ID (ID), conserva nel tuo account HTX. In alternativa, puoi inviare tramite trasferimento blockchain o scambiare per altre criptovalute.Step 4: Scambia SPACE ID (ID)Scambia facilmente SPACE ID (ID) nel mercato spot di HTX. Accedi al tuo account, seleziona la tua coppia di trading, esegui le tue operazioni e monitora in tempo reale. Offriamo un'esperienza user-friendly sia per chi ha appena iniziato che per i trader più esperti.

195 Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2024.12.12Aggiornato il 2026.06.02

Discussioni

Benvenuto nella Community HTX. Qui puoi rimanere informato sugli ultimi sviluppi della piattaforma e accedere ad approfondimenti esperti sul mercato. Le opinioni degli utenti sul prezzo di ID ID sono presentate come di seguito.